Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Heteroepitaxy of Semiconductors Theory Growth and Characterization 2Nd Edition Ayers Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Heteroepitaxy of Semiconductors Theory Growth and Characterization 2Nd Edition Ayers Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-
loucas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-semiconductor-
nanostructures-growth-characterization-properties-and-
applications-alexander-v-latyshev/
https://textbookfull.com/product/synthesis-and-characterization-
of-glycosides-2nd-edition-marco-brito-arias-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/semiconductor-nanowires-i-
growth-and-theory-1st-edition-dayeg/
Electromagnetic Composites Handbook Models Measurement
and Characterization 2nd Edition Rick Moore
https://textbookfull.com/product/electromagnetic-composites-
handbook-models-measurement-and-characterization-2nd-edition-
rick-moore/
https://textbookfull.com/product/posttraumatic-growth-theory-
research-and-applications-1st-edition-richard-g-tedeschi/
https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainability-an-environmental-
science-perspective-1st-edition-john-c-ayers/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-science-of-animal-growth-
and-meat-technology-2nd-edition-steven-m-lonergan/
https://textbookfull.com/product/public-debt-sustainability-and-
economic-growth-theory-and-empirics-1st-edition-alfred-greiner/
Second Edition
Heteroepitaxy of
Semiconductors
Theory, Growth, and Characterization
Second Edition
Heteroepitaxy of
Semiconductors
Theory, Growth, and Characterization
J o h n E . Ay e r s
University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA
Te d i K u j o f s a
University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA
Paul Rago
University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA
Johanna E. Raphael
University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to
publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials
or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material repro-
duced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any
copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any
form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming,
and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.copy-
right.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400.
CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been
granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identifica-
tion and explanation without intent to infringe.
Names: Ayers, John E., author. | Kujofsa, Tedi, author. | Rango, Paul,
author. | Raphael, Johanna E., author.
Title: Heteroepitaxy of semiconductors : theory, growth, and characterization
/ John E. Ayers, Tedi Kujofsa, Paul Rango, and Johanna E. Raphael.
Description: Second edition. | Boca Raton : Taylor & Francis Group, a CRC
title, part of the Taylor & Francis imprint, a member of the Taylor &
Francis Group, the academic division of T&F Informa, plc, [2017] |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2016013249 | ISBN 9781482254358 (alk. paper)
Subjects: LCSH: Compound semiconductors. | Epitaxy.
Classification: LCC QC611.8.C64 A94 2017 | DDC 537.6/226--dc23
LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2016013249
1. Introduction..............................................................................................................................1
References..................................................................................................................................4
2. Properties of Semiconductors...............................................................................................7
2.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................7
2.2 Crystallographic Properties.........................................................................................7
2.2.1 Diamond Structure......................................................................................... 12
2.2.2 Zinc Blende Structure..................................................................................... 12
2.2.3 Wurtzite Structure.......................................................................................... 13
2.2.4 Silicon Carbide................................................................................................ 14
2.2.5 Miller Indices in Cubic Crystals................................................................... 15
2.2.6 Miller–Bravais Indices in Hexagonal Crystals........................................... 16
2.2.7 Computations and the Metric Tensor.......................................................... 17
2.2.7.1 Coordinate Transformation........................................................... 18
2.2.7.2 The Metric Tensor........................................................................... 20
2.2.7.3 Distances between Lattice Points and Lengths of Vectors........ 21
2.2.7.4 Angle between Vector Directions................................................. 23
2.2.7.5 Volume of a Unit Cell...................................................................... 24
2.2.7.6 Reciprocal Basis Vectors and Reciprocal Metric Tensor............ 24
2.2.7.7 Distances and Angles Involving Planes...................................... 26
2.2.8 Orientation Effects.......................................................................................... 29
2.2.8.1 Diamond Semiconductors.............................................................. 29
2.2.8.2 Zinc Blende Semiconductors......................................................... 29
2.2.8.3 Wurtzite Semiconductors...............................................................30
2.2.8.4 Hexagonal Silicon Carbide............................................................. 32
2.3 Lattice Constants and Thermal Expansion Coefficients........................................ 32
2.4 Elastic Properties.......................................................................................................... 37
2.4.1 Infinitesimal Strain Theory........................................................................... 37
2.4.2 Hooke’s Law.................................................................................................... 41
2.4.2.1 Hooke’s Law for Isotropic Materials............................................43
2.4.2.2 Hooke’s Law for Cubic Crystals....................................................43
2.4.2.3 Hooke’s Law for Hexagonal Crystals........................................... 46
2.4.3 Elastic Moduli.................................................................................................. 46
2.4.3.1 Elastic Moduli for Cubic Crystals................................................. 48
2.4.3.2 Elastic Moduli for Hexagonal Crystals........................................ 49
2.4.4 Biaxial Stresses and Tetragonal Distortion in Cubic Crystals.................. 50
2.4.5 Biaxial Stresses in Hexagonal Crystals........................................................ 52
2.4.6 Strain Energy in Cubic Crystals................................................................... 52
2.4.7 Strain Energy in Nitride Semiconductors................................................... 53
2.5 Surface Free Energy..................................................................................................... 53
v
vi Contents
2.6 Dislocations................................................................................................................... 57
2.6.1 Screw Dislocations.......................................................................................... 58
2.6.2 Edge Dislocations............................................................................................ 58
2.6.3 Slip Systems..................................................................................................... 59
2.6.4 Dislocations in Diamond and Zinc Blende Crystals.................................. 61
2.6.4.1 Threading Dislocations in Diamond and Zinc Blende
Crystals.............................................................................................63
2.6.4.2 Misfit Dislocations in Diamond and Zinc Blende Crystals.......64
2.6.5 Dislocations in Wurtzite Crystals................................................................. 67
2.6.5.1 Threading Dislocations in Wurtzite Crystals............................. 67
2.6.5.2 Misfit Dislocations in III-Nitrides................................................. 69
2.6.6 Dislocations in Hexagonal SiC...................................................................... 69
2.6.6.1 Threading Dislocations in Hexagonal SiC.................................. 70
2.6.7 Strain Fields and Line Energies of Dislocations......................................... 70
2.6.7.1 Energy of the Screw Dislocation................................................... 70
2.6.7.2 Energy of the Edge Dislocation..................................................... 72
2.6.7.3 Energy of Mixed Dislocations....................................................... 73
2.6.7.4 Frank’s Rule for Dislocation Energies.......................................... 74
2.6.7.5 Line Energies of Dislocations in Nitride Semiconductors........ 74
2.6.7.6 Hollow-Core Dislocations (Micropipes)...................................... 75
2.6.8 Forces on Dislocations.................................................................................... 76
2.6.9 Dislocation Motion.........................................................................................77
2.6.10 Electronic Properties of Dislocations...........................................................80
2.6.10.1 Diamond and Zinc Blende Semiconductors................................80
2.7 Planar Defects...............................................................................................................83
2.7.1 Stacking Faults................................................................................................83
2.7.2 Twins................................................................................................................85
2.7.3 Inversion Domain Boundaries...................................................................... 86
2.8 Electronic Properties of Semiconductors.................................................................. 88
References................................................................................................................................ 89
Since the printing of the first edition, heteroepitaxy has only increased in importance with
the explosive growth of the electronics industry and the development of a myriad of het-
eroepitaxial devices for solid-state lighting, green energy, displays, communications, and
digital computing. Our ever-growing understanding of the basic physics and chemistry
underlying heteroepitaxy, and especially lattice relaxation and dislocation dynamics, has
enabled an ever-increasing emphasis on metamorphic devices, creating great freedom in
the choice of semiconductor materials for the many applications named above. To reflect
this emphasis, we have included two all-new chapters that address metamorphic buffer lay-
ers (Chapter 6) and metamorphic devices (Chapter 9). The other seven chapters have been
revised extensively, with new material on crystal symmetry and relationships, III-nitride
materials, lattice relaxation physics and models, in situ characterization, and reciprocal
space maps. The basic approach remains the same, however, with a focus on principles
that should remain useful for some time to come. It is our hope that this approach, and the
extensive new material, will make the second edition an even more valuable reference for
researchers in the field.
John E. Ayers
Tedi Kujofsa
Paul B. Rago
Johanna Raphael
Storrs, Connecticut
xiii
Preface to the First Edition
Heteroepitaxy, or the single-crystal growth of one semiconductor on another, has been the
topic of intense research for several decades. This effort received a significant boost with
the advent of MOVPE, MBE, and other advancements in epitaxial growth. It became possi-
ble to grow almost any semiconductor material or structure, including alloys, multilayers,
superlattices, and graded layers, with unprecedented control and uniformity. Researchers
embraced these capabilities and set out to grow nearly every imaginable combination of
epitaxial layer/substrate. Across this great diversity of materials and structures, there has
begun to emerge a general understanding of at least some aspects of heteroepitaxy, espe-
cially nucleation, growth modes, relaxation of strained layers, and dislocation dynamics.
The application of this knowledge has now enabled the commercial production of a wide
range of heteroepitaxial devices, including high-brightness light-emitting diodes, lasers,
and high-frequency transistors, to name a few.
Our understanding of heteroepitaxy is far from complete, and the field is evolving rap-
idly. Here, I did not attempt to report all of the results from every known heteroepitaxial
material combination. Even if this had been possible, such a book would become out of
date with the next wave of electronic journals. Instead, I tried to emphasize the principles
underlying heteroepitaxial growth and characterization, with many examples from the
material systems which have been studied. I hope that this approach will remain useful
for some time to come, as a reference to researchers in the field and also as a starting point
for graduate students.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Professor Sorab K. Ghandhi, who intro-
duced me to the field of heteroepitaxy. I am also indebted to my graduate students and my
fellow researchers, without whom this book would not be possible. Finally, I would like to
thank my family for their unending support and patience throughout this endeavor.
John E. Ayers
Storrs, Connecticut
xv
1
Introduction
1
2 Heteroepitaxy of Semiconductors
ZnS
3
ZnSe
AIP
AIAs ZnTe
Energy gap (eV)
Gap
2
CdSe
AISb CdTe
GaAs
Si
Inp
1
Ge
GaSb
InAs HgTe
HgSe InSb
0
5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6
Lattice constant a (Å)
FIGURE 1.1
Energy gap as a function of lattice constant a for cubic semiconductors. Room temperature values are given.
Dashed lines indicate an indirect gap.
AIN
6
Energy gap (eV)
4
4H-SiC
GaN
6H-SiC
2
InN
0
3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6
Lattice constant a (Å)
FIGURE 1.2
Energy gap as a function of lattice constant a for hexagonal semiconductors. Room temperature values are
given. Sapphire, a commonly used substrate material for III-nitrides, has room temperature lattice constants of
a = 4.7592 Å and c = 12.9916 Å. (From Y. V. Shvyd’ko et al., J. Synchrotron Rad., 9, 17, 2002.)
methods afford tremendous flexibility and the ability to deposit thin layers and complex
multilayered structures with precise control and excellent uniformity. In addition, the
high-vacuum environment of MBE makes it possible to employ in situ characterization tools
using electron and ion beams, which provide the crystal grower with immediate feedback,
and improved control of the growth process. For these reasons, MBE and MOVPE have
Introduction 3
substrates. All of these were designed to reduce the dislocation densities of heteroepitaxial
layers to practical levels for device applications. Some are intended to remove existing
defects from lattice-relaxed heteroepitaxial layers, such as patterning and annealing, ELO,
or superlattice buffer layers (dislocation filters). Others were conceived in order to prevent
lattice relaxation in the first place; these include reduced area growth, nanoheteroepitaxy,
and compliant substrates.
The proliferation of defect engineering methods could be taken as an indication that
none of them are uniquely suited to the purpose, for all material systems. On the other
hand, some of these approaches have been highly successful, to the point of being used
in commercial devices. Graded buffer layers are the most important example of this,
and have been used in commercial GaAs1−xPx LEDs on GaAs substrates and InxGa1−xAs
HEMTs on GaAs substrates. ELO is an important method used to reduce the threading
dislocation densities in the active regions of III-nitride lasers. Other defect engineering
approaches, such as the use of compliant substrates, show great promise but have not yet
found commercial use. In order to tap the great potential of heteroepitaxy, defect engineer-
ing approaches will continue to be important, not only in the applications listed above but
also in new ones.
Chapter 9 discusses some of the important applications of metamorphic materials to
semiconductor devices, including strain-relaxed buffer (SRB) metal oxide semiconduc-
tor field effect transistors (MOSFETs), HEMTs, LEDs, and solar cells. This list, though not
exhaustive, provides a good cross section of applications and illustrates the relationships
between processing, defects, strain, and surface roughness, and device characteristics. The
rapid progress in the development of metamorphic devices can be expected to continue
and, in fact, accelerate, based on the great success already achieved in this area.
References
1. E. A. Fitzgerald, A. Y. Kim, M. T. Currie, T. A. Langdo, G. Taraschi, and M. T. Bulsara, Dislocation
dynamics in relaxed graded composition semiconductors, Mater. Sci. Eng., B67, 53 (1999).
2. J. W. Matthews and A. E. Blakeslee, Defects in epitaxial multilayers. I. Misfit dislocations,
J. Cryst. Growth, 27, 118 (1974).
3. W. E. Hoke, T. D. Kennedy, A. Torabi, C. S. Whelan, P. F. Marsh, R. E. Leoni, S. M. Lardizabal,
et al., Properties of metamorphic materials and device structures on GaAs substrates, J. Cryst.
Growth, 251, 804 (2003).
4. L. J. Mawst, J. D. Kirch, C.-C. Chang, T. Kim, T. Garrod, D. Botez, S. Ruder, et al., InGaAs/
AlInAs strain-compensated superlattices grown on metamorphic buffer layers for low-strain,
3.6 μm-emitting quantum-cascade-laser active regions, J. Cryst. Growth, 370, 230 (2013).
5. J. H. van der Merwe, Crystal interfaces. Part II. Finite overgrowths, J. Appl. Phys., 34, 123 (1963).
6. M. S. Abrahams, L. R. Weisberg, C. J. Buiocchi, and J. Blanc, Dislocation morphology in graded
heterojunctions: GaAs1−xPx, J. Mater. Sci., 4, 223 (1969).
7. G. H. Olsen and R. T. Smith, Misorientation and tetragonal distortion in heteroepitaxial vapor-
grown III-V structures, Phys. Status Solidi A, 31, 739 (1975).
8. I. Daruka and A.-L. Barabasi, Dislocation-free island formation in heteroepitaxial growth:
A study at equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 3708 (1997).
9. J. Tersoff, Stress-induced roughening in epitaxial growth, Appl. Surf. Sci., 102, 1 (1996).
10. A. E. Romanov, W. Pompe, S. Mathis, G. E. Beltz, and J. S. Speck, Threading dislocation reduc-
tion in strained layers, J. Appl. Phys., 85, 182 (1999).
Introduction 5
2.1 Introduction
The key challenges in the heteroepitaxy of semiconductors, relative to the development of
useful devices, include the control of the growth morphology, stress and strain, and crystal
defects. The purpose of this chapter is to review the properties of semiconductors that bear
on these aspects of heteroepitaxy, including crystallographic properties, elastic properties,
surface properties, and defect structures.
2.2 Crystallographic Properties
Semiconductors that are commonly in use today are nearly always single-crystal materi-
als.* A crystal is a periodic arrangement of atoms in space. A space lattice and a basis com-
prise a crystal structure. The space lattice describes the periodic arrangement of points on
which atoms (or groups of atoms) may be placed, whereas the basis can be a single atom or
an arrangement of atoms placed at each space lattice point. A basis consisting of a single
atom is monoatomic, whereas a basis consisting of multiple atoms is polyatomic.
Considering Haüy’s block model, a three-dimensional (3-D) crystal can be constructed
by the stacking of a particular unit cell. An example of this is shown in Figure 2.1. The unit
cell illustrated in Figure 2.1 can be described by choosing one of the corners as the origin
and defining three vectors, a, b, and c, along the adjacent edges. These are known as the
basis vectors, and they may be used to identify any of the other lattice points in the struc-
ture through the use of a translation vector t .
The resulting collection of points gives rise to the space lattice, with each corner forming a
node or lattice point. The translation vector defines the lattice displacement from the origin by
linear combinations of the three basis vectors. In addition, if we were to translate the entire lat-
tice using a translation vector t , we would obtain an invariant (undistinguishable) lattice from
the one prior to translation. This property is known as translational symmetry; the environ-
ment is the same when viewed from two distinct points separated by a translation vector t.
Translation from the origin to a lattice point with coordinates (u, v, w) requires a
translation vector t given by
t = ua + vb + wc , (2.1)
* Notable exceptions include thin-film transistors, made using polycrystalline or amorphous silicon, and
the gates of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors, which have traditionally been made using
polycrystalline silicon.
7
8 Heteroepitaxy of Semiconductors
β α
b
γ
a
FIGURE 2.1
General 3-D unit cell with lattice parameters.
where u, v, and w are integers. In order to shorten the vector notation, we refer to vector
quantities such as t by a boldface symbol, t. In principle, the set of translation vectors of
the space lattice contains an infinite number of elements, although real crystals have finite
size.
The parameters necessary to describe a unit cell are given by {a, b, c, α, β, γ}, where a, b, and
c are the magnitude of the basis vectors and the angles α, β, and γ are the angles between
the basis vectors b and c, a and c, and a and b, respectively. The lattice parameters are not
constant for real crystals and their values depend on temperature, pressure, and compo-
sition, but we will treat them as constants in sections to come. The consideration of the
six parameters yields seven fundamentally different 3-D crystal structures known as the
primitive cells, and a summary of them is given in Table 2.1. The seven primitive 3-D crys-
tals are triclinic (sometimes referred to as anorthic), monoclinic, orthorhombic, rhombohe-
dral (sometimes referred to as trigonal), tetragonal, hexagonal, and cubic. Table 2.1 lists the
crystal structures according to their characteristic symmetry where the minimum sym-
metry is governed by rotations that are compatible with translation. In addition, the metric
tensors that will be explained in later sections are given to allow an indirect correlation
to the symmetric elements of each primitive crystal structure. In addition, Table 2.1 gives
restrictions (if any) on the angles between the basis vectors. A primitive cell is regarded
as a minimum volume cell, and it contains one lattice point per unit cell. In general, one
describes a crystal lattice using the shortest combination of the basis vectors (primitive
cell). However, there also exists another choice of basis vectors that describes the mini-
mum volume cell, known as the Wigner–Seitz (WS) cell, and this reveals the true symme-
try of the lattice. The basis vector choice to describe such a cell is not as straightforward as
in the previous cases because a WS cell may contain anywhere between 6 and 14 faces. A
WS cell is commonly used in solid-state physics to study quantum mechanics of minimum
volume cells. Although it may be possible to describe any crystal structure using a primi-
tive cell, the use of simpler basis vectors such as the case of nonprimitive cells enables a
better distinction of the cubic symmetry characteristics of the crystal structure. Therefore,
it may also be possible to add additional points to a space lattice without changing the
crystal symmetry. However, it requires that the additional lattice points are centered with
respect to the original lattice nodes. The three possible types of centering are body center-
ing (BC), face centering (FC), and base centering. The inclusion of these types of centering
translations to the primitive cell gives rise to seven new crystal structures; these crystal
structures are known as the nonprimitive cells, and they contain more than one lattice
point per unit cell. In the case of body centering, the centering vector is given by
a+b+c
I= , (2.2)
2
Properties of Semiconductors 9
TABLE 2.1
Summary of the 3-D Crystal Systems along with Their Metric Tensor and Symmetric
Characteristics
Crystal System 3-D Structural Minimum
{Lattice Parameters} Representation of Metric Symmetric
Requirements Primitive Cell Tensor Characterization
Triclinic c None
a2 ab cos γ ac cos β
{a, b, c, α, β, g}
No Restrictions ba cos γ b2 bc cos α
β α ca cos β cb cos α c 2
b
γ
a
Monoclinic c
a2 0 ac cos β One two-fold Axis
{a, b, c, 90°, β, 90°}
0 b2 0
α = γ = 90° β ca cos β 0 c 2
a
b
Tetragonal c
a2 0 0 One four-fold
{a, a, c, 90°, 90°, 90°} axis
0 a2 0
a=b
0 0 c 2
α = β = γ = 90°
Cubic a
a2 0 0 Four three-fold
{a, a, a, 90°, 90°, 90°} axes
0 a2 0
a=b=c
0 0 2
a
α = β = γ = 90°
a
a
10 Heteroepitaxy of Semiconductors
whereas in the case of face centering or base centering, a node can be added between two
existing lattice points using one of the following lattice vectors,
b+c
A= , (2.3)
2
a+c
B= , (2.4)
2
a+b
C= . (2.5)
2
1 1 1
N = N Body + N Face + N Edge + N Corner , (2.6)
2 4 8
where the subscript refers to the specific location of the site within the crystal structure.
A combination of symmetric operations such as rotation, reflection, and inversion that
are compatible with translation give rise to 32 crystal classes (also known as point groups)
into which crystalline structures can be further categorized. In addition, multiple combi-
nations of these symmetric operators, which produce translations less than the magnitude
of the basis vectors, give rise to 230 space groups. However, in our brief discussion of
symmetry we must make two clear distinctions. First, a combination of symmetry ele-
ments whereby at least one atom or point of the crystal lattice remains fixed constitutes a
point group. An example of this is the set of proper rotations about a screw axis. It should
also be noted that the name point group derives from the idea that all symmetry elements
performed on the crystal structure intersect at a single point. Second, the combination of
symmetry elements involving translation that leaves no fixed point on the crystal lattice
gives rise to space groups, that is, the set of glide planes. Although the focus of this book
is not on the structure and classification of crystalline materials, these concepts serve as a
fundamental background in the discussion of heteroepitaxy of semiconductors.
The wide variety of crystal structures among semiconductors presents both opportu-
nities and challenges for the crystal grower. It is possible to create unique heterojunc-
tion devices and metastable structures by the proper choices of materials. Moreover, it is
sometimes possible to determine the crystal structure of a particular epitaxial layer by the
choice of substrate or growth conditions, adding another dimension to device design. On
the other hand, it is also possible to end up with mixed phase material, which usually has
degraded electronic properties. It is therefore the purpose of this section to describe the
crystal structures exhibited by semiconductor materials of interest, as well as their charac-
teristics and behavior relevant to heteroepitaxy.
Properties of Semiconductors 11
c c c
β α β β
b a a
γ
a b b
c c c c
b b b b
a a a a
a c c
c
α
α
a a 120°
a
a
a a
a a a
a a a
a a a
FIGURE 2.2
The 14 Bravais lattices. The cells within the dashed rectangles are the nonprimitive cells formed from centering
translations. P indicates that the lattice structure is primitive, F indicates face centering, I indicates body center-
ing, and C indicates base centering.
FIGURE 2.3
Diamond crystal structure. All atoms are of the same type (e.g., Si). The shaded spheres show an atom and its
four nearest neighbors.
2.2.1 Diamond Structure
The diamond structure is shared by Si, Ge, Si-Ge alloys, and α-Sn, as well as the diamond
form of carbon. This structure belongs to the cubic class, with an FCC lattice and a basis
of two atoms at each lattice point: one at the origin (0, 0, 0) and the other at a point with
coordinates (¼ a, ¼ a, ¼ a), where a is the lattice constant. Thus, the structure can be thought
of as two interpenetrating FCC sublattices, one displaced from the other by one-quarter of
the unit cell diagonal. The space group is F 43m (Td2 ).
Figure 2.3 shows the cubic unit cell of the diamond structure. The length of each side of
the cubic unit cell is a, the lattice constant. The atoms are tetrahedrally bonded, and each
atom in the structure is covalently bonded to its four nearest neighbors.
* The zinc blende structure is occasionally referred to as the “sphalerite” structure in the literature.
Properties of Semiconductors 13
Ga
As
FIGURE 2.4
Zinc blende crystal structure. The white and black atoms belong to the two different sublattices (e.g., Ga and As).
cd
s a1 a3
a2
c
120°
FIGURE 2.5
Wurtzite crystal structure. The white and shaded atoms belong to the two different sublattices.
of 60° dislocations along the [110] and [110] directions, and these are referred to as α and β
dislocations, respectively.
2.2.3 Wurtzite Structure
The wurtzite* (Wz) structure is common among III-nitrides such as AlN, GaN, and InN,
and also some II-VI semiconductors. This structure comprises a hexagonal close-packed
(HCP) lattice with a basis of two atoms; it can therefore be considered two interpenetrat-
ing HCP lattices. Because the unit cell is hexagonal, there are two lattice constants, a and
c. (Here, c is the lattice constant in the direction parallel to the axis of sixfold rotational
symmetry, as shown in Figure 2.5.) The two interpenetrating HCP lattices are made up
of two different types of atoms, offset along the c axis by 5/8 of the cell height (5c/8). The
space group is P6 3 mc (C64v ).
As with the zinc blende structure, the wurtzite crystal structure involves two types of
atoms, A and B. Each atom A is bonded tetrahedrally to four nearest neighbors, which
are type B. Because the nearest-neighbor configuration is the same as in the zinc blende
* The wurtzite structure is occasionally referred to as the “zincite” structure in the literature.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
No. Expended in this Service for Boats Freight, and 28 4 0
25 other Charges in embarking the Troops, Landing
and reimbarking them from time to time as
occasion required, subsistence to them and for
Information, Guides, etc.
Wal: Grosett.
II
Lieutenant-General Handasyde to Walter Grossett
By the Honble Roger Handasyde Esqr Lieutenant
General and Commander in Cheif of All His Majesty’s
Forces, in North Britain etc.
Whereas it has been found Injurious to His Majesty’s
Service that any Boats shou’d pass from Leith to Kinghorn
or from Kinghorn to Leith, These are therefore Requiring
All Magistrates, Justices of the Peace, Constables and
Others concerned to be Aiding and Assisting to you in
bringing all the Passage Boats and Yauls from Kinghorn
and all other places on the North Side of the Forth to the
Harbour of Leith where they are to be kept till His
Majesty’s Service shall allow of their being returned to
their Respective Ports.
Given under my hand at Edinburgh this 26th Novemr
1745.
R: Handasyde.
To Walter Grosett Esqr Collector of
His Majesty’s Customs.
III
Lieutenant-General Handasyde to Walter Grossett
By the Honble Roger Handasyd Esqr. Leutt General and
Commander in Chief of all His Majs Forces in North
Brittain.
Whereas it has been found Injurious to His Majesties
Service that any Boats should pass from the North or
South sides of the Forth or that any Vessells whatever
should be allowed to remain upon the North side of the
said River These are therefore requiring all Magistrats,
Justices of the Peace, Constables and others concerned
to be aiding and assisting to you in Stoping the said
passage and removeing all Boats and Vessells whatever
from the North to the South Side of the Forth from
Kinghorn to Stirling Bridge and in case of resistance or
refussall to Burn or otherwise Destroy such Boats and
Vessells as shall after due Intimation made be found upon
the North Side of the said River.
Given under my Hand at Edinburgh this 27th November
1745.
R: Handasyde.
To Walter Grosett Esqr, Collr of His
Majesties Customs at Alloa, and
one of His Majs Justices of ye
Peace.
IV
The Commissioners of Customs to Walter Grossett
Mr. Grosett.
Inclosed We send You for Your Government and
Direction, a Copy of a Letter from the Lord Justice Clerk
and General Guest Commander in Chief of His Majestys
Forces in Scotland, Containing an order and Instructions
for bringing over all Ships, Vessels, Boats and Yoals of all
sorts and sizes lying in the Harbours and Creeks betwixt
Stirling Bridge and St Andrews inclusive on the North side
of the Frith with their Apparel and Furniture, and for laying
them up in the several Harbours therein Specified on the
South side of the Frith, and in the Execution of these
Directions and Instructions, all Officers whatsoever under
Our direction, are to give You their utmost assistance
when required so to do, as they will answer the Contrary
at their Peril, and You are particularly to apply to the
respective Officers in the several Ports and Precincts for
their Aid and Information. The General having given
proper orders to the Captain of the Milford Man of war to
concur and assist You in this Servise, You are to meet and
Concert with him proper measures for the Effectual
Execution thereof. We are,
Your Loving Friends,
Co: Campbell.
Alex Arbuthnott.
Rd. Somers.
Customho Edinbr
8th Decemr 1745. }
Collr Alloa.
Enclosure to No. IV.
Edinbr Decemr 9th 1745.
Gentlemen—We think it absolutely necessary for the
Good and Service of the Government at this Conjuncture,
that all the Ships, Vessels, Boats and Yoals of all sorts and
Sizes, with their Apparel and Furniture, in all Harbours and
Creeks etc. betwixt Stirling Bridge and St Andrews
inclusive on the North side of the Frith of Forth, be brought
over and Moord in the several Harbours of Dunbar, Leith,
Queensferry and Borrowstoness, and these on the South
side of the said River, betwixt Cramond and Eymouth be
Carried to Leith and Dunbar, as the Persons to be
Employed by You in the Execution hereof, shall Judge to
be most Conveneint, all to remain in these respective
Harbours untill further orders; We therefore earnestly
recommend it to You as proper Judges, to Nominate and
Appoint such of Your Officers under Your Direction and
Government to Execute our Orders as You shall think
most fit to be Employed for the doing of so necessary a
Duty, And as some former Orders of this Nature have not
been observed and obeyed so punctually as Directed for
want of other proper Assistance, We do therefore hereby
direct and ordain all Magistrates of Burghs Justices of the
Peace, Constables etc. within the respective bounds
aforesaid, laying aside all Excuses whatsoever, to be
aiding and assisting to the Person or Persons that are
possessed of Copys hereof, and of Your Instructions given
by You to them, as they will be answerable upon their
highest Peril; and in Case any of the Proprietors or others
Concerned in said Ships etc. as abovementd shall not
forthwith Comply with these Our orders, Then the Persons
so Employed are hereby ordained to burn and Destroy the
same, where any objections or refusals are made to obey
and Comply herewith, and the aforesaid Copys hereof
with your Instructions as above, shall be to them a
Sufficient Warrant for destroying of the above Ships etc.
not doubting of Your Compliance and Concurrence, We
are,
And: Fletcher.
Sign’d
{ Jos: Guest.
N.B.—Buys Boat who has been often Employed in
transporting of Rebels frequently, should be burnt out of
hand.
Honble Commrs of the Customs Edr.
V
Lieutenant-General Guest to Walter Grossett
Edenburgh December the 15th 1745.
Sr,—I agree to your hiring the Borrowstness Ship at
the Rate you mention, provided the owners dont insist on
my Insuring her from the Enemy, for that I cant consent to
—if they comply, you’l immediatly station her at Higgins
Nook, and Nicol at Carse’s Nook, or wherever they can be
best placed for His Majestys Service. You’l give them
positive Derections to be very carefull, in watching both
sides the River, and sending immediat Intelligence to the
Ld Justice Clerk, on discovering any Motions of the
Enemy.
You’l consider the Ship is not ensured now, and is in as
much, or more danger than when employd by his Majesty.
—I am Sr your most Obedt humble Servant,
Jos: Guest.
VI
Walter Grossett to the Commissioners of Customs
Hond. Sirs,—In Obedience to your directions of the
8th Instant Inclosing an Order and Warrand from Lord
Justice Clerk and General Guest Commander in chief of
the Forces in Scotland, for bringing over all Ships,
Vessells and Boats, lying in any of the Harbours or
Creeks, betwixt Stirling and S: Andrews on the North side
of the Firth, to the Harbours therein specified on the south
side thereof, and for Burning or destroying the ships and
Vessells etc., of such of the Proprieters thereof as should
refuse to comply with these Orders; I have with the
assistance of the Kings Boats at Queensferry and
Borristounness, and two Boats Crews belonging to the
Happy Janet stationed off Queensferry, removed,
disabled, or destroyed, all Boats and Vessells that lay
betwixt Stirling and Aberdour. But as the doing of this,
would not have hinder the Rebell Army from geting a
Cross the River, while Boats and Vessells were allowed to
remain at the severall Creeks in Carron Water, and at
Hargens Nuik Airth, and Elphingstone, and other Creeks
on the south side of the Forth betwixt Borristounness and
Stirling; I therefore proceeded to these places, and
prevailed with severall of the Proprieters of Boats and
Vessells there, to remove them from thence, but as some
of them refused to comply, by reason of their not being
included in the Order and Warrand above mentioned, I am
therefore Humbly of Opinion, that Lord Justice Clerk and
General Guest should be applyed to, for a Warrand for the
removing or destroying of them. And as there are at this
time at Alloa, a considerable quantity of Deals and Learge
Loggs of Wood, of 30 or 40 feet in Length, of which Floots
may not only easely be made, for the Transporting of Men,
Horses etc.; from the one side of the River to the other,
but upon which Flooting Batteries may be reased, to move
from place to place, to play upon such of His Majesties
Forces or others, who may be employed in Defending the
Banks of the River, to prevent the Landing of the Rebells.
It is therefore Humbly submitted, how far it may be thought
proper at this Juncture, to have these Deals and Loggs
removed from Alloa. If this is approven off, what I would
propose as the easiest method of removing them, would
be to put them on Board of Vessells, to ly at
Borristounness till the danger is over. With this view I
spook to several shipmasters of my acquaintance, (who I
knew to be good Whiggs and well wishers to the common
Cause) on Tuesday last at Borristounness, and who at my
request, readily agreed to take them on Board their
Vessells, upon their only being paid the Charges they
should be put to in going to Alloa to Load and unload
them. All which is Humbly Submitted by Hon: Sirs Your
Hors Most Obedt Huml Servt
Wat: Grosett.
Edinburgh 16th Decr 1745.
Endorsements.
16th Decr 1745.
Mr. Grosett to wait upon the Justice Clerk and Genl
Guest with this Lre. and to Report their Opinion.
W. H. for the Secry.
The Board approve Mr. Grosetts Conduct and Zeal in
this whole Affair and his proposal is agreed to if the Lord
Justice Clerk and Genl Guest think proper.
W. H. for the Secretary.
VII
The Commissioners of Customs to Walter Grossett,
forwarding approval of Lord Justice Clerk and General
Guest
Edinburgh 16th Decr 1745.
We approve of Mr. Grosetts Conduct and proposalls
and desire the Board of Customs may give him the proper
directions for puting the same in Execution and for which
end a proper Warrant shall be granted by us.
And Fletcher.
Jos: Guest.
Mr. Grosett
Having considered the above Approbation of the Lord
Justice Clerk and General Guest, We heartily agree with
the same and direct you to proceed accordingly, having
first obtained their Warrant for the purposes as mentioned
in Your Letter of this date.
Co: Campbell.
Alexr Arbuthnott.
Rd. Somers.
Custom Ho Edinburgh
16th December 1745.
VIII
The Lord Justice Clerk to Walter Grossett
(Holograph but not signed)
Pray forward the Inclosed, and get all Stirling shire in
Arms immediately, If Ld Home approves G. Blackney will
give arms—raise ye Hue and Cry—Cause the Sherriff
distribute ye papers yt comes wt ys bearer.
Go on and prosper.
Edr 19th Decr 1745.
I have paid none of the Expresses yt they may make
more hast but given every one two shills. wch is not to be
deducted out of yr hire if they make Speed.
IX
Lieutenant-General Guest to Walter Grossett
Joshua Guest Esqr Lieut. General and Commander in
Cheif of all His Majesty’s Forces, Castles, Forts and
Barracks in North Britain etc.
His Majesty’s Service Requiring that all Vessells and
Boats of whatever Size be instantly removed out of the
Harbours of Borrostouness, Queensferry, Leith or any
where else upon the South Coast of the Forth betwixt
Leith and Stirling, Those at Borrostouness and
Queensferry to the Road of Borrostouness or Such other
place or places as you shall think most for His Majesty’s
Service at this Juncture; those at Leith to the Road of
Leith or such other place as you shall judge most proper
for said Service; These are therefore Authorizing and
Empowering you to put the said order in Execution, and to
which purpose the Commanders of His Majesty’s Ships of
War or others employ’d in the Kings Service, are hereby
Required to give you their Utmost Assistance, as are all
Magistrates, Justices of the Peace, Constables, and all
other Persons, Civil or Military whom these may Concern.
A Copy hereof sign’d by you shall be a sufficient warrant
to any Person required or empower’d by you in the
Execution hereof as they will answer to the Contrary at
their highest Peril.
Given at Edinburgh the 21st day of Decemr 1745.
Jos: Guest.
To Walter Grosett Esqr Collector of
His Majesty’s Customs.
X
Lieutenant-General Guest’s Directions
Directions for the Master of the Boat that goes to
Borrostouness.
Edinburgh 22d Decem. 1745.
He is to sail directly for Borrostouness, lye out in the
Road of that place and send in his Boat or yawl, to
Collector Grosett who is there and get directions from him
how he is to dispose of his Cargo, part of which is to go to
Stirling Viz. the 9 pounders Cannon Ball, Spunges, etc.
The Pouder and small Cannon Ball is for the use of the
Jean of Alloa, and Pretty Janet, that are stationed near
that place or at Higgens Nuik. The Biscuit which is to be
taken in at Leith from Mr. Walker is to be disposed of at
Bosness as Mr. Grosett will direct. In case of any accident
of your not meeting with Mr. Grosett, I desire Cap. Knight
of the Happy Janet may forward im̅ ediately the 9 pound
Cannon Ball, Spunges etc. to Stirling, where General
Blakeney has present occasion for them.
Jos: Guest.
To the Master of the Boat Order’d to
sail for Borrostouness.
XI
Captain Knight R.N. to Walter Grossett
Sir,—Having Sent 7 pounds of powder, 20 Sheets fine
paper made in Cartridges and 15 pounds Musquet Shot to
be used, if occasion required it, by my people in
preventing the Rebells passage at Higgens-Nook, which I
understand you gaue to John Peirson Master of the Pretty
Jennett, I desire you will be pleased to procure an Order
from General Guest to me for supplying these Ordnance
Stores to him, with his Ricept to Alexander Wedderburn
Master of the Armed Vessel under my Command of the
Same, and to transmit both to me at this place with the
first opportunity.—I am Sir, Your very humble Servant,
Jno. Knight.
Happy Jennett Queensferry Road
22d December 1745.
Walter Grosett Esq. Collector of his
Majts Customs at Alloa.
XII
Lieutenant-General Guest to Walter Grossett
Joshua Guest Esqr Lieut. General and Commander in
Cheif of all His Majesty’s Forces, Castles, Forts and
Barracks in North Britain etc.
His Majesty’s Service Requiring that a number of
Vessells and Boats be hired for Transporting of His
Majesty’s Forces, These are therefore authorizing and
Empowering you to hire such a number of Vessells and
Boats and make such agreement with them as you shall
judge necessary at this Juncture, and I hereby oblige
myself to make good such agreement, for which this shall
be your Warrant. Given at Edinburgh this 22d December
1745.
Jos: Guest.
To Walter Grosett Esqr Collector of
His Majesty’s Customs.