.

, manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

347.628

MANUS
,
, : , , .1
,
. ,
. , . ,
, .
,
,
. , : manus (cum manu) manus (sine manu). manus,

.
, . ,

manus, , a
.
:

manus; ;
; .

. , mirjanaroljic83@gmail.com
1
Mod. D.23.2.1: Nuptiae sunt coniunctio maris et feminae et consortium omnis
vitae, divini et humani iuris communicatio.
. ,
III .

189

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

1.
Manus ,
. ,
, , . manus, .
alieni iuris. sui iuris,
.2 , .
(filiae loco),
. , alieni iuris,
, neptis loco.
manus, ,
.
, ,
consortiumu, : , ,

.3 ,

, . , ,
materfamilijas. ,
, . paterfamilijasa
.4
2.
, ,
. ,
,

A. Ma, , 2006, 65
. , ,
1970, 350.
4
. , , , 1973, 86.
3

190

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

ius conubi,5 , ,
, , . manus
,
, .
, ius conubi
. ,
. , 12 , ius conubi
. , . ,
, , Lex Canuleia,
.6
, , .
, . ,
. ,
.7

.
, . ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
, 5

Ulpiani Reg. 5.2: Iustum matrimonium est, si inter eos qui nuptias contrahunt
conubium sit.
6
,
, ,
. ,
, .
,
445. .
7
.
, 1983, 241

191

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

, .8 ,
.

, . .9 .
,
.
,
.
manusom
, . .
,
, , . , , ,
. , ,
. ,
.
,
,

, .
,
.10 manus ,
,
. ,
,
,
, . ,

. 8

Gai. Inst. 1.62: Fratris filiam uxorem ducere licet, idque primum in usum venit,
cum divus Claudius Agrippinam fratris sui filiam uxorem duxisset, sororis vero filiam
uxorem ducere non licet. Et haec ita principalibus constitutionibus significantur.
9

Paul. D.23.2.16.2: Furor contrahi matrimonium non sinit, quia consensu opus
est, sed recte contractum non impedit.
10
. , , ,
8/2005, 23.

192

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

,
.11
3.
. (sponsalia), .12
pater familijasa . ,
. ,
,
, .
, .
, , ,
. ,
.13
, ,
, , ,
, .
,
: ,
, , ,
pater familijasa .
,
.
, ,
.
. . ,
, . ,
,
. ,
11

turpis persona,
, , ...
12
Florentin D.23.1.1: Sponsalia sunt mentio et repromissio nuptiarum futurarum.
13
. , 244.

193

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

,
.

, , .
, .
.
,
. ,
, .
, ,
.
. , , . ,
.
Iuno Curitisa,14
,
curis. ,
. ,
,
.15
. , ,

, (
).16 , ,
, ,
.
. , pater
familijas, .
(dos)
. ,
, .

14

, .
. , , 2009, 72.
16
. , , 2000, 148
15

194

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

pater familijas, dos profecticia,17

, dos adventicia.18
,
,
,
.19 ,
dolus ulpu,
,
.20
, ,
. , .
, dos adventicia, dos profecticia
,
.
. ,


,
.21 , manus,
.
.
,
, .
, , manus , 204
.
.

17

proficicor, , .
advenire, , ,
.
19
. ,
,
8/2006, 186.
20
Paul. D.23.3.17: In rebus dotalibus virum praestare oportet tam dolum quam
culpam, quia causa sua dotem accipit, sed etiam diligentiam praestabit, quam in suis
rebus exhibet.
21
. ,
, 1974, 349.
18

195

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

4.

,
. . ,
conferratio, ,
,
coemptio
, usus
coemptia per
aes et libram. confarreatio , , ,
.
, coemptio
, .
, .
confarreatio , coemptio usus , ,
.
(Rossbach)
, ,
,
, .
. confarreati, coempti usus,
,
. , , .22
Confarreatio (o panis farreus )
, manus.
22

196

P. Elwood Corbett, The Roman law of marriage, Oxford 1969, 70.

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

, ,
. . . auspicija

haruspicies.
konfareacije.23
, .
.
,
. farreusa na
. , . , ,
,
. ,
: Ubi tu Gaius et ego tua
Gaia. :
, .
,
.
detestatio sacrorum.
,
,
lares compitales. ,

,
, .
, repotia, . , paterfamilijasa, manus
, sui iuris, pater familijasa.24
,
, . , , , , . ,
, ,

23
24

. , Forum Romanum, 2005, 197.

. , 246.

197

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

confarreatio,
confarreatio.
Coemptio, ,
. ,
,
. Koempcijom
manus , . ,
,
.
manus . , koempciju,
, ,
oempcije:
fiducijarna. oempciju ,
, koempciju
, empciju,
, , .
, fiducijarna empcija.25
Usus manus,
12 .
,
,
,
. ,
, paterfamilijasa, . ,

. ,
manus.
5.
,
XVIII ,
.
, ,
.
,
, ,
25

198

. (), , 1983, 61.

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

,
(...) .26
,
, . ,
,
, ,
.27
, , ,
, ,
, , .
,
, ,
, .
,
.28 , ,

. XIX
, Leges regiae

Leges regiae
.
, , ,

. , ,
,
, .
,
. ,
, , . -

26

. , , ,
1976, 4647.
27
. , ius civile, , 2007, 131.
28
. , ius civile, , 2002, 76.

199

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

,
.29
, ,
XIX XX , manus patria potestas
, , ,
: ,
,
,
. , , .30

, .
,
, . ,


.31
. , , lex Oppia, ,
, .32 , ,
, ,
. ,
, .
6.
manus
manus, ,
, . 29

. . , ,
2006, 251 .
30
. , ,
, 1984, 440 .
31
. , 153.
32
. , (2006), 240.

200

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

, , .
,
. ,
.
, Leges regiae,
,
.33
, ,
.34
,
, pter familias,
,
. : , ,
, , .

, , . .
,
,
,
.
.
,
,
. ius
osculi, ,
,
, .35
, ,
. ,
, . ,
, .
, ,
. ,
,
. , ,
33

. , (2007), 151 152.

Paul D.24.2.1: Dirimitur matrimonium divortio morte captivitate vel alia,
contingente serviture utrius eorum.
35
. , (2006), 243.
34

201

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

,
.
,
,
. , .
,
. (repudium),
, e .
, ,
, ,
.
cum manu, ,
, ,
(. contrarius actus), confarreatio difereacije, coempcije
, remancipatio ( mancipacija).
, , .
, ,
,
. , 307. . . .
, .
, ,
. ,
,
.36
difarreatio,
confarreatio.
, ,
. , , , pontifex maximusa. , ,
, , ,
. , ,
, . ,
,
36

202

. , , 1987, 115.

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

,
.37
remancipacio,
per aes et libram. ,
.
, ,
mancipijuma. , coempcio.
Usus, ,
, ,
12 . ,
, . ,
,
capitis deminutio
minima, media maxima.
7.
manus .
, ,
. ,
, . , manus
.
,
, , , ,
.
, ,

.
domusu, ,
.
, ,
.
,
37

. , 198.

203

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

, , .
,
, ,
,
.

. ,
manus,
manus. , , ,
.


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.

204

, , Forum Romanum, 2005;

, , , ,
1976;
, , ius civile, , 2002;
, , ius civile, , 2007;
, , , , 1984;
, ,
2006;
, , , 2006;
, , ,
1974;
, ,
, 1983;
, , , ,
8/2005;
, , , 1987;
, , ,
2009;
, , , 2000;
, , ,
1970;
, , , ,
1973;
Corbett, Elwood, The Roman low of marriage, Oxford 1969;
, ,
,
8/2006.

. , manusom, , I, 1/2010,
. 189205.

Mirjana Rolji, LL.B.

Assistant, Faculty of Law
University of East Sarajevo
MARRIAGE WITH MANUS
Summary
The definition of the marriage by Modestine, the last great jurist
of classical jurisprudence, rather suits the old times than more recent
times when it was really given: "Marriage is a relationship between
husband and wife, the community of all forms of life, the institution of
divine and human rights." Looking from today's perspective at the
institution of marriage in ancient Rome, we must admit that it seems a
bit paradoxical and strange.
The marriage of love was a very rare exception. It was a private
act, quite opposite of contemporary marriages. People did not go to the
registrar or the priest and only the agreement between the parents was
sufficient. The Romans believed that a woman's place was at home, and
that the best reputation of a woman is that no one mentions her by good
or evil deeds, that she is unnoticeable. The Roman family law has two
concepts of marriage: Marriage with manus (cum manu) and marriage
without manus (sine manu). Marriage with manus is characteristic of
the beginning of Roman history and it was retained as the dominant
form of marriage as long as the Roman society was based on a closed
home economy. The main objective of this kind of marriage is to have
children, to extend the family. Later on, this marriage vanished and the
marriage without manus appears as a general form of the relationship
between man and woman, in which a womans position becomes better
and relations between spouses become much freer.
Key words:

Marriage with manus; Conditions to establish marriage;

Forms of marriage; Dissolution of marriage.

205