....................................................................

)(

13/11/2013 :

26/2/2014 :

)(
.
) (66
) (
)(
.
.

)(


)( .
:
.
The Effect of Written Texts According to Rothkopf` Method
Upon the Achievement & Learning Motivation of Tenth Graders
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the effect of written texts
according Rothkopf` method in comparison to the traditional
method upon the achievement and learning motivation of tenth
)graders. The study sample was selected randomly, and consisted of (66
students, divided into two groups (experimental and control). The first group
studied through written texts, while the second one studied according to the

*
traditional method. After ensuring the equality.
between
the
two
groups, the researcher applied the written texts to the
:
experimental group. The results showed a statistically significant
difference between the two groups in achievement and

motivation, in favor of the experimental group.
Keywords:
`Rothkopf
Achievement,
method,

Learning

motivation, Tenth grade.

235
20 /12014

....................................................................

.
)(






).(2004





) .(1984
20 /1236
2014

....................................................................

)(

) .(2004






).(Ertem, 2013
) (2012









.



237
20 /12014

....................................................................

).(Guthrie, 2011






.



) .(2007

) (2009
:
-1 :


.

-2 :

.
-3 :

.

) : .(2007

20 /1238
2014

....................................................................

:

.

:


.

.
:

.







)
.(1992





-

).(2009
239
20 /12014

....................................................................

.




) .(Biehler & Snowman, 1995



) )Gebara, 2010



) .(2000



)(Santrock, 2003



)Petri,
.(and Govern, 2004



) .(Hartnett, et. Al , 2011




20 /1240
2014

....................................................................

)(2011

).(Keller, 2008





)Barolli, et. al,
0(2006







).(Wigfield, et.al, 2008
) (Wiener, 1992

.

:









).(2005





241
20 /12014

....................................................................

)Malouff,
.(Rock, Schutte, Foster, & Bhullar, 2008







).(Good & Brophy, 1990





) .(2004


) .(2005




)
.(2000



).(Yun, 2001

:

) (Ertem, 2013

. ) (47


20 /1242
2014

....................................................................

.
) (2012

. ) (70
)(2010 )(34
) (36

.

.
) (Brophy, 2011

. )(75

.
) -( ,
.


.
) (Kim & Frick, 2011




.
) (2009

) (52


.
) (Ainsworth and Burcham,2007

) (48
243
20 /12014

....................................................................

.

.
) (Corio and Dabler, 2007




.
) (Kerr and Symons, 2006

. ) (60



.
) (2006
)( .
)(35

) (36
.
.
) (Hancock, 2002


) (70

:

.

) (2012
) (2009 ) (2006
) (Ertem,2013
) (Corio and Dobler,2007 )Kerr,
.( and Symons )(
) (Brophy,2011
) (2012
20 /1244
2014

....................................................................

) (2009
.
) (2012 ) (2006
((Ainsworth, and Birchen ,2007
) (Brophy,2011 ) .(Hancock, 2002









.

:
- -
- -




.


)
.(2002 ) (Jang, 2008


.

)
.(Greene,et.al, 2004


)Ryan,
(et.al, 2009 )
245
20 /12014

....................................................................

(2004


)(
.

:
:

- ) (0.05

)(

.(0.05
)

)(

:
-

.

.

.


.

:
-

:


.2013/2014

.
20 /1246
2014

....................................................................

)(

.

:
:




) .(2004 :
:

.
:
.:

.
:

) .(2011 :
.
:


).(2009
:
.

:
:

) (4361 ) (40
.2013/2014
247
20 /12014

....................................................................

)( ) (34 )
( )( ) (32 ) (

)(
.

:
) 1
(
) .(t-test
)(1
) (t-test

34

10.01

4.77

32

11.99

4.55

34

100.01

12.01

32

102.25

11.09

)(

3.01

0.091

2.22

0.072

) (1

)(
)(
) (3.01 ) (0.092 )(
) (2.22 )(0.072

.
)(

20 /1248
2014

....................................................................

. )(1



) (2
.
)(


.
.
.

: :
)( :
:
.

249
20 /12014

....................................................................

:
-1 :



) (35.




) (5 ) (5

) (5

) (0.20
.) (3
)(25
)(0.88
.)(4
) (25
.
-2 :
- - ) (Kozeki & Entwistele,1984
) (60 ) (4 -0 )- 8
(20 . ) (1989

) (24

) (0.63 -0.21
) (0.72
.



) 0.73 0.22
( .
)(0.76
) (36 . ) (5
.
20 /1250
2014

....................................................................

) (4 -0 ) (4) (3) (2
) (1 ) (0
) (144 -0
.

:



) (t-test
.

:
:
: )
(0.05
)(

:
) (
).(2
)(2
)(

34
32

20.74
14.94

4.67
4.14

)(
3.31

0.02

) (2
) (20.74 )(4.67
) (14.94
) .(4.14 ( ) t-test

)( ) .(3.31
)(
251
20 /12014

....................................................................

)(





)2005
(
)
(Gage and Berliner, 1991

( (Peirce, 2003
)(
)Biehler
(and Snowman, 1995
.


) (2009


Tuckman, & ).
(Kennedy, 2009




).(2009


)(2009


).(1992
20 /1252
2014

....................................................................

:
: )
.(0.05
)(


. ).(3
)(3
)(

34
32

127.15
111.25

14.29
14.42

)
(
2.23

0.029

) (3
) (127.15
) .(14.29
)(t-test
) (2.23 ) (2.029


)(


((Hancock, 2002
-

)(Unrau et.al,, 2006



)(Hancock, 2007


) .(Nunally, 1992

253
20 /12014

....................................................................

)
(2003

)
(2009
.

)
(1998

) (Guthrie, 2011
Hulleman, ,
( .(Hendriks, & Harackiewicz, 2010

)(Guthrie, & Klauda, 2012

) (Guthrie, et.al, 2009

).(Guthrie, et.al, 1999


) (Long, et.al, 2007

).(Guthrie, et.al, 2000

:
-

:
)(

.

)( .
)(
.

:
20 /1254
2014

....................................................................

) (
.2009


4) 27 2012
(.60-45


) ( .2006

.22 (67) 12 2004


.74-200473

) (
.2004

.2009


) ( .1989

:
.202-167 2005

.2005

.2011


.1984

.2002

.2000

255
20 /12014

....................................................................

.1998
.1992

.2007

. 2005
:
.2003

.2000


.2009

:
Ainsworth, S., and birchen, S. The Impact of Text coherence on learning by SelfExplanation. Learning and Instruction, 2007, 17 (4), 286- 303.
Barolli, L., Koyama, A., Durresi, A., & De Marco, G. A web-based e-learning
system for increasing study efficiency by stimulating learners motivation.
Information, Systems Frontiers, 2006, 8(4), 297-306.
Biehler, R., and Snowman, P. Psychology Applied to teaching. Houghton Mifflin,
1995, 530.
Brophy, J. E. The Effects of Strategy Learning on Achievement, and Motivation
in a Physics Course, Educational Psychology, 2011, 51 (2), 39-62.
Corio, J., and Dobler, E. Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies
used by sixth grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the
internet. Reading research Quarterly, 2007, 42 (2), 214 257.
Ertem, I. The Influence of Personalization of Online Texts on Elementary School
Students Reading Comprehension and Attitudes toward Reading,
International Journal of Progressive Education, 2013, 9(3),91-101.
Gage, N., and Berliner, D. Educational Psychology. (5th Ed), Boston: Houghton
Mifflin, 1991.

256 /1 20
2014

....................................................................

Gebara, T. (). Comparing A Blended Learning Environment To A Distance

Learning Environment For Teaching A Learning And Motivation
Strategies Course. The Ohio State University, 2010.
Good, T., and Brophy, J. Looking in Classroom. Harper and Row: New York, 1990.
Greene, B.A., Miller, R.B., Crowson, H.M., Duke, B.L., & Akey, K.L. Predicting
high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions
of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary, Educational
Psychology, 2004, 29(4), 462-482.
Guthrie, J. T. Best practices in motivating students to read. In L. Morrow &
L. Gambrell (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (4th ed., pp. 177198). New York: Guilford, 2011.
Guthrie, J., Klauda, L. Educational Making Textbook Reading Meaningful.
Education Research Complete, 2012, 69, (6).55-77.
Guthrie, J.T., & Coddington, C. Reading motivation. In K. Wentzel & A.
Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 503-525). New York:
Routledge, 2009.
Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. Effects of integrated instruction on
motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology,
2000, 92(2), 331-341.
Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J.L., & Cox, K.E. Motivational and cognitive
predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of
Reading, 1999, 3(3), 231-256. 3
Hancock, D. Influencing University Students' Achievement and Motivation in
Technology Courses. Journal of Educational Research, 2002, 95 (6), 365363.
Hancock, D. Exploring the effects of group on gradual students' Motivation and
achievement. Assessment a Evolution in Higher
Education, 2007, 32 (2), 215-227.
Hartnett, M., St George, A., & Dron, J. Being together-factors that unintentionally
undermine motivation, Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning,
2011, 15(1), 1-16.
Hulleman, C, Codes, O., Hendriks, B., & Harackiewicz, J. Enhancing interest and
performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 2010, 102, 880-895
257
2014 /1 20

....................................................................

Jang, H. Supporting students' motivation, engagement, and learning during an

uninteresting activity, Journal of Educational Psychology, 2008, 100(4),
798-811.
Keller, J. M. First principles of motivation to learn and e3learning. Distance
Education, 2008, 29(2), 175-185.
Kerr, M and Symons C. Computerized presentation of Text: Effects on childrens
reading of information material special Issue on reading
comprehension .Reading and Writing .an Inter Disciplinary Journal, 2006,
19 (1), 1-19.
Kim, K. J., & Frick, T. W. Changes in student motivation during online learning.
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2011, 44(1), 1-23.
Kozeki, B., and Entwistle, N. (). Identifying Dimensions of School Motivation,
Britain and Hungary, British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1984, 54
(3), 306-319.
Long, J.F., Monoi, S., Harper, B., Knoblauch, D., & Murphy, P.K. Academic
motivation and achievement among urban adolescents. Urban Education,
2007, 42(3), 196-222.
Malouff, J., Rook, S., Schutte, N, Foster, R., and Bhullar, N. Methods of
Motivational Teaching, Report on line Submission, from:htt://www.
academic.pg.cc.md.us. 2008, 212-223.
Perice, W. Meta Cognition: Study Strategies, Monitoring, and Motivation.
Retrieved November, 2003, 15.
Petri, H; and Govern, J. Motivation: Theory, Research and Applications, 2004.
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. Promoting self-determined school engagement:
Motivation, learning, and well-being. In K.R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield
(Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school , New York: Routledge,
2009, 171-195
Tuckman, B. W., & Kennedy, G. Teaching learning into strategies to enhance the
success of firstterm college students. American Educational Research
Association, San Diego, CA, 2009, 19(2), 95-111
Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J., Motivation and its relationship with reading
achievement in an urban middle school. The Journal of Educational
Research,. 2006, 100(2), 55-72.

258 /1 20
2014

....................................................................

Wiener, B., Theories of Motivation: From Mechanism to Cognition. Chicago:

Road Mc Nelly College Publishing Company, 1992.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. Development of
achievement motivation. Child and adolescent development: An
advanced course, 2008, 406-434.
Yun, D. AComparison of gender differences in academic self-concept and
Motivation between high-ability Chinese adolescents, Journal of Secondary
Gifted Education, 2001, 1995, 13 (1), 22-33.

259
2014 /1 20

....................................................................

)(1

1
2
3
4
5
6

.
.
.
.
.

)(2

-1 :
. . . . . .
- .

-2 :
. : . . . -3 :

.
20 /1260
2014



.

.

.
.

....................................................................

-4 :
-5 :
-

261
20 /12014

....................................................................

-6 :
* )(:
. . . -7 :
*
.

20 /1262
2014

....................................................................

)(3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

0.44
0.21
0.26
0.36
0.64
0.47
0.58
0.79
0.47
0.58
0.54
0.56
0.23
0.33
0.27
0.50
0.33
0.36
0.43
0.46
0.55
0.66
0.70
0.55
0.80

0.46
0.79
0.74
0.64
0.36
0.53
0.42
0.21
0.53
0.42
0.46
0.44
0.77
0.67
0.73
.0.5
0.67
0.64
0.57
0.44
0.45
0.34
0.30
0.45
0.75

0.42
0.45
0.45
0.39
0.32
0.41
0.55
0.35
0.23
0.61
0.46
0.44
0.33
0.51
0.36
0.46
0.40
0.33
0.60
0.49
0.73
0.80
0.66
0.55
0.63

)(4

(1
-.

-.

263
20 /12014

-.

- .

....................................................................

(2 :
-.

-.

-.

-.

(3 :
- .
- .

- .
- .

(4 :
- .
- .

-.
-.

(5 :
- .

-.

-.

-.

(6
:
-.

-
.

-
.

-
.

(7 :
-.

-.

-.

-.

(8 :
-
.

-
.

-
.

-.

-
.

-
.

(9 :
-
-.
.

(10 :
-.
- . -.
-.
(11 :
-.
-.
-.

- .

(12 :
- .
- .

-
-
.

(13 :
20 /1264
2014

....................................................................

- .
- .

- .
-
.

(14 :
-
- .
.
-
- .
.

(15
:
----
.
---
.

- ---
.
---.

(16 :
-.
-.
- .

-.

(17
:
- .
- .

-
-

(18 :
-
-.
- . -.
.
(19
:
-
.
-
-.
-.
.

(20 :
- .
- .

- .
-
.

(21
- . -.

-.

265
20 /12014

-.

....................................................................

(22
:
.
-
-.
-.
-.
(23 :
- .
- .

-
.
- .

(24 :
-.
-.
-.
-.
(25 :
-.
-.
-.

- .

20 /1266
2014

....................................................................

)(5

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

267
20 /12014

....................................................................

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.


.

20 /1268
2014