Chapter I

Panimula:

Isa sa mga kontrobersyal na isyu na minsang pinag-usapan at pinagtalunan ng mga

mamamayang Pilipino ay ang death penalty. Ayon sa Republic Act No. 7659, ang death

penalty ay ang parusang ipinapataw sa mga gumagawa ng mga kagimbal-gimbal na

krimeng nakahahapic, nakaririmarim, kakilakilabot, at nakapopoot. Ilang halimbawa ng

mga krimen na maaring humantong sa kaparusan ng kamatayan ay parricide, murder,

qualified bribery, piracy, kidnapping, robbery, rape, at drug pushing.

Paglalahad ng Suliranin:

Bilang isang mag aaral hindi lang dapat ang mag-aaral ay naka pokus sa mga

libro kundi na din san ng yayari sa labas nila. Itong pag aaral na ito ay sumasaloob sa

mga estudyante kung may kamalayan o may pake sa paksang “Death Penalty”.

Pangkalahatang Tanong:

1. Ano persepsyon ng mga Mag-aaral ng Baitang 10 ng Antipolo Immaculate

Conception School Tungkol sa “Death Penalty”?

2. Ano ang mga kaalaman ng mga Mag-aaral ng Baitang 10 ng Antipolo

Immaculate Conception School Tungkol sa “Death Penalty”?

Pantulong na tanong:

1. Ang Pilipinas ba ang kwalipikado upang mag karoon ng “Death Penalty”? Bakit?
Layunin at Kahalagahan ng Pag-aaral:

Layunin mapaunawa sa mga taga mag-aaral ang mga kahalagahan ng “Death

Penalty”

Kahulugan ng mga katawagan:

“Death Penalty”

Saklaw at Limitasyon ng Pag-aaral:

Limitasyon ng pag-aaral

Ang pananaliksik na ito ang nangangailangan ng 10 respondante

mula sa mag-aaral ng Antipolo Immaculate Conception School na nasa baiting 10, Nais

makabuo ng mga mananaliksik ng limang lalake at limang babae na mag bibigay ng

kanilang pananaw o opinyon sa naturang paksa.

Chapter 2

Crimes in the United States are punishable, ones are more severe then others. The

Death penalty is a capital punishment in which the government takes control of the rest

of your life depending on the amount of damage one has made on society. Questions

that are brought up with this controversial topic are on defining the actual capital

punishment, what might be the cost differences between keeping a person incarcerated

or the death penalty. Also what are some ways the death penalty is delivered and in

what states are the administrations allowed, and if fifteen years is long enough to clear

all legal rights to make sure the right criminal is being dealt properly.
The Death penalty is known as capital punishment. It symbolizes crime punishment as

the biggest and most important consequence. The Death penalty can be easily

described as punishment of execution, administered to someone convicted of a capital

crime. Crimes are happening every day, but have different ways of being justified. Many

are pro death penalty when it comes to murder. Others see the death penalty as

inhumane and ineffective. The great debate of this topic has increased over the years,

but the main controversial question still remains: Is the death penalty effective?

Although the legal system has been justifiable to a point, there are many questions to

truly validate the controversial topic. When talking about how effective or whether it is

effective or not, one must ask some questions to validate this controversial topic:

1. What does the death penalty consist of?

2. What are the cost differences between keeping someone for life in prison and the

death penalty?

3. What are some of the administrations of capital punishment and what states

administer them?

4. Is the current death penalty (fifteen years) a sufficient amount of time to remedy all

legal opportunities?

Therefore the following review on literature will: Define what the death penalty

consist of, explain the cost difference between having an inmate sentenced for the

death penalty of having him in prison for life, Finding out the in what ways they
administer death, To see if fifteen years is a sufficient amount of time to remedy all legal

opportunities.

It is very important to know the forms and measures the death penalty consists of. To

begin the person getting the death penalty must have killed a person or equal to that

crime and got sentence to death row. First an inmate is sentenced to life in prison but

then a background check is done and done well to make sure the right person is getting

the right sentenced. Once the prisoner is marked as guilty then the judge makes the

decision on whether or not the crime needs the ultimate capital punishment and if the

person does then gets the death penalty. According to Warden Marvin Polk on

NifterMedia, (2009) the process first starts by assigning the inmate on death row a cell

but has a special assigned cell just for inmates about to get processed. But the cell

does not get closed so that the inmate can walk freely in and out and does have a

television available. Contact visitations are allowed with families and possibly with

friends. Visitations start at ten am and end around 11 pm and have breaks for meals in

between. Special phone calls can be requested if the inmate so desires. Around one am

the warden and the prep team start preparing for it. The prep team is chosen by the

warden but is voluntarily and can be the same people. At one fifty the inmate is put in

the chamber where it will be administered. And there must be witnesses.

 ^

In

1979, the Supreme Court of Rhode Island held that the state's statute imposing a

mandatory death sentence for an inmate who killed a fellow prisoner was

unconstitutional. The legislature repealed the law and removed it from the state criminal

code in 1984.

^^ In 2004, the New York Court of Appeals held that a portion of the state's death

penalty law was unconstitutional. In 2007, the court ruled that its prior holding applied to

the last remaining person on the state's death row. The legislature has voted down

attempts to restore the statute.

* In March 2009, New Mexico voted to abolish the death penalty. However, the repeal

was not retroactive, leaving two people on the state's death row.

** In April 2012, the Connecticut legislature voted to abolish the death penalty for future

crimes. By its terms, the repeal law did not affect the status of the 11 prisoners then on

the state's death row. The Connecticut Supreme Court subsequently ruled in August

2015 that the death penalty violated the state constitution. The Court reaffirmed that

holding in May 2016 and reiterated that the state's remaining death row prisoners must

be resentenced to life without possibility of parole.

# On August 2, 2016, the Delaware Supreme Court held that the state's capital

sentencing procedures were unconstitutional and struck down Delaware's death penalty

statute. On August 15, the Delaware Attorney General's office announced that it will not

appeal the Supreme Court's ruling. Whether the Supreme Court's decision applies to

the 13 people facing active death sentences is still unknown.

Batayan Konseptwal/Theoretical:

Process:
INPUT: Ang mga
Output
Mag hahanda ng mananaliksik ay
mga tanong. nag tungo sa Ang pagayos at
Antipolo pag presenta ng
Naghanap ng mga mga datos mula sa
Immaculate
respondente. panayam na
Conception
School. ginagamitan ng
tabyular.
Nag panayam ng
mga estudyante.

Sanggunian o reperenses ng bibliography:

http://philrights.org/ang-sentensyang-kamatayan-death-penalty-sa-pilipinas/

https://www.wattpad.com/14695710-death-penalty-solusyong-walang-epekto

https://thepinoysite.com/2015/09/29/bakit-kailangang-ibalik-ang-death-penalty-sa-

pilipinas/