Department of Education

NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES

2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
QAME Analysis Form I: Analysis of the Monitoring/Evaluation Results
ANALYSIS OF THE MONITORING/EVALUATION RESULTS
(to be accomplished by Individual Monitors)

Title of the Training Program: SCHOOL-BASED IN-SERVICE TRAINING FOR TEACHERS

Inclusive Dates: January 24-26, 2024
Learning Service Provider (Division/HEI):_Planas Elementary School Class Section: __________________________
Venue: Planas Elementary School Conference Hall_ Proponent: Maryjane B. Tabiano
NAME OF MONITOR: Date Monitored: ___________ Mobile number of Monitor: _________________________

PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation

Based on the results of the evaluation of the session and facilitation done by the participants, as well as the validated observations of the On-Site
monitors, answer the following questions:

1. What are the strong points of the session? Of the facilitator? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.

SESSION TITLE
Session1: Science of Reading
Average Session Rating:
Excellent
Strong Points Factors that helped Areas for Factors that may Recommended Steps
(This may be done Improvement have contributed to Address the
through a Focus-Group to the areas for Issue/s. (Indicate
Discussion) improvement whether action can be
(This may be done immediate or long-
through a Focus- term)
Group Discussion)
There was a complete Lecture videos about There should be more Application of the Clarify things that
power point the topic. engaging sharing of strategies to seems to be inexplicit
presentation. ideas. struggling readers.

Facilitator : The speaker exhibited Joined the district Livelier discussion. The topic is timely Technical assistance
Michelle T. Omela mastery of the topic. orientation. but it made the will be given to
Average Facilitator Rating: participants quite teachers who are still
Excellent weary. confused.

Session2: Early Language,
Literacy and Numeracy
Average Session Rating:
Excellent
Facilitator :
Ana C. Baybado
Average Facilitator Rating:
Excellent
Session3: Overview of D.O 31
s. 2018
Average Session Rating:
Excellent
Facilitator:
Jasmin Iris F. Pad-ay
Average Facilitator Rating:
Excellent
Session4: Child Protection
Policy
Average Session Rating:
Excellent
Facilitator:
Maritess T. Guimmangal
Average Facilitator Rating:
Excellent
Session5: Best Qualities of a
good Mathematics Teacher &
Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
Topic is relevant to our There was an in-depth 100% active There should be Enough time will be
work. discussion with the participation of enough time for given to the
school head and participants the workshop. participants to make
master teacher before their own intervention
the session.
The speaker shares her Participants show More active sharing of The speaker was Longer period will be
knowledge regarding interest on the thoughts being bothered by given to the
the topic session. time constraint. participants to share
enthusiastically. their own
understanding.
Topic was relevant to Complete power point More hands-on activity Integration to the Technical assistance to
our work. presentation and longer time for the DLL teachers
workshop.
The presenter is very Participants show .Computer skills Needs technical Technical assistance
well versed with the strong interest on the assistance. will be given to those
topic that it was taken session. teachers who are still
by the participants confused.
clearly.
Topic are relevant to Lecture videos about Longer time for the The topic is timely Technical assistance
our work. the topic. workshop. but it made the will be given to
participants quite teachers who are still
weary. confused.
The presenter is very The speaker is an ICT Confusion on some Needs technical Technical assistance
well versed with the expert and the details. assistance. will be given to those
topic that it was taken participants are eager teachers who are still
by the participants to learn. confused.
clearly.
There is really a need to Lecture videos about There should be more Lack of time Materials will be
discuss every objective the topic. engaging sharing of provided before the

Classroom Management
Average Session Rating:
Excellent
Facilitator:
Charlyn C. Arquillo
Average Facilitator Rating:
Excellent
Session6: Catch Up Fridays
Average Session Rating:
Excellent
Facilitator :
Michelle T. Omela
Average Facilitator Rating:
Excellent
Session7: Overview of D.O 31
s. 2018
Facilitator:
Dick B. Pad-ay
Average Facilitator Rating:
Excellent
Session8: Safe Space Act
Average Session Rating:
Excellent
Facilitator:
Sheryl D. Chumawin
Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
clearly. ideas session.
The speaker explained Participants show Livelier discussion More engaging of Clarify things that
the topic in a clear and strong interest on the ideas and insights seems to be inexplicit.
effective manner. session.
There was a complete Lecture videos about There should be more Application of the Clarify things that
power point the topic. engaging sharing of strategies to seems to be inexplicit
presentation. ideas. struggling readers.
The speaker exhibited Joined the district Livelier discussion. The topic is timely Technical assistance
mastery of the topic. orientation. but it made the will be given to
participants quite teachers who are still
weary. confused.
Topic was relevant to Complete power point More hands-on activity Integration to the Technical assistance to
our work. presentation and longer time for the DLL teachers
workshop.
The speaker explained Participants show Livelier discussion More engaging of Clarify things that
the topic in a clear and strong interest on the ideas and insights seems to be inexplicit.
effective manner. session.
There is really a need to Lecture videos about There should be more Lack of time Materials will be
discuss every objective the topic. engaging sharing of provided before the
clearly. ideas session.
The speaker explained Participants show Livelier discussion More engaging of Clarify things that
the topic in a clear and strong interest on the ideas and insights seems to be inexplicit.

Average Facilitator Rating:
Excellent
Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
effective manner. session.

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:

Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Proposed Course/s of Action to Address
Standard/s the Deviation
None None None

PART II: Analysis of the Daily Operations of the Training Management

Based on the results of the evaluation of the daily operations, answer the following questions:

1. What are the strong points of the daily operations of the training program? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.

DAY Overall Rating Strong Points Areas for Improvement and Suggestions
1 Excellent There is a need of field application of all the Printed materials will be given before the
topics discussed. session for a smoother flow of discussion.

2 Excellent Speakers mastered the topics. Double check the materials to be used for a
smooth flow of the session
3 Excellent Participants were all open minded and vocal to Enough time will be provided for hands-on
share how they feel on the topic discussed. activity for mastery and for better learning.
AVERAGE RATING Excellent
FOR OPERATIONS

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:

Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the
Standard/s Deviation
None None None
 Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
IMPORTANT: Parts I and II should be used for Debriefing as Feedback to the Program Management Team for information and immediate action
PART III: ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)

AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from “1.0” – “4.0” )

Identify Class Section/s and Program Attainment Delivery of Provision of Program Training Accommodations
batches Management of Objectives Content Support Management Venue
Materials Team
School-based Orientation Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent
on the Administration of
Reading Assessment for
School Year 2022-2023

Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:

SIGNIFICANT LEARNING
1. Application of the learnings through integration to DLL, lesson delivery, and assessment.
2. Importance of reading program and other activities under it.
3. Classroom management should always be kept in mind at all times.
FURTHER LEARNING
1. The learnings gathered in the training should be apply.
2. Sharing of ideas and insight will deepen understanding.
3. Asking for technical assistance should be done if being confused.
COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT
1. Longer period should be allotted for the open forum.
2. There should be a more active participation from the participants.
3. There should be enough time for hands-on activity.

Submitted by: MARYJANE B. TABIANO_ Copy Given to: On-Site QAME Team Leader
Teacher III
 Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City

QAME ANALYSIS FORM 2

SUMMARY OF DAILY MONITORING AND EVALUATION
(to be accomplished by On-Site Team Leader)
Title of Training Program: SCHOOL-BASED ORIENTATION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF READING ASSESSMENT FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2022-2023
Learning Service Provider/Division: Planas Elementary School
 Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
Venue: Planas Elementary School Conference Hall
Inclusive Dates: August 24-26, 2022
Learning Area/s: PPST
Participants: (No. of Participants and General Description): 20 Teachers
Name of On-Site Team Leader: JOEL A. BAYBADO
Mobile Number of On-Site Team Leader: 09273863631

1. What is the daily overall rating of the sessions and facilitators?

Day Overall Session-Facilitator Rating General General Summary of Comments and Suggestions
(Average of General Rating for Sessions Rating for Rating for
and Facilitators) Sessions Facilitators
1 Excellent Excellent Excellent The facilitator mastered the topic and shows willingness to
share her knowledge.
2 Excellent Excellent Excellent The topics discussed were relevant to the participants
3 Excellent Excellent Excellent The facilitator is well-versed.
SITE AVERAGE FOR SESSIONS AND Excellent
FACILITATORS:

Major Observations/ Findings:

________The discussions went through with complete visual presentations._____________________________

2. What is the overall rating of the daily operations of the training program?
Day Overall Summary of Significant Comments and Suggestions
Rating
1 Excellent Longer period should be allotted for the workshop.
2 Excellent The sessions were informative.
3 Excellent The facilitators are knowledgeable about their respected topics discussed.
AVERAGE Excellent
FOR
OPERATIONS
 Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
Major Observations/ Findings:

_Participants were really eager to learn.__________________________________________________________________

3. Are there critical incidents that should be addressed by the Training Program Provider/Management?
CRITICAL INCIDENT/S BASED ON Training Region of Action Taken by the Program Status
STAR Provider Training Management
(Division/TEI) Provider
None None None None None

Major Observations/Findings:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)

AVERAGE RATING PER CRITERIA (Values from “1.0” – “4.0”)

Training Site/Venue Program Attainment Delivery of Provision of Program Training Accommodations
Management of Objectives Content Support Management Venue
Materials Team
Planas Elementary School Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Good
Conference Hall
SITE AVERAGE: Excellent
*Average of ALL 7 criteria within a training site/venue

Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:

SIGNIFICANT LEARNING
1. How to conduct reading assessment to every Grade.
2. Create strategies in dealing with struggling readers.
 Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
2nd Floor, Mabini Building, DepEd Complex
Meralco Avenue, Pasig City
3. Work efficiently to have a reliable result of the reading assessment

FURTHER LEARNING
1. The concepts, importance and guidelines in conducting reading assessment.
2. Apply the stages in administering reading assessment.
3. Learned about the strategies in making interventions in reading.
COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT
1. The session was managed efficiently
2. The speakers are knowledgeable enough in facilitating the topics.
3. The orientation is timely.

1. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE TRAINING PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS:

Set a longer period for the training.

2. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY ACTION:

Validate the effectiveness of the training by monitoring the implementation of what has been learned.

Submitted by: MICHELLE T. OMELA Copy Given to: On-Site QAME Team Leader
Teacher III