You are on page 1of 36

INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Table 1:Tailrace Estimation for cascade

Quantity
Sectional
S.N. Description Unit NOS Length Width Height Quantity (Increased
Area
by 5%)
A Demolition
1 Concrete
At the base of canal
i m3 1 10.87 0.7 1.4 - 10.65 11.19
which to be demolish
At the existing wall
ii m3 1 10.87 0.6 5.52 - 36.00 37.80
which to be demolish
Total 46.65 48.99

B Excavation
i At Stoplog m3 1 2.9 7.1 5.03 - 103.57 108.75
3
ii At Tailrace Canal m 1 - - 7.1 33.08 234.87 246.61
Total 338.44 355.36

C Fill Zone 3B
i At Stoplog m3 1 2.9 7.1 0.3 - 6.18 6.49
ii At Tailrace Canal
a Side wall of canal m3 1 - - 0.3 5.27 1.58 1.66
Tailrace slab after
b m3 1 - - 0.3 - 0.00 0.00
stoplog
c Side wall of canal m3 1 - - 0.3 6.46 1.94 2.04
Total 9.70 10.18

PCC (0.1 m C8/10 :


D
X0)
i At Stoplog m3 1 2.9 7.1 0.1 - 2.06 2.16
ii At Tailrace Canal
a Left Side wall of canal m3 1 - - 0.1 5.27 0.53 0.55
Tailrace slab after
b m3 1 5.1 3.4 0.3 - 5.20 5.46
stoplog
Right Side wall of
c m3 1 - - 0.1 6.46 0.65 0.68
canal
Total 3.23 3.39

E RCC (C25/30 : XC2)


i At Stoplog m3 1 2.9 - - 16.88 48.95 51.40

Annex II-2
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

ii At Tailrace Canal
1 Left Side wall of canal
a Wall m3 1 - - 5.52 3.30 18.24 19.15
3
b Foundation m 1 - - 1 1.30 1.30 1.37
2 Right Side wall of canal
a Wall m3 1 - - 5.52 3.30 18.24 19.15
3
b Foundation m 1 - - 1 1.30 1.30 1.37
3 Slab m3 1 - - 1 5.53 5.53 5.80
Total 141.46 148.53

F Formwork
1 For PCC (0.1 m C8/10 : X0)
i At Stoplog m2 2 2.9 - 0.1 - 0.58 0.61
ii At Tailrace Canal
a Left Side wall of canal m2 1 17.20 - 0.1 - 1.72 1.81
Right Side wall of
b m2 1 22.71 - 0.1 - 2.27 2.38
canal
Total 4.57 4.80

For RCC (C25/30 :


b
XC2)
i At Stoplog
Left and right side of
1 m2 2 2.9 - 5.2 - 30.16 31.67
stoplog
u/s and d/s side of
2 m2 2 2.9 - 1.2 - 6.96 7.31
stoplog
u/s and d/s side of
3 m2 2 2.9 - 5.1 - 29.58 31.06
stoplog
Left and right side of
4 m2 2 2.9 - 2.4 - 13.92 14.62
stoplog
5 Closing formwork m2 2 - - - 29.12 58.24 61.15
vi Stoplog Groove m2 2 6 - 0.5 6.00 6.30
ii At Tailrace Canal
a Left Side wall of canal m2 1 17.95 - 5.52 -
b Foundation of canal m2 1 7.73 - 1 - 7.73 8.12
Right Side wall of
c m2 1 22.71 - 5.52 -
canal
d Foundation of canal m2 1 10.28 - 1 - 10.28 10.79
Total 162.87 171.01

Annex II-3
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

G Construction Joint (with water stop) Type A


At the side of stoplog
i Rm 1 9.06 9.06 9.51
groove
Total 9.06 9.51
H Backfilling (As per site condition)
i At Stoplog m3 1 10.63 25.97 276.05 289.85
3
ii At new wall of canal m 1 37.70 12.69 478.25 502.16
Total 754.30 792.02

Table 2: Abstract of Detail Estimation.

S.N.
Description Unit Quantity

1 Demolition of existing wall of Chilime HEP cu.m 48.99

2 Excavation for stoplog, tailrace canal and new wall for canal cu.m 355.36

3 Fill zone 3B cu.m 10.18

4 PCC C8/10:X0 cu.m 3.39

5 RCC C25/30:XC2 cu.m 148.53

6 Formwork sq. m 171.01

7 Rebar metric ton 27.45

8 Construction Joint rm 9.51

9 Backfilling cu.m 792.02

Annex II-4
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Table 3: Concreting at birfurcation area form el 1743.40 to el.1746.70

S.N Description Unit No. Length (m) Breadth Height (m) Volume (m3)
(m)
A Concrete (C25/30:XC2) at Bifurcation Area ( el 1743.40 to el.1746.70
1 Bifurcation area m3 1 C.S.A=153.34 3.30 506.02
2 Corbel Section m3 1 20.40 C.S.A=0.04 0.82
B Deductions
1 Bifurcation Pipes
1.1 1.06 dia near MIV 1 C.S.A = 0.94 17.40 16.42
Tappered Intersection at m3 2 C.S.A= 0.99 1.54 3.04
1.2
Unit-2
1.3 1.5 dai pipe 1 C.S.A=1.87 12.53 23.46
Tappered Intersection at 2 C.S.A =1.47 1.54 4.54
1.4
Unit-3
1.5 dia to 1.06 dia tappered m3 1 C.S.A = 1.50 1.94 2.90
1.5
pipe
1.6 1.8 dia pipe 1 C.S.A = 2.71 1.76 4.76
2 Staircase 3 1 C.S.A = 0.42 1.25
TOTAL 450.47

Annex II-5
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Design of Side drainage:

INPUT PARAMETERS:

A. Unpaved gravel road surface and shoulders


Length of the road L = 100
m
Width of the road W = 5 m
Area of the road A1 = 500 m2

B. Area of land on the other side drain


As per site
Length of the road L = 0.021 m
condition
Width of the road W = 0.8 m
Build up area A2 = 0.02 m2

C. Area of land covered by grass


Area of the land A3 = 0 m2

5.00E-
Hence, total catchments area (A1 + A2 + A3) AT = km2
04

D. Surface runoff coefficient (C)


Coefficient of gravel surface C1 = 0.35
Coefficient of build up C2 = 0.8
Coefficient of soil covered with grass C3 = 0.1
Weighted value of runoff Coefficient C = 0.35

Therefore, the runoff coefficient C = 0.30

E. Rainfall intensity (I)


From Kirpich's equation:
Slope of catchment S = 35 %
Time of concentration tc = 1.01 min

i. Empirical Formula for North India


Intensity of rainfall I = 8.22 cm/hr

Annex II-6
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

ii. British Ministry Formula, Birdie Book


Intensity of rainfall I = 69.02 mm/hr

iii. From P.C. Jha


Intensity of rainfall I = 102.6 mm/hr

F. Stormwater runoff (Q)


Surface runoff coefficient C = 0.30
Maximum rainfall intensity I = 102.6 mm/hr
Size of surface area to be drained A = 5.00E-04 km2
3
Peak stormwater runoff Q = 0.004 m /sec

Therefore, quantity of rain water surface runoff (Q) = 0.004 m3/sec

1. For Trapezoidal section


Design discharge Q = 0.005 m3/sec
Velocity of flow (for lined structure) v = 1.5 m/sec
2
Cross section area A = 0.003 m
Therefore, the required cross section area is 0.003 m2

Consider the trapezoidal section:


Suppose, the bottom width b = 0.5 m
Side slope S = 2:1
i.e. z = 2
Calculation
Let the free water body FB = 0.15 m
Vertical height d = 0.006 m
Horizontal length B = 0.51 m
D = 0.156 m
Top width = 0.81 m
Effective Area Aeff = 0.003 m2

Length of two
Wetted perimeter is equal to the total length of the wetted area = side slope +
Bottom Length
Bottom length = 0.5 m

Annex II-7
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

B= b+2zd
Length of side slope is calculated below;
slope of trapezoid (1:z); where z=2
Area = 0.5× (B+b) × d
A= 0.003 m2
b = 0.6 m D
B= b+2zd m
2d2 + 0.5 d – 0.003=0 d
On solving d= 0.006m

Fig: Trapezoid Section


From Pythagoras theorem,
s = 0.014 m

Wetted perimeter P = 0.527 m

For longitudinal slope


From Manning’s formula
Hydraulic Radius R = 0.006 m
Manning’s roughness coefficient n = 0.02
Velocity of flow v = 1.5 m/s
Longitudinal slope (Bed slope) S0 = 0.865

Therefore, the proposed slope for the side drainage is 0.865

0.81

0.006 0.156
1
z
Here, z = 2 0.5

All dimensions are in meters.

Annex II-8
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

2. For Rectangular Section:


INPUT
PARAMETERS:
Quantity of rain water surface runoff Q = 0.004 m3/sec
Velocity of flow v = 1.5 m/sec
Cross section area A = 0.003 m2

Required dimension
Suppose the bottom width = 0.5 m
Free water body = 0.15 m
Calculation
Consider the formula of rectangular section
Width b = 0.5 m
Area A = 0.003 m2
Height d = 0.006 m
Let the free water body FB = 0.15 m
Total depth D = 0.156 m

Longitudinal slope
Using Manning’s formula
Area A = 0.003 m2
Wetted perimeter P = 0.51 m
Hydraulic Radius R = 0.01 m
Manning’s roughness coefficient n = 0.03
Velocity of flow v = 1.5 m/s
Longitudinal slope S = 1.432

Therefore, the proposed slope for the side drainage is 1.432

0.156
0.006

0.5

All dimension are in meters.

Annex II-9
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Catchment Area:
Google Earth:

Fig: Catchment area from Google earth

Annex II-10
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Fig: Catchment area calculation by GIS

Annex II-11
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Hydrology Study:
WECS:

WECS/HYDEST method
Monsoon Wettness Index(MWI,mm) 1200
A below 3000 (sq. km.) 1.04
A below 5000 (sq. km.) 16.16
Total area of basin (sq. km.) 16.16

MEAN MONTHLY FLOW


COEFFICIENT TABLE
MONTH C A1 A2 A3
JAN 0.01423 0 0.9777 0
FEB 0.01219 0 0.9766 0
MAR 0.009988 0 0.9948 0
APR 0.007974 0 1.0435 0
MAY 0.008434 0 1.0898 0
JUN 0.006943 0.9968 0 0.261
JUL 0.02123 0 1.0093 0.2523
AUG 0.02548 0 0.9963 0.262
SEP 0.01677 0 0.9894 0.2878
OCT 0.009724 0 0.988 0.2508
NOV 0.00176 0.9605 0 0.391
DEC 0.001485 0.9536 0 0.3607

FLOW DURATION CURVE


Discharge
Percentage of exceedence (m3/s)
0 5.98
5 3.27
10 2.69
20 1.53
30 0.97
40 0.42
50 0.32
60 0.21
70 0.18

Annex II-12
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

80 0.15
90 0.11
95 0.09
100 0.06

MEAN MONTHLY FLOW DATA CALCULATION


MONTH DISCHARGE
(m3/s)
JAN 0.23
FEB 0.20
MAR 0.17
APR 0.15
MAY 0.19
JUN 0.71
JUL 2.24
AUG 2.77
SEP 2.15
OCT 0.95
NOV 0.41
DEC 0.27

Annex II-13
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

FLOW DURATION CURVE


7

5
dischargem3/sec)

0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
percentage of exceedence

Fig: Flow duration curve of Sanjen Khola

MIP method:

S.N. Descriptions Value Unit

1 Hydrological Region 1 See table 1

2 Basin Area 16.16 km2


3 Area below 5000 mamsL 16.16 km2
4 Area below 3000 mamsL 1.04 km2
5 Monsoon Wetness Index (MWI) 1200 mm
6 Month of Guaging April
7 Flow measured using wading method 0.233 m3/s

Annex II-14
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Discharge in
Discharge Probability of
Month C Rank (n) Frequency(f) descending
m3/s exceedance
order

January 2.4 0.56 1 12.00 8.33 5.83

February 1.8 0.42 2 6.00 16.67 3.84

March 1.3 0.30 3 4.00 25.00 3.38

April 1 0.23 4 3.00 33.33 1.86

May 2.6 0.61 5 2.40 41.67 0.96

June 6 1.40 6 2.00 50.00 1.40

July 14.5 3.38 7 1.71 58.33 0.72

August 25 5.83 8 1.50 66.67 0.56

September 16.5 3.84 9 1.33 75.00 0.61

October 8 1.86 10 1.20 83.33 0.42

November 4.1 0.96 11 1.09 91.67 0.30

December 3.1 0.72 12 1.00 100.00 0.23

FLOW CALCULATION

0% 5.83

10% 3.80

20% 3.08

30% 1.72

Annex II-15
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

40% 1.22

45% 0.98

50% 0.84

60% 0.65

70% 0.57

80% 0.45

90% 0.31

100% 0.23

Flow Duration Curve


7
6
5
Discharge

4
3
2
1
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Probability of exceedance

Fig: Flow duration curve of Sanjen Khola

Annex II-16
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

CAR Method:
MONTHLY FLOW AT CHILIME
DISCHARGE
MONTH
(m3/sec)
Jan 3.15
Feb 2.73
Mar 3.42
Apr 5.82
May 10.82
Jun 23.4
Jul 43.07
Aug 48.03
Sep 33.97
Oct 14.92
Nov 7
Dec 4.28
Year 16.81

MONTHLY FLOW AT CHHUPCHUNG


Jan 0.23
Feb 0.20
Mar 0.25
Apr 0.42
May 0.78
Jun 1.69
Jul 3.11
Aug 3.47
Sep 2.45
Oct 1.08
Nov 0.51
Dec 0.31
Yearly 1.21

Annex II-17
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

FLOW CALCULATION
0% 48.03
10% 42.16
20% 31.856
30% 20.856
40% 13.28
45% 11.025
50% 8.91
60% 6.292
70% 4.742
80% 3.592
90% 3.177
100% 2.73

Ratio calculation
River Catchment
Chhupchung 16.16
Chilime 224
Ratio 0.072

FDC of Chilimi
60

50

40

30

20

10

0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Fig: FCD of Chilime

Annex II-18
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

FDC of Chhupchung khola


4
3.5
3
Discharge (m3/s)

2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
% of Exceedence

Fig: Flow duration curve of Chhupchung Khola

Flow Duration Curve


7.00

6.00

5.00
Discharge (m3/s)

4.00
MIP
3.00 WECS
CAR
2.00

1.00

0.00
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110%
Percentage of exceedance

Fig: Comparison of FDC from MIP/WECS/CAR

Annex II-19
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Hydrograph
7.00

6.00

5.00
Discharge

4.00
MIP
3.00 WECS
CAR
2.00

1.00

0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Months

Fig: Comparison of Q40 from MIP/WECS/CAR

Annex II-20
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Quantity Estimation of Gabion in Access Road:


Table 4: Estimation of Gabion
Consecutive
Length
Item Description Unit Area (m2) average Quantity
(m)
area (m2)

1 Structure Cut

At chainage
a m³ 7.152 -
8,870.00 - -
At chainage
b m³ 11.817 94.85
8+880.00 10.00 9.485
At chainage
c m³ 6.118 89.68
8+890.00 10.00 8.968
At chainage
d m³ 8.657 73.87
8+900.00 10.00 7.387
At chainage
e m³ 3.517 -
9+060.00 - -
At chainage
f m³ 5.847 46.82
9+070.00 10.00 4.682
At chainage
g m³ 4.025 49.36
9+080.00 10.00 4.936
At chainage
h m³ 3.631 38.28
9+090.00 10.00 3.828
At chainage
i m³ 5.439 -
9+160.00 - -
At chainage
j m³ 9.399 74.19
9+170.00 10.00 7.419
At chainage
k m³ 4.519 69.59
9+180.00 10.00 6.959
At chainage
l m³ 5.468 49.94
9+190.00 10.00 4.994

TOTAL STRUCTURE CUT 586.580

2 Drain Cut
At chainage
a m³ 0.6311 -
8+870.00 - -
At chainage
b m³ 0.7136 6.72
8+880.00 10.00 0.672
At chainage
c m³ 0.7136 7.14
8+890.00 10.00 0.714
At chainage
d m³ 0.604 6.59
8+900.00 10.00 0.659
At chainage
e m³ 0.6311 -
9+060.00 - -

Annex II-21
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

At chainage
f m³ 0.6311 6.31
9+070.00 10.00 0.631
At chainage
g m³ 0.6311 6.31
9+080.00 10.00 0.631
At chainage
h m³ 0.6311 6.31
9+090.00 10.00 0.631
At chainage
i m³ 1.4 -
9+160.00 - -
At chainage
j m³ 1.3592 13.80
9+170.00 10.00 1.380
At chainage
k m³ 1.662 15.11
9+180.00 10.00 1.511
At chainage
l m³ 1.7204 16.91
9+190.00 10.00 1.691

TOTAL DRAIN CUT 85.195

3 Backfilling
At chainage
a m³ 0.718 -
8+870.00 - -
At chainage
b m³ 0.726 7.22
8+880.00 10.00 0.722
At chainage
c m³ 0.642 6.84
8+890.00 10.00 0.684
At chainage
d m³ 0.604 6.23
8+900.00 10.00 0.623

At chainage
e m³ 0.100 -
9+060.00 - -
At chainage
f m³ 0.336 2.18
9+070.00 10.00 0.218
At chainage
g m³ 0.107 2.22
9+080.00 10.00 0.222
At chainage
h m³ 10.00 0.100 0.104 1.04
9+090.00
At chainage
i m³ 2.671 -
9+160.00 - -
At chainage
j m³ 3.817 32.44
9+170.00 10.00 3.244
At chainage
k m³ 1.897 28.57
9+180.00 10.00 2.857
At chainage
l m³ 3.090 24.94
9+190.00 10.00 2.494

TOTAL FILLING 111.666

Annex II-22
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Cost estimation of Head works of SUHEP:

Table 5: Estimation of Weir

Length Breadth Height Area Volume


S.N Description Unit No.
(m) (m) (m) (m2) (m3)
1 Earthwork m3 1 9.7 52.1 505.37
2 Soling
u/s Apron
a. Key 1 9.7 0.5 0.2 0.97
Raft 1 9.7 9 0.2 17.46
Weir
b. Raft (Straight) 1 9.7 5.5 0.2 10.67
m3
Raft (Inclined) 1 9.7 0.28 0.2 0.5432
d/s Apron
Key 1 9.7 0.5 0.2 0.97
c.
Raft (Straight) 1 9.7 10.6 0.2 20.564
Raft (Inclined) 1 9.7 1.84 0.2 3.5696
TOTAL 54.75
3 PCC
u/s Apron
a. Key 1 9.7 0.5 0.1 0.485
Raft 1 9.7 9 0.1 8.73
Weir
b. Raft (Straight) 1 9.7 5.5 0.1 5.335
m3
Raft (Inclined) 1 9.7 0.28 0.1 0.2716
d/s Apron
Key 1 9.7 0.5 0.1 0.485
c.
Raft (Straight) 1 9.7 10.6 0.1 10.282
Raft (Inclined) 1 9.7 1.84 0.1 1.7848
TOTAL 27.37
4 Concrete
u/s Apron
a. Key 1 9.7 3 29.1
Raft 1 9.7 6.5 63.05
b. Weir m3 1 9.7 15.7 152.29
d/s Apron
c. Key 1 9.7 3.4 32.98
Raft 1 9.7 17.4 168.78
TOTAL 446.2
5 Formwork

Annex II-23
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

u/s Apron
m2
Key PCC 1 21.4 0.1 2.14
Length Breadth Height Area Volume
Description Unit No.
(m) (m) (m) (m2) (m3)
a.
Key (Concrete O/F) 1 11.45 4.3 49.235
Key (Concrete I/F) 1 10.2 3.8 38.76
Raft (PCC) 1 37.7 0.1 3.77
Raft (Concrete) 1 27.85 0.8 22.28
Weir
PCC 1 15.45 0.1 1.545
b.
Concrete 2 31.4
Face
m2
d/s Apron
Raft (PCC) 2m thick 1 30.5 0.1 3.05
Raft (PCC) 1.7m thick 1 30.5 0.1 3.05
Key (PCC) 1 21.4 0.1 2.14
c.
Raft (Concrete) 2m thick 1 31 2 62
Raft (Concrete) 1.7m thick 1 31 1.7 52.7
Key (Concrete) (I/F) 1 10.7 2.6 27.82
Key (Concrete) (O/F) 1 10.2 4.3 43.86
TOTAL 343.75

Table 6: Estimation of Intake and trashrack

Length Breadth Height Area Volume


S.N Description Unit No.
(m) (m) (m) (m2) (m3 )
1 Earthwork m3 1 15.6 9.4646 147.64776
TOTAL 147.65
Soling
2 Raft m3 1 15.6 5.51 0.2 17.1912
Cutoff 1 15.6 0.25 0.2 0.78
TOTAL 17.9712
PCC
3 Raft m3 1 15.6 5.51 0.1 8.5956
Cutoff 1 15.6 0.25 0.1 0.39
TOTAL 8.9856
Concrete
Flood wall 3 4.4 0.47 3.9 24.1956
3
4 Pier middle m 2 4.3 2.77 0.7 16.6754
Pier edge 2 4.3 2.77 0.5 11.911
Cutoff 1 15.6 2.3 0.45 16.146

Annex II-24
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Raft 1 15.6 5.51 0.3 25.7868


TOTAL 94.7148
5 Formwork
Concrete
Flood wall 3 10.2 3.9 119.34
Pier middle 2 10.8 2.77 59.832
a.
Pier edge 2 10.4 2.77 57.616
m2
Cutoff 1 32.6 2.3 74.98
Raft 1 43 0.3 12.9
PCC
b. Raft 1 43 0.1 4.3
Cutoff 1 32.6 0.1 3.26

Table 7: Estimation of Gravel Trap

S.N Description Unit No. Length Breadth Height Area Volume


(m) (m) (m) (m2) (m3)
1 Earthwork m3 1 5.5 132.45 728.475
TOTAL 728.475
2 Soling
a. At inlet 1 6.4 4.5 0.2 5.76
m3
b. At transition zone 1 16.82 6.9 0.2 23.2116
TOTAL 28.9716
3 PCC
a. At inlet 1 6.4 4.5 0.1 2.88
m3
b. At outlet 1 16.82 6.9 0.1 11.6058
TOTAL 14.4858
4 Concrete
a. Inlet zone (inclined) wall 2 0.5 18.0778 18.0778
b. Inlet zone (inclined) slab 1 0.5 20.4055 10.20275
m3
c. Transition zone wall 2 6.53 6.7605 88.29213
d. Transition zone slab 1 6.9 8.2758 57.10302

Annex II-25
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

e. Above flushing canal 1 6.9 1.582 10.9158


f. For flushing canal 1 6.9 1.01 6.969
TOTAL 244.2075
5 Stone Masonry
a. Above flushing canal m3 1 6.9 7.63 52.647
TOTAL 52.647
6 Formwork
Concrete
Inlet zone wall (Outer) 2 21.3814 42.7628
Inlet zone wall (Inner) 2 19.17 38.34
Transition zone wall (Inner) 2 97.16 194.32
a. Transition zone wall (Outer) m2 2 96.49 192.98
Above flushing canal 2 3.66 7.32
Inlet zone slab 2 24.2 0.5 12.1 24.2
Transition zone slab 2 40.8 0.5 20.4 40.8
For flushing canal (slab) 2 1.2 2.4
PCC
Inlet zone 2 0.7 1.4
b. 2
Transition zone m 2 6.9 13.8
Flushing canal 2 0.38 0.76
TOTAL 559.0828

Table 8: Estimation of Settling Basin

S.N Description Unit No. Length Breadth Height Area Volume


(m) (m) (m) (m2) (m3)
1 Earthwork m3 1 80.7 839.69 135525.966
TOTAL 135525.966
2 Soling
a. At Inlet 2 0.2 141.08 56.432
m3
b. At Transition Zone 2 60.3 10.77 0.2 259.7724
TOTAL 316.2044
PCC
a. At Inlet 2 0.1 141.08 28.216
m3
b. At Outlet 2 60.3 10.77 0.1 129.8862
TOTAL 158.1022
Concrete
Inlet zone (Inclined) wall 4 0.5 111.77 223.54
4 3
Inlet zone (Inclined) slab m 2 0.4 142.89 114.312
Transition zone wall 3 9.12 29.57 809.0352

Annex II-26
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Transition zone slab 2 0.4 27.04 21.632


Above flushing canal 2 10.71 6.6 141.372
For flushing canal 2 10.71 2.63 56.3346
TOTAL 1998.1158
5 Stone Masonry
a. At outlet m3 2 10.71 29.5 631.89
TOTAL 631.89
6 Formwork
Concrete
Inlet zone wall (Outer) 4 119.03 476.12
Inlet zone wall (Inner) 4 109.75 439
Transition zone wall 2 584.075 1168.15
(Inner)
a. Transition zone wall 2 610.2 1220.4
(Outer)
Above flushing canal m2 4 6.87 27.48
Inlet zone slab 4 56.55 0.4 22.62 90.48
Transition zone slab 4 142.72 0.4 57.088 228.352
For flushing canal (slab) 2 7.483 14.966
PCC
Inlet zone 2 55.5 0.1 5.55 11.1
b.
Transition zone 2 142.6 0.1 14.26 28.52
Flushing canal 2 32.22 0.1 3.222 6.444
TOTAL 3711.012

Table 9: Details of cost

S.N Details of Work Unit Quantity Rate Amount(Rs.) Remarks


A Excavation
I Weir 505.37 345 174352.65
3
ii Intake/Trashrack m 147.65 345 50938.48
iii Gravel Trap 728.48 345 251323.88
iv Settling Basin 67762.98 345 23378229.14

Annex II-27
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Hydrological Flood analysis:

Station number: 627.5


Location: Helambu
Latitude: 28˚ 02ʹ 21ʺ
River: Melamchi Khola Longitude: 85˚ 32ʹ 07ʺ
Table 10: Melamchi Khola Flood data

MAX.
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Q(Y)
1990 4.5 3.9 4.05 3.9 6.5 21.6 77.7 44.2 37.6 27.9 13.8 5.5 77.7
1991 3.75 3.6 3.6 3.15 4.75 20.1 45.4 47.1 40.3 12.3 6.78 5 47.1
1992 3.79 3.62 3.07 3.07 5.17 22 28.8 37.1 27 16.4 8.13 5.75 37.1
1993 3.96 3.21 2.94 6.37 7.64 22 33.5 47.1 27 15.1 6.58 3.79 47.1
1994 2.94 2.52 2.84 2.48 3.21 19.9 31.1 35.4 26.5 14.4 8.13 5.34 35.4
1995 3.48 3.35 5.55 10.9 29.2 42 32.5 35.1 26.1 14.2 50.2 7.4 50.2
1996 3.35 3.03 2.57 2.94 8.87 23.7 29.4 41.4 26.8 13.3 5.75 2.66 41.4
1997 1.63 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.63
1998 1.8 0.959 0.912 2.71 6.51 38.4 56.7 45.5 33.1 19.5 10.6 7 56.7
1999 3.53 2.28 2.45 2.87 12.7 46.4 34.1 33.5 27.9 31.3 6.92 NA 46.4
2000 2.25 2.25 1.43 6.99 65.7 103 256 288 192 39.6 13.2 5.54 288
2001 2.25 1.67 1.56 1.94 3.68 19.2 26.1 40 38.7 18 12.4 8.92 40
2002 5.46 3.8 3.53 4.61 9.03 18 42.5 46.3 35.2 24.4 16.1 8.6 46.3
2003 5.24 4.2 7.96 8.49 5.83 37.6 42.9 42.3 42.1 24.8 11.3 6.56 42.9
2004 4.4 3.8 4.47 4.74 8.49 46.2 39.7 41.6 44.7 18.4 11.6 7 46.2
2005 5.9 5.24 4.74 5.17 8.39 20.1 43.2 40 30 20.5 11.6 5.46 43.2
2006 4.33 3.87 5.03 4.95 4.27 19.2 34.9 16.1 11.5 8.37 5.34 3.35 34.9
MAX
Q
(M) 5.9 5.24 7.96 10.9 65.7 103 256 288 192 39.6 50.2 8.92

Annex II-28
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Log Pearson III and Log normal distribution method of flood analysis:

Table 11: Flood data.

Sanjen Q. z=
Sn. Year Melanchi Corr. Coeff ẑ (z-ẑ)3
(x) log(x)
1 1990 77.7 11.11 1.05 0.02
2 1991 47.1 6.74 0.83 0.00
3 1992 37.1 5.31 0.72 0.00
4 1993 47.1 6.74 0.83 0.00
5 1994 35.4 5.06 0.70 0.00
6 1995 50.2 7.18 0.86 0.00
7 1996 41.4 5.92 0.77 0.00
8 1997 1.63 0.23 -0.63 -2.78
9 1998 56.7 0.14 8.11 0.91 0.773 0.00
10 1999 46.4 6.64 0.82 0.00
11 2000 288 41.19 1.61 0.60
12 2001 40 5.72 0.76 0.00
13 2002 46.3 6.62 0.82 0.00
14 2003 42.9 6.14 0.79 0.00
15 2004 46.2 6.61 0.82 0.00
16 2005 43.2 6.18 0.79 0.00
17 2006 34.9 4.99 0.70 0.00

σz 0.42
∑(z-ẑ)3 -2.160
N 17
CS -2.079

For Cs = -0.027, Kz = f(Cs ,T)


Recurring intervals in T years
Coeffcient of skew, Cs
2 10 25 50 100 200 1000
-1.8 0.28 0.95 1.04 1.07 1.09 1.10 1.13
-2.2 0.33 0.84 0.89 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.91
-2.079 0.32 0.87 0.93 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.98

Annex II-29
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Table 12: Flood data from Log Pearson III.

LOG PEARSON III


Year,T K Zt Xt=antilogZt
2 0.32 0.91 8.05
5 0.53 0.99 9.85
10 0.87 1.14 13.80
20 0.89 1.15 14.06
50 0.95 1.17 14.86
100 0.96 1.18 14.99
200 0.96 1.18 15.05
500 0.97 1.18 15.12
1000 0.98 1.18 15.23

Table 13: Flood data form Log Normal Distribution.

LOG NORMAL DISTRIBUTION


T K Zt Xt=antilogZt
2 0.28 0.89 7.79
5 0.53 1.00 9.90
10 0.95 1.17 14.77
20 0.98 1.18 15.22
50 1.07 1.22 16.65
100 1.09 1.23 16.94
200 1.10 1.23 17.11
500 1.11 1.24 17.31
1000 1.13 1.25 17.66

Annex II-30
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

FLOOD DISCHARGE COMPARISON


20

18

16

14
DISCHARGE(m3/s)

12

10

0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
YEAR (T)

LOG PEARSON III LOG NORMAL

Fig: Comparison of Flood Disccharge Log Pearson III and Log normal

Annex II-31
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

WECS Method:
Table 14: Flood data.

Return Period (T) (yrs) Standard normal Variant (S)


2 0
5 0.842
10 1.282
20 1.645
50 2.054
100 2.326
200 2.576
500 2.878
1000 3.09
5000 3.54
10000 3.719

Monsoon Wettness Index(MWI,mm) 1200


Area below 3000 (sq. km.) 1.04
Area below 5000 (sq. km.) 16.16
Area above 5000 (sq.km)
Total area of basin (sq. km.) 16.16

Table 15: Flood calculation by WECS

YEAR,T S FLOOD (PEAK) DISCHARGE(QF)


DAILY INSTANTENOUS
2 0 1.61 3.51
5 0.842 2.82 7.11
10 1.282 3.78 10.29
20 1.645 4.81 13.95
50 2.054 6.31 19.66
100 2.326 7.57 24.69
200 2.576 8.94 30.46
500 2.878 10.93 39.24
1000 3.09 12.59 46.87

Annex II-32
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Formulee:
0.8154 x (A below 3000m
Q2 daily +1)0.9527 1.608257
4.144 x(A below
Q100 daily 3000m+1)0.8448 7.568247

1.8767x (A below
Q2 inst 3000m+1)0.8783 3.51029
14.630x(A below 3000m+
Q100 inst 1)0.7343 24.69481
QF e (lnQ2 +S.σlnQF)
σlnQF ln(Q100/Q2)/2.326

FLOOD USING WECS


50.00
45.00
40.00
DISCHARGE (m3/s)

35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
YEAR (T)

DAILY INSTANTENOUS

Fig: Flood discharge calculation by WECS

Annex II-33
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Gumbel’s Method:
Table 16: Given data.

River Catchment below 3000m Units


Melamchi 113 m2
Chhupchung 16.16 m2
corr. Coeff. 0.14300885

Sn. YEAR MAX. Q X


1 1990 77.7 11.112
2 1991 47.1 6.736
3 1992 37.1 5.306
4 1993 47.1 6.736
5 1994 35.4 5.063
6 1995 50.2 7.179
7 1996 41.4 5.921
8 1997 1.63 0.233
9 1998 56.7 8.109
10 1999 46.4 6.636
11 2000 288 41.187
12 2001 40 5.720
13 2002 46.3 6.621
14 2003 42.9 6.135
15 2004 46.2 6.607
16 2005 43.2 6.178
17 2006 34.9 4.991

average Q. 8.263

σz 8.7358

Annex II-34
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Table 17: Reduce Mean yn in Gumbel's Extreme Value Distribution.


N = Sample
size
N 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 0.4952 0.4996 0.5035 0.5070 0.5100 0.5128 0.5157 0.5181 0.5202 0.5220
20 0.5236 0.5252 0.5268 0.5283 0.5296 0.5309 0.5320 0.5332 0.5343 0.5353
30 0.5362 0.5371 0.5380 0.5388 0.5396 0.5402 0.5410 0.5418 0.5424 0.5430
40 0.5436 0.5442 0.5448 0.5453 0.5458 0.5463 0.5468 0.5473 0.5477 0.5481
50 0.5485 0.5489 0.5493 0.5497 0.5501 0.5504 0.5508 0.5511 0.5515 0.5518
60 0.5521 0.5524 0.5527 0.5530 0.5533 0.5535 0.5538 0.5540 0.5543 0.5545
70 0.5548 0.5550 0.5552 0.5555 0.5557 0.5559 0.5561 0.5563 0.5565 0.5567
80 0.5569 0.5570 0.5572 0.5574 0.5576 0.5578 0.5580 0.5581 0.5583 0.5585
90 0.5586 0.5587 0.5589 0.5591 0.5592 0.5593 0.5595 0.5596 0.5598 0.5599
100 0.5600

Table 18: Reduce standard deviation Sn in Gumbel's Extreme Value Distribution.

N = Sample size
N 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 0.9496 0.9676 0.9833 0.9971 1.0095 1.0206 1.0316 1.0411 1.0493 1.0565
20 1.0628 1.0696 1.0754 1.0811 1.0864 1.0915 1.0961 1.1004 1.1047 1.1086
30 1.1124 1.1159 1.1193 1.1226 1.1255 1.1285 1.1313 1.1339 1.1363 1.1388
40 1.1413 1.1436 1.1458 1.1480 1.1499 1.1519 1.1538 1.1557 1.1574 1.1590
50 1.1607 1.1623 1.1638 1.1658 1.1667 1.1681 1.1696 1.1708 1.1721 1.1734
60 1.1747 1.1759 1.1770 1.1782 1.1793 1.1803 1.1814 1.1824 1.1834 1.1844
70 1.1854 1.1863 1.1873 1.1881 1.1890 1.1898 1.1906 1.1915 1.1923 1.1930
80 1.1938 1.1945 1.1953 1.1959 1.1967 1.1973 1.1980 1.1987 1.1994 1.2001
90 1.2007 1.2013 1.2020 1.2026 1.2032 1.2038 1.2044 1.2049 1.2055 1.2060
100 1.2065

Annex II-35
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

Table 19: For return period T,


T YT Ȳn Sn K XT =ẋ +K.
2 0.367 -0.146 6.991
5 1.500 0.943 16.501
10 2.250 1.664 22.798
20 2.970 2.355 28.838
50 3.902 0.5181 1.0411 3.250 36.656
100 4.600 3.921 42.515
200 5.296 4.589 48.352
500 6.214 5.471 56.053
1000 6.907 6.137 61.874

FLOOD USING GUMBEL


70.000

60.000

50.000
DISCHARGE(m3/s)

40.000

30.000

20.000

10.000

0.000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
YEAR (T)

Fig: Flood discharge using Gumbels Method

Annex II-36
INTERNSHIP REPORT AT SANJEN HEP 2019

FLOOD DISCHARGE COMPARISON


70.00

60.00

50.00
DISCHARGE(m3/s)

40.00

30.00

20.00

10.00

0.00
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
YEAR (T)

WECS GUMBEL LOG PEARSON III LOG NORMAL

Fig: Comparison of Flood discharge by WECS/ Gumbel/ Log Pearson III/Log Normal

Annex II-37

You might also like