A first course on variational methods in

structural mechanics and engineering

Govindjee S.
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-first-course-on-variational-methods-in-structural-me
chanics-and-engineering-govindjee-s/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

A First Course on Variational Methods in Structural

Mechanics and Engineering Sanjay Govindjee

https://textbookfull.com/product/a-first-course-on-variational-
methods-in-structural-mechanics-and-engineering-sanjay-govindjee/

A First Course in Quality Engineering: Integrating

Statistical and Management Methods of Quality 3rd
Edition K S Krishnamoorthi

https://textbookfull.com/product/a-first-course-in-quality-
engineering-integrating-statistical-and-management-methods-of-
quality-3rd-edition-k-s-krishnamoorthi/

A first course in quality engineering integrating

statistical and management methods of quality Third
Edition Krishnamoorthi

https://textbookfull.com/product/a-first-course-in-quality-
engineering-integrating-statistical-and-management-methods-of-
quality-third-edition-krishnamoorthi/

Variational principles in classical mechanics Cline D.

https://textbookfull.com/product/variational-principles-in-
classical-mechanics-cline-d/
A Course in Quantum Mechanics 1st Edition Nandita Rudra
(Author)

https://textbookfull.com/product/a-course-in-quantum-
mechanics-1st-edition-nandita-rudra-author/

Australian guidebook for structural engineers : a guide

to structural engineering on a multidiscipline project
1st Edition Lonnie Pack

https://textbookfull.com/product/australian-guidebook-for-
structural-engineers-a-guide-to-structural-engineering-on-a-
multidiscipline-project-1st-edition-lonnie-pack/

High-Performance Computing for Structural Mechanics and

Earthquake/Tsunami Engineering 1st Edition Shinobu
Yoshimura

https://textbookfull.com/product/high-performance-computing-for-
structural-mechanics-and-earthquake-tsunami-engineering-1st-
edition-shinobu-yoshimura/

Advanced Structural Mechanics Alberto Carpinteri

https://textbookfull.com/product/advanced-structural-mechanics-
alberto-carpinteri/

Introduction to the Variational Formulation in

Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications 1st Edition
Edgardo O. Taroco

https://textbookfull.com/product/introduction-to-the-variational-
formulation-in-mechanics-fundamentals-and-applications-1st-
edition-edgardo-o-taroco/
 A First Course on Variational
Methods in Structural Mechanics and
Engineering

Sanjay Govindjee
Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720-1710
c 2017 by Sanjay Govindjee
All rights reserved.
This book is dedicated to the memory of
Juan Carlos Simo: a truly exceptional
scholar, mentor, and friend

d
δΠ := Π(ϕ +  δϕ) = 0
d =0
vi

Preface
This text was designed for a second level course in Mechanics that I developed
starting in Spring 2009. At that time the engineering mechanics curriculum
at Berkeley was reorganized to combine a standalone Sophomore level statics
course with a Junior level strength of materials (engineering mechanics) course.
In the design of the new single course, most of the topics of the original two
courses were retained but the coverage and sophistication of the presentation
was reduced. With only one course in (solid) mechanics, it was felt that a
follow-on course was essential for the students. One option was to identify
the material that was no longer being taught in our new single combined
course and to assemble it into a follow-on course. However, due to the design
of the single course, this did not present a topical outline which was very
appealing. Thus we opted instead to create a course from scratch which we
felt would complement our combined statics and strength course. It would
build upon and extend the material the students has already learned but it
would explicitly not revisit the topics in more technical detail, rather it would
expand their understanding of mechanics and engineering problem solving. It
would prepare them for advanced studies.
This book covers essential topics in variational methods using structural
mechanics as the application area. At selected junctures the reader is also ex-
posed to how the analysis concepts can be applied to other areas of engineering
such as piping flow, thermal networks, ground water diffusion, and advective
pollutant transport to name several. The book begins with a quick overview
of the elementary relations governing tension-compression bars (rods), torsion
bars, and beams – all within the setting of elasticity. This review considers
the solution of such problems from a differential equation viewpoint and in-
troduces the reader to their solution using MATLAB’s bvp4c functionality.
Computer solution of problems is a central aspect of this book and this ex-
ercise is designed to introduce the reader to one option for the solution of
standard problems involving these basic systems. The basic systems are all
one-dimensional and this, of course, is rather limiting since many engineered
systems are multi-dimensional in nature. To that end, the book next treats
trusses and networks in a systematic way. Notions of kinematics are separated
from those of equilibrium and material response. The concepts developed are
intended to introduce the student to the canonical linear structure associated
with many numerical solution methods. Careful attention is paid to issues
of boundary conditions and the concept of static condensation. Problems in
this section, as is true throughout the book, are both pencil and paper as
well as programming oriented. The reader writes their own programs to solve
problems.
With this material in hand the book turns to energy, energy methods, and
the principle of stationary potential energy as a unifying concept in engi-
neering. The principle of stationary potential energy is a powerful tool to
organize our understanding of conservative systems and its exploitation is a
common analysis methodology. The emphasis here is on the method of Ritz.
Problems are presented and solved both by hand and via the construction of
computer programs. Issues of approximation and error are discussed and a
clear connection to the truss program written in the earlier section is made.
The material is then extended to the problem of structural instability, viz.,
buckling. Again problems are treated via pencil and paper as well as via the
writing of computer programs.
 vii

The methods developed to this point are all designed for conservative sys-
tems. As not all systems are conservative we also introduce the concept of
virtual work (weak form descriptions). The equivalence of the principle of vir-
tual work to the concept of stationary potential energy is developed but the
reader is also shown how the principle applies to a non-conservative system.
The final part of the book deals with two-dimensional problems, those that
are described by partial differential equations. The method of Ritz is applied
as well as the principle of virtual work and applications are made to problems
beyond structural engineering.
As noted, computer programing is a central tool for engineering analysis
and throughout the material is developed with this in mind. The end of chap-
ter problems all include programming questions. Beyond that, Appendix C
provides at set of directed computer laboratory exercises. These are designed
to be completed most weeks during a standard 14 week semester at a single
three hour laboratory session. At Berkeley, we cover the entire contents of
this book using two hours of lecture per week plus one three hour computer
laboratory session; a sample syllabus is given in Appendix D. The pace is
modest and unhurried. Thus if desired, there is room to augment the material
covered with other application areas. Likewise the book can be comfortably
covered in a single quarter, if one provides three hours of lecture per week.
As mentioned earlier, the writing of this text began in Spring 2009. At
that time, Dr. Tsuyoshi Koyama took careful lecture notes of the original
offering of the course and typeset them. He also organized and conducted the
computational laboratory. I am very grateful for his excellent efforts. Since
that first offering the course has evolved and the notes were updated into
the present form. My colleague Dr. Shaofan Li has also taught the course
several times and I am very appreciative of his feedback as well as that from
the course’s graduate student instructors (TAs), who direct the computer
laboratory sessions.
Notwithstanding, improvement is always possible. If you find any errors or
have suggestions for improvements, please let me know.

Sanjay Govindjee
Berkeley, CA
s.g@berkeley.edu
Contents

1 Review of Engineering Mechanics 1

1.1 Tension-compression bars 1
1.2 Torsion bars 3
1.3 Beams 6
1.4 A purely structural perspective 8
1.4.1 Tension-compression bars 9
1.4.2 Torsion bars 9
1.4.3 Beams 10
Exercises 10

2 Trusses and Networks 17

2.1 Analysis of truss structures 17
2.1.1 Introduction 17
2.1.2 Governing equations 18
2.1.3 Problem setting 26
2.2 Analysis of flow networks 33
2.2.1 Conservation of mass 34
2.2.2 Compatibility 35
2.2.3 Constitutive relation 35
2.2.4 Resultant relation 35
2.2.5 Problem setting 35
2.3 Results for other networks 36
2.3.1 Electrical resistance networks 37
2.3.2 Thermal conduction networks 37
2.3.3 Other cases 37
Exercises 39

3 Power, Work, and Conservation 43

3.1 Work and Power 43
3.1.1 Power 43
3.1.2 Work 45
3.1.3 Conservative Forces 45
3.1.4 Conservative Mechanical System 47
3.2 Conservation of Energy 48
3.3 Summary: Work Relations 54
Exercises 56

4 Potential Energy Methods 59

4.1 The Principle of Stationary (Minimum) Potential Energy 59
x Contents

4.1.1 Application to a two degree of freedom problem 61

4.1.2 Application to a single degree of freedom torsion
problem 62
4.1.3 Castigliano’s 1st Theorem 64
4.1.4 Application to an N -node truss 65
4.2 The Method of Ritz 69
4.2.1 Analogy between vectors and functions 78
4.2.2 Evaluating the quality of a given approximation 81
4.2.3 Estimating error in Ritz’s method 81
4.2.4 Summary of the Method of Ritz 83
Exercises 84

5 Buckling 89
5.1 Instability of discrete systems 89
5.2 Instability of continuous systems 94
5.2.1 Beam buckling using potential energy 96
5.2.2 Buckling with distributed loads 100
5.2.3 Deflection behavior for beams with compressive
axial loads and transverse loads 102
Exercises 104

6 Virtual Work 109

6.1 Principle of Virtual Work 109
6.1.1 Motivating example: Tension-compression bar 109
6.1.2 Summary of the steps leading to the virtual work
equations 113
6.1.3 Solutions 113
6.1.4 Equivalence between the Principle of Virtual Work
and the Principle of Stationary Potential Energy 117
6.2 Torsion 119
6.3 Bending 121
6.3.1 Generalizations 127
Exercises 129

7 Two-dimensional problems 131

7.1 The Method of Ritz: Application to two dimensional
problems 131
7.1.1 Anti-plane shear 131
7.1.2 Thin Membrane 136
7.1.3 Non-circular solid cross section bars in torsion 136
7.1.4 Underlying equilibrium equations 137
7.1.5 Plate bending 138
7.2 Piezometrically driven transport of ground water 139
7.3 Virtual Work (Weak Form): Application to two dimen-
sional problems 142
7.3.1 Advection diffusion for pollutant transport 146
Exercises 152

A Additional Reading 155

 Contents xi

B Dirac Delta Function 157

C Laboratory Exercises 159

C.1 Solution of traditional problems using BVP4c 159
C.1.1 Tension-compression bar 160
C.1.2 MATLAB solution method with bvp4c 163
C.1.3 Lab Exercises 166
C.1.4 MATLAB tips 168
C.2 Using BVP4c for beam bending problems 169
C.2.1 Beam equations in first order form 169
C.2.2 First Steps 172
C.3 Truss lab 1 174
C.3.1 Truss equations synopsis 174
C.3.2 Download 174
C.3.3 Walk Through 175
C.3.4 Verify 176
C.4 Truss Lab 2 178
C.4.1 Boundary Conditions 178
C.4.2 Download 178
C.4.3 Walk Through 179
C.5 Truss Lab 3 182
C.5.1 Problem 1 182
C.5.2 Problem 2 182
C.6 Potential energy: Visualization 184
C.6.1 Principle of stationary potential energy 184
C.6.2 Potential energy for linear mechanical systems 185
C.6.3 Solutions for linear mechanical systems 185
C.6.4 Exercise 186
C.6.5 Additional Exercise 188
C.7 Ritz’s method: Hat functions 190
C.7.1 Model Problem 190
C.7.2 Linear Hat Functions 190
C.7.3 Discrete Equations 191
C.8 Buckling: System of rigid-bars 194
C.8.1 Geometry 194
C.8.2 Potential Energy 194
C.8.3 Energy Landscape 196
C.8.4 Evolution of equilibrium 196
C.9 Buckling: Beams 198
C.9.1 Buckling load: A cantilever beam (clamped-free
case) 198
C.9.2 Beam with a transverse load and axial compression 199
C.10 Bubnov-Galerkin method: Beams with Hermite polyno-
mials 201
C.10.1 Model Problem 201
C.10.2 Function spaces 201
C.10.3 Weak Form/Virtual Work Equation 202
C.10.4 Hermite Hat Functions 202
xii Contents

C.10.5 Discrete Equations 203

D Sample Syllabus 207

Index 211
Review of Engineering
Mechanics
1
Elementary engineering mechanics or strength of materials deals with
approximate theories that allow one to easily compute the mechanical 1.1 Tension-compression bars 1
behavior of simple slender bodies under the action of axial forces, trans- 1.2 Torsion bars 3
verse forces and moments, as well as axial torques. In this introductory 1.3 Beams 6
chapter we will briefly review the essential elements of these theories 1.4 A purely structural perspec-
tive 8
restricted to the special case of linear elastic materials. For our pur-
Exercises 10
poses we will be interested in a formulation of the governing equations
in a manner suitable for both statically determinate and indeterminate
problems.1 1
Recall statically determinate prob-
lems are ones for which the internal
forces and moments can be determined
1.1 Tension-compression bars from statics alone without the need for
kinematic considerations.

A tension-compression bar is a slender bar subject exclusively to axial

forces. These forces can be applied to the ends of the bar as well as
distributed along the length of the bar. Additionally the bar can be
subject to kinematic boundary conditions on its axial motion. To for- b(x)
malize the governing equations, consider the bar shown in Fig. 1.1. Our
axial coordinate will be x and the bar will be subjected to a distributed
axial force b(x). The dimensions of b(x) are force per unit length. The
bar has a cross-sectional area A(x) and is assumed linear elastic with
Young’s modulus E(x). x
If we consider a section cut at an arbitrary location x along the bar,
then we have internal (or resultant) forces R(x) acting of the faces of Fig. 1.1 Canonical tension-
the section cut. Using a differential element of length ∆x as shown in compression bar.
Fig. 1.2, one sees by force equilibrium in the x-direction that
Z x+∆x
R(x + ∆x) − R(x) + b(x) dx = 0 .
x
Dividing through by ∆x and then taking the limit as ∆x goes to zero
yields the differential equation of equilibrium for the bar:
dR
+ b = 0.
dx
The internal force R(x) is related to the stresses in the bar by the relation
Z
R(x) = σ dA = σ · A ,
A(x)
2 Review of Engineering Mechanics

∆x where the second equality follows only in the case where σ is a constant
on the cross-section (i.e., when the material is homogeneous on the cross-
section).
R(x) b(x) R(x+ ∆ x) The primary kinematic assumption for the axial deformation of slender
bars is that plane sections remain plane under deformation. A differen-
tial argument applied to a section of the bar (see Fig. 1.3) shows that
the normal strain in the x-direction is given by
x u(x + ∆x) − u(x) du
ε(x) = lim = ,
∆x→0 ∆x dx
Fig. 1.2 Differential construction for
equilibrium in a tension-compression where ε(x) is the normal strain in the bar and u(x) is the displacement
bar. field in the bar. This relation is the primary kinematic relation for axial
deformation in slender bars. It is also known as the strain-displacement
relation.
∆x u(x+∆ x) To close the system of equations, one needs an expression for the ma-
terial response – a constitutive relation. In this text, we will restrict our
attention to linear elastic response and hence our governing constitutive
relation will be
σ = Eε ,
where E is the Young’s modulus for the material. In total, one has 4
linear equations in 4 unknowns u(x), ε(x), R(x), and σ(x). A convenient
x re-writing of these equations involves the repeated substitution of one
u(x)
into the other until one is left with a single (differential) equation for
the displacement field:
Fig. 1.3 Differential construction  
for strain-displacement relation in a d du
AE + b = 0. (1.1)
tension-compression bar. dx dx

For a given problem this relation can be integrated twice to yield the dis-
placement field. Knowing the displacement field, the strains are easily
computed via differentiation, the stresses by multiplication, and simi-
larly for the forces.
Remarks:
(1) In the case where the Young’s modulus is not a constant on the
cross-section,
R then the term AE can be replaced by (AE)eff =
A(x)
E dA in eqn (1.1).

b(x) = bo
F Example 1.1
Bar with a constant distributed load and an end-load
x Consider the bar shown in Fig. 1.4 and determine the displacement
L field in the bar.
Solution: Since AE is a constant the governing differential equation
Fig. 1.4 Bar with a constant dis- reduces to a second order ordinary differential equation with constant
tributed load b(x) = bo and constant coefficients:
AE with an end-load F̄ . d2 u
AE 2 + bo = 0 .
dx
 1.2 Torsion bars 3

This equation can be integrated twice to yield

du
AE = −bo x + C1
dx
1
AEu = − bo x2 + C1 x + C2 .
2
The integration constants C1 and C2 can be determined from the bound-
ary conditions. At x = 0 the displacement is zero, thus u(0) = 0 and
C2 = 0. At x = L the applied force is F̄ and hence R(L) = F̄ . In terms
of the displacements, R = σA = AEε = AEdu/dx. Hence,
du
AE (L) = F̄ ,
dx
which implies that C1 = F̄ + bo L. Thus the final result is
 
1 1
u(x) = − bo x2 + (F̄ + bo L)x .
AE 2

Remarks:
(1) This method of solving the differential equation to determine the
system response works independent of whether or not the problem
is statically determinate or indeterminate – here the problem was
determinate.
(2) Once the displacement field is known all other quantities of interest
are easily computed: ε = du/dx, σ = Eε, and R = σA.

For a more comprehensive discussion and further examples of the

tension-compression bar relations see Chapter 2 in S. Govindjee Engi-
neering Mechanics of Deformable Solids, Oxford University Press, Ox-
ford (2013).

1.2 Torsion bars

A torsion bar is a slender bar subjected to distributed torques about its
long-axis as well as similarly oriented end-torques. The overall structure
of the governing equations for torsion is virtually identical to that for
tension-compression bars.
Consider the bar shown in Fig. 1.5. The bar is subject to distributed t(z)
torques t(z) with dimensions of force times length per unit length. If we
make a section cut as some location z along the length of the bar the
cut faces have resultant (internal) torques T (z) acting on them. Using a
differential argument, as in Sec. 1.1, it is easy to show that the governing
differential equation of equilibrium for a bar in torsion is z
dT
+ t = 0. Fig. 1.5 Torsion bar subjected to a dis-
dz tributed torque t(z).
4 Review of Engineering Mechanics
2
This relation derives from assump-
tions that are only reasonable for bars
with circular cross-sections.
The internal resultant torques T (z) are related to the shear stresses
(τ = σzθ ) on the cross-sectional cuts via
Z
T (z) = rτ dA ,
A(z)
where A(z) is the cross-sectional area of the bar and τ (r, z) is the shear
stress acting on the section cut. Using the plane sections remain plane
assumption along with the assumption that the cross-sections rotate as
rigid bodies, one can show that the fundamental kinematic relation is
given by
dφ
γ=r ,
dz
where γ(r, z) is the engineering shear strain 2εzθ and φ(z) is the rotation
field for the bar – i.e. the amount of rotation of each cross-section.2 The
constitutive relation that is relevant to the present situation is
τ = Gγ ,
where G is the shear modulus – note that as before, we restrict ourselves
to the linear elastic case.
The four basic equations can be combined into a single equation by
repeated substitution. If we introduce the kinematic relation into the
constitutive relation, we find that τ = Grdφ/dz. Inserting this expres-
sion Rinto the resultant definition, one finds that T = GJdφ/dz, where
J = A r2 dA is the polar moment of inertia for the cross-section. Com-
bining this last result with the equilibrium relation gives
 
d dφ
GJ + t = 0. (1.2)
dz dz
Remarks:
(1) This equation is mathematically identical to the one for tension-
compression bars. Note that in the present setting GJ takes the
place of AE, φ takes the place of u, z takes the place of x, t takes
the place of b, and T takes the place of R.
(2) To solve structural analysis problems in torsional systems, stat-
ically determinate or indeterminate, one can integrate our final
ordinary differential equation twice to find φ(z). Constants of in-
tegration are determined from the boundary conditions and all
other quantities of interest can be determined from φ via the op-
erations of differentiation and multiplication.
(3) In the case that the shear modulus is not a constant on the
R cross-
section, then the product GJ can be replaced by (GJ)eff = A(z) Gr2 dA
in eqn (1.2).
 1.2 Torsion bars 5

L/2 L/2
Example 1.2
Statically indeterminate torsion bar with a point load
Consider the torsion bar shown in Fig. 1.6. It is subjected to a point
torque To at mid-span and has a constant GJ. Find the rotation field
for the bar.
To
Solution: The appropriate distributed torque expression for a point z
torque is a Dirac delta function (see Appendix B):
  Fig. 1.6 Doubly built-in torsion bar
L with a point torque To at mid-span and
t(z) = To δ z − .
2 constant GJ.

Since GJ is constant we have

d2 φ
 
L
GJ 2 = −To δ z −
dz 2
 
dφ L
GJ = −To H z − + C1
dz 2
 
L
GJφ = −To z − + C1 z + C2 .
2
Note that H(·) is the Heaviside step function and h·i are the Macauley
brackets (they evaluate to their argument if the argument is positive,
else they evaluate to zero).3 The boundary conditions for the bar are 3R R
δ(x) dx = H(x) + C, H(x) dx =
1
hxi + C, and hxin dx = hxin+1
R
φ(0) = φ(L) = 0: n+1
+
C.
 
L
φ(0) = 0 ⇒ 0 = −To − +C1 · 0 + C2 ⇒ 0 = C2 .
2
| {z }
=0

and
 
L
φ(L) = 0 ⇒ 0 = −To L − + C1 L ⇒ C1 = To /2 .
2 φ (z)
ToL
Thus, 4GJ
   
1 L 1
φ(z) = −To z − + To z .
GJ 2 2
L/2 L
Remarks:
(1) A plot of the solution is shown in Fig. 1.7. Note that the first term Fig. 1.7 Rotation field for Example
in the Macauley brackets only gives a non-zero result for z > L/2. 1.2.

For a more comprehensive discussion and further examples of the tor-

sion bar relations see Chapter 7 in S. Govindjee Engineering Mechanics
of Deformable Solids, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013).
6 Review of Engineering Mechanics

q(x) 1.3 Beams

A slender bar acts as a beam when it is subjected to transverse loads
and/or moments perpendicular to its long axis. For our purposes we
will be concerned with beam bending in the x-y plane.
y Consider the beam shown in Fig. 1.8. The beam is subjected to a
distributed load q(x) with dimensions of force per unit length. If we
x make a section cut at some location x along the length of the beam, then
the cut faces will have resultant (internal) shear forces V (x) and bending
Fig. 1.8 Beam subjected to a dis-
moments M (x) acting on them. Fig. 1.9 shows our sign convention
tributed load q(x). for positive values; note further, we assume that the beam deflection
q(x) v(x) is positive in the positive y-direction. Using a differential element
argument one can show that force equilibrium in the y-direction and
moment equilibrium about the z-axis, respectively, imply that

dV
+q =0
dx
y dM
+ V = 0.
dx
M V x V M
z These two equations can be combined into a single differential equation
(+) of equilibrium by eliminating the shear force to give

d2 M
= q.
dx2
Fig. 1.9 Assumed positive sign conven-
tion for distributed loads, internal shear
forces, and internal bending moments.
The internal bending moment M (x) is related to the normal stress (σ =
σxx ) on the cross-section by
Z
M= −yσ dA .
A(x)

Using a plane-sections remain plane and normals remain normal assump-

tion, one can shown that the fundamental kinematic relation for a beam
is given by
ε = −yκ(x) ,

where ε(x, y) is the bending strain (εxx ), κ(x) = dθ/dx is the bending
4
Note that one can also write κ = curvature, and θ(x) = dv/dx is the cross-section rotation field.4 The
d2 v/dx2 . constitutive relation that is relevant to the present situation is

σ = Eε ,

where E is the Young’s modulus.

The basic equations can be combined into a single governing differ-
ential equation by repeated substitution. If we introduce the kinematic
relation into the constitutive relation, we find that σ = −yEκ. Insert-
ing this into
R the moment resultant definition, one finds that M = EIκ,
where I = A y 2 dA is the moment of inertia of the cross-section (about
 1.3 Beams 7

the z-axis). Combining this last result with the equilibrium relations
gives
d2 d2 v
 
EI = q. (1.3)
dx2 dx2

Remarks:

(1) The governing equation here is a fourth order ordinary differential

equation. In the case that EI is not a function of x, this is an
ordinary differential equation with constant coefficients.
(2) The solution of the governing equation for the deflection v(x) for
statically determinate or indeterminate problems requires one to
integrate four times. This will produce four constants of inte-
gration. For their determination, one will need four boundary
conditions. Typically, two are taken from the left and two are
taken from the right. These will normally be given in terms of the
deflection directly, the rotation θ = dv/dx, the bending moment
M = EId2 v/dx2 , or the shear force V = −EId3 v/dx3 . Once the
deflection field has been determined, then all other quantities of
interest can be found from v(x) via differentiation and multiplica-
tion.
(3) In the case that the Young’s modulus is not a constantRon the cross-
section, the product EI can be replaced by (EI)eff = A(x) Ey 2 dA
in eqn (1.3).

x
Example 1.3
Cantilever beam with an end-force
P
Consider the cantilever beam shown in Fig. 1.10. It is subjected to an
end-force P at x = L and has a constant EI. Find the deflection field
for the beam. L
Solution: The distributed load in this problem is zero; i.e. q = 0. Since
EI is constant we have Fig. 1.10 Cantilever beam with an
end-force P at x = L and constant EI.
d4 v
EI = 0
dx4
d3 v
EI 3 = C1
dx
d2 v
EI 2 = C1 x + C2
dx
dv 1
EI = C1 x2 + C2 x + C3
dx 2
1 1
EIv = C1 x3 + C2 x2 + C3 x + C4 .
6 2
8 Review of Engineering Mechanics

The boundary conditions for the beam are v(0) = 0, θ(0) = dv/dx(0) =
0, M (L) = EId2 v/dx2 (L) = 0, and V (L) = −EId3 v/dx3 (L) = P . The
first two boundary conditions give:
1 1
v(0) = 0 ⇒ 0= C1 · 0 + C2 · 0 + C3 · 0 + C4 ⇒ 0 = C4
6 2
and
dv 1
(0) = 0 ⇒ 0= C1 · 0 + C2 · 0 + C3 ⇒ 0 = C3 .
dx 2
The condition on the end-shear gives
d3 v
−EI (L) = P ⇒ P = −C1 .
dx3
Lastly, the moment condition gives
d2 v
EI (L) = 0 ⇒ 0 = −P L + C2 ⇒ C2 = P L .
dx2
Thus,
P x2  x
v(x) = L− .
2EI 3
Remarks:

(1) This procedure is applicable to both determinate and indetermi-

nate problems. The example shown was determinate.

For a more comprehensive discussion and further examples of the

beam bending relations see Chapter 8 in S. Govindjee Engineering Me-
chanics of Deformable Solids, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013).

1.4 A purely structural perspective

In Sec. 1.1–1.3 we have presented the classical equations learned in ele-
mentary mechanics courses. The presentation follows the typical devel-
opment and the underpinning assumption of each theory is a kinematic
assumption on the three dimensional motion of the system in question.
However, from a purely structural perspective, leaving aside three di-
mensional issues and issues of the detailed response of the material on
the cross-section, one can abstract complete theories from the equations
presented that only involve functions of the axial coordinate. These rela-
tions are already present in what was reviewed but for added clarity we
summarize them here. The main principle is to select a set of equations
that only depend upon a single coordinate and constitute a complete
system of equations.
 1.4 A purely structural perspective 9

1.4.1 Tension-compression bars

For tension-compression bars, this can be achieved by constructing a
system of equations in terms of the internal forces and the displacements
as:

dR
+b=0
dx
du R
= .
dx AE

Alternately, in vector form we have

   
d u R/AE
= .
dx R −b

In this system of two coupled ordinary differential equations, we have

two unknown fields u(x) and R(x). The remaining terms are the ap-
plied loading b(x) and the property combination A(x)E(x), which is
sometimes called the axial stiffness or axial rigidity. As written this is a
first order system. If one combines these two relations, then one recovers
the second order differential equation from Sec. 1.1. Note that nowhere
in these equations do we encounter terms that depend on the y or z
coordinates.

1.4.2 Torsion bars

For torsion bars, this can be achieved by constructing a system of equa-
tions in terms of the internal torques and the rotations as:

dT
+t=0
dx
dφ T
= .
dz GJ

Alternately, in vector form we have

   
d φ T /GJ
= .
dz T −t

In this system of two coupled ordinary differential equations, we have

two unknown fields φ(x) and T (x). The remaining terms are the applied
loading t(z) and the property combination G(z)J(z), which is sometimes
called the torsional stiffness or torsional rigidity. As written this is a
first order system. If one combines these two relations, then one recovers
the second order differential equation from Sec. 1.2. Note that nowhere
in these equations do we encounter terms that depend on the r or θ
coordinates.
10 Exercises

1.4.3 Beams
For beams, the same can be achieved by constructing a system of equa-
tions in terms of the internal forces and moments as well as the deflec-
tions and rotations as:
dV
+q =0
dx
dM
+V =0
dx
dθ M
=
dx EI
dv
= θ.
dx
Alternately, in vector form we have
   
v θ
d 
 θ  =  M/EI  .
  
dx  M   −V 
V −q

In this system of four coupled ordinary differential equations, we have

four unknown fields v(x), θ(x), M (x), and V (x). The remaining terms
are the distributed load q(x) and the property combination E(x)I(x),
which is sometimes called the bending stiffness or the flexural rigidity. As
written this is a first order system. If one combines these four relations,
then one recovers the fourth order differential equation from Sec. 1.3.
Note that nowhere in these equations do we encounter terms that depend
the y or z coordinates.
Remarks:
(1) The utility of expressing the governing system of equations in these
matrix formats is that they are then seen to fit the abstract format
dy/dx = f (y, x) for which effective numerical schemes are known
to exist.

Exercises
(1.1) Using the governing equation for the axial deforma-
tion of a bar, argue why the displacement field must
be linear (independent of the boundary conditions
for the bar) in the absence of any distributed body
forces; i.e. for the case where b(x) = 0. Assume
AE is constant.
(1.2) Consider the linear elastic tension-compression bar
shown. The bar is subjected to an end-force P and
a distributed load b(x) = bo sin(kx), where bo and
k are given constants. Assume that AE is constant
and determine the displacement field of the bar.

x
P x
b(x) = bosin(kx)
(1.3) Consider a bar of length L with constant EA and
constant density ρ. The bar is supported by a
fixed pivot and spun about it at angular frequency
ω. Doing so produces a distributed body force of
b(x) = Aρω 2 x, where x is measured from the pivot.
Find the maximum and minimum strains and their
locations. Write down the governing ordinary dif-
ferential equation, then solve.
ω
L ulus, E, and constant cross sectional area, A. The
(1.4) For the bar shown determine the displacement field
u(x).
L
b(x) = bocos(x/L)
AE − constant
(1.5) You are given a prismatic bar with constant cross-
sectional area A, Young’s Modulus E, and length
L. Determine the reaction force at the top of the
bar due to the load P .
Exercises 11
L/2
P
L/2
(1.6) The bar shown is built-in at the left and supported
by a spring with spring constant k at the right. List
the boundary conditions at x = 0 and x = L. Find
the expression for u(x).
L
b(x) = exp(x/L)
x k
AE − constant
(1.7) Consider an elastic bar with constant Young’s mod-
bar is built-in at both ends and subject to a spa-
tially varying distributed axial load
2π
b(x) = bo sin( x) ,
L
where bo is a constant with dimensions of force per
unit length. Determine the largest (in magnitude)
compressive internal force. Write down the gov-
erning ordinary differential equation, then solve.
y b(x)
x
L
(1.8) For the linear elastic bar shown. Determine the
axial displacement as a function of x. Note that
there is a distributed load and a point load. The
point load should be modeled using a Dirac delta
function. Write down the governing ordinary dif-
ferential equation, then solve.
12 Exercises

AE −− constant (1.13) For the round torsion bar show, with constant GJ,
Distributed Load b(x) = Cx find the maximum torque (magnitude) and its lo-
cation.
x P
8 Nm 4 Nm

a L−a
(1.9) Consider an elastic bar with length L and constant
AE that is subjected to a point force at x = a. 2m 1m 1m
Find u(x).
k
1
P (1.14) Consider a circular bar which is built-in at both
k
2
ends and loaded by a linear distributed load, t(z) =
to z. By solving the governing second order or-
dinary differential equation find the value of to
x needed to induce a rotation θ̂ at the mid-point of
(1.10) Find the axial deflection u(x) in the bar shown. the bar. Assume GJ is a constant.
The bar has length L and a constant AE. Write (1.15) Consider the linear elastic (circular) bar shown be-
down the governing ordinary differential equation, low. Determine the rotation field, φ(z), for the bar.
then solve. 



Assume GJ to be constant.
 



b = constant k 


t(z) = to z/L
 



 x
EA




(1.11) Consider the bar shown in Fig. 1.4. Assume that
in addition to the loads shown, that it is sub-
ject to a temperature change ∆T . Formulate the
L
governing differential equations in first order form (1.16) In the statically indeterminate beam shown, find
along with expressions for the boundary condi- the reactions at the wall by integrating the differ-
tions. Assume that the material response is given ential equation for the deflection of the beam.
by σ = E(ε α∆T ), where α is the coefficient of
thermal expansion.
(1.12) An elastic solid circular bar of length L with po-
lar moment of inertia J and shear modulus G is
built-in at both ends and subject to a system of
distributed torques:

 0 z<d
2 3
q(x)=3Wx / L
t(z) =
c z d


Determine the support torques T (0) and T (L) at

the two ends of the bar. Solve this problem using
the governing ordinary differential equation. x
c
L

(1.17) For the beam shown below, with imposed deflection

d L−d ∆, find the deflection curve v(x) and the location
and magnitude of the maximum bending stress.
T(0) T(L) Assume EI is constant and the maximum distance
 Exercises 13

from the neutral axis to the outer fibers of the beam (a) State the relevant boundary conditions.
is c. Use the governing ordinary differential equa- (b) State the relevant distributed load function.
tion to solve this problem. (c) Solve the relevant ODE for the beam’s deflec-
∆ tion.
(1.21) For each system below, (i) state the relevant bound-
ary conditions in the form needed to solve for the
motion of each when using the governing ordinary
differential equation, (ii) provide the proper expres-
sion for the distributed loads, if relevant.
L
P
x x
L
(1.18) The beam shown below is loaded by a point mo- (a)
ment at x = 2; find the maximum internal moment
(in absolute value – i.e. independent of sign) by
P
first solving the governing fourth order differential
equation. [Hint: to find the maximum value just
plot your answer.] x
a L-a
EI - constant (b)
M = 100
Ta
kt
x
z
2 1 L/2 L/2
(c)
(1.19) Find the equation for the deflection of the beam po P
shown. Assume a constant value for EI. Use the
given coordinate system.
q

x
L
x (d)

a L-a
(1.20) Consider a simply supported beam with a trans- MATLAB Exercises
verse load P applied at its mid-span.

EI −− constant P (1.22) Write a MATLAB program using bvp4c that solves

x
Exercise 1.11 for the case of bo = 0, F̄ = 0, A =
100 mm2 , E = 210 103 N/mm2 , L = 1000 mm,
L α = 6 10 6 1/C, and ∆T = 300 C. You should
check your computation against a hand solution.
(1.23) Re-solve Exercise 1.22 where the boundary condi-
Determine the deflection of the beam using the gov- tion at x = L has been changed to u(L) = 0 (in-
erning ordinary differential equation as follows: stead of being force free).
14 Exercises

(1.24) The bar shown below is built-in at the left. On
the right, it is free to expand, until a distance β.
At that point it encounters a rigid wall. The bar
is subject to change in temperature which may or
may not induce contact with the wall. Write a
MATLAB program that uses bvp4c and can han-
dle the case of contact or no contact without the
need for re-coding. Assume A = 100 mm2 , E =
210 103 N/mm2 , L = 1000 mm, α = 6 10 6 1/C, (1.27) Consider an elastic beam of length L = 10 ft with
and β = 3 mm. Test your program with the tem-
perature changes ∆T = f100, 500, 600g C. These
represent no contact, just touching, and contact,
respectively.
L β
tributed torsional load
2π
t(x) = p sin( x) ,
L
where p = 50 N mm/mm and L = 1000 mm. Solve
for the system response and determine the location
and magnitude of the maximum internal torque in
the bar. Use the built-in MATLAB function bvp4c
to solve this problem.
constant Young’s modulus E = 30 106 psi, and
cross sectional area moment of inertia I = 256 in4 .
The beam is subject to a point moment at x = a =
5 ft. Determine the torsional stiffness at x = a; i.e.
determine kT = S/θ(a). Use the built-in MATLAB
function bvp4c to solve this problem.
S

x a L−a

(1.25) An elastic circular bar is fixed at one end and x

attached to a spring support at the other end.
The torsional stiffness of the spring support is
k = 50 N m/rad. If a concentrated torque of mag-
nitude Ta = 500 N m is applied in the center of
the bar, what is the rotation at the end of the bar,
φ(L), where L = 300 mm? Assume a shear modu-
2
lus G = 10 kN/mm and polar moment of inertia
4
J = 2000 mm . Use the built-in MATLAB func-
tion bvp4c to solve this problem. Make sure to
double check your code by looking at the limits of
zero and very high spring stiffness compared to a
hand computation.

[Remark: S is intensionally unspecified. Why?]
(1.28) Consider a beam supported by a distributed spring
foundation (e.g. a railroad rail or grade beam).
Such spring supports are known as Winkler foun-
dations 5 . Assume the beam is 100 ft long with
a Young’s modulus of E = 30 106 psi and a
cross sectional area moment of inertia I = 77.4 in4 .
Assume a foundation stiffness of k = 100 lb/in2
and determine the maximum positive and negative
moments in the beam for a 30 103 lb load dis-
tributed over 3 in at the beam’s center. Note that
for this problem the governing equation is given by
EIv(x)0000 = q(x), where q(x) = qapplied (x) kv(x).

For boundary conditions, assume zero moment and

L/2 


shear. Use the built-in MATLAB function bvp4c


to solve this problem.
30,000 lbf
k 3"

Ta

L
L/2 L/2

(1.26) Consider a solid round elastic bar with constant (1.29) Consider an elastic beam of length L = 10 ft with
shear modulus, G = 140 kN/mm2 , and cross sec- constant Young’s modulus E = 30 106 psi, and
tional area, A = 40 mm2 . The bar is built-in at cross sectional area moment of inertia I = 256 in4 .
both ends and subject to a spatially varying dis- The beam is subject to a point force P at x = b =

5 Ifyou are interested in historical matters, you can find Emil Winkler’s original de-
velopments in his 1867 book on Elasticity and Strength on Google Books. Search on
“Die Lehre von der Elasticitaet und Festigkeit” pages 182-184.
 Exercises 15

6 ft. Determine the transverse stiffness at x = b; i.e. b

determine k = P/v(b). Use the built-in MATLAB
function bvp4c to solve this problem. P

[Remark: P is intentionally unspecified. Why?]

Trusses and Networks
2
2.1 Analysis of truss structures 2.1 Analysis of truss structures 17
2.2 Analysis of flow networks 33
So far we have looked at the solution of basic one dimensional systems
2.3 Results for other networks 36
under various types of loadings. Real engineering systems, of course,
Exercises 39
come in a much greater variety. We wish to look at an extension of
P
our basic notions to examine systems with greater geometric complexity
while still being composed of elementary parts. Our central example will
be trusses but the methodologies developed also allow one to study pip-
ing systems for water delivery, traffic networks for flow properties, as well
as other network systems that appear in fields ranging even to electrical
and mechanical engineering. We will see that the basic concepts of kine-
matics, equilibrium, and constitutive relations also have counterparts in
Fig. 2.1 Statically indeterminate truss
these more complex settings. Lastly, we will encounter mathematical with 4 unknown reactions.
constructs that are central to many areas of engineering and science. In
the context of trusses we will be able ascribe concrete physical meaning
to them and this will help us later on when we encounter them in more
abstract settings.

2.1.1 Introduction
A truss is a mechanical system composed of tension-compression bars
P
that are connected together by frictionless hinges, or nodes, and is loaded
only at its nodes. Thus, truss structures are mechanical structures in Fig. 2.2 Statically determinate truss
which we make the following restrictions or assumptions in the theory: with 3 unknown reactions.

• Tension-compression bars are the individual components which

constitute the structure.
• All joints, or nodes, are friction free pin connections.
• Applied loads can only occur at nodes.

Some examples are shown in Figs. 2.1-2.3. An important consequence

of these assumptions is that internal forces in the bars are co-linear
with the bars and are constants for each bar in the truss; consequently
the stresses and strains are also constants. Further, under small strain
assumptions, the axial displacements will be linear. P
Simple trusses Fig. 2.3 Statically indeterminate truss
with 4 unknown reactions.
An important sub-category of trusses are simple trusses. Simple trusses
are trusses that can be built-up sequentially from a single triangular
18 Trusses and Networks

truss, through the step-by-step addition of two bars and one joint to the
current configuration of the truss, where the two new bars in each step
are precluded from being co-linear. Figures 2.2 and 2.3 are examples
of simple trusses. Figure 2.4 shows an example of a non-simple truss.
A fundamental advantage of simple trusses is that one can determine
whether or not they are statically determinate via a simple counting
P procedure, which we will discuss later.

Fig. 2.4 Statically indeterminate non- 2.1.2 Governing equations

simple truss with 4 unknown reactions.
Our interest will be in developing an analysis scheme that will work
for understanding the behavior of both determinate and indeterminate
trusses. Our plan of attack will be to develop the relevant equilibrium,
kinematic, and constitutive relations for general trusses and then com-
P bine the expressions to produce a single equation capable of describing
2 the behavior of the system, determinate or indeterminate, just as we
did in Chapter 1 for the basic one-dimensional problems of tension-
compression bars, torsion rods, and beams. Our final result will be a
1 set of equilibrium equations solely in terms of the displacements of the
2
nodes of the truss. Thus it will be quite analogous, for example, to the
relation AEd2 u/dx2 + b = 0.

1 3 Equilibrium
To develop the equilibrium equations for the truss, let us examine the
truss system in Fig. 2.5. We will begin by defining a unit vector pointing
Fig. 2.5 2 bar truss structure.
from node i to node j in the following manner,
xj − xi
eij := .
kxj − xi k
As a result of the definition, one can also observe the relation

eji = −eij .

For example the unit vector pointing from node 1 to node 2 is denoted
as

2 P e12 :=
x2 − x1
=
x2 − x1
,
kx2 − x1 k L1
where L1 is the length of bar 1, and x1 and x2 are the positions of nodes
1 2 1 and 2.
For each node in the truss, one can write an equilibrium equation.
R1 e21 R2 e23 For example, considering node 2, the balance of forces can be depicted
as shown in Fig. 2.6. R1 and R2 denote the axial forces in bars 1 and
2, respectively. The nodal equilibrium equation is,
Fig. 2.6 Equilibrium at Node 2.
R1 e21 + R2 e23 + P = 0 . (2.1)
 2.1 Analysis of truss structures 19

Remarks:

(1) Equation (2.1) is a vector equation and thus represents two scalar
equations – balance of forces in the horizontal and vertical direc-
tions.
R1 e12
(2) Note that our convention is to always assume that forces are ten-
sile. If they are actually compressive, then they will come out to 1
be negative at the end of the analysis.

If we now consider equilibrium at node 1, the balance of forces can 1

be depicted as shown in Fig. 2.7. R1 denotes the axial force in bar 1
and F r1 is the reaction force at node 1. Thus, the nodal equilibrium
equation is
F r1
R1 e12 + F r1 = 0 . Fig. 2.7 Equilibrium at Node 1

The last node in the truss is node 3. The balance of forces at this node R2 e32
is depicted in Fig. 2.8. R2 denotes the axial force in bar 2 and F r3 is
the reaction force at node 3. The nodal equilibrium equation is
2
R2 e32 + F r3 = 0 .
3
Gathering the nodal equations of equilibrium, one has 3 vector (6
scalar) equations: F r3
e12 R1 + F r1 = 0,
Fig. 2.8 Equilibrium at Node 3
e21 R1 +e23 R2 + P = 0,
e32 R2 + F r3 = 0,

which can be written as a single equation:

   
e12 0   F r1
R1
 e21 e23  + P  = 0,
R2
0 e32 F r3
   
e21 0   F r1
R 1
⇔  e12 e32  = P ,
R2
0 e23 F r3
⇔ AT R = F ,

where we have defined,

 
R1
R := ,
R2 2×1
 
F r1
F :=  P  ,
F r3 6×1
 T
e21 eT12 0

A := .
0 eT32 eT23 2×6
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
 The boys on United States battleships are fond of making trinkets
and souvenirs to be sent home, and the sailors’ sweetheart picture
frame shown in the sketch is a favorite. Speaking from experience, I
know that many “landlubbers” will be interested in this novelty,
although coming from a man-of-war makes it more interesting. I have
been there and, therefore, I know. The place of honor in the center is
of course reserved for the lady. The smaller picture openings may be
filled with penny pictures of father and mother, or other relatives.—
Contributed by Charles Rorer, Bridgeport, Connecticut.
 Woven Reed Furniture
By CHARLES M. MILLER
Taborets and Small Tables for the
Summer Veranda

[The various materials referred to in this article by number or size were

described in detail in an article on “A Reed Basket,” in the Boy Mechanic,
Book 2, page 257.]

Utility and ready portability are well recognized features of woven-

reed furniture, but the qualities which make it especially attractive
for summer use in the open air, or on the veranda, are its inviting
comfort and graceful lines. While furniture of this type arranged in
suites makes a particularly harmonious showing, individual pieces
may be used in combination with other furniture, lending a touch of
variety. Small tables or taborets, of light weight and simple design,
may be made by the novice, and may be adapted to a variety of
uses. Footstools, jardinière stands, sewing tables, yard tables, and
smoking stands are some of the possibilities. Three representative
types are shown in Figs. 1 to 3, and the general method of
construction as well as the details of the weaving are also illustrated.
A serviceable taboret or stand is illustrated in Fig. 1. It is 18 in.
high, and 17 in. in diameter on the top. The sides are 9 in. wide at
the top and 14 in. at the bottom.
The framework for the top of the stand consists of a disk of wood,
16 in. in diameter, with a similar one, 14 in. in diameter, directly
underneath, the edge being set under 1 in. all around. Four legs of 1-
in. doweling support it, and two cross braces of doweling are placed
between diagonally opposite corner posts, behind the woven
portions of the side. The grain of the wood in the upper disk should
run at right angles to that of the lower, to prevent warping, and the
disks should be fastened together with nails or screws. Avoid putting
them into the lower disk, where the legs are to be fixed.
To locate the position for the legs, draw a diameter on the under
side of the top, as at A, Fig. 4, and 4 in. on either side of it draw
parallel lines B and C. Draw another diameter, D, at right angles to
A, and draw the parallel lines E and F 4 in. from the diameter D.
Where the four outside lines intersect will be the centers of the holes
for the legs. These holes are not bored perpendicularly, but are
slanted to conform to the slant of the leg. A template should be used
in guiding the bit, as shown at G, Fig. 4. It may be constructed of
wood, 3 in. wide and 5 in. long, Fig. 5. Place the gauge just outside
the edge of the hole to be bored. Nail it to the board lightly on the
diagonal, as shown, and guide the bit against it.
Before the legs are fixed into place finally, the holes for the spokes
of the side should be bored. The parallel lines of Fig. 4 now serve
another purpose, that of giving the location of the spokes. Place one
spoke ¹⁄₂ in. from each leg, and the others 1 in. apart. The legs are
utilized as spokes in the weaving. The spokes should be double, and
the extra spokes may be inserted beside the original ones, after the
weaving has progressed a few rounds. Number 5 reed should be
used for the spokes and No. 4 reed for the weavers, which are
woven back and forth around the spokes.
 Drive the legs into their sockets, applying glue, and pin them with
nails, as at H, Fig. 4. Tack strips on the bottoms of two pairs of legs
and then fasten two strips to brace them, as shown in Fig. 6. The
strips should be put on and the distance between the legs spaced
before the glue sets.
It is best to weave the sides before beginning the top, so as to
prevent rubbing the woven top while weaving the sides, with the
stand inverted. The side spokes should be 2 ft. long and should be
set into the top 1 in., with glue. Turn the top of the stand down on a
table, and begin the weaving at the under side of the top. Single
weaving is used for the sides, every other round passing twice
around the legs.
There being four sides in the construction, there will be an even
number of spokes, even though there should be an odd number to
each side. The weaving would thus repeat itself, in going behind and
before the same spoke each time. This is not desirable in this
construction, and a change should be made each round. To do this,
go over two spokes, instead of one, at the finish of a round. Such a
“skip” is an Indian method, and forms a design that may be carried in
slanting lines back and forth down the side of the stand. It is best to
confine these “skips” to one side. Another way to overcome the
repeat, as the weaving in and out around the same spokes in two
successive layers is called, is to insert an extra spoke on one side,
thus making an odd number of spokes around the stand. It is
necessary then to conform the design of the open work for this side
to the number of spokes. The design for the open work shown in Fig.
2 will be used for the stand illustrated in Fig. 1, and to be described
in detail. The first of the two methods of overcoming the “repeat” will
be used.
Insert the extra reed for doubling the spokes, after a few rounds
have been woven adjoining the top. The method of weaving from the
corner post and the making of the open design are shown in Figs. 7
and 8. The method of “pairing” for winding the reed in and out of the
spokes, is shown in Figs. 9 and 10. The rear weaver of the pair of
strands is thrown over the forward weaver, back of the next spoke
and out. The fore weaver then becomes the rear one, and is thrown
in like manner. This process is repeated in order to make the
complete rounds. Figure 9 shows the weaving from the side, and
Fig. 10 is a view looking down on top of the spokes and the edge of
the weaving, shown in section. Pairing gives a continuous rope twist
to the two weavers, and an even or odd number of spokes is equally
suitable.
For the open designs of Fig. 2, one or more of which may be
placed in the side of the stand, the center spokes are left free, as
shown in Fig. 7. Before turning the first weaver back for the open
work, as at M, start a short weaver N about two spokes back from
the opening, and pair it with the regular weaver across the opening,
and two spokes beyond. In turning back on the spokes, the single
weaver goes twice around the spokes, as shown by the intermediate
layers O. This is a short bend and the weavers must be very soft.
Use short ones and wet them frequently with a sponge. A sectional
view of the weaving at the opening is shown in Fig. 8, as it joins with
the weaving around the corner posts. At K, the weaver turns back on
a double thickness of reed, and at L, a short spoke is set back of the
other two, and the weaver is wound around the three, thus lessening
the abruptness of the winding. The latter method is the better. At the
horizontal center of the opening, two rounds continue across the
opening and around the stand. Pair a short piece of reed across at
the finish of the openings, as was done at the lower end at N, Fig. 7.
After weaving to within 5 in. of the bottom of the legs, cut off the
extra member of the double spokes, and soak the ends of the
remaining spokes in water. Braid them into the border finish, as
shown in Fig. 1. The corner posts serve as spoke spaces, and the
spokes nearest them are wound around the bottom ends of the legs.
Short spokes may be inserted beside the posts and wound around
them if the ends of the spokes are not long enough for this purpose.
 Fig. 3
Fig. 1 Fig. 2
Fig. 5
Fig. 4
Fig. 7 Fig. 11
Fig. 6
Fig. 12
Fig. 8 Fig. 19
Fig. 15 Fig. 16 Fig. 20
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 13 Fig. 14
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Taborets, of Light Weight and Simple Design, may be Made by the Novice
and Adapted to a Variety of Uses in the Home. They Are Particularly
Attractive for the Summer Veranda. Sewing Tables, Jardinière Stands,
Taborets, Footstools, Card Tables, and Smoking Stands Are Some of the
Possibilities. A Taboret, or Small Stand, is Illustrated in Fig. 1, and the
Details of Its Construction are Also Shown. The Tall Stand illustrated in
Fig. 2 Involves the Same General Principles of Construction, Modified to
Suit the Framework. The Footstool Shown in Fig. 3 Is Typical of Stands
Having Vertical Sides

The top may be made next. Holes are bored horizontally into the
edge of the under disk, as shown in Figs. 4 and 11. In Fig. 12 the
holes are shown bored into the edge on an angle. This method gives
a thicker rolled edge to the top, although both methods are
satisfactory. These holes must be bored before the work on the top
is begun. There are two ways of beginning the weaving for the top.
The radial spokes may cross each other in groups of four, the upper
and lower courses being bound together with winding reed, as
shown in Fig. 13, or a small maple disk may be used as a center
from which the spokes radiate, as shown in Figs. 14 and 20. The
center-disk method is not difficult, and is used extensively. The other
type is novel, and also quite feasible.
 The spokes for the method shown in Fig. 13 are bound together in
the following manner: Place two spokes at right angles to each other
and wind them with winding reed, the end of the latter beginning
between the two spokes, as shown at P, Fig. 15. The perpendicular
spoke is uppermost. Add a second perpendicular spoke and bind it
into place, as at Q. Continue this process until four perpendicular
spokes have been bound in as at R. Place a second horizontal reed
into position and go over each vertical spoke with a separate
winding, as in the first course. Continue until four horizontal spokes
are bound in, and the end of the winding reed is looped around the
last, as shown at S. The spokes should be of No. 5 reed, and 24 in.
long.
Four groups of four spokes each will result by following out the
process described. Separate the spokes by drawing the outer ones
into the corner spaces. They should have the appearance of spokes
in a wheel, as in Fig. 16. Use two weavers of No. 4 reed, in the
pairing weave, as shown in Fig. 16, and in detail in Figs. 9 and 10.
Continue the pairing weave until a center, 8 in. in diameter, is woven.
Crowd up the weaving closely, for the appearance of the top will
depend much on the first few rounds. Hold the center with the left
hand, and manipulate the weavers until they are well seated in their
proper places.
When a few rounds have been woven, nail the center securely to
its place on the middle of the top. This will leave both hands free for
the weaving. After a disk, 8 in. in diameter, has been woven, begin
the triple weave illustrated in Figs. 17 and 18. As the triple weave is
begun, add another spoke, 8 in. long, between each pair, all around
the top, making 16 new and 16 original spokes. When two or three
rounds are woven, the new spokes will become secure. Continue the
triple weave to the edge of the top. Measure and cut the end of the
spokes to uniform length. Curve the ends over the edge to see how
much will be needed before cutting, allowing about ¹⁄₂ in. for insertion
into the holes in the edge.
Wet the ends of the spokes with water until they are pliable
enough for the curve. Bending and tying them down while wet and
permitting them to dry in this position, as shown in Fig. 19, is
desirable also. Weave down the curve of the roll and insert the ends
of the spokes in their respective holes with glue. Then with the
single, plain weave on the under side of the roll, weave well up to the
ends of the spokes.
For the disk-center method of construction, as shown in Figs. 14
and 20, use ¹⁄₂-in. maple, and cut it 5 in. in diameter for the
centerpiece. To locate holes on the edge of the disk draw a line ³⁄₁₆
in. from the upper edge and mark off spaces 1 in. apart, except four,
which are made ¹⁵⁄₁₆ in. apart, to make a convenient division,
practically uniform. Bore the holes ³⁄₄ in. deep. Number 5 reed is
used for the spokes and No. 4 reed for the weavers. The disk should
be toenailed around its edge with brads, fixing it firmly to the top
before the spokes are inserted. Proceed with the pairing weave, as
in the other method described, until 2 in. of the spokes is covered;
then change to the triple weave and add additional spokes. Proceed
as with the other type from this point on.
The taboret is braced by two 1-in. dowel rods, placed 2 in. above
the bottom roll of the sides and extending from one corner to the
other, diagonally. Their crossing at the center may be made into a
halved joint, by cutting away one-half of each rod on the adjacent
edges. The ends are fitted closely into the corners, and are nailed to
the legs.
A taller stand or small table, the side weaving of which has been
described as applied to the taboret shown in Fig. 1, is illustrated in
Fig. 2. The construction in general is similar. A lighter roll is used for
the top, and the bottom ends of the legs are curved outward slightly.
The legs are curved by steaming the ends of the corner posts,
clamping them into position, and permitting them to dry.
The footstool, shown in Fig. 3, may be made as a miniature stand,
with vertical legs, and the spokes set in a circle under the top board.
The spokes and weavers will carry the form, if well woven. The stool
may also be braced, to withstand hard usage. It should be about 12
in. in diameter at the top, 10 in. in diameter for the body, and 6 in. in
height.
The method of forming the opening shown in the side of the
taboret in Fig. 1, and the weaving of the construction, will be readily
understood from the method described. The principles and methods
presented may be applied readily to other construction of the same
general type. The physical limitations of reed, as a constructive
material, and the necessity for a substantial framework must always
be considered in such adaptations in order to obtain satisfactory
results.

¶One ounce of nitrate of iron added to 8 oz. of hyposulphite of soda

in a gallon of water and applied hot, produces a green finish on
brass.
 Coaster with Safety Brake

The Brake Is a Worth-While Addition to the Coaster from the Standpoint of

Safety

Coasting on homemade devices is much enjoyed by children, but

often accompanied with dangers because of difficulty in stopping
quickly. The sketch shows a method of applying a simple brake to
such a coaster, and the materials used may be obtained easily by
boys in the home. The rubber mat indicated in the sketch gives a
secure footing. The brake consists of a piece of wood, about 10 in.
long and 3 in. wide. It is hinged to the base and held in a raised
position by a coiled string, attached near the top of the device. A
powerful pressure is obtained by throwing the rider’s weight on the
pedal.
 Fountain-Pen Wrench

The Eraser Aids in Gripping the Barrel

Experiencing considerable difficulty in unfastening the parts of my

fountain pen, I pressed into service an eraser in the method
illustrated. The grip on the pen parts was positive and resulted in
quickly releasing them without marring the surface or injuring the
fingers.—Contributed by Charles R. Mellen, Jr., Geneva, N. Y.
 Diving Tower for the Summer Camp
Aquatic pleasures and sports at a summer camp or lake may be
considerably enlivened by the building of a diving tower like that
shown in the sketch. It has proved very successful at a boys’
summer camp at Crystal Lake, Ill. The boys have made a practice for
several years of building a tower early each swimming season on the
opening of their camp in July and disposing of it for about $5 at the
close of the camp some weeks later. This covers the cost of the
lumber, and several resorts and cottages now boast towers made by
the campers.
 Boys at a Summer Camp Construct a Diving Tower Each Summer and
Dispose of It for the Cost of the Lumber When They Break Camp. The
Tower is Built Largely of Two by Four-Inch Stock and is Weighted with a
Box of Stone. At the Right Is a Reproduction of a Photograph Showing
the Builders Putting Their Diving Tower to Use

The tower is built largely of 2 by 4-in. stock. The longer pieces at

the corners are 12 ft. in length, slanted so that the lower end of the
tower is 7 ft. square and the platform at the top 3 ft. square. The
handrail at the top is fixed to extensions of the rear uprights. A spring
board is fastened on two horizontal braces near the middle of the
tower, and is reached by the ladder. The structure is built on the
shore and towed out to its position. It is sunk and weighted by the
box of stone supported on cross braces.—Contributed by F. D.
Lewis.
 Gas Mantles Made at Home
I spent several interesting hours in experimenting with gas mantles
which I made at home, and the process should be of interest to
others. While I did not succeed in making mantles of the quality of
the commercial article, they were nevertheless successful and gave
light. Magnesium produces a white light when ignited. By using
common Epsom salts, which contain magnesium sulphate, I made a
strong solution in distilled water. I soaked a piece of gauze bandage
in the solution, dried it carefully and soaked it again a number of
times, drying it after each immersion. By this time the cloth was stiff
with the dry salt. When held in a flame, the cloth catches fire and
burns out, leaving the skeleton of magnesium sulphate. This
framework, when held in the flame, glows with an intense white light.
I shaped a piece of the gauze like a commercial mantle and dipped it
into the solution as explained. It proved quite satisfactory.—
Contributed by Victor E. Carpenter, South Bend, Ind.
 Whistle Warns of Fish Catch

When the Fish Strikes the Bait the Water is Forced Up into the Whistle
Suddenly, and the Escaping Air Warns the Fisherman

A toy railroad wheel, a piece of hollow cane, and pieces of wire

are the materials necessary for making the whistle shown in the
illustration, which warns a fisherman that a fish is attempting to make
away with his bait. The wheel is fitted into the end of the cane and
wedged into place to form a tight joint. The wires are formed into
loops at the ends of the cane and fixed to it. The whistle is attached
to the fishline, as shown, with the open end down and slightly below
the surface of the water. The fishpole may be fixed so that the
whistle will remain in this position while the fisherman is at ease in
the shade near by. When the fish attempts to make away with the
bait, as shown in the sketch, the water forces the air in the upper
part of the cane out through the center hole of the wheel, and a
whistling sound is the result.
 Anchor for a Canoe or Small Boat
Small craft, particularly those used for fishing or on streams where
a current is encountered, should be provided with an anchor. The
illustration gives details for making one that is simple in construction
and inexpensive. It weighs about five pounds, and is heavy enough
for light craft up to 18 ft. long.
This Homemade Anchor Is a Practical Addition to the Equipment of a Canoe
or Small Boat, and Weighs Five Pounds

The main section was made of a piece of 1¹⁄₂-in. angle iron, 10 in.
long. The flukes, or endpieces, were made of sheet iron, 2 in. wide
and 8 in. long, bent at a right angle, and riveted in place. The straps
which hold the link, permitting it to swing freely, were made of band
iron. The link was made of an old bicycle crank, into which a ring
was forged. It may be made of iron rod, forged into the desired
shape and fitted with a ring. A convenient method of handling the