Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment Point: MN-5 The following data are excerpts from multiple reports. While the same location in the Menomonee River watershed is represented, the assessment point IDs differ. Throughout the following data, Assessment Point MN-5 is also represented by: o Reach 823 o RI-16 o Menomonee River at County Line Road o Menomonee River at Washington-Waukesha County Line
45 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o CEDARBURG CEDARBURG
43
C ii tt y o ff C y o MEQUON MEQUON
41 t u 45 t u
WILLOW CREEK
NOR-X-WAY CHANNEL
43
LIT TLE MENOMONEE RIVER UPPER MENOMONEE RIVER
45 t u 41 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o GLENDALE GLENDALE
LILLY CREEK
45 t u
43
BUTLER DITCH
41 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o B R O O K F II E L D BROOKF ELD
C ii tt y o ff C y o M II L W A U K E E M LWAUKEE
C ii tt y o ff C y o WAUWATOSA WAUWATOSA
45 t u
UNDERWOOD CREEK
43 41 t u 18 t u
94
DOUSMAN DITCH
18 t u
18 t u
94
o ff SHA SHA
94 18 t u
SOUTH BRANCH UNDERWOOD CREEK
894
C ii tt y o ff C y o W E S T A L L II S WEST ALL S
41 t u
HONEY CREEK
C ii tt y o ff C y o N E W B E R L II N NEW BERL N
45 t u
94
C ii tt y o ff C y o G R E E N F II E L D GREENF ELD
894
43
LEGEND
Water Waterbodies Watersheds Subwatersheds Combined Sewer Area Civil Divisions
0 0.5
1 Miles 2
Watershed Map
WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN MENOMONEE RIVER WATERSHED
November 10, 2008
45 t u
G " )
T " ) M " )
T " )
@ ?
145
@ ?
181
N.
BR.
NORTH BRANCH MENOMONEE RIVER
@ ?
57
Y " )
E
NO
PIG EO N
E CRE
PIT LAKE
43
@ ?
175
145
41 t u 45 t u BARK LAKE
BAR
MENOM O
W.
RI VE R
F " )
NE
ME NO MO . NEE BR
RIVER
E
LITTLE MENOMONEE CREEK
RI
" )
G
VE R
@ ?
CREEK
@ ?
167
C ii tt y o ff C y o MEQUON MEQUON
ME NO MO NE E
N MO
EE
@ ?
32
K
W " )
@ ?
167 Y " )
@ ?
167
@ ?
57
@ ?
181
WILLOW CREEK
NOR-X-WAY CHANNEL
LITTLE
@ ?
145
CH AN NE L
@ ?
175
CREEK
@ ?
57
LAC du COURS
WIL LOW
AY
NOR-X -W
Y " ) YY " )
RIV
ER
PP " )
@ ?
175 W " )
B " ) G " )
IN D
CREEK
VV " ) J " )
V VV " " ) )
Y " )
LILLY
K
RIV ER
Q " ) V " )
FISH
Q " ) F " )
Q " )
@ ?
32
CREEK
LITTLE
@ ?
57
@ ?
145
43
WAUK E MIL
@ ?
74
@ ?
100
ME
@ ?
100
@ ?
100
@ ?
32
@ ?
74
45 t u 41 t u
@ ?
181
O M
O NE
. CR
N IA
W " )
NO ME
NEE MO
RI V ER
C ii tt y o ff C y o GLENDALE GLENDALE
S " ) W " )
ER RIV
PP " )
@ ?
74
@ ?
145
LILLY CREEK
E WHIT
@ ?
74
S " )
45 t u @ ?
100 E " )
@ ?
57
SUS SEX
VV " )
43
" )
YY K " ) K " ) EE " )
@ ?
181
E CR E
K
EE " )
J " )
BUTLER DITCH
LINCOLN
Y " )
@ ?
190
@ ?
190
@ ?
190
CREEK
@ ?
190 J " )
@ ?
100
@ ?
145
@ ?
57
41 t u
@ ?
164
C ii tt y o ff C y o B R O O K F II E L D BROOKF ELD
45 t u
UN
C ii tt y o ff C y o M II L W A U K E E M LWAUKEE
DE
RIV ER
JJ " )
CREEK
PE
TJ " ) Y " )
UKE WA
FT " )
M " )
OD RW O
E
M " )
FOX
43
RIVER
ER RIV
MENO M
ONE E
94
DOUSMAN DITCH
41 t u
DOUSMAN
K EE CR
18 t u
DITCH
" )
J
JJ " )
18 t u
DEER
CRE E K
18 t u
94
A A
94
SOUTH BRANCH UNDERWOOD CREEK
t u
18
894
@ ?
181
@ ?
59 D " ) Y " )
AR PL PO
@ ?
59
@ ?
59
@ ?
59
ER RIV
O " )
@ ?
100 D " )
C ii tt y o ff C y o W E S T A L L II S WEST ALL S
41 t u KINNICKINNIC
LYONS
@ ?
32
D " ) ES " )
T " ) NN
" )
HO Y NE
HONEY CREEK
E CR EK
W IL
C ii tt y o ff C y o N E W B E R L II N NEW BERL N
SO
@ ?
9
Y " ) U " )
U " )
@ u ? t 45
100
C ii tt y o ff C y o G R E E N F II E L D GREENF ELD
@ ?
36
PA RK
94
CR.
@ ?
164
" )
O I " )
I " )
894
CREEK
@ ?
38
43
UPPER KELLY LAKE
LOWER KELLY LAKE
Y " ) N " )
" )
Y
@ ?
24
MILL
EK CR E
I " )
@ ?
119
OK
ES " )
@ ?
24
LEGEND
Water Waterbodies Watersheds Subwatersheds Civil Divisions
Aerial Map
WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN MENOMONEE RIVER WATERSHED
October, 14, 2008
45 t u
MN-1
C ii tt y o ff C y o MEQUON MEQUON
43
MN-1 MN-3
41 t u 45 t u
MN-2 MN-10
!
MN-3
!!
MN-2
!
MN-4 MN-4
MN-6 MN-5
MN-10
43
!
MN-9
MN-7
C ii tt y o ff C y o
MN-7
GLENDALE GLENDALE
45 t u
MN-8
!!
MN-12
MN-9
! !
MN-11
43
MN-12 MN-8
MN-15
41 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o B R O O K F II E L D BROOKF ELD
45 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o M II L W A U K E E M LWAUKEE
C ii tt y o ff C y o WAUWATOSA WAUWATOSA
MN-13 MN-13
MN-14
94 18 t u
!
MN-14
18 t u
MN-15 MN-17
43 41 t u 18 t u
! ! MN-16 ! MN-17
94
A A
18 t u
94
MN-18
! MN-18
894
C ii tt y o ff C y o W E S T A L L II S WEST ALL S
41 t u
C ii tt y o ff C y o N E W B E R L II N NEW BERL N
45 t u
MN-16
C ii tt y o ff C y o G R E E N F II E L D GREENF ELD
94
894
43
LEGEND
Assessment Points Water Routing Reach Tributary Area Watersheds Waterbodies Civil Divisions
! !
Mequon Road
! Ap pl et on
Av .
MN-5
!
Main St.
!
. St
LEGEND
!
" "
! !
Mequon Road
! Ap pl et on
Av .
MN-5
!
Main St.
!
. St
LEGEND
Assessment Points Water Waterbodies Watersheds Assessment Point Basins Civil Division
Land Use
Agriculture Low Density Residential High Density Residential Commercial
Institutional and Governmental Outdoor Recreation, Wetlands, Woodlands and Open Lands Transportation, Communication and Utilities Manufacturing and Industrial
Menomonee River Standards/Targets Constituent Measure Geometric Mean Standard Fecal Coliform Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Total Phosphorus (TP) Not to Exceed Standard Minimum Concentration Standard USGS Median TSS Reference Concentration (estimated background concentration) Planning Guideline Richards Baker Flashiness Index (quantifies the frequency and rapidity of short-term changes in stream flow; the index ranges from 0 - 2, with 0 being constant flow) Standard/Target 200 counts/100 ml 400 counts/100 ml 5 mg/l 17.2 mg/l 0.1 mg/l
Flashiness
indicator only
Menomonee River Watershed Restoration Plan Fact Sheet MN-5, Reach 823, RI-16, Menomonee River at Washington-Waukesha County Line (County Line Road)
Data resulting from model runs:
Figure Flashiness index Dissolved oxygen v. days per year Fecal coliform v. days per year Phosphorus v. days per year Suspended solids v. days per year Monthly chloride grab samples (CL not from models) Monthly dissolved oxygen Monthly fecal coliform Monthly phosphorus Monthly suspended solids
Overall Project Analysis Team Assessment The Flashiness Index quantifies the frequency and rapidity of short-term changes in stream flow. The index ranges from 0 Very Good Good Moderate Moderate to Poor Very Good Inconclusive (no winter data)
to 2, with 0 being constant flow. The flashiness is reasonably low at this location. Typically, aquatic communities need 5 mg/l or more of dissolved oxygen to survive. Concentrations at this site rarely fall below this level. For recreational uses, lower fecal coliform counts (a measure of bacteria) are better (preferably under 400 counts / 100ml). The counts on majority of the days are below 400. This site exhibits fewer spikes of above 5,000 counts than many of the downstream sites. Phosphorus is a nutrient that can lead to increased growth of algae. The concentrations on most days are at or below the 0.1 mg/l planning guideline, but occasionally, the concentrations exceed 0.5 mg/l. Suspended solids cause water to become cloudy, which is aesthetically unpleasant. They can also clog the gills of fish and invertebrates, make feeding difficult, and lead to sediment deposition (poor habitat). The concentrations are less than 25 mg/l during most of the days and the concentrations of suspended solids do not exceed 125 mg/l on any day These samples exhibit chloride concentrations that are below those that are toxic to fish and invertebrates. Concentrations measured in March consistently exceed the chronic toxicity threshold. However, a common source of chloride is road salt and there is no winter data. Note that concentrations in the March samples (which include snow melt and spring runoff) are higher than the rest of the year. However, chloride concentrations during the winter would be expected to be greater than those measured in March. Note the decline in dissolved oxygen concentrations during the summer. This is normal due to the decreased solubility of oxygen in warmer water. Conditions in early-to-mid summer approach the dissolved oxygen standard. While this is not a problem, it suggests that small amounts of additional organic inputs or algal growth may increase biochemical oxygen demand and create problems. While the ranges of values are fairly consistent throughout the year, notice that the median and 75th percentile values decline during the summer swimming season. This may be related to the die-off of bacteria due to solar radiation. Also note that the conditions are poorest in March and are likely related to snow melt. In most months, phosphorus concentrations exceed the planning guideline 25% to 50% of the time. Note that the lowest range of concentrations increase in the late spring and early summer, possibly related to fertilizer runoff. The concentrations of suspended solids are relatively low year-round and lower during the winter months. The lower concentrations during the winter are probably related to a number of factors including frozen conditions and low-impact storms (snow doesnt pound the soil like rain).
Good
Figure Chloride by flow (Cl not from models) Dissolved oxygen by flow Fecal coliform by flow
Overall Project Analysis Team Assessment Inconclusive (no As the field data used to develop this figure do not include samples from the winter, it is impossible to draw accurate winter data) conclusions regarding chloride from this figure. Good Moderate to Poor
Note the slight decline in the concentration of dissolved oxygen that occurs at low flows. This is likely due to a combination of decreased water agitation and higher temperatures (low flow conditions are often associated with the warm summer months). Generally, a pollutant that is present at high concentrations during high flows and low concentrations during low flows (fecal coliform, in this case) is attributed primarily to non-point sources. The infrequent sewer overflows (once every 2-5 years) would only contribute during the high flows when substantial non-point loads are present. Note that during any period with the highest flows, fecal coliform counts exceed the regulatory standard 75% of the time. During low flows, the standard is met more than 75% of the time. This would be the safest time for any recreational uses (boating, swimming, wading, etc.), although the amount of water in the stream may limit recreational use to wading. Concentrations of phosphorus are greatest at high and low flows. This suggests a background source of phosphorus that is particularly noticeable during low flows as well as non-point loading of phosphorus at high flows (likely associated with suspended sediment). The concentrations of suspended solids increase with increased flows, suggesting contributions from non-point sources. The suspended solids may come from runoff that carries a sediment load, from stream bank erosion, or re-suspended stream sediments.
Flashiness Index
Reach RI-16
Assessment Point
MN-5 Menomonee River at WashingtonWaukesha County Line
Statistic
Condition Existing
1,417 68 205 202 890 82 105 125 10.5 10.7 99 0.097 0.063 70 1.21 1.08 10.2 6 0.0041 0.0016
Mean (cells per 100 ml) Percent compliance with single sample standard (<400 cells per 100 ml) Geometric mean (cells per 100 ml) Days of compliance with geometric mean standard (<200 cells per 100 ml)
Mean (cells per 100 ml) Percent compliance with single sample standard (<400 cells per 100 ml) Geometric mean (cells per 100 ml) Days of compliance with geometric mean standard (<200 cells per 100 ml)
Dissolved Oxygen
Mean (mg/l) Median (mg/l) Percent compliance with dissolved oxygen standard (>5 mg/l)
Total Phosphorus
Mean (mg/l) Median (mg/l) Percent compliance with recommended phosphorus standard (0.1 mg/l)
Total Nitrogen
Copper
400
360
320
280
240
200
160
120
80
40
0 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 >10
Average DO (mg/L)
360
320
280
240
200
160
120
80
40
360
320
280
240
200
160
120
80
40
0 0-0.05 0.05-0.1 0.1-0.15 0.15-0.2 0.2-0.25 0.25-0.3 0.3-0.35 0.35-0.4 0.4-0.45 0.45-0.5 >0.5
Average TP (mg/L)
360
320
280
240
200
160
120
80
40
Concentration (mg/L)
100
10
High Flows
Moist Conditions
Mid-range Flows
Dry Conditions
Low Flows
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flow Duration Interval (%)
Concentration (mg/L)
10
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flow Duration Interval (%)
1.E+04
Concentration (cfu/100 mL)
1.E+03
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flow Duration Interval (%)
Concentration (mg/L)
0.10
0.01
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flow Duration Interval (%)
Concentration (mg/L)
100
10
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Flow Duration Interval (%)