You are on page 1of 24

THE VALIDITY OF FIRE PREVENTION

PROGRAM IN LALA MUNICIPAL FIRE


STATION

Tito S. Cadeliña Jr John Lloyd G. Ansao Ivy Rose P. Espina Jaymar Pajente, MM-EM

ID No: 216923 ID No: 218945 ID No: 212971 Adviser


Rationale
• To ensure better and more effective
programs in the community through the
BFP's implementation of various fire
prevention activities and initiatives. The
community will be better informed on how
to protect themselves in the event of a
fire.
• To inform them that, in order to avoid any fire
catastrophes, we should begin by becoming
wiser ourselves. Fire can claim lives, so be
wise enough to keep yourself safe. Safety
starts with you; you are the one who
determines your own safety.

• The BFP's efforts, as well as their programs,


are commended for their dedication and
passion in keeping the community safe and
prepared in the event of a fire.
Significance of the Study:

• School Administrators
• Teachers
• BFP
• Parents
• Students
• Community
• Future Researchers
Theories:
 Theory of Planned Behavior
(Ajzen, 1985),
 Health Belief Model (Rosenstock,
1974),
 Protection Motivation Theory
(Rogers, 1975)
Independent Variables Dependent Variables Output

1. Profile of the Community:


1.1 type of respondents

1.1.1 BFP

1.1.2 local residents E


N
1.2 age
H
1.3 gender A
N
1.4 educational attainment C
3. Validity of Prevention
1.5 rank (BFP only) Program E
M
1.6 community (for local residents E
only) N
T
2. Fire Prevention Program PROGRAM
2.1 OLP-oplan ligtas na
pamayanan
2.2 Fire drills
2.3 Earth quake drill
Schematic Diagram
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM:
1. What is the profile of the respondents of:
1.1 type of respondents;
1.1.1 BFP;
1.1.2 local residents;
1.2 age;
1.3 gender;
1.4 educational attainment;
1.5 rank (BFP only); and
1.6 community (for local residents only)?
2. What is the fire prevention program interms of:

2.1 OLP - oplan ligtas na pamayanan


2.2 Fire drills
2.3 Earth quake drill
3. What is the validity prevention

program interms of:


4. Is there significant relationship
between the profile of the
respondents and the validity of
prevention program?
5. Is there significant relationship between
the fire prevention program and the
validity of prevention program?

6. What is the possible enhancement


program will be drawn based on the
result of the study?
Hypotheses
Hypotheses is null forms are formulated and tested

empirically at 0.05 level of significance.

Ho1: There is no significant relationship between the socio-

economic profiles of the respondents and the new normal phase

of flexible learning.

Ho2: There is no significant relationship between the effects

of e-learning behavior and the new normal phase of flexible

learning.
DEFINITION OF TERMS:
 Age
 Gender
 Educational Attainment
 BFP
 Community
 Fire Prevention Program
 Validity
 OLP
 Fire Drills
 Earthquake Drills
Research Design
• This research design will use in this study the
descriptive correlational research design, which involved
gathering of data in order to answer the questions
concerning the validity of fire prevention program in
Maranding, Lala, Lanao del Norte. This design will focus
on validity of fire prevention program . The aimed of the
design is to determined the impact of the fire prevention
program.
Statistical Treatment
1. Frequency and or Percentage
Distribution
2. Average Weighted Mean
3. Chi-square
QUESTIONNAIRE
Fire Prevention Program
Validity of Prevention Program
THANKYOU

And

God Bless!!

You might also like