Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ﺚ
ﺺ ﺍﻟﺒﺤ
ﺨ
ﻣﻠ
ﺳ ﻌﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔ ﻲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺋ ﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﻟﻠﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ
ﺺ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ )ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮﰲﹼ ،ﻭﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﱘ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ( ﻭﺃﻥ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ
ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﻭ ﺧﹸﻠ
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﲑﺓ .ﻭﺗﻮﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺑﻨﻮﺩ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺘﻤﺔ ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻔﺤﺺ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺰﻳﺎ ﲤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮﰲﹼ،
ﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ %1ﺇﱃ .%1
ﺕ ﻧﺴﺒ ﹲﺔ ﻣﺌﻮﻳﺔ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮﰲ ﺗﺮﺍﻭﺣ
ﻭﺗﻬﻤﻞ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺇﺫ ﻇﻬﺮ
ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﳎﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﹰﺎ ،ﺇﺫ ﺣﺼﻠﺖ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ %ﰲ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ
ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﻧﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﱘ ﺻﻔﺮﺍ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ.
ﺍﳌﻘ ﺪﻣﺔ
ﺗ ﻌ ﺪ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﳘﻴ ﹰﺔ ﰲ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﻌﻠﱡﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺼﻔ ﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻟﻐﲑ
ﺱ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﻜﱡﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ
ﺴ ﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ ﹺ
ﺃﻫﻠﻬﺎ؛ ﳌﺎ ﺗﺆﺩﻳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﹺﺟ
)ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺎﻉ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﺔ( ،ﻭﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﻘﱠﺪﺓ ﺗﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻭﺗﺘﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ )ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ،
ﺕ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﺋ ﹶﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌ ﺦ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ،ﰒ ﺭﺑﻂ ﻛ ﱢﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﳋﱪﺓ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﺪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ( .ﻭﻳﺘ ﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺍ
ﺐ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻬﺎ؛ ﻷﻧﻬﺎ – ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ –
ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﺭﺉ ﻭﺻﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ .ﻭﻋﻤﻠﻴ ﹲﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻳﺼﻌ
∗دآر
ا
ت ،ا
ا ا
! " #$% #&' ً
،آ ا
ت.
1
ﺻﺎﻣﺘﺔ ،ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻣﺘﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺻﻴﻔﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﳉﻬﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻒ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﰲ
ﺍﻷﻳﺪﻱ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﺘﻨﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻣﺘﺔ ،ﺑﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﺟﺎﻫﺪﻳ ﻦ ﻟﻠﺘﻐﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺄﺧﺮﺟﻮﺍ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﺜﻞ standardized test ﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺣ ﺪ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﻨﻨﺔ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺪﻑ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﻭﺻﻠ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ،TOEFL Testﻭﺍﻣﺘﺤﺎﻥ(IELTS) International English Language Testing System ﺗﻮﻓﻞ
ﺐ ﰲ ﺧﺎﻧﺔ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻹﳒﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ ﺑﻮﺻﻔﻬﺎ ﻟﹸﻐ ﹰﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻭﺃﺟﻨﺒﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻓﺘﻌﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﺍﻧﺼ
ﺍﺎﻝ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﻳﺘ ﻢ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺅﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺪﺭﺳﲔ ،ﻭﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﻟﺘﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﰲﹼ ،ﻓﺄﺳﺌﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ Bloom ﺼﻨﻒ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺮﻡ ﺑﻠﻮﻡ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗ
ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﳏﺪﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻤﻞ ﺗﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ .Intellectual growthﻭﻣﻦ
ﻫﻨﺎ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺤﻨﲔ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻘﻨﻨﺔ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ
ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺑﻮﺻﻔﻬﺎ ﻟﻐ ﹰﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺟﻨﺒﻴﺔ.
ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ
-1ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻮﺟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ﻤﺘﺤﻦ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ؟
-ﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍ ﰲ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ؟
"-ﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﰲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺰﻳﺎ؟
ﺃﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ
ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ
ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ – ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ – ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴﺔ
ﻼ ﻏﲑ ﺭﺷﻴﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺑﻮﺻﻔﻬﺎ ﻟﹸﻐ ﹰﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﻴ ﹰﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺟﻨﺒﻴ ﹰﺔ.
ﺕ ﺇﳘﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺷﻬﺪ
ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ
ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ
ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ #ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ،ﱠﰎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻋﺸﻮﺍﺋﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﻬﻢ
ﺖ ﰲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺰﻳﺎ.
ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﹸﺟﺮﻳ
ﻱ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ
ﺍ ِﻹﻃﹶﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻈ ﹺﺮ
"
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ -1
ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺆﻟﱠﻔﺎﺕ ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﻋﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﻃﻘﲔ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻧﻨﻜﺮ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﻟﻠﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ 1ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺎ ﻗﻴﻤﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﺺ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﲟﺒﺤﺚ ﻓﻴﻪ،
ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﳛﻤﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﻃﻘﲔ ﺑﻐﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺧ
ﻼ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭﻛﱠﺰ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﺳﺲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﳍﺎ ﺗﻨﺎﻭ ﹰﻻ ﳎﻤ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺇﺫ ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﳕﺎﺫﺝ ﻃﻴﺒﺔ ﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ .ﻭﻟﻄﻌﻴﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺳ ﹾﻔ ﹺﺮ ﻩ ﺍﻟ ﹶﻘﻴﻢ – ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﰲ
ﺺ
ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﻃﻘﲔ ﺑﻠﻐﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ – ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺣﺪﻳﺜﻪ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹰﺎ ﻋﺎﻣﺎ ﱂ ﳜ
ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﲜﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﳏﺪﺩﺓ.
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﻃﻘﲔ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻓﺈ ﱠﻥ ﺣﺎﳍﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ
ﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ .2ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ
ﺕ ﻛﺘ
ﺕ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ،ﻭﻇﻬﺮ
ﺠ ﺪ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺇﺫ ﻛﺜﹸ ﺮ
ﺍﻹﳒﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ ﹶﻟ ﹺ
ﺍﻟﻠﺼﻴﻘﺔ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﲝﺚ ﻗﺪﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﹶﺭﻙ Park 3ﲢﺪﺙ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺼﻨﻴ
ﻒ Taxonomyﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﰲ ﺳﺘﺔ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ،
ﻼ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳊﺎﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ
ﻭﺃﺑﺮﺯ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻓﻴ ﹰﺔ ﳉﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﻔﺎﻋ ﹰ
4
?What Do We Test When We Test Reading ﲝﺚ ﺻﻐﲑ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ: Akmar ﺑﺎﺭﻙ .Parkﻭﻷﻗﻤﺎﺭ
ﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ،ﻭﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﻧﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ
ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﳔﺘﱪ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻴﺲ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ؟ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻗﻤﺎ ﺭ ﺍﳍ ﺪ
ﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ ﰲ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ،ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻟﻐﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻀﻤﻨﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﲢﺪﺙ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ
ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﲝﺚ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳊﺎﱄ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ.
ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ -
1
" !+ا
،!- ،.
/ا+,رات ا
،ا
ض ،ا
) د1-#- ،م ،ص .14 -1-
%إ
،56
7 8
9 :وه:
- Mee, Sherry, Steve, Handbook of Reading Assessment, Pearson, #.
- Calkins, Lucy, A Teacher‘s Guide to Standardized Reading Test, Heinemann, 1--#.
"
Park, Jeong-Suk, Charles, Developing Reading Comprehension Question , reading in a Foreign Language,r.17, No.1, April
.
4
Mahmud, Akmar, What Do We Test When We Test Reading? http://itelslj.org/Techniques/Reading/.html
4
ﺗﻌ ﺪ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﹸﻌ ﱠﻘﺪﺓ ﺇﺫ ﺗﺘﺸﺎﺑﻚ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﺑﺪﺀًﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺰ
ﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﻮﺯ ﺍﳌﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ ،ﻭﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎ ًﺀ ﺑﺮﺑﻄﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﳋﱪﺍﺕ
ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻮﻋﺔ ﻭﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻟ ﹶﻔ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺗﺞ ﰲ ﺣ ﱢﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻼﺕ.5
ﻭﺑﻨﺎ ًﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗ ﹶﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﺈ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﳉﻴﺪﺓ ﳍﺎ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ ،ﻭﻫﻲ:
ﺝ -ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎ ﻋ ﹸﻞ ﺏ -ﺍﻟ ﹶﻔ ﻬ ﻢ ﺃ – ﺍﻟﺘﻌ ﺮﻑ
ﻫـ -ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺗﺞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﱪﺍﺕ ﰲ ﺩ -ﺭﺑﻂ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺑﺎﳋﱪﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ
ﺕ ﺍﻵﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻴﺔ.
ﺣ ﱢﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻼ
ﻭﺗﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ -1 :ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺻﺎﻣﺘﺔ -ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺟﻬﺮﻳﺔ.
ﻭﻳﻬﻤﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻷ ﻭﻝ – ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻣﺘﺔ – ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﲎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ
ﺺ ،ﻭﻻ ﺩﺧﻞ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻔﺘﲔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻧﺴﺒ ﹰﺔ ﻷﳘﱠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻣﺘﺔ ﺃﻭﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﻣﺞ
ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﺘﺎﺑﻊ ﻟﻠﻨ
ﺻﺔﹰ ،ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﺞ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺑﻮﺻﻔﻬﺎ ﻟﹸﻐ ﹰﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﻴ ﹰﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺟﻨﺒﻴﺔﹰ؛ ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺎﻋﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺃﳘﻴ ﹰﺔ ﺧﺎ
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﳍﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧ ﹰﺔ ﺑﺮﺻﻴﻔﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﳉﻬﺮﻳﺔ.
ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ،ﻭﺟﹺﺴﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺻﻞ "ﺍﳌﻜﺘﻮﺏ" ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ،ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﻭﻳﻌﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻮﻳﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻧﺼﻮﺹ ﻗﺮﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﺼﺤﻮﺑ ﹰﺔ ﺑﺄﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻣﺪﻯ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﰲ
ﺣﻴﺰ ﺯﻣﲏ ﳏﺪﺩ .ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻣﺘﺔ ﺻﻌﻮﺑ ﹰﺔ ﻭﺗﻌﻘﻴﺪﺍ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺮﻛﱢﺰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﺑﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﻴﺲ ﺷﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﻤﻮﻉ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺮﺋﻲ.
ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻭﻣﺘﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺋﻴﺔ
ﺕ ﻣﺄﺧﻮﺫﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻣﻮﺯ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﺮﺋﻴﺔ ﳛﻮﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺉ ﺇﱃ
ﲎ ﻭﻓﺎﻗﹰﺎ ﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎ
ﻻﺣﻈﻨﺎ ﳑﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻣﻌ
ﻂ ﻭﺛﻴ ﻖ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﰐ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ
ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻐ ﺔ ﲢﻤﻞ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ،ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺭﺑ ﹲ
ﺍﻟﻌﺐﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺉ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻓﺤﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ
را>= ، ? :ر!Eي ،ا
>=
B Cا
A 7 6?@'
@ Aت أ ,ى ،أم ا
6ى ،و!ة ا
-+ث وا
'ه !F ،Gا
ا
،@ Aد.ت ،.ج ،ص .1#
وا
'6ري- O
P ،ب ،ا ا Cت BCا
ا
F %Mرة ا
6اءة %ذ>ً ،ا
? /م ،ا
A 7 6?'
@ Aه > ،أ
6ا
،ا
!د ' ،-
1م ،ص.111
ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺒﻴﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺻﻌﻮﺑ ﹰﺔ ﻭﻏﻤﻮﺿﺎ؛ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺮﺑﻂ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺗﻪ ﰲ )ﻝ( ﺑﲔ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ
ﰊ ﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ،
ﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺓ ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺗﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎ
ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺎ
ﻚ
ﻑ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋ ﺔ )ﹶﻓ
ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ.ﺗﻨﺸﻄﺮ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻛ ﱡﻞ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺎﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﺎﺭ
ﺭﻣﻮﺯﹺ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻓﻮﻧﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺩﻻﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﳓﻮﻳﺔ ...ﺇﱁ( .ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺗﺎﻥ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ
ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻣﺘﺔ ،ﻭﳘﺎ:6
-ﺍﻟﻔﹶﻬ ﻢ -1ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ
ﰊ
ﺭﺑﻂ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻣﺰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎ ﺃ-
ﻱ.
ﺏ -ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ
ﺝ -ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ.
ﺩ -ﺭﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻣﺰ ﺍﳌﻜﺘﻮﺏ.
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ. ﻩ-
6
را>=
! 7ا
، ? &8ا
>= ا
،TU8% .AUو ،-
،S%أ ت B Cا
ا
Aوا
ّ Aا ّ ،ا
6ه ة ،دار ا
"+W
6Mوا
' ،
1-#1م ،ص 17و !Aه! ،آر " ،أ!!C ،ر'
Sن ا
ا
،ّ Aا
+Y ،ZYا
8ح1-#4 ،م ،ص 16و !Aه .و B C ،7U ،TC-Eا
ا
7 A Aا
'\ وا
،. +Wا
6ه ة ،ا
!ار ا
&
، %'+د.ت .ص ".1
Alderson, Charles, Assessing Reading, Cambridge,-, p. 1- "1, and Mee, Sherry, Reading Assessment, Pearson, #, p.
"-, and Ur, Penny, A Course in Language Teaching, Cambridge, 1--7, p. 1"#.
6
ﻳﻌ ﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﳉﻴﺪﺓ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﻗﺮﺍﺀ ﹰﺓ ﺳﻠﻴﻤ ﹰﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻓﻬ ﹴﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻌ ﺪ ﻗﺎﺭﺋﹰﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻓﺎ ﻙ ﻟﻠﺮﻣﻮﺯ .7ﻭﻣﻦ
ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ:
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﰲ ﻭﺣﺪﺍﺕ ﻓﻜﺮﻳﺔ. ﺃ-
ﺏ -ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺗﺒﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ.
ﺝ -ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻻﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ.
ﺩ -ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ.
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻔﺎﻅ ﺑﺎﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺮﺟﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ. ﻩ-
ﻭ -ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﺗﻔﺴﲑﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﺍﳋﱪﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ.
ﺺ ﻭﻧﻘﺪﻩ.
ﺯ -ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺃﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﳉﹸﻤﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ. ﺡ-
ﻁ -ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺍﳉﹸﻤﻞ؛ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻇﻪ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ.
ﻱ -ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻟﻠﻜﻠﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ.
ﺱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲣﻤﲔ ﺑﻌﺾ
ﻼ ﻋﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﺈ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ
ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ،ﻭﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﺃﻱ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺇﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺫﻫ ﹴﻦ ،ﻭﻓﻬ ﹴﻢ ﳌﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﻮﺭ.
7
ن \ Bدار آ ا
ّت
! BFا
!6رة " :ا
6اءة ،ٍ `WAو
7Yدون
BFد` f
.ن ،و`! اآ ْZ+Uه dا
> c8ل ا
6اءة C 7وة ا
a 6ن ُ] أ ّ
.ً P
ا
Fا
ن "' ً @ ,
7
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﺪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻹﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻓﺾ؛ ﻟﻴﺼ ﹶﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭﺉ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻣﻊ
ﺺ.
ﺍﻟﻨ
#
? ،ر!Eي ،إ"!اد ا
cjا
ر` اh dُ ،ّ %-iآ ة ' gرة > ،ارات ا
@ Aا
ّ!-ة1-- ،م ،ص.
-
ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻳﻔﺘﺮﺽ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻀﻤﻦ ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻃﹸﺮﺣﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ
ﺟﻴﺪﺓ ﻓﺈﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺑﺎﺭﻙ ،9 Parkﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻫﻲ:10
ﻫﺮﻡ ﺑﻠﻮﻡ ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﺺ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻓﻬﻢ
ﻳﻬﺪﻑ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﺩﱏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﺘﻤﺜﱢﻞ ﰲ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﻣﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩﺍﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺭﻳﺦ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ...ﺇﱁ ،ﻭﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ
ﺺ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻣﻬﻢ؛ ﻷﻧﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺘﻪ ﻧﻘﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺪﻯ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ
ﺍﻟﻨ
11
ﺺ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺘﻪ :ﻣﱴ ﻭﻟ ﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ؟
ﻟﻸﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺺ
ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﻫﺬ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﺩﱏ ﺇﺫ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮﰲﹼ ،ﻓﺎﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﺃﺟﺰﺍ ًﺀ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺺ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌ ﻲ ﻭﻟﺪ ﻋﺎﻡ 1ﻫـ ،ﻭﳚﺪ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﰲ
ﻟﻠﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﺑﻔﻬﻢ ﺇﺿﺎﰲﹼ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﻘﺮﺃ ﰲ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﲔ ﻟﻺﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﻵﰐ:
ﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺘ ﹺ
ﺖ ﻋﺎﻡ 4ﻫـ ،ﻓﲑﺑﻂ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺎﺗ ﹺ
ﺺ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﻭﻓﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌ ﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺪﺛ
ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﻛﻢ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌ ﻲ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﰲ؟ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺑﺎﺭﻙ Parkﻭﺭﻳﺸﺎﺭﺩ ،12 Richardﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻬ ﻢ ﻟﻠﻐﺎﻳﺔ؛ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳉﺰﺋ ﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﻮﱄﹼ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻮﻗﻊ ﺃﻥ
ﰲ.
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺻﻌﻮﺑ ﹰﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮ ﹼ
-
Park, Jeong-Suk, Richard, Developing Reading Comprehension Question, Reading in A Foreign Language, Volume 17, No.
1, April 6 , p.6.
1
ا
>= ا
،TU8% .AUص .6 – 6
11
(( ا
>د
آب ا
A 7 6?'
Aه
+Wا
م ا،ّ %U%
)) lام ا
ّ
ا"! ا
g P
m+ا cjا
>دة
هdا ا
ّ % :" BU6
آ ا
ّت ،ا
ا ّ ا
ّ
# ،م ،ص .6"-6
1
Aرك ورEرد ،.A => ،ص .64
1
ﰲ ﻟﻠﻨﺺ ،ﻓﺎﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ، ،
ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮ ﹼ
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ
ﺺ ﻭﺧﱪﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﻭﺗﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺬﻝ ﺟﻬﺪﺍ ﻟﻠﺮﺑﻂ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻬﻤﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺺ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺃﺳﻔﺎﺭﻩ؟
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺨﻤﲔ .ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﻫﻮ :ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻓﻬﻤﻚ ﻟﻠﻨ
ﻓﺎﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ.
-6ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺘﻪ ﻻ ﻭﺟﻮ ﺩ ﻟﻺﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺻﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺃﻭ
ﺺ .ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺘﻪ :ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺎﻝ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺑﻚ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻞ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺑﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ؟ ﻭﳌﺎﺫﺍ؟
ﺧﻄﺌﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺻﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨ
11
ﺧﺎﻣﺴﺎ :ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ
ﺺ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ
ﻳﺘ ﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﳓﻮ :ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻼﺕ ،ﻭﺍﳉﺮﺍﺋﺪ...ﺇﱁ ،ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺲ ﻭﺳﻼﻣﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻔﲔ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭﺃﺳﺲ ﺗﻌﲔ
ﺃﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﻮﻳﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﳊ
ﺺ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺐ ،ﻭﻫﻲ:13
ﻣﺼﻤﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺺ ﻭﻗﺼﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻱ ،ﻭﻧﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ
ﻳﺘﻮﱠﻗﻒ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺃ-
ﺺ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻠﻤﺒﺘﺪﺋﲔ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ – 1ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻠﻤﺘﻮﺳﻄﲔ – 1
ﺍﻟﻨ
ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺘﻘﺪﻣﲔ – " ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ،ﻷ ﱠﻥ ﻭﺍﺿﻊ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺼﻤﻢ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ
ﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻀﻊ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ 4ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ 1ﻛﻠﻤﺔ .ﻭﻟﻜﻲ ﻧﺒﺘﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﳏﺎﺑﺎﺓ ﻓﺌﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ ﻳﺴﺘﺤ
ﺺ.
ﻧﻘﺪﻡ ﳍﻢ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻧ
ﻟﻠﻤﺤﺎﻓﻈﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ،ﺍﺧﺘ ﺮ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ً ﻟﻜ ﱢﻞ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺻﻔﺎﺕ. ﺏ-
ﺹ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗ ﹼﻞ ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ .reliability
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎ ﺭ ﺛﻼﺛ ﺔ ﻧﺼﻮ ﹴ ﺝ-
ﺍﺧﺘ ﺮ ﻧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺎ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻣﺒﺜﻮﺛﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ scanning ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﺺ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﺩ-
ﺺ.
ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﲔ ﻭﺧﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺛﺎﺭﺓ.
ﺹ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﺼﻮ ﹴ ﻩ-
ﺍﻻﺑﺘﻌﺎﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﻤﻞ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ؛ ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺇﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻭ-
ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ.
ﺹ ﺍﳌﺸﺤﻮﻧﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺮﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﻛﻴﺐ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﱠﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻ ﺑ ﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ،
ﺍﻻﺑﺘﻌﺎﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ ﹺ ﺯ-
ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﺎﻍ ﺻﻴﺎﻏ ﹰﺔ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓﹰ؛ ﻹﺯﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﻛﻴﺐ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﱠﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﳚﺐ ﺃ ﱠﻻ ﻧﺒﺎﻟﻎ ﰲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻬﻴﻞ.
"1
ا
ّ'6ري- O
P ،ب ،أ
#إ"!اد ا+,iرات ا
ّّ ،آُ ' g #ر ،ا
ا ّ ا
ّ
1--7 ' ،م ،ص " ،و" !+ا
،.
/
،!-ا+,رات ا
> ،ا
) د1-#- ،م ،ص ،1-#و
Hughes, Arthur, Testing for Language Teachers, Cambridge University Press, 1-#-, p.11- – 1.
1
ﺍﻻﺑﺘﻌﺎﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﻃﱠﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ،ﺃﻭ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳ ﹶﻈ ﻦ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﺍ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺡ-
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺜﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺻﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﺃﻳﺴﻤﺢ ﻟﻠ ﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ ﺑﺎﻟ ﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﺃﻡ ﻳﺴﺤﺐ
ﺺ ﳛﻮﻝ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻟﻠﺬﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﳑﺎ
ﺺ ﳊﻈ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ؟ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻫ ﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺳﺤﺐ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺍﻟﻨ
14
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻻ ﺳﺎﺳﻮ
ﻧﻘ ﹰ Charles ﻭﺷﺎﺭﻟﺲ Park ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻟﻠﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺏ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﻙ
ﺺ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻬﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧ ﹰﺔ ﺑﺴﺤﺒﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ،
ﺖ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨ
ﺇﱃ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻷﺧ ﲑ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳ ﺔ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺛﺒ Lassaso
ﻭﻳﻼﺣﻆ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺸﺄﺓ ،constructed responseﻭﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺗﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ
ﺺ ﻭﺳﺤﺒﻪ ،ﻓﺎﻷﺧﲑﺓ ﺗﺴﻬﻞ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﺼﻌﺐ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺸﺄﺓ .ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺃ ﱠﻥ
ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺺ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﳒﻌﻠﻪ ﻳﻌﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺘﲔ ﰲ ﺁ ﻥ
ﺩﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺑﻐﲑﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺳ ﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﻭﺍﺣ ﺪ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻟﺬﺍﻛﺮﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﻔﻬﻤﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺘﺼﺎﺭﻉ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻐﺘﺎ ﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ
ﺍﳍﺪﻑ.
14
Alderson, p.17.
1
Alderson, p. 16#.
"1
ﺳﺎﺑﻌﺎ :ﻣﻮﺍﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ
ﺗﺆﺩﻱ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ ﻓﻌﺎ ﹰﻻ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺭﺑﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻭﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ،ﻭﲢﺪﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺍﻷﻭﺯﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺷﺮﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﹰﺎ .16ﻭﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ
ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺻﻔﺎﺕ specificationsﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ:
-ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﳌﻤﺘﺤﻦ )ﻋﻤﺮﻩ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻪ ،ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ ،ﻟﹸﻐﺘﻪ -1ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ.
16
ا \%ص 7 1هdا ا
.m-+
17
Alderson, p.1-.
14
ﺛﺎﻣﻨﺎ :ﺗﻘﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ
ﻳﻌ ﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻬ ﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ،ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻓﻜﺮﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻧﺎﻗﺼﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﺗﻠﻴﻪ
ﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺪﺍﺋﻞ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺔ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻮﺟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺳ ﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﻍ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺔ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﶈﻮﻻﺕ ،distractersﻭﻣﻦ
ﺻﻮﺭﻩ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﲨﻴﻊ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﺋﻞ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺑﺪﻳﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻳﻄﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ،ﻭﻳﻌﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺰﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻩ:18
ﺹ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ.
ﺺ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ
ﺍﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋﺔ ﲝﻴﺚ ﺗﻐﻄﻲ ﺍﻟﻨ ﺃ-
ﺏ -ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻧﺴ ﹰﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ.
ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺍﻋﻲ ﰲ ﺍﶈﺎﻭﻻﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺌﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ: ﺝ-
-ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎﻭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﻄﱡﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺼﺮ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ.
-ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺯ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻹﻣﻜﺎﻥ.
1#
ا
ّ'6ري- O
P ،ب و ، ,aا+,iرات ا
ّّ ،ا
ا
!
ّ Aرات ا
،ا
? /م !F ،ا
? /م ا
!و
،ا
!د ،د6 ، +Uم ،ص
.#
1
-ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮﻳﺔ.
-ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﻣﻘﻨﻌﺔ.
ﺩ -ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻋﺸﻮﺍﺋﻴﺎ.
ﱯ
ﺳﻠ ﺃ-
ﺏ -ﻳ ﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﻟﻠﺨﻄﺄ
ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻤﲔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺠﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺷﻚ. ﺝ-
ﺾ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻟﻠﺪﺍﺭﺱ؛ ﻷ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻻ ﲢﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ
-ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺩ ﺣ
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺡ
ﺧﻄﺄ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﶈﻮﻻﺕ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ،ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﺔ ))ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻤﲔ(( ﻓﻘﻂ.
ﺖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺘﻤﺔ ،close test 19ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﻧ
ﺺ ﺣﺬﹶﻓ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﺭﻗﻢ -ﺃﻭ ،11ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﺃ ﱠﻻ ﻳﺘ ﻢ ﺍﳊﺬﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻭﻳﻄﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺳ ﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﻍ ﺑﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻬﻢ
ﻱ ﻟﻠﺪﺍﺭﺱ.
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺻﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮ
ﺺ ﻭﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﻛﻠﱢﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨ
1-
را>= ا
ّ'6ري ،أ
#إ"!اد ا ,iرات ا
ّ ،.A => ،ص 17و
Madsen, Harold, Techniques in Testing, Oxford University Press, 1-#", p.-".
را>= ،.A => ،Madsenص .-
16
ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲡﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹶﺍﺗﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻌﻦ
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﲤﺘﺎﺯ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﻧﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻋﻴﻨ ﺔ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻬﺪﻓﺔ ،ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﺑﺎﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺼﺤﺢ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺧﻮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ.
ﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻣﺎ ﱠﰎ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻧﻮ ﺩ ﺃﻥ ﳔﺘﻤﻪ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﰲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ
ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﱠﰎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ #ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻋﺸﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﲤﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ #ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ
ﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﻲ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ 11 – 1ﻡ.
ﺼ ﺮ
ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻘﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﹸﻗ
ﺃ -ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﺑﻨﺎ ًﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺒﻨﺎﻩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ،ﻣﻊ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ.
ﺏ -ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺗﻴﺔ.
ﺝ -ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﺑﺘﻮﺻﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺰ.
1
را>=
! 7ا
@Hughes, p.1- : &8
17
ﺃ ﻭ ﹰﻻ :ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ
ﺖ ﻋﻴﺒﺎ
ﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﺔ ﺑﻨﻘﻴﺼﺔ ﺃﺎ ﻣﻄﱠﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﹶﻗﺒ ﹸﻞ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ ﺑﻞ ﲪﻠ
ﻭﱂ ﺗﻜﺘ
ﺺ! ﺇﺫ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ
ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻴﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺴﺒ ﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺒﺴﻄﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺣ ﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻝ.
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ )ﺍﻷﻋﻴﺎﺩ ،ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺩ( ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﺺ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﹶﺛ ﻢ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺷﺮﻧﺎ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﹰﺎ ﰲ
ﺖ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺑﺘﻘﺪﱘ ﻧ
ﺍﻛﺘﻔ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻻ ﻳﻀﻤﻦ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ .reliabilityﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﶈﻤﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺰ ﺃ ﱠﻥ
ﺖ ﻵﺧﺮ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ
ﺺ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗ
ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﺼﺤﻮﺑﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ،ﻓﻠﺪﻳﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺻﺔ ﳌﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻴﺤﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻚ ﻳﺘﻤﺎﺷﻰ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﻮﻥ؛ ﻷ ﱠﻥ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻓﻬﻢ
ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ،ﻻ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺬﱠﺍﻛﺮﺓ.
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ن ا
َ' -ول )ا
،ّ
-
Bّ Cا+د "'& ا
ّ' -C !'" 9t+أوراق ا+,ر
BFا
6وء؛ Tّ%jأ
& 6A .س
BFا
6وء دا ,ات ا
!hرا :' ،ذ
) أ ّ
إ"دة ا
@'\ ،Bا'iج ،ا
@ B6ا Aiا
ّ.(ّ &/
1#
ﺺ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻗﻌﺖ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ
ﱠﰎ ﻋﺮﺽ 1ﺳﺆﺍ ﹰﻻ ﻣﺒﻨﻴﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧ
ﺺ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﲡﺎﻩ ﻳﻨﺎﺳﺐ
ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ )ﺍﻟﺘﺬﻛﱡﺮ( ،ﻓﺎﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﺃﻱ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﹰﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺺ ﺃﻱ ﻫﻮ
ﲔ ﻟﻸﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺤﻨ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺇﺫ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﻬﺪﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺪﻯ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻤﺘ
ﻓﺤﺺ ﺳﻄﺤ ﻲ ﻻ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﱠﺜﺎﱐ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﱠﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﺺ ﻭﺍﺣ ﺪ ،ﻭ 1ﺳﺆﺍﻻﹰ %# ،ﻟﻠﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮﰲﹼ ،ﻭ %17ﻹﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻭ" %1ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ
ﺑﻪ ﻧ
ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻳ ﺪ ﱡﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﹼﰎ ﻋﺸﻮﺍﺋﻴﺎ ،ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﻳﺪﻱ ﻭﺍﺿﻊ
ﰲ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻗﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘ ﹼﻞ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺎ ،ﺇﺫ ﲤﺪﺩﺕ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮ ﹼ
ﲔ.
ﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘ ﹺ
ﻣﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳ ﹺ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟ ﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ
1-
ﰲ ،ﻭ %47ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ .ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ
ﺺ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭ 1ﺳﺆﺍ ﹰﻻ %" ،ﻟﻠﺤﺮ ﹼ
ﺑﻪ ﻧ
ﺑﺎﳌﺮﻛﺰ ﻳﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻣﺌﻮﻳﺔ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮﰲﹼ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﻚ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﻭﺭ ﺣﻮﻝ
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﱪﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺪﺱ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺨﻤﲔ.
ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ
ﺺ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭ ﺳﺆﺍﻻﹰ % ،ﻟﻠﺤﺮﰲ ﻭ %ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ .ﻭﻳﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ
ﺑﻪ ﻧ
ﲔ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﰲ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻫﺮﻡ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻫﺬﻳ ﹺﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳ ﹺ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﻣﻦ
ﺺ ﻭﺍﺣ ﺪ ﻭ #ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ %1.ﻟﻠﺤﺮﰲﹼ ،ﻭ %"7.ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ،ﻭ %ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ
ﺑﻪ ﻧ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻋﺠﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ؛ ﻷ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻯ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﺼﺼﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻗﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﱘ ﺃﻱ
ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺳﲔ.
ﳔﻠﱢﺺ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺃﻱ ﺑﻨﺎ ًﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ
ﰲ ﻳﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﺔ ،ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺇﺫ ﻇ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮ ﹼ
ﺺ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳔﺮﺝ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ
ﻚ – ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼ ﹶﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻨ
–ﻻﺷ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻈ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻮﺿ ﻊ ﺗﺴﺎﺅﻻﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ.
ﺑﻨﻮﺩ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺰ
ﺑﻔﺤﺺ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﹸﻟﻮﺣﻆﹶ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﲡﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﺍﺗﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ
ﺐ ﻣﻦ
ﺖ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺄ ،ﻭﻟﻠﺤ ﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻤﲔ ﻃﹸﻠ
،%7ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ .%ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﹸﺳﺘﺨﺪﻣ
ﺕ ﺑﻨﺴﺒﺔ %ﰲ ﻛﻞ
ﺼﻮﺏ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺧﻄﺄ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﺭﺩ
ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺤﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳ
ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﰲ ﳎﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺟﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺑﺪﹶﺃ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﰲ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺍﶈﻮﻻﺕ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ
ﺖ ﻟﻮﺍﺿﻌﻲ
ﻼ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻴﺎ ﻣﻄ ﻮﻻﹰ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﳏﻤﺪ ﹲﺓ ﺗﺜﹺﺒ
ﺖ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﻗﺼﲑﺓ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻤ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺗﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﺪﻣ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ.
ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ
-1ﺃﻫ ﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ )ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮﰲﹼ ،ﻭﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻮﱘ،
ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ(.
ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺮﻭﺀ ﻫﻲ :ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺘﻤﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﲑﺓ ,ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ -
ﻳﻄﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺗﻪ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﺘﻤﺔ.
" -ﻣﻴ ﹸﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺮﰲﹼ ،ﻭﺇﳘﺎﻝ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ.
ﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ.
ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﺃ ﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﺭ
1
ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺻﺎﱀ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﻴﺠﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﳕﻮﺫﺟﺎ ،ﺍﳋﺮﻃﻮﻡ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺃﻓﺮﻳﻘﻴﺎ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ،-ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ 1ﻡ.
_____ ،ﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺇﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻛﺘﻴﺐ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ،ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺰﻳﺎ ،ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ
1--7ﻡ.
_____ ،ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ،ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ،ﺍﻠﹼﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻐﻮﻳﺔ ،ﺍﳋﺮﻃﻮﻡ ،ﻣﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﳋﺮﻃﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﱄ،
ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ،ﺩﻳﺴﻤﱪ ﻡ.
ﺷﺤﺎﺗﺔ ،ﺣﺴﻦ ،ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻖ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻠﺒﻨﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﺩ.ﺕ.
ﻃﻌﻴﻤﺔ ،ﺭﺷﺪﻱ ،ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﰲ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻟﻠﻨﺎﻃﻘﲔ ﺑﻠﻐﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﺃﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﹸﺮﻯ ،ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻫﺞ ،ﻣﻌﻬﺪ
ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﺩ.ﺕ ،.ﺝ. .
_____ ،ﺇﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﺳﺌﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﺤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻣﺬﻛﱢﺮﺓ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺓ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺪﺓ،
1--ﻡ.
ﻣﺪﻛﻮﺭ ،ﻋﻠﻲ ﺃﲪﺪ ،ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺡ1-#4 ،ﻡ.
ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ،ﻓﺘﺤﻲ ،ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ،ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﹼﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ،
1-#1ﻡ.
ﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺒﻴ:ﺎﺛﺎﻧﻴ
Alderson, Charles, Assessing Reading, Cambridge, 2000.
Hughes, Arthur, Testing for Language Teachers, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
"