BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LIMITED COMMENTS REPLY SHEET (CRS)-CLIENT Page 1 of 4

POWER PROJECTS DIVISION

OWNER/PURC APGENCO Project DR. NARLA TATA RAO THERMAL Consultant DCPL BGRE PROJ 235
HASER POWER STATION REF
STAGE –V, UNIT #8, 1X800MW
Client Drg/Doc … Package/Structure ASH HANDLING PLANT
No.
BGRE Drg/Doc GID-235-ME-ETA-XM-14271 BGRE Drg/Doc Title CROSS COUNTRY PIPING Current Rev 8
No. LAYOUT (SLURRY & RECOVERY) No.
(PROPOSED ROUTING)

Reply Tracker
Rev No. BGRE Letter Reference/Date
0 T/03003 dated 13-10-2017
1 T/03818 Dated 23.1.2018
T/03855 Dated 25.1.2018
2 T/04293 Dated 13.3.2018
3 T/04773 Dated 04.05.2018
Customer / DCPL Letter Reference&date Remarks
DCPL Comments on mail dated 03.11.2017 & APGENCO comments
on mail dated 08.12.2017
APGENCO SITE COMMENTS MARKED ON THE DRG AND HANDED Mr. Balakrishna Rao from BGR has taken the additional comments from APGENCO SITE on
OVER TO BGR ON 22.2.2018 22.2.2018
APGENCO SITE COMMENTS PEDESTAL SPACING 7000mm NOT
ACCEPTED
APGENCO Lr.No.CCE/TPC/EME-311/Estt/AHP/D.No.11/2018
Dt.25.05.2018.
APGENCO CHIEF ENGINEER MAIL Dt. 06.06.2018.

4 T/05769 Dated 29.08.2018 APGENCO CHIEF ENGINNER MAIL Dt. 05.10.2018.

5 T/07175 Dated 19.03.2019 DCPL Comments on dated 16.05.2019

7 T/8056 Dated 18.02.2020 DCPL Comments on dated 08.05.2020

Sl. No Client BGRESL reply dated Client BGRESL reply Client Comment on BGRESL reply Client BGRESL reply Client Comment on Rev.7 BGRESL reply on Rev 8
Commen 04.05.2018 Comment on dated 28.08.2018 Rev.4 dated Comment on dated 04.07.2019 dated 08.05.2020 dated 17.07.2020
t on Rev.3 18.03.2019 Rev.5
Rev.2

1. APGENC 1. For support 1. Please 1. Duly 1. Comments 1. The 1) If pipeline (1) The proposed 1. Please ref to Lr . NO. 1. Pl. refer
O spacing we specify incorporat marked on revised crossing disposal pipe has SE/Civil/Stage-V- clarification
comment have already pedest ed letter route existing passed on the Const/DR NTTPS/Ash stated in sl no2
s: provided al attached, followe inspection path existing inspection Lines/F02/D.No25/20 below
path. Hence 500mm
Pedestal detailed distanc Provide d inline provide gravel dtd 21-04-2020
2. Duly thck. of gravel cover
spacing calculation e in walkway with cover of 500 will be provided for
addressed to RCM,
7000mm considering notes incorporat from TP23 site mm thick BGRE (attached) replies
protection of pipe as
not allowable and in all 5 ed to TP25 as observa above the per your advice. agsinst contents
accepted actual sheets marked in tion disposal lines. mentioned in Letter
deflection. 2. For attached dated (2) It is ensured that along with revised
Based on the sheet drawing. 3.12.20 2) Existing existing drain will drawing has to be
support sizing 2,3,4 18 drains should not be disturbed. submitted by BGRE.
criteria &5 re- not be
provison of 7m surveyi disturbed and Drain system for up-
provide coming slurry pipe:
spacing is well ng 2. APGENCO
with in limits. drawin information COMMENTED DT.
It will be followed
2. The applicable gs are regarding drain 21.4.2020 to VTPS

Form: ESSF-018/2
BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LIMITED COMMENTS REPLY SHEET (CRS)-CLIENT Page 2 of 4
POWER PROJECTS DIVISION

code for slurry require system for the existing drain SITE (RCM)
piping is ASME d. upcoming only.In this regard,
B 31.11, which slurry\pipes. suitable slope in the a. In between TP-11
does not existing GL below and TP-18AA6
the upcoming pipe (a)It is applicable in drg no
spitulate maintenance
to the existing drain 14269 and clarified
specific will be provided.
paths are to be therein.
support provided along DCPL reply: Noted
spacing. the stage-V ash
3. The code (3) The revised slurry lines for
ASME B31.1 layout is submitted attending
for power to you strictly in line maintenance
piping provides 3) Please with the discussions works in future.
‘suggested’ provide revised held at site site on
pipe support layout dated 14.05.2019. b. In beween TP-11
spacing. according to and TP-18AA4
Although it is discussion held from TP-18AA6 to
mentioned as at site on TP-18AA9 the
water service 14.05.2019. alignment of ash (b) It is applicable in drg
and steam gas slurry lines and no 14269 and clarified
or air service, the recovery lines therein.
the criteria for got separated.
deflection The alignment of
(sag) which ash recovery
has been used water lines in
is mentioned between TP-
in the note (C) 18AA6 and TP-
of the 18AA9 was
table.Hence located for away
for slurry from the exixting
application the maintenance path
calculation is on hill side and it
done using the is not possible to
allowable attend the
deflection execution of civil
works, erection of DCPL reply: Noted
(sag). As
already pipe line and as
mentioned well as their
above we have maintenance in
provided future.
calculation
considering c. The ash slurry
simply lines in between
supported TP-18AA6 and
beam vide TP-AA9 are
letter No. fouling with the
GID/0235- existing
T/04323 dated maintenance path
15/Mar/2018 of ash slurry lines
as this of stage III and
provides more IV

Form: ESSF-018/2
BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LIMITED COMMENTS REPLY SHEET (CRS)-CLIENT Page 3 of 4
POWER PROJECTS DIVISION

stringent (c) It is applicable in drg

criteria. no 14269 and clarified
4. We have 3. Changing the therein.
enclosed alignment of the ash
slurry lines in between DCPL reply: Noted
calculation
using fixed TP 23 to TP 24
beam as without encroaching
mentioned in B the existing
31.1 as maintinance paths and
Annexure. The drain,to enable to
calculated attend the
deflection is maintinance works of
much lesser the existing ash slurry
than the lines of O&M.The new
alignment should be (3) revised the corridor as
allowable
per acceptance of VTPS
deflection of arranged in such a
site civil and maintenance
2.5mm with way that the existing team.
simply maintinance path can
supported also be utilized for DCPL reply: Noted
beam concept. newly proposed Stage-
The calculated v ash slurry lines also.
deflection is
1.81mm as
against
allowable 4. Arrange RCC box
deflection of culvert on khilla road
2.5mm. With according to R&B
fixed beam standards
mentioned in
ASME B31.1,
the actual
deflection is
0.363mm as
against the
allowable
deflection of (4) RCC Box culvert with
2.5mm. BGR requirement will be
5. For the ash provided.
water recovery
pipe the DCPL reply: Please not
calculation has provided Box Culvert
been done should be approved by
using the concerned R&B Dept.
simply
supported
beam and the
deflection is
within the
limits.
Calculation

Form: ESSF-018/2
BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LIMITED COMMENTS REPLY SHEET (CRS)-CLIENT Page 4 of 4
POWER PROJECTS DIVISION

have already
been provided
vide letter
GID/0235-
T/04323 dated
15/Mar/2018.
Calculation
with fixed
beam is also
enclosed which
shows
calculated
deflection is
much lower
than the
allowable
deflection.
6. In other
similar plants
also 7 to 8 M
span has been
used.
(Example:
Singareni
collieries,
2X600mw
attached.)

Form: ESSF-018/2