Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peer Review of Oral Presentations - TRAVIS TEOH SEN JIA NP - Given Feedback
Peer Review of Oral Presentations - TRAVIS TEOH SEN JIA NP - Given Feedback
Review export of
Accessibility consideration
This file does not fully conform with all applicable guidelines for OPEN ALTERNATIVE
accessible digital documents
Delivery
Rubric criterion
A B C D F
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point
Average given
Class average
Given ratings
A - Extremely engaging and confident. Clear and effective delivery of points. Presentation is easy to follow.
Very well prepared.
TRAVIS TEOH SEN JIA NP
1 comments
loud, confident and good delivery allows me to understand clearly (eg the use of firstly, secondly, lastly and
in summary)
can be improved if she goes slightly more into what is good health and well being since the main topic is
that
1/5
Peer Review
Review export of
Accessibility consideration
This file does not fully conform with all applicable guidelines for OPEN ALTERNATIVE
accessible digital documents
Delivery
Rubric criterion
A B C D F
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point
Average given
Class average
Given ratings
B - Good engagement, though this may be inconsistent. Delivery may be unclear or hesitant at points.
Evidence of competent preparation.
TRAVIS TEOH SEN JIA NP
1 comments
deep thoughts went through behind the solutions which allows me to have a better understand of the topic.
2/5
Peer Review
Review export of
Accessibility consideration
This file does not fully conform with all applicable guidelines for OPEN ALTERNATIVE
accessible digital documents
Delivery
Rubric criterion
A B C D F
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point
Average given
Class average
Given ratings
B - Good engagement, though this may be inconsistent. Delivery may be unclear or hesitant at points.
Evidence of competent preparation.
TRAVIS TEOH SEN JIA NP
1 comments
more confident and clearer voice would definity make the presentation better
points were well covered and presented, examples were used well.
3/5
Peer Review
Review export of
Accessibility consideration
This file does not fully conform with all applicable guidelines for OPEN ALTERNATIVE
accessible digital documents
Delivery
Rubric criterion
A B C D F
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point
Average given
Class average
Given ratings
B - Good engagement, though this may be inconsistent. Delivery may be unclear or hesitant at points.
Evidence of competent preparation.
TRAVIS TEOH SEN JIA NP
1 comments
louder and more confident delivery would make the presentation more interesting.
4/5
Peer Review
Review export of
Accessibility consideration
This file does not fully conform with all applicable guidelines for OPEN ALTERNATIVE
accessible digital documents
Delivery
Rubric criterion
A B C D F
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point
Average given
Class average
Given ratings
B - Good engagement, though this may be inconsistent. Delivery may be unclear or hesitant at points.
Evidence of competent preparation.
TRAVIS TEOH SEN JIA NP
1 comments
transition of points to points were smooth which makes the whole presentation smooth
5/5