Sociocultural Anthropology

Mid-Term Debate Score Sheet

1ST DEBATE
Cultural Relativism vs. Cultural Universalism

Criteria Cultural Relativism Cultural Universalism

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Understanding of Topic. The
 4 - Good  4 - Good
debater understood the topic in depth
 3 - Average  3 - Average
and presented his/her information
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
forcefully and convincingly.
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Organization. All arguments were  4 - Good  4 - Good
clearly tied to an idea (premise) and  3 - Average  3 - Average
organized in a tight, logical fashion.  2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Use of Facts/Statistics. Every major
 4 - Good  4 - Good
point was well supported with several
 3 - Average  3 - Average
relevant facts, statistics and/or
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
examples.
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
 4 - Good  4 - Good
Rebuttal. All counterarguments were
 3 - Average  3 - Average
accurate, relevant and strong.
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Presentation Style. Tone of voice,  4 - Good  4 - Good
volume, use of gestures, and  3 - Average  3 - Average
enthusiasm are convincing.  2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

TOTAL

1
 Sociocultural Anthropology
Mid-Term Debate Score Sheet
2nd DEBATE
Should the proposed law declaring Baybayin as the National Writing System of the
Philippines be enacted?

Criteria Yes No

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Understanding of Topic. The
 4 - Good  4 - Good
debater understood the topic in depth
 3 - Average  3 - Average
and presented his/her information
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
forcefully and convincingly.
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Organization. All arguments were  4 - Good  4 - Good
clearly tied to an idea (premise) and  3 - Average  3 - Average
organized in a tight, logical fashion.  2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Use of Facts/Statistics. Every major
 4 - Good  4 - Good
point was well supported with several
 3 - Average  3 - Average
relevant facts, statistics and/or
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
examples.
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
 4 - Good  4 - Good
Rebuttal. All counterarguments were
 3 - Average  3 - Average
accurate, relevant and strong.
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Presentation Style. Tone of voice,  4 - Good  4 - Good
volume, use of gestures, and  3 - Average  3 - Average
enthusiasm are convincing.  2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

TOTAL

2
 Sociocultural Anthropology
Mid-Term Debate Score Sheet
3rd DEBATE
Is CHED correct in issuing Memorandum Order No. 20 s-2013 (declaring Filipino as no
longer a core subject in college)?

Criteria Yes No

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Understanding of Topic. The
 4 - Good  4 - Good
debater understood the topic in depth
 3 - Average  3 - Average
and presented his/her information
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
forcefully and convincingly.
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Organization. All arguments were  4 - Good  4 - Good
clearly tied to an idea (premise) and  3 - Average  3 - Average
organized in a tight, logical fashion.  2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Use of Facts/Statistics. Every major
 4 - Good  4 - Good
point was well supported with several
 3 - Average  3 - Average
relevant facts, statistics and/or
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
examples.
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
 4 - Good  4 - Good
Rebuttal. All counterarguments were
 3 - Average  3 - Average
accurate, relevant and strong.
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Presentation Style. Tone of voice,  4 - Good  4 - Good
volume, use of gestures, and  3 - Average  3 - Average
enthusiasm are convincing.  2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

TOTAL

3
 Sociocultural Anthropology
Mid-Term Debate Score Sheet
4th DEBATE
Ancient Filipino gender status roles: Should it be revived?

Criteria Yes No

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Understanding of Topic. The
 4 - Good  4 - Good
debater understood the topic in depth
 3 - Average  3 - Average
and presented his/her information
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
forcefully and convincingly.
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Organization. All arguments were  4 - Good  4 - Good
clearly tied to an idea (premise) and  3 - Average  3 - Average
organized in a tight, logical fashion.  2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Use of Facts/Statistics. Every major
 4 - Good  4 - Good
point was well supported with several
 3 - Average  3 - Average
relevant facts, statistics and/or
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
examples.
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
 4 - Good  4 - Good
Rebuttal. All counterarguments were
 3 - Average  3 - Average
accurate, relevant and strong.
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Presentation Style. Tone of voice,  4 - Good  4 - Good
volume, use of gestures, and  3 - Average  3 - Average
enthusiasm are convincing.  2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

TOTAL

4
 Sociocultural Anthropology
Mid-Term Debate Score Sheet
5th DEBATE
Spanish Enculturation of the Philippines: Boon or bane?

Bane
Criteria Boon (Advantegeous)
(Disadvantegeous)

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Understanding of Topic. The
 4 - Good  4 - Good
debater understood the topic in depth
 3 - Average  3 - Average
and presented his/her information
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
forcefully and convincingly.
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Organization. All arguments were  4 - Good  4 - Good
clearly tied to an idea (premise) and  3 - Average  3 - Average
organized in a tight, logical fashion.  2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Use of Facts/Statistics. Every major
 4 - Good  4 - Good
point was well supported with several
 3 - Average  3 - Average
relevant facts, statistics and/or
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
examples.
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
 4 - Good  4 - Good
Rebuttal. All counterarguments were
 3 - Average  3 - Average
accurate, relevant and strong.
 2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

 5 - Excellent  5 - Excellent
Presentation Style. Tone of voice,  4 - Good  4 - Good
volume, use of gestures, and  3 - Average  3 - Average
enthusiasm are convincing.  2 - Fair  2 - Fair
 1 - Poor  1 - Poor

TOTAL

5
 Sociocultural Anthropology
Mid-Term Debate Tabulation Sheet
1ST DEBATE
Cultural Relativism vs. Cultural Universalism

Juror Cultural Relativism Cultural Universalism

Juror 1

Juror 2

Juror 3

TOTAL ►

EQUIVALENT ►
The debater with the higher total score will receive an equivalent of 100/100 points; and
the lower-scoring debater will receive an equivalent of 75/100. In case of tie, both will be
given 100/100.

2nd DEBATE
Should the proposed law declaring Baybayin as the National Writing System of the
Philippines be enacted?

Juror Yes No

Juror 1

Juror 2

Juror 3

TOTAL ►

EQUIVALENT ►
The debater with the higher total score will receive an equivalent of 100/100 points; and
the lower-scoring debater will receive an equivalent of 75/100. In case of tie, both will be
given 100/100.

1
 3rd DEBATE
Is CHED correct in issuing Memorandum Order No. 20 s-2013 (declaring Filipino as
no longer a core subject in college)?

Juror Yes No

Juror 1

Juror 2

Juror 3

TOTAL ►

EQUIVALENT ►
The debater with the higher total score will receive an equivalent of 100/100 points; and
the lower-scoring debater will receive an equivalent of 75/100. In case of tie, both will be
given 100/100.

4th DEBATE
Ancient Filipino gender status roles: Should it be revived?

Juror Yes No

Juror 1

Juror 2

Juror 3

TOTAL ►

EQUIVALENT ►
The debater with the higher total score will receive an equivalent of 100/100 points; and
the lower-scoring debater will receive an equivalent of 75/100. In case of tie, both will be
given 100/100.

2
 5th DEBATE
Spanish Enculturation of the Philippines: Boon or bane?

Boon
Juror Bane (Disadvantageous)
(Advantageous)

Juror 1

Juror 2

Juror 3

TOTAL ►

EQUIVALENT ►
The debater with the higher total score will receive an equivalent of 100/100 points; and
the lower-scoring debater will receive an equivalent of 75/100. In case of tie, both will be
given 100/100.

Name and Signature

of Juror

Name and Signature

of Juror

Name and Signature

of Juror