New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path by Stable Perfect Domination

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.
com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Stable 3
Perfect Domination 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 SYNOPSIS 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a 10
pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11
V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination if the following expressions, 12
terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination criteria 13
holds. 14
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )],
Vi , Vj ∈ V 00 : Vi , Vj 6∈ Ej∗ = {Va , Vb |
}}|.
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 15
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Stable Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic Stable 16
Perfect Domination. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but 17
research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18
SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19
implemented throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this 20
research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21
and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22
examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23
understand the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the 24
things that are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing 25
research and future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended 26
manner. There are different types of them. Some are individual and some are well 27
modeled by groups of cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but 28
the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30
selected for research on “Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense 31
super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32
diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific research have been considered. It has also 33
been formally collected in the form of several questions and problems. It is useful to 34
define a “neutrosophic” version of Stable Perfect Domination. Since there are more 35
ways to get type results a Stable Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. In 36
order to master the Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination, there is a need to 37
“re-define” the concept of “Stable Perfect Domination mastery”. SuperHyperVertices 38
and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position 39
of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Stable Perfect Domination. If the specified 40
table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges 41
belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values 42
of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum 43
values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of its vertices”, ”super edge 44
values&max values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and maximum values of its 45
endpoints”. To get examples and structural examples, I would like to introduce the next 46
SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Stable Perfect Domination. This is the 47
original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in the SuperHyperClass type 48
would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all Stable Perfect Domination until 49
Stable Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Stable Perfect Domination”, but 50
otherwise, it is not Stable Perfect Domination. There is some explanation for the 51
original definition titled “Stable Perfect Domination”. These two examples are further 52
explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 53
disciplinary methods based on a dominant Stable Perfect Domination. Because of 54
having Stable Perfect Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of 55
“neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination” and “neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination”. 56
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 57
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic 58
SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table 59
exists. And if the desired table exists, a Stable Perfect Domination is redefined to a 60
“Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 61
version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain Neutrosophic type 62
results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination becomes more 63
understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, 64
there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, 65
SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and 66
SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, 67
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 68
SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 69
SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 70
elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 71
of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 72
SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 73
exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 74
SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 75
SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 76
and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, 77
and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no SuperHyperEdge in 78
common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 79
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 80
separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 81
among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 82
SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 83
designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 86
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 87
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 91
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 92
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 93
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 94
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 95
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 96
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 97
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 98
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 99
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 100
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 101
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 102
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 103
the longest Stable Perfect Domination or the strongest Stable Perfect Domination in 104
those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the 105
longest Stable Perfect Domination called Stable Perfect Domination and the strongest 106
Stable Perfect Domination called Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination. Beyond that 107
in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but 108
it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style 109
of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, but literally, it is the transformation of any 110
cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. A basic introduction to the theory of 111
Stable Perfect Domination Neutrosophic, SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic 112
SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 113
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination, 114
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 115
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 116
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 117
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 118
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 119
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 120
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 121
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 122
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 123
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 124
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 125
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 126
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 127
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 128
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 129
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 130
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 131
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 132
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 133
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 134
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 135
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 136
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 137
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 138
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 139
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 140
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 141
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 142
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 143
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 144
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Stable Perfect 145
Domination”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct 146
object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific 147
research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 148
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 149
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 150
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 151
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 152
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 153
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 154
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 155
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 156
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 157
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 158
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 159
Stable Perfect Domination or Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination for 160
SuperHyperModels in it. Some general results are presented. Beyond that in 161
SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two 162
SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 163
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form 164
of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 165
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 166
“Stable Perfect Domination Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or 167
fixed group of cells broadly, “Stable Perfect Domination Rate” based on fixed groups or 168
fixed cells. Groups of groups of cells? 169
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 170
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 171
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 172
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Stable Perfect 173
Domination” and “neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination” over “superhypergraph” 174
and “neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more 175
motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this 176
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples 177
and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general results 178
and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key point 179
of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 180
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 181
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 182
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 183
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 184
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 185
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 186
new concepts, Stable Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination, 187
are specified in the sections “Stable Perfect Domination” and “Neutrosophic Stable 188
Perfect Domination”. In the concept of dealing with results and in Stable Perfect 189
Domination to create logic about the continuation of the scientific research, the ideas of 190
SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their 191
consequences, the corresponding SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the 192
work done in this section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 193
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, clever steps 194
towards common concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, 195
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on 196
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There 197
is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final part 198
of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. Some 199
general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 200
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. “Stable 201
Perfect Domination”, “Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination”, “Results on 202
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are 203
curious questions about what has been done about SuperHyperNotions to make sense of 204
the superiority of this scientific research and to discover the word “best” as a description 205
and adjective of this scientific research as presented in the “Stable Perfect Domination” 206
section. The keyword of this scientific research was presented in the section 207
“Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps 208
towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: Incremental steps 209
towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the “open issues” section, there is a 210
detailed examination and recognition of what was done in this scientific research and 211
what happened in this scientific research in the form of “questions” and “issues” in 212
order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding style, the advantages and 213
limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has been done in this scientific 214
research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” section. 215
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 216
Research On the Redeemed Ways 217
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 218
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 219
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 220
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 221
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 222
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 223
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 224
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 225
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 226
to Ref. [1]. 227
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 228
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 229
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 230
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by
x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 231
+
]− 0, 1 [. 232
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 233
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 234
2.5,p.2). 235
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 236
pair S = (V, E), where 237
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 238
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 239
1, 2, . . . , n); 240
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 241
V; 242
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 243
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 244
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 245
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 246
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 247
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 );
P
(viii) i0 248
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 249
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 250
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 251
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 252
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 253
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 254
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 255
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 256
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 257
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 258
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 259
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 260
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 261
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 262
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 263
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 264
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 265
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 266
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 267
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 268
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 269
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 271
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 272
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 273
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 274
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 275
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 276
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 277
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 278
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 279
namely, E4 . 280
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 281
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 282
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 283
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 284
SuperHyperEdge. 285
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 286
SuperHyperEdge. 287
SuperHyperEdge. 289
SuperHyperEdge. 291
SuperHyperEdge. 293
SuperHyperEdge. 295
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

SuperHyperEdge. 297
SuperHyperEdge. 299
SuperHyperEdge. 301
SuperHyperEdge. 303
SuperHyperEdge. 305
SuperHyperEdge. 307
SuperHyperEdge. 309
SuperHyperEdge. 311
SuperHyperEdge. 313
SuperHyperEdge. 315
SuperHyperEdge. 317
SuperHyperEdge. 319
Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)





Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 320
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 321
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 322
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 323
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 324
characterized as follow-up items. 325
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 326
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 327
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 328
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 329
HyperEdge; 330
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 331
SuperEdge; 332
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 333
SuperHyperEdge. 334
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 335
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 336
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 337
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 338
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 339
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 340
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 341
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 342
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 343
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 344
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 345
pair S = (V, E), where 346
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 347
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 348
1, 2, . . . , n); 349
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 350
V; 351
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 352
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 353
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 354
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 355
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 356
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 357
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 359
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 360
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 362
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 363
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 364
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 365
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 366
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 367
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 368
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 370
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 371
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 372
characterized as follow-up items. 373
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 374
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 375
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 376
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 377
HyperEdge; 378
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 379
SuperEdge; 380
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 381
SuperHyperEdge. 382
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 383
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 384
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 385
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 386
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 387
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 388
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 389
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 390
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 391
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 392
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 393
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 394
given SuperHyperEdges; 395
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 396
SuperHyperEdges; 397
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 398
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 399
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 400
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 401
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 402
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 403
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 404
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 405
common SuperVertex. 406
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 407
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 408
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 409
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 410
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 411
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 412
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 413
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 414
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 415
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 416
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 417
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 418
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 419
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 420
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 421
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 422
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 423
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 425
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 426
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 427
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 428
is up. 429
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 430
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 431
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 432
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 433
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 434
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 435
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 436
of following conditions hold: 437
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 440
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 441
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 442
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 443
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 444
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 445
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 446
Vi0 , Vi+1
0
∈ Ei0 . 447
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 448
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 449
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 450
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 451
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 452
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 453
SuperHyperPath . 454
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 455
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 457
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 458
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 459
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 460
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 461
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 462
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 463
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 464
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 465
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 466
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 467
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 468
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 469
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 470
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 472
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 473
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 475
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 476
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 477
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 478
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 479
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 480
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 481
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 482
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 483
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 484
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 485
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 486
understandable. 487

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 488
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 489
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 490
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 491
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 492
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 493
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 494
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 495
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 496
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 497
understandable. 498
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 499
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 500
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 501
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 502
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 503
Table (3) holds. 504
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 505
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 506
in every Neutrosophic items. 507
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 509
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
4 Main Resultant 516
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect 517
).
Domination 518
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 519
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 520
SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination if the following expressions, terms and statements is 521
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination criteria holds. 522
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the

Neutrosophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (4.2)

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) - -
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) - -
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 , ∃!Vi ∈ V 00 :
}}|.
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S is a pair 523
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 524
SuperHyperBipartite (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 526
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 527
SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 . Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 }. 528
Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination since the following 529
expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect 530
Domination criteria holds. 531

X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 }






Figure 36. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-








V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) - -
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!V1 ∈ V :
}}|.
SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 . Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 535
V 0 = {Vi=1−2 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination 536
since the following expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic 537
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination criteria holds. 538
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−2 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−2 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−2 }
= (0.5, 0.5, 0.5) =

X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!V1 ∈ V :
}}|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−3 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−3 }
= (0.74, 0.74, 0.74) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V 00 , ∃!V1 ∈ V 00 :
}}|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−4 }
= (0.98, 0.98, 0.98) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi=5−7 }, ∃!V1 ∈V = {Vi=1−4 } :
0
TV (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
}}|.
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−5 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−5 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−5 }
= (1.22, 1.22, 1.22) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi=6−7 }, ∃!V1 ∈V = {Vi=1−5 } :
0
}}|.
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−6 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−6 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−6 }
= (1.46, 1.46, 1.46) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi=7 }, ∃!V1 ∈ V = {Vi=1−6 } :
0
}}|.
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i=1−7 }
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
= (1.7, 1.7, 1.7) =

X X X
= min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {}, ∃!V1 ∈ V = {Vi=1−7 } :
0
}}|.
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 574
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 575
SuperHyperPath (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (15). 577
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 578
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34 i=8 . Consider a 579
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 : DOESN’T EXIST. Then V 0 is called 580
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination since the following expressions, terms 581
and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination criteria 582
holds. 583
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={VDOESN’T EXIST }
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
}}|.
holds. 591
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
}}|.
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34

i=8 . Consider a 595
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
holds. 599
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
}}|.
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
holds. 607
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
DOESN’T EXIST }
: DOESN’T EXIST :
X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
}}|.
holds. 615
X
|( T (Vi ),
X
I(Vi ),
X
F (Vi ))|
: DOESN’T EXIST :
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
}}|.
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=25−30,32−34}. Then V 0 is called 620
holds. 623
X
|(
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=25−30,32−34} T (Vi ),
X
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=25−30,32−34} I(Vi ),
X
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=25−30,32−34} F (Vi ))|
= (6.08, 6.08, 6.08) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
000
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vi=25−30,32−34},∃!V7 ∈V 000 ={Vi6=25−30,32−34}:
0
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)

}}|.
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−34}. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 628
SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination since the following expressions, terms and 629
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination criteria holds. 630
X
|(
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−34} T (Vi ),
X
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−34} I(Vi ),
X
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−34} F (Vi ))|
= (8.24, 8.24, 8.24) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
000
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {}, ∃!Vi ∈ V 000 = {Vi=1−34}:
}}|.
5 Main Result 631
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 632
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite has the letter z. The notion on the 633
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath coincide. 634
Proof. 635
(i). Let 636
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
637
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHM : (V, E). 638
There’s a new way to redefine as 639
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 640
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect 641
Domination. The latter is straightforward. 642
(ii). Let 643
P :
ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ ,
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
644
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
is a longest SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination taken from a connected Extreme 645
SuperHyperPath ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 646

Domination. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 649
SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 650
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination could be 651
applied. The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination proposes 652
some longest Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination excerpt from some 653
representatives. The latter is straightforward. 654
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{V P1 }.
Proof. Let 655
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2
656
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2

Proposition 5.3. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|V P1 | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 662
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
663
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair S = (V, E). 669
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic 670
SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination set is as follows. 671
ViEXT ERN AL ,
EXT ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
}
Proof. Let 672
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
673
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|V |
× 0.26.
2
Proof. Let 684
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
685
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Uniform 696
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath). 697
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every 698
pair of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 699
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 700
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called 701
Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite. 702
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 703
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 704
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 705
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 706
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath. 707
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination set is as follows.
{V P1 }.
Proof. Let 708
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2
709
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2

Proposition 5.8. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|V P1 | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 715
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
716
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair 722
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination set is as follows. 723
{
ViEXT ERN AL ,
EXT ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
}
Proof. Let 724
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
725
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination number is as follows.
|V |
× 0.26.
2
Proof. Let 736
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
737
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Neutrosophic 748
SuperHyperPath). 749
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 750
two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, have the 751
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 752
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination set. 753
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 754
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two have the 755
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 756
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination set. 757
Proof. 758
(i). Let 759
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
760
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 766
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
767
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Embedded 778
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath). 779
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then two 780
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, is in every 781
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination set. 782
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then every 783
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two is in every 784
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination set. 785
Proof. 786
(i). Let 787
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
788
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 794
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
795
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 806
Neutrosophic Recognition 807
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 808
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 809
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 810
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 811
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 812
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 813
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 814
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 815
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 816
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 817
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 818
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 819
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 820
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 821
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 822
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 823
happened and what’s done. 824
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 825
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 826
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 827
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 828
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination, SuperHyperStar, 829
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 830
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination or the Neutrosophic 831
SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic 832
SuperHyperModels. 833
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 834
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 835
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 836
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 837
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 838
featured. 839
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 840
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 841
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 842
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 843
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 844
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination. 845
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination
Figure 44. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 846
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 847
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 848
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (44), the 849
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 850
Neutrosophic featured. 851
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (44) and the Table (23), the Neutrosophic 852
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 853
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 854
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 855
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 856
SuperHyperModel (44), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination. 857
9 Wondering Open Problems But As The 858
Directions To Forming The Motivations 859
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 860
The SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect 861
Domination are defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 862
Question 9.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 863
recognitions? 864
Question 9.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperStable Perfect 865
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination?

Domination 866
Question 9.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 867
compute them? 868
Question 9.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the SuperHyperStable 869
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination?

Problem 9.5. The SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 871
do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on

SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination, are there else? 873
Problem 9.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 874
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 875
Problem 9.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 876
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 877
10 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 878
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 879
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 880
research are highlighted. 881
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 882
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Stable 883
Perfect Domination. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of 884
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based 885
on the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 886
Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination, finds a suitable background to implement 887
some results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses 888
are the subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer 889
attacks in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer 890
Diagnosis”. To formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Stable Perfect Domination, 891
SuperHyperClasses and new SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general 892
results are summarized in the Stable Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Stable 893
Perfect Domination sections. Clarifications, examples, and literature reviews go all the 894
way. In this scientific research, the literature review has met the lines containing 895
concepts and results. SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are 896
super-hypermodels in “cancer diagnosis” and both are the foundation of the background 897
of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer has occurred in an area full of cells, cell 898
groups, and embedded styles. In this section, SuperHyperModel proposes 899
SuperHyperNotions, formally called “Stable Perfect Domination”, based on the 900
connections of Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with the 901
formation of design and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The 902
“SuperHyper” prefix refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of 903
SuperHyperNotions. In the table (24), the advantages and ways of this scientific 904
research are specified, pointed out and expressed. 905
11 Background 906
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 907
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 908
Table 24. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Stable Perfect Domination
3. Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 909
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 910
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 911
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 912
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 913
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 914
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 915
with pages 32-55. 916
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 917
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 918
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 919
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 920
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 921
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 922
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 923
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 924
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 925
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 926
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 927
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 928
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 929
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 930
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 931
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 932
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 933
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 934
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 935
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 936
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 937
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 938
SuperHyperNumbers. 939
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 940
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 941
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 942
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 943
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 944
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 945
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 946
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 947
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 948
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 949
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 950
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 951
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 952
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 953
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 954
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 955
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 956
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 957
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 958
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 959
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 960
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 961
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 962
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 966
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 967
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 968
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 969
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 970
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 971
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 972
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 973
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 974
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 978
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 979
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 980
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 981
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 982
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 983
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 984
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 985
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 986
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 987
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 988
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 989
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 990
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 991
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 992
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 993
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 994
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 995
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 996
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 997
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 998
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 999
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 1000
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1001
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 1002
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 1003
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 1004
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 1005
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 1006
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 1007
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1008
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 1009
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1010
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1011
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1012
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1013
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1014
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1015
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1016
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1017
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1018
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1019
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1020
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1021
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1022
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1023
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1024
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1025
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1026
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1027
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1028
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1029
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1030
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1031
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1032
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1033
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1034
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1035
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1036
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1037
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1038
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1039
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1040
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1041
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1042
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1043
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1044
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1045
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1046
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1047
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [237] by Henry 1048
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1049
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1050
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [238] by Henry Garrett 1051
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1052
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1053
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [239] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1054
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1055
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1056
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [240] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1057
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1058
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [243] by 1059
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1060
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1061
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [244] by Henry 1062
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1063
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1064
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [247] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1065
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1066
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [250] by Henry 1067
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1068
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1069
in Ref. [251] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1070
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1071
Ref. [252] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1072
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1073
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [253] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1074
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1075
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [254] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1076
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1077
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [255] by Henry Garrett 1078
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1079
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [266] by Henry 1080
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1081
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1082
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [267] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–267], there 1083
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1084
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1085
at [268–407]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1086
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [408, 409]. 1087
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1088
proposed as book in Ref. [408] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1089
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1090
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1091
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1092
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1093
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1094
proposed as book in Ref. [409] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1095
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1096
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1097
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1098
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1099
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1100
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1101
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1102
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1103
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1104
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–267] 1105
alongside scientific research books at [268–407]. Two popular scientific research books 1106
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1107
science is on [408, 409]. 1108
References 1109
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1110
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1111
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1112
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1113
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1114
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1115
(2023) 35-47. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.01.05). 1116
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1117
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1118
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1119
(2023) 136-148. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.03.03). 1120
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1121
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1122
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1123
(2023) 221-307. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.06.04). 1124
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1125
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1126
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1127
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1128
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1129
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1130
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1131
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1132
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1133
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1134
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1135
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1136
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1137
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1138
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1139
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1140
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1141
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1142
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1143
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1144
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1145
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1146
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1147
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1148
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1149
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1150
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1151
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1152
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1153
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1154
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1155
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1156
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1157
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1158
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1159
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1160
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1161
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1162
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1163
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1164
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1165
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1166
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1167
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1168
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1169
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1170
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1171
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1172
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1173
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1174
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1175
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1176
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1177
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1178
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1179
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1180
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1181
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1182
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1183
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1184
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1185
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1186
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1187
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1189
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1190
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1191
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1192
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1193
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1194
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1195
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1197
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1201
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1202
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1203
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1204
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1205
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1206
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1207
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1208
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1209
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1210
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1211
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1212
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1213
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1214
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1215
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1216
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1217
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1218
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1219
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1220
29. Henry Garrett, “Star and Wheel on Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1221
SuperHyperGraph with a Specific Type of Independency of 1222
SuperHyperVertices”, Preprints 2024, , 2024020663 (doi: 1223
10.20944/preprints202402.0663.v1). 1224
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Total Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 1226
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10929590). 1227
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Total Perfect Domination”, 1229
Zenodo 2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10918770). 1230
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Total Perfect Domination”, 1232
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 2023, 1235
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10899659). 1236
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 1238
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10895887). 1239
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Perfect Domination”, 1241
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel By 1244
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1245
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Bipartite and Counteroffer Path By 1248
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1249
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Multipartite and Counteroffer Cycle 1252
By Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super 1253
Gatherings”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10640905). 1254
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1256
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1257
10.13140/RG.2.2.17389.97769). 1258
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1260
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1261
10.13140/RG.2.2.28685.10727). 1262
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly Resolving Sequence 1264
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1265
10.13140/RG.2.2.24994.20169). 1266
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1268
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529). 1269
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1271
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1274
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1275
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1276
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1278
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1279
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1281
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1282
47. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1283
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1284
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1285
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1287
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1290
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1291
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1292
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1294
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1296
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1298
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1300
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1302
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1304
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1306
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1308
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1310
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1312
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1314
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1315
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1316
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1318
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1319
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1320
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1322
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1324
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1326
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1329
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1332
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1335
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1336
62. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1337
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1338
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1339
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1341
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1342
64. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1343
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1344
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1347
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1348
66. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1349
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1350
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1353
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1354
68. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1355
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1359
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1360
70. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1361
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1362
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1365
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1366
72. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1367
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1368
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1371
74. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1373
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1377
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1378
76. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1379
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1383
78. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1385
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1389
80. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1391
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1392
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1395
82. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1397
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1401
84. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1403
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1407
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1408
86. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1409
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1413
88. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1415
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1419
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1420
90. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1421
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1422
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1423
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1425
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1426
92. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1427
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1428
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1429
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1431
94. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1433
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1434
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1437
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1438
96. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1439
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1441
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1443
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1444
98. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1445
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1446
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1449
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1450
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1451
100. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1452
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1453
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1454
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1455
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1457
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1458
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1460
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1463
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1466
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1469
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1470
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1472
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1475
108. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1477
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1478
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1481
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1484
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1487
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1488
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1490
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1493
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1494
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1496
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1499
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1502
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1505
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1508
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1511
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1512
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1514
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1515
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1517
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1518
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1520
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1523
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1526
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1527
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1529
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1532
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1533
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1534
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1536
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1537
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1539
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1540
129. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1541
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1542
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1545
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1548
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1549
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1551
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1552
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1554
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1557
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1560
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1563
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1566
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1569
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1572
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1575
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1578
142. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1580
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1581
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1582
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1584
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1587
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1588
145. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1589
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1591
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1593
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1596
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1599
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1600
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1602
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1603
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1605
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1606
151. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1607
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1608
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1609
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1611
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1614
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1617
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1618
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1620
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1623
157. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1625
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1627
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1629
159. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1631
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1632
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1635
161. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1637
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1638
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1641
163. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1643
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1645
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1647
165. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1649
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1650
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1653
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1654
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1656
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1659
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1661
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1663
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1665
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1666
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1668
172. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1670
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1672
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1674
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1675
174. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1676
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1677
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1678
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1680
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1681
176. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1682
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1683
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1686
178. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1688
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1689
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1692
180. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1694
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1695
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1698
182. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1700
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1702
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1704
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1705
184. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1706
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1707
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1710
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1711
186. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1712
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1713
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1716
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1717
188. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1718
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1719
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1722
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1723
190. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1724
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1725
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1728
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1729
192. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1730
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1731
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1734
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1735
194. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1736
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1737
195. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1739
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1740
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1743
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1744
197. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1745
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1746
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1749
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1750
199. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1751
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1752
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1755
201. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1757
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1758
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1761
203. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1763
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1764
204. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1766
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1767
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1770
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1773
207. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1775
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1776
208. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1778
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1779
209. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1781
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1782
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1783
210. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1784
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1785
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1786
211. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1787
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1788
212. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1790
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1791
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1792
213. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1793
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1794
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1795
214. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1796
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1797
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1798
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1799
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1802
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1803
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1806
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1807
217. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1808
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1810
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1811
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1814
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1815
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1818
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1819
220. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1820
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1821
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1822
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1823
221. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1824
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1825
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1826
222. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1827
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1828
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1829
223. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1830
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1831
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1832
224. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1833
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1834
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1835
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1836
225. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1837
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1838
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1839
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1840
226. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1841
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1842
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1843
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1844
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1845
227. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1846
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1847
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1848
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1849
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1850
228. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1851
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1852
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1853
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1854
229. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1855
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1856
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1857
230. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1858
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1859
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1861
231. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1862
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1863
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1864
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1865
232. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1866
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1867
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1868
233. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1869
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1870
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1871
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1872
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1873
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1874
234. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1875
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1876
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1877
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1878
235. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1879
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1880
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1881
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1882
236. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1883
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1884
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1885
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1886
237. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1887
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1888
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1889
238. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1890
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1891
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1892
239. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1894
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1895
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1896
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1897
240. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1898
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1899
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1900
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1901
241. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1902
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1903
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1904
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1905
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1907
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1908
243. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1909
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1910
244. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1912
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1913
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1914
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1919
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1923
247. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1924
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1925
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1926
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1927
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1930
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1932
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1933
250. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1934
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1935
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1938
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1939
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1941
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1942
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1945
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1946
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1948
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1949
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1952
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1953
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1955
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1956
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1958
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1963
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1964
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1968
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1969
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1972
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1975
262. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1976
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1977
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1978
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1979
263. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1980
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1981
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1982
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1983
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1986
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1987
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1990
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1991
266. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1992
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1993
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1994
267. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1995
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1996
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1997
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1998
268. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 2”. Dr. 1999
Henry Garrett, 2024 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10909931). 2000
269. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2001
270. Henry Garrett, “Stable Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2003
271. Henry Garrett, “Resolving Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2005
272. Henry Garrett, “Dominating Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2007
273. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2009
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 2010
274. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 2011
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 2012
275. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 2013
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 2014
276. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 2015
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 2016
277. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2017
278. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2019
279. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2021
280. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2023
281. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2025
282. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2027
283. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2029
284. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2031
285. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2033
286. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2035
287. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2037
288. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2039
289. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2041
290. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2043
291. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2045
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 2046
292. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2047
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 2048
293. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2049
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 2050
294. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2051
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 2052
295. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2053
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 2054
296. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2055
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 2056
297. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2057
298. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2059
299. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2061
300. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2063
301. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2065
302. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2067
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2068
303. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2069
304. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2071
305. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2073
306. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2075
307. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2077
308. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2079
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2080
309. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2081
310. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2083
311. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2085
312. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2087
313. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2089
314. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2091
315. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2093
316. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2095
317. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2097
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2098
318. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2099
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2100
319. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2101
320. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2103
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2104
321. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2105
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2106
322. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2107
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2108
323. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2109
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2110
324. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2111
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2112
325. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2113
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2114
326. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2115
327. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2117
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2118
328. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2119
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2120
329. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2121
330. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2123
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2124
331. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2125
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2126
332. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2127
333. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2129
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2130
334. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2131
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2132
335. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2133
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2134
336. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2135
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2136
337. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2137
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2138
338. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2139
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2140
339. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2141
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2142
340. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2143
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2144
341. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2145
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2146
342. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2147
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2148
343. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2149
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2150
344. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2151
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2152
345. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2153
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2154
346. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2155
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2156
347. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2157
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2158
348. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2159
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2160
349. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2161
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2162
350. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2163
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2164
351. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2165
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2166
352. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2167
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2168
353. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2169
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2170
354. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2171
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2172
355. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2173
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2174
356. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2175
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2176
357. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2177
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2178
358. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2179
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2180
359. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2181
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2182
360. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2183
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2184
361. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2185
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2186
362. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2187
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2188
363. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2189
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2190
364. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2191
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2192
365. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2193
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2194
366. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2195
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2196
367. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2197
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2198
368. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2199
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2200
369. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2201
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2202
370. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2203
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2204
371. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2205
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2206
372. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2207
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2208
373. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2209
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2210
374. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2211
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2212
375. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2213
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2214
376. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2215
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2216
377. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2217
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2218
378. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2219
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2220
379. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2221
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2222
380. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2223
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2224
381. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2225
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2226
382. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2227
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2228
383. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2229
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2230
384. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2231
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2232
385. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2233
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2234
386. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2235
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2236
387. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2237
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2238
388. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2239
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2240
389. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2241
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2242
390. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2243
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2244
391. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2245
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2246
392. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2247
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2248
393. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2249
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2250
394. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2251
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2252
395. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2253
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2254
396. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2255
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2256
397. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2257
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2258
398. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2259
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2260
399. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2261
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2262
400. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2263
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2264
401. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2265
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2266
402. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2267
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2268
403. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2269
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2270
404. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2271
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2272
405. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2273
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2274
406. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2275
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2276
407. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2277
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2278
408. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2279
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2280
409. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2281
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2282

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path by Stable Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path by Stable Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.

com · Manhattan, NY, USA

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Stable 3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a 10

pair S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then 11

V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination if the following expressions, 12

terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable Perfect Domination criteria 13

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Stable Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic Stable 16

research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 18

SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 19

research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 21

and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 22

examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 23

the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 29

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 30

super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 32

order to master the Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination, there is a need to 37

“re-define” the concept of “Stable Perfect Domination mastery”. SuperHyperVertices 38

table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and hyperedges 41

belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is redefined. ”values 42

of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of SuperVertices&maximum 43

SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Stable Perfect Domination. This is the 47

explored and distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass 53

disciplinary methods based on a dominant Stable Perfect Domination. Because of 54

having Stable Perfect Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of 55

“neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination” and “neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination”. 56

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 57

method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic 58

SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table 59

“Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” 61

results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Stable Perfect Domination becomes more 63

understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, 64

there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, 65

SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and 66

SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, 67

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 68

SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 69

SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 70

elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 71

of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 72

SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 73

exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 74

SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 75

SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 76

common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 79

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 80

separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 81

among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 82

SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 83

designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88

Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89

of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90

“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 91

the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 98

visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 102

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 103

Stable Perfect Domination Neutrosophic, SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic 112