Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Environmental Waste Management 1St Edition Ram Chandra Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Environmental Waste Management 1St Edition Ram Chandra Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/zero-waste-management-practices-
for-environmental-sustainability-management-practices-for-
environmental-sustainability-1st-edition-ashok-k-rathoure-editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/phytoremediation-of-
environmental-pollutants-1st-edition-chandra/
https://textbookfull.com/product/e-waste-recycling-and-
management-present-scenarios-and-environmental-issues-anish-khan/
https://textbookfull.com/product/environmental-pollutants-and-
their-bioremediation-approaches-1st-edition-ram-naresh-bharagava/
Mycoremediation and Environmental Sustainability Volume
1 1st Edition Ram Prasad (Eds.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/mycoremediation-and-
environmental-sustainability-volume-1-1st-edition-ram-prasad-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/hazardous-waste-management-an-
introduction-vanguilder/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mathematics-applied-to-
engineering-and-management-1st-edition-mangey-ram-editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/waste-biomass-management-a-
holistic-approach-1st-edition-lakhveer-singh/
https://textbookfull.com/product/environmental-materials-and-
waste-resource-recovery-and-pollution-prevention-1st-edition-m-n-
v-prasad/
ENVIRONMENTAL
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Edited by
Ram Chandra
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been
made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the valid-
ity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright
holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this
form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may
rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or uti-
lized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopy-
ing, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the
publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://
www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923,
978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For
organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
and the CRC Press Web site at
http://www.crcpress.com
Contents
Preface............................................................................................................................................. vii
Editor................................................................................................................................................ix
Contributors.....................................................................................................................................xi
1 The Use of PMDE with Sugar Industries Pressmud for Composting: A Green
Technology for Safe Disposal in the Environment..........................................................1
Ram Chandra and Sangeeta Yadav
v
© 2016 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
vi Contents
Index.............................................................................................................................................. 565
vii
© 2016 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2016 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Editor
ix
© 2016 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
© 2016 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Contributors
CONTENTS
1.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................2
1.2 The Principles of the Composting Process..........................................................................6
1.3 Category of Composting........................................................................................................8
1.3.1 Microbial Composting/Thermophilic Composting..............................................8
1.3.1.1 Advantages of Composting........................................................................9
1.3.1.2 Disadvantages of Composting................................................................. 10
1.3.2 Vermicomposting...................................................................................................... 10
1.3.2.1 Advantages of Vermicomposting............................................................ 12
1.3.2.2 Disadvantages of Vermicomposting....................................................... 12
1.4 Methods of Composting...................................................................................................... 12
1.4.1 Aerobic Composting................................................................................................. 12
1.4.1.1 Passive Composting Piles......................................................................... 12
1.4.1.2 Windrow Composting............................................................................... 13
1.4.1.3 In-Vessel Systems....................................................................................... 16
1.4.2 Anaerobic Composting............................................................................................ 18
1.5 Microorganism in Compost................................................................................................ 19
1.5.1 Bacteria....................................................................................................................... 19
1.5.2 Fungi........................................................................................................................... 21
1.5.3 Actinomycetes...........................................................................................................22
1.5.4 Higher Organisms.................................................................................................... 23
1.5.5 Pathogens in Composting........................................................................................ 23
1.6 Factors Influencing Composting........................................................................................ 24
1.6.1 Nutrient Factors Influencing Composting............................................................ 25
1.6.1.1 Macronutrients and Micronutrients........................................................ 25
1.6.1.2 Carbon-to-Nitrogen Ratio (C:N).............................................................. 25
1.6.2 Environmental Factors Influencing Composting................................................. 26
1.6.2.1 Moisture...................................................................................................... 26
1.6.2.2 Oxygen and Temperature......................................................................... 26
1.6.2.3 Aeration....................................................................................................... 27
1.6.2.4 pH................................................................................................................. 28
1.6.2.5 Electrical Conductivity.............................................................................. 28
1
© 2016 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
2 Environmental Waste Management
1.1 Introduction
Composting is a sustainable waste management technique in developing countries. It
is an eco-friendly approach for bioconversion into value added products which may be
utilized as plant nutrients. It also reduces disposal and pollution problems arising from
distillery effluent. Composting is an aerobic, thermophilic, and controlled microbial bio-
oxidation process resulting in a product rich in humus which is used as a fertilizer. The
oxidation produces a transient thermophilic stage which is followed by a period of cool-
ing of degrading organic matter. The resulting material is held at ambient temperatures
for maturation purposes which results in a stable, volume-reduced, hygienic, humus-like
material which is beneficial to soil and plants. Composting is a popular option adopted
by several Indian distilleries attached to sugar mills with adequate land availability. The
wastewater of distilleries, that is, spent wash, either directly or after biomethanation is
sprayed in a controlled manner on sugarcane pressmud. The effluent discharged after the
biomethanation process is known as postmethanated distillery effluent (PMDE).
The rapid growth of distilleries in India has resulted in a substantial increase in the indus-
trial pollutant load. There are more than 315 distilleries in India producing 3.25 × 109 L of
alcohol and 4.04 × 1011 L of effluent each year. The industrial waste generated by various
distillery units is posing a serious threat to adjoining aquatic and terrestrial habitats due
to the practice of discharging waste into nearby wastewater courses and land. Distillery
effluents have a high-biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD),
phenols, and heavy metals. The color of the effluent persists even after anaerobic treat-
ment and causes a serious threat to environment. The water bodies receiving color waste
get colored and the penetration of light in aquatic ecosystems is reduced, which in turn
affects aquatic life. PMDE is an effective organic liquid fertilizer after appropriate dilution
(Bharagava et al., 2008; Chandra et al., 2009). PMDE could be recycled in agriculture both
as irrigation water and as a source of plant nutrients. It contains a large amount of organic
carbon, K, Ca, Mg, Cl, and SO4 and moderate amount of N and P and traces of Zn, Cu, Fe,
and Mn (Mahimairaja and Bolan, 2004).
There are a number of large-scale distilleries integrated with sugar mills in India. The
waste products from sugar mills comprise bagasse (the residue from sugarcane crush-
ing), pressmud (the mud and dirt residue from juice clarification), and molasses (the final
residue from the sugar crystallization section) as shown in Figure 1.1. Bagasse is used
in paper manufacturing and as fuel in boilers; molasses as raw material in distilleries
for alcohol production. These days pressmud has been used in the composting of waste-
water generated by distilleries in India because it is a source of nutrients. Pressmud is a
solid residue, obtained from sugarcane juice before the crystallization of sugar. It is a soft,
spongy, lightweight, amorphous, dark brown to black colored material (Figure 1.1a). About
3% pressmud is produced from a total quantity of crushed cane. Pressmud is a rich source
of organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphate, potassium (NPK), and other micronutrients. It gen-
erally contains 60%–85% moisture (w/w) and the chemical composition depends on the
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
FIGURE 1.1
(See color insert.) View of byproducts of the sugar industries, pressmud (a) molasses (b), and bagasses
(c and d).
cane variety, soil condition, nutrients applied in the field, process of clarification adopted
and other environmental factors. Comparative physicochemical properties of pressmud
and distillery wastewater are shown in Table 1.1.
Pressmud from sugar factories typically contains 71% moisture, 9% ash, and 20% vola-
tile solids (VSs), with 74%–75% organic matter found on solids. Hence, it may be the best
source material for microbial growth and for use in the treatment of distillery waste. The
distillery effluent based compost can be prepared by using pressmud and the compost
can be enriched with the use of rock phosphate, gypsum, yeast sludge, bagasse, sugar-
cane trash, boiler ash, coir pith, and water hyacinth. First, the pressmud is spread in the
compost yard to form a heap of 1.5 m height, 3.5 m width, and 300 m length. Ten liters of
bacterial culture, diluted with water, in the ratio of 1:10 is sufficient for a tone of pressmud.
A consortium of efficient microbial decomposers, namely, Phanerocheate chrysosporium,
Trichurus spiralis, Pacelomyces fusisporus, Trichoderma spp., and so on, are sprayed on the
pressmud and mixed thoroughly using an aerotiller which makes the pressmud aerable
and enhances the process of decomposition.
After three days, distillery effluent is sprayed on the heaps to a moisture level of 60%
and the pressmud heaps are allowed to absorb the effluent for 4–5 h. The heaps are then
thoroughly mixed by an aerotiller as shown in Figure 1.2. When the moisture level drops
below 30%–40%, the effluent is sprayed again, mixed with pressmud, and the heaps are
once again formed.
Effluent can be sprayed once or twice in a week depending on the moisture content of
the pressmud heaps. Mixing of effluent and heap formation will be repeated for 8 weeks so
TABLE 1.1
Characteristics of Pressmud and Wastewater Generated from a Distillery
Pressmud
(Joshi and Distillery Spent Post-Methanated
Parameters Sharma, 2010) Wash Distillery Effluent
Color (Co–pt) — Dark brown (150,000) Dark brown (70,000)
Odor — Jaggery smell Mild sulfur smell
pH 7.66 ± 0.047 3.9 ± 0.25 8.3 ± 0.310
Temperature (°C) 44.5 ± 1.098 90 ± 2.0 35 ± 1.2
T.S. — 103,084 ± 5.50 34,317 ± 455
T.D.S. — 77,776 ± 3768 20,022 ± 438
T.S.S. — 25,308 ± 1201 14,276 ± 16
COD — 90,000 ± 231 58,018 ± 185
BOD — 42,000 ± 123 29,120 ± 265
Chloride — 2200 ± 105 1300 ± 60.5
Phenol — 4.20 ± 1.8 1.65 ± 0.76
Sulfate 2.297 ± 0.123 5,760 ± 260 13656 ± 21.23
Phosphate 1.80 ± 0.157 5.36 ± 0.168 1.16 ± 0.15
Total nitrogen 1.13 ± 0.095 2,800 ± 130 568 ± 23
Total organic carbon — 25,368 ± 1.060 10,904 ± 0.34
Water holding capacity 78.2 ± 1.323 — —
Moisture content 54.9 ± 8.993 — —
Carbon content 29.67 ± 1.058 — —
Organic matter 51.2 ± 1.827 — —
Electrical conductivity 1.77 ± 0.092 — —
(S/cm)
Metals — — —
Cadmium — 0.02 ± 0.00 2.281 ± 0.067
Chromium — 0.192 ± 0.008 0.440 ± 0.013
Iron — 6.312 ± 0.210 84.01 ± 1.980
Nickel — 0.1706 ± 0.006 1.241 ± 0.037
Copper — 0.961 ± 0.001 0.955 ± 0.022
Lead — 0.945 ± 0.002 4.446 ± 0.064
Zinc — 2.012 ± 0.001 4.631 ± 0.108
Manganese — 0.214 ± 0.001 2.112 ± 0.045
Note: Mean ± SD, n = 3. All values of distillery wastewater are reported in mg/L and pressmud in
% except pH, temperature, odor, and color. TS: total solid, TDS: total dissolve solid, TSS: total
suspended solid, COD: chemical oxygen demand, BOD: biological oxygen demand.
that the pressmud and effluent proportion reaches an optimum ratio of 1:3. The heaps are
then allowed to cure for a month. The compost obtained from this process is neutral in pH
with an electric conductivity (EC) of 3.12–6.40 dS/m. It contains 1.53% N, 1.50% P, 3.10% K,
300 ppm Fe, 130 ppm Cu, 180 ppm Mn, and 220 ppm Zn. The organic carbon and C:N ratio
reduces from 36% to 18% and from 28.12% to 16.3%, respectively. The technology of using
distillery effluent for the composting of pressmud, pressmud along with sugarcane trash
and coir waste, pressmud plus bagasse ash, and city garbage has been successfully used in
several places.
Composting involves the conversion of organic residues of distillery effluent into
manure. It is largely a microbiological process based on the activities of several bacteria,
FIGURE 1.2
(See color insert.) Mixing of effluent and pressmud with the help of an aerotiller.
actinomycetes, and fungi. During the composting of effluent with pressmud, microorgan-
isms that firstly colonize in the heap are mesophilic bacteria, actinomycetes, fungi, and
protozoa. They grow between 10°C and 40°C and break down easily degradable com-
ponents such as sugars and amino acids. The degradation of fresh matter starts when
the heap is formed. Then due to the oxidative action of microorganisms the temperature
increases. Although there is a drop in pH at the very beginning of composting, caused by
the formation of volatile fatty acids (VFAs), the subsequent degradation of acids brings
about an increase in pH. When the temperature of a waste heap reaches 40–60°C, ther-
mophilic microorganisms replace mesophilic ones. The second phase is called the ther-
mophilic phase and can last several weeks. It is the active phase of composting: most of
the organic matter is degraded and consequently most oxygen is consumed in this phase.
The degradation of lignin and more persistent compounds also start during this phase.
Indeed, the optimum temperature for thermophilic micro-fungi and actinomycetes which
mainly degrade lignin is 40–50°C. Above 80°C, these microorganisms cannot grow and
lignin degradation is slowed down. After the thermophilic phase, the peak of degradation
of fresh organic matter, the microbial activity decreases, as does the temperature. This is
termed the cooling phase. The compost maturation phase then begins when the compost
temperature falls to that of the ambient air. During this phase, mesophilic microorgan-
isms colonize the compost heap and slowly degrade complex organic compounds such as
lignin. This last phase is important because a humus-like substance is produced in this
phase to form mature compost. The microbial succession in different steps of composting
is shown in Figure 1.3.
Compostable substrates (feedstocks) in effluents contain metabolizable carbon which
will enhance microbial diversity and activity during composting and will promote the
degradation of xenobiotic or persistent organic compounds, such as melanoidin (the brown
colored carbonyl-amino acid Maillard product of sugar industries), phenolics, and organo-
chlorines. Metallic pollutants are not degraded during composting but may be converted
into organic species that are less bioavailable. Selvamurugan et al. (2013) conducted a field
experiment to study the impact of biomethanated distillery spent wash and pressmud
biocompost with inorganic fertilizers in various proportions on the yield attributes, yield,
oil, and protein content of groundnut.
Results of the field experiment revealed that the yield of groundnut was improved by the
application of biomethanated distillery spent wash and pressmud biocompost compared
to recommended NPK as chemical fertilizers. Davamani et al. (2006) also reported that
biocompost significantly enhanced the yield and yield components and the juice quality
FIGURE 1.3
Microbial succession during composting.
of sugarcane. Bhalerao et al. (2006) observed that increased nutrient uptake by sugarcane
is due to the use of spent wash and pressmud compost. The application of biomethana-
ted distillery spent wash and pressmud biocompost substantially increased the microflora
and enzyme activities of the soil throughout the crop growth period of sugarcane. The
increased microbial biomass and enzymatic activities in sugarcane grown soil expedited
mineralization of biomethanated distillery spent wash and biocompost, nutrient cycling
and formation of organic matter and soil structure. Thus, biocomposting not only solves
disposal problems but also helps in saving the cost of chemical fertilizers. Many workers
have studied the effect of spent wash as a source of plant nutrients; however, very little
information is available on the use of PMDE and sugarcane pressmud in composting.
moisture, air and nutrients. During composting, the microorganisms consume oxygen
and feed on organic matter. Active composting generates a considerable amount of heat
and large quantities of carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapor are released into the air. The
CO2 and water losses can amount to half the weight of the initial organic materials, so
composting reduces both the volume and mass of the raw materials while transforming
them into a beneficial humus-like material.
Microbial metabolism
Organic compounds + O 2 → Stabilized organic waste
material + CO 2 + 2H 2O + Energy
This conversion is not achieved through a single reaction, but through a series of reac-
tions. These reactions serve not only to liberate significant quantities of energy, but also
to form a large number of organic intermediates that serve as starting points for other
synthetic reactions. The two possible modes of energy yielding metabolism for heterotro-
phic microorganisms are respiration and fermentation. Respiration can be either aerobic
or anaerobic. Aerobic respiration is preferred over anaerobic respiration and fermenta-
tion for composting because it is more efficient, generates more energy, operates at higher
temperatures, and does not produce odorous compounds. Aerobes can also use a greater
variety of organic compounds as a source of energy that results in more complete degrada-
tion and stabilization of the compost material. In anaerobic respiration, the microorgan-
isms use electron acceptors other than O2, such as nitrates (NO −3 ), sulfates (SO 2−4 ), and
carbonates (CO 2−3 ) to obtain energy. Their use of these alternate electron acceptors in the
energy-yielding metabolism produces odorous or undesirable compounds, such as hydro-
gen sulfide (H2S) and methane (CH4). Anaerobic respiration also leads to the formation of
organic acid intermediates that tend to accumulate and are detrimental to aerobic micro-
organisms. Aerobic respiration also forms organic acid intermediates, but these intermedi-
ates are readily consumed by subsequent reactions so that they do not pose as significant a
potential for odors as anaerobic respiration. Fermentation is the simplest means of energy
generation. It does not require oxygen and is quite inefficient. Most of the carbon decom-
posed through fermentation is converted to end-products, not cell substituent, while lib-
erating only a small amount of energy. In addition, nitrogenous organic residue is broken
down to obtain the nitrogen necessary for the synthesis of cellular material in heterotro-
phic microorganisms. Nitrogenous organic residues or proteins undergo enzymatic oxida-
tion (digestion) to form complex amino compounds through a process called aminization.
Carbon dioxide (CO2), energy, and other by-products are also produced.
The complex amino compounds formed can then be synthesized into microorganisms
or undergo additional decomposition into simpler products. The products of the digestion
of proteins and complex amino acids can only be used in the synthesis of new cellular
material if sufficient carbon is available. If not enough carbon or energy is available to
incorporate these amino compounds into the cells, unstable nitrogen forms accumulate
through the process of ammonification. As the ammonia group is characteristic of amino
acids, ammonia (NH3) or ammonium ions (NH +4 ) accumulates. The ammonium compound
that is formed interconverts between the two forms depending on the pH and tempera-
ture of the heap. This interconversion between NH3 and NH +4 is described by the reaction
shown below. Acidic conditions (pH < 7) promote the formation of NH +4 , while basic con-
ditions promote the formation of NH3. Elevated temperature also favors the formation of
NH3 and because of the low vapor pressure of NH3, it generally results in gaseous NH3
emissions from the heap. Another key chemical transformation of the composting process
is nitrification, the process by which ammonia or ammonium ions are oxidized to nitrates.
Nitrification is a two-step process. In the first step, NH +4 −N is oxidized to form nitrites (
NO −2 ) through the action of autotrophic bacteria that use the energy produced by this con-
version. The nitrites are then rapidly converted to nitrates (NO −3 ) by a different group of
microorganisms called nitrifying bacteria. The reactions are as follows:
Nitrification occurs during the curing period. Since nitrites (NO −2 ) are toxic to plants
and nitrates (NO −3 ) are the form of nitrogen most usable in plant metabolism, enough time
must be allowed for the curing period so nitrates are the final nitrogen product in the com-
post. In addition, because nitrification requires oxygen, proper aeration of the compost pile
must be maintained during curing. Another important nitrogen transformation is denitri-
fication. Denitrification occurs in oxygen-depleted environments. It can be carried out by
either aerobic or anaerobic bacteria. If denitrification is carried out by aerobic bacteria, the
reaction is as follows:
NO −3 → NO −2 → N 2O → N 2 (gas)
HNO −3 + H 2 → NH 2 + N 2O
As nitrous oxide (N2O) is an odorous compound and results in the loss of beneficial
nitrate–nitrogen, denitrification is not desired and can be avoided by maintaining aerobic
heap conditions. This is accomplished with proper aeration.
FIGURE 1.4
View of thermophilic composting of pressmud.
TABLE 1.2
Key Parameters That Influence the Composting Process and Their Optimum Values
Parameter Optimum Value for Composting
C:N ratio of the feed 25:1 to 35:1
Particle size 10 mm for agitated systems and forced aeration, 50 mm for long
heaps and natural aeration
Moisture content 50%–60% (higher values when bulking agents are used)
Air flow 0.6–1.8 m3 air/day/kg volatile solids during thermophilic stage, or
maintain oxygen level at 10% or higher
Temperature 55–60°C held for 3 days
Agitation No agitation to periodic turning in simple systems and short bursts of
vigorous agitation in mechanized systems
pH control Normally not necessary
Heap size Any length, 1.5 and 2.5 m wide for heaps using natural aeration
With forced aeration, heap size depends on need to avoid overheating
Activators Use of efficient cellulolytic fungi and biofertilizers
1.3.2 Vermicomposting
Vermicomposting is a simple biotechnological process of composting, in which certain
species of earthworms is used to enhance the process of waste conversion and produce
a better end product. Vermicomposting is somewhat similar to thermophilic compost-
ing, but one of the major differences is that it involves the joint action of earthworms and
microorganisms (whereas the other process relies solely on microbes). Although it is the
microorganisms that biochemically degrade the organic matter, earthworms are the cru-
cial drivers of the process, as they aerate, condition, and fragment the substrate, thereby
drastically altering the microbial activity. Figure 1.5 shows the vermicomposting.
Vermicomposting is also a much cooler process working best at 59–86°F (15–30°C). The
relationship between temperature and time in thermophilic and vermicomposting is shown
in Figure 1.6. Vermicomposting typically follows the “continuous” composting model that
is to say materials are added continuously (usually in smaller amounts). Earthworms act
as mechanical blenders and by comminuting the organic matter they modify its physical
and chemical status by gradually reducing the ratio of C:N and increasing the surface area
exposed to microorganisms—thus making conditions much more favorable for microbial
activity and further decomposition.
Therefore, two phases can also be distinguished: (i) an active phase where the earth-
worms process the waste modifying its physical state and microbial composition and (ii) a
maturation-like phase marked by the displacement of the earthworms toward fresher lay-
ers of undigested waste, where the microbes take over in the decomposition of the waste.
As in composting, the duration of the active phase is not fixed and will depend on the
FIGURE 1.5
(See color insert.) View of vermicomposting.
species and density of earthworms, the main drivers of the process, and their ability to
ingest the waste (ingestion rate). Vermicomposting is not fully adapted to the industrial
scale and since the temperature is always in the mesophilic range, pathogen removal is not
ensured, although some studies have provided evidence of suppression of pathogens. In
some cases, organic residues require pretreatment before vermicomposting as they may
70
Thermal
Thermophilic
compost
Vermicompost
Time
FIGURE 1.6
Time versus temperature curves for thermophilic composting and vermicomposting. Phases for thermal com-
post are adapted from Chefetz et al. (1996) and those for vermicompost are adapted from Benitez et al. (2000).
contain substances that are toxic for earthworms, such as acidic compounds. The combina-
tion of composting and vermicomposting has recently been considered as a more appro-
priate technique to treat complex wastewater.
Air
FIGURE 1.7
Passive composting piles.
(a) (b)
FIGURE 1.8
View of windrow composting (a) and mixing with the help of an aerotiller (b).
3 to 4 feet
10 feet
FIGURE 1.9
(See color insert.) Passively aerated windrows.
Once the windrow is formed, however, the labor requirement necessary is to primarily
monitor the temperature and porosity of the pile. As in the passive composting system, the
key element is to formulate a mix with good porosity and structure to allow for adequate
aeration. Passive aeration also requires that the piles not be as high as those for the wind-
row method. The typical height is 3–4 feet with a width of about 10 feet. The bottom and
top layers should each be about 6 inches thick.
Air
Peforated pipes
Blower
FIGURE 1.10
(See color insert.) Aerated static pile.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
And when hee is once entred to[1805] rule the [beastly]
rout,
Although hee would, he can no way get out:
Hee may bee sure none will to him resorte,
But such as are the vile and rascall sorte:
All honest men, as well the most as lest,
To tast of treason will vtterly detest.
31.
Then let him way how long hee can bee sure,
Where fayth nor frendship may no while endure:
Hee whom hee trusteth most, to gayne a grote
Will fall him from, and assay[1806] to cut his throate:
Among the knaues and slaues where vice is rooted,
There is no other frendship to bee looked.
32.
33.
They lose their lands and goods, their childe and wife
With sorrowe and shame shall leade a wofull lyfe:
If hee bee slayne in fielde hee dyeth accurst,
Which of all wrecks wee should accompt the worst:
And hee that dyeth defending his liege lord
Is blist, and blist agayne by God’s owne worde.
35.
36.
37.
38.
Therefore the rebell is accurst and mad,
That hopeth[1811] for that which rebell neuer had:
Who trusting still to tales doth hang in hope,
Tyll at the last hee hang fast by the rope,
For though that tales bee tolde that hope might feede,
Such foolishe hope hath still vnhappy speede.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
And when wee had prepared euery thing,
Wee went to Tawnton with all our prouision,
And there we slewe the prouost of Penryn,
For that on the subsedy hee sate in commission:[1833]
Hee was not wise, nor yet of great discretion,
That durst approche his enmies in their rage,
When wit nor reason coulde their yre asswage.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
[This] my lorde and wee the captaynes of the west,
Tooke [our] inne at Newgate, fast in fetters tide,
Where after tryall[1845] wee had but litle rest:
My lorde through London was drawne on a slide,
To Tower hill, where with an[1846] axe hee dyde,
Clad in his [coate] armour painted all in paper,
Torne[1847] and reuersed[1848] in spite of his behauer.
[1849]
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
Wherefore, good Baldwine, do[1859] thou record my
name,
To bee ensample to[1860] such as credit lyes,
Or thrist to sucke the sugred cup of fame,
Or doe attempt agaynst their prince to ryse:
And charge them all to keepe within their syse:
Who doth assay to wrest beyond his strength,
Let him be sure hee shall repent at length.
68.
Maister Cauyll.[1864]
[“It is pity,” quoth[1865] one, “that the meeter is no better, seeing
the matter is so good: you may do very well to helpe it, and a lytle
filing would make it formal.” “The author him selfe,” quoth[1866] I,
“could haue done that, but hee would not, and hath desired me that it
may passe in such rude sort as you haue heard it: for hee obserueth
therein a double decorum both of the Smith, and of himselfe: for hee
thinketh it not meete for the Smith to speake, nor for himselfe to write
in any exact kinde of meeter.” “Well,” sayd another, “the matter is
notable to teach al people, as well officers as subiects, to consider
their estates, and to liue in loue and obedience to the highest
powers, whatsoeuer they bee, whome God either by birth, law,
succession, or vniuersall election, doth or shall aucthorise in his
owne roume to execute his lawes and iustice among any people or
nation. For by all these meanes God placeth his deputies. And in my
iudgement there is no meane so good eyther for the common quiet
of the people, or for God’s free choise, as the naturall order of
enheritaunce by lineall discent: for so it is left in God’s handes, to
creat in the wombe what prince hee thinketh meetest for his
purposes: the people also knowe their princes, and therefore the
more gladly and willingly receiue and obay them. And although some
realmes, more carefull then wise, haue entailed theire crowne to the
heire male, thinking it not meete for the feminine sexe to beare the
royall office: yet if they consider all circumstaunces, and the chiefest
vses of a prince in a realme, they shall see how they are deceiued.
For princes are God’s lieutenauntes or deputies, to see God’s lawes
executed among theire subiects, not to rule according to their owne
lustes or deuises, but by the prescript of God’s lawes: so that the
chiefest poynt of a prince’s office consisteth in obedience to God and
to his ordinaunces, and what shoulde let but that a woman may bee
as obedient vnto God, as a man? The second poynt of a prince’s
office is to prouide for the impotent, nedy, and helples, as widowes,
orphanes, lame, and decrepite persons: and seing women are by
nature tender harted, milde and pitifull, who may better then they
discharge this duty? Yea but a woman lacketh courage, boldnesse,
and stomacke, to withstand the aduersarie, and so are her subiects
an open spoyle to their enemies. Debora, Iaell, Iudith, Thomeris, and
other doe proue the contrary. But graunt it were so: what harme were
that, seing victory consisteth not in witte or force, but in God’s
pleasure.[1867] I am sure that whatsoeuer prince doth his duty in
obaying God, and causing iustice to bee ministred according to
God’s lawes, shall not only lacke warre (bee hee man, woman, or
childe) but also bee a terroure to all other princes. And if God suffer
any at any time to be assayled, it is for the destruction of the
assayler, whether he bee rebell or forayne foe, and to the honour
and profit of the vertuous prince, in whose behalfe, rather then hee
shall miscary, God himselfe will fight with enfections and
earthquakes from the lande and waters, and with stormes and
lightenings from the ayre and skies. Moe warres haue bene sought
through the wilfull and hauty courages of kings, and greater
destructions happened to realmes therby, then by any other meanes.
And as for wisdome and pollicy, seing it consisteth in following the
counsayle of many godly, learned, and long experienced heades, it
were better to haue a woman, who considering her owne weaknes
and inability, should be ruled thereby, then a man which presuming
vpon his owne fond brayne, will heare no aduise saue his owne. You
muse peraduenture wherefore I say this. The franticke heades which
disable our queene, because shee is a woman, and our king
because hee is a straunger, to bee our princes and cheife
gouernours, hath caused mee to say thus mutch. For whatsoeuer
man, woman, or childe, is by the consent of the whole realme
established in the royall seate, so it haue not bene iniuriously
procured by rygour of sworde and open force, but quietly by tytle,
either of enheritaunce, succession, lawfull bequest, common consent
or election, is vndoubtedly chosen by God to bee his deputye: and
whosoeuer resisteth any suche, resisteth agaynste God himselfe,
and is a ranke traytour and rebell, and shalbe sure to prosper as well
as the blacke Smith and other suche haue done. All resist that
wilfully breake any lawe, not being agaynst God’s lawe, made by
common consent for the wealthe of the realme, and commaunded to
be kept by the authority of the prince: or that deny to pay such
duties, as by consent of the high court of parliament, are appointed
to the prince, for the defence and preseruation of the realme.” “You
haue saide very truly herein,” quoth[1868] I, “and I trust this terrible
example of the blacke Smith, will put all men in minde of their duties,
and teach them to bee obedient to all good lawes, and lawfull
contributions. The scriptures do forbyd vs to rebell, or forcibly to
withstand princes, though they commaund vniust things: yet in any
case wee may not doe them: but receiue quietly at the prince’s hand
whatsoeuer punishment God shall suffer to bee layd vpon vs for our
refusall. God will suffer none of his to bee tempted aboue their
strength.”[1869] This talke thus being ended: “I was willed my
maisters,” quoth I, “by maister Holinshed, to bring sir Nicholas Burdet
vnto you.” “Were you?” quoth they: “on his word we will heare what
he sayes.” “Read it, I pray you,” quod one. “You must thinke then,”
quoth I, “that you see him all wounded as he was slaine at Pontoise,
to say as foloweth.”]
How the Valiant Knight Sir Nicholas
Burdet, Chiefe Butler of Normandy,
was slayne at Pontoise, Anno 1441.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.