Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Joint Preservation in The Adult Knee 1St Edition E Carlos Rodriguez Merchan Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Joint Preservation in The Adult Knee 1St Edition E Carlos Rodriguez Merchan Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/hip-joint-restoration-worldwide-
advances-in-arthroscopy-arthroplasty-osteotomy-and-joint-
preservation-surgery-1st-edition-joseph-c-mccarthy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/regenerative-strategies-for-the-
treatment-of-knee-joint-disabilities-1st-edition-joaquim-miguel-
oliveira/
https://textbookfull.com/product/foundations-and-adult-health-
nursing-e-book-eighth-edition-cooper/
https://textbookfull.com/product/preservation-1st-edition-
christina-ward/
Moss Adams Heart Disease in infants Children and
Adolescents Including the Fetus and Young Adult Robert
E. Shaddy
https://textbookfull.com/product/moss-adams-heart-disease-in-
infants-children-and-adolescents-including-the-fetus-and-young-
adult-robert-e-shaddy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-hip-joint-1st-edition-iyer/
https://textbookfull.com/product/cardiac-surgery-in-the-
adult-5th-edition-lawrence-h-cohn/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-complete-guide-to-male-
fertility-preservation-1st-edition-ahmad-majzoub/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-knee-injury-bible-
everything-you-need-to-know-about-knee-injuries-how-to-treat-
them-and-how-they-affect-your-life-1st-edition-robert-f-laprade/
E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Alexander D. Liddle
Editors
Joint Preservation
in the Adult Knee
123
Joint Preservation in the Adult Knee
E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Alexander D. Liddle
Editors
v
vi Preface
Between them, they provide an overview of the state of the art of joint-
preserving surgery of the knee, using the latest evidence together with insights
from their practice. We hope that it will be of use to surgeons looking to
develop and refine their practice to provide the best care for their patients.
vii
viii Contents
Abstract
The art of clinical examination is often forgotten with the advent of
increasingly precise imaging modalities but in fact remains the most pow-
erful tool in the surgeon’s armamentarium and is at the heart of the patient–
clinician relationship. A clear examination sequence forms a fundamental
tool for the diagnosis and correct treatment of knee pathology. Whilst this
is important, the advanced examiner together with the history will tailor a
specific exam series depending on the suspected pathology. In general,
there are three broad series: one for patellofemoral/extensor mechanism
pathologies; one for meniscal and chondral (articular) lesions; and one for
instability. This chapter will provide an overview of advanced physical
examination of the knee and outlines the most commonly used tests.
Images and detailed descriptions will provide the reader with a thorough
understanding of hand positions and identifying a positive sign.
Keywords
Knee • Clinical examination • Static assessment • Dynamic assessment
Assessment of gait
1.1 Introduction
Electronic supplementary material The online version The knee is amongst the most commonly injured
of this chapter (doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41808-7_1) con- large joint in the body [1], primarily because the
tains supplementary material, which is available to autho-
rized users. tibiofemoral and patellofemoral articulations are
inherently unstable and also due to the large loads
Q.O. Tang • C.M. Gupte (*) that are transmitted through the joint when bear-
The Musculoskeletal Surgery Group, Department of ing weight.
Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London,
The art of examining the knee should there-
London, UK
e-mail: quentang@gmail.com; c.gupte00@imperial. fore involve consideration of the interplay
ac.uk between stabilising factors of the knee (muscles
and ligaments) and the overall biomechanics of performed in the case of patellofemoral instabil-
the lower limbs. ity using the “Staheli profile” technique with the
Whilst the examiner should have a logical and patient seated [3].
repeatable sequence of examination for each
knee, the advanced examiner will develop the
ability to adapt this protocol and add further tests Sagittal plane (Fig. 1.2) The patient is examined
to the specific knee condition suspected. For from the side assessing for flexed posture, and
example, the tests employed to assess for patel- anterior tibial or femoral bowing.
lofemoral instability in a young patient (tracking,
apprehension, Q angle) may differ from the 1.2.1.2 Assessment of Gait
assessment of an elderly patient with medial Full gait assessment is beyond the scope of this
osteoarthritis. chapter. However, specifically with regards to
The general sequence of examination should orthopaedic knee examination, gait should again
be as follows: be assessed in coronal (frontal) and sagittal
planes:
(a) Look
(b) Feel (with knee in extension and 90° Coronal
flexion) Assess varus thrust for lateral collateral and pos-
(c) Move terolateral corner injury. Valgus thrust indicates
(d) Special tests medial collateral injury.
1.2 Look
1.2.1 Alignment
a b
Fig. 1.2 (a) Assessing left lateral sagittal plane. (b) Assessing right lateral sagittal plane
4 Q.O. Tang and C.M. Gupte
Fig. 1.3 Examination of knee with patient sitting on Fig. 1.4 Assessing whilst supine on a couch. Note the
couch, legs suspended from side of couch valgus attitude is more obvious whilst supine
• Grade 2: Patellar tap: A moderate sized effu- there is a weakness of the quadriceps, known as
sion will lead to the patella floating up towards extensor lag (Video 1.2). If the knee stays flexed,
the skin. The patella can then be “tapped” then there is fixed flexion.
against the femoral trochlea. Once this is performed, the patient is asked
• Grade 3: Cross fluctuance: A very large effu- to flex the knee – “pull your heel towards your
sion will lead to a fluid thrill demonstrated by buttock”. Active flexion is assessed first. If
cross fluctuance of the fluid when pressed. there is full active flexion, then no passive
assessment is required. If there is any deficit,
1.3.1.2 Joint Palpation the heel can be gently held and the knee flexed
The joint line is best palpated with the knee further always watching the patient’s face for
flexed to 80°. The examiner should visualise pain.
the anatomy being palpated through the skin It is important to note that full extension is
and sequence of palpation should be termed as “zero degrees flexion”, a right angle is
consistent: “90° flexion” and full flexion will depend on the
body habitus of the patient and can vary from
1. Medial joint line: medial meniscus, medial 120° in a patient with large thighs to 160° in a
femoral condyle, and tibial and femoral very thin patient. Another way to quantifying
insertions of the medial collateral ligament flexion deficit between knees is to determine the
(MCL). If a thickened medial plica is sus- “heel to buttock” distance.
pected, this can be palpated over the medial It is best to assess flexion of both knees one
femoral condyle with the knee at 30°. More after the other.
distally, the pes anserinus bursa should be
palpated for tenderness typical of pes
bursitis. 1.5 Special Tests
2. Lateral joint line: lateral meniscus, lateral
femoral condyle, and lateral collateral liga- These can be divided into:
ment. The fibula can also be palpated for ten-
derness and the superior tibiofibular joint can (a) Cruciate ligaments
be balloted if instability is suspected. (b) Collateral ligaments
3. Popliteal fossa for popliteal cyst, and to (c) Meniscal tests
exclude popliteal aneurysm. (d) Patellofemoral tests
• Grade 1: 0–5 mm side to side difference with the knee in the same position as for a Lachman’s.
good end point Often the subtlest sign of laxity is a soft end point.
• Grade 2: 5–10 mm difference with soft end More obvious laxity is demonstrated by more than
point 2 mm side to side difference.
• Grade 3: gross laxity beyond 10 mm
difference 1.5.1.2 Tests with Knee at 80°
of Flexion
It is important to note that the knee should be
1.5.1 Cruciate Ligaments between 80° and 90° of flexion for the following
tests as higher angles of flexion can lead to false
1.5.1.1 Tests with Knee at 30° Relaxed negative results.
Over the Examiner’s Thigh Posterior sag and medial step off (for poste-
Lachman´s test (for anterior cruciate ligament rior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury):
(ACL) injury) Best performed with the knee
relaxed over the examiner’s contralateral thigh, Posterior sag The knees are flexed together to
with the point of contact between the two 80°. The examiner inspects from the side so that
approximately 5 cm proximal to the popliteal a tangential view of the tibiofemoral joint is
fossa. The thigh is stabilised anteriorly with the obtained in the sagittal plane. A posterior sag is
examiner’s contralateral hand and the tibia is observed if there is “dip” in the tibiofemoral
gently translated anteriorly with the ipsilateral articulation. This is often confirmed using a pen
hand placed cupping the tibial tubercle (Fig. 1.5 with a straight edge on the area.
and Video 1.3).
Posterior Lachman’s (for posterolateral capsular Medial step off In a PCL injured knee, there is
injury) This is a subtle sign that indicates poste- loss of the normal medial step off. Normally the
rior capsule laxity in the case of posterolateral cor- anterior aspect of the medial tibial condyle pro-
ner injury. The tibia is translated posteriorly with trudes 3–5 mm anterior to the medial femoral
condyle. PCL injury results in loss of this protru- drawer” when the tibia is brought back into its
sion, whereby the tibia sags posteriorly: grade 1 normal position.
is fewer steps off than the normal side, grade 2 is
tibia level with the femoral condyle and grade 3 1.5.1.3 Other Tests
is tibia posterior to the femoral condyle. Pivot shift test (for ACL injury) This test should
only be performed if ACL insufficiency is sus-
Anterior drawer (for ACL deficiency), poste- pected and only in the most comfortable of
rior drawer (for PCL deficiency) and dial test patients. If the patient is in significant discom-
(for PLC insufficiency): fort, the pivot shift test should be reserved for
examination under anaesthetic.
Anterior drawer It is essential to ensure relaxation
of the hamstring tendons with the examiner’s mid- In the comfortable, relaxed patient, the pivot
dle fingers whilst performing this test. Otherwise, a shift test should be performed as follows:
false negative result is obtained. The examiner
places their hands with the thumbs just below the (a) Knee fully extended.
joint line and middle finger behind the knee palpat- (b) Ipsilateral hand cupping the sole of the foot
ing the relaxed hamstring tendons on either side. rotating the tibia into internal rotation.
The tibia is then brought forward. Again, it is best (c) Contralateral hand holding lower leg at neck
to assess for the number of millimetres of side-to- of fibula, again rotating the tibia into internal
side difference and end point rather than grades of rotation. This will sublux the lateral tibia
laxity (Fig. 1.6 and Video 1.4). anteriorly, with the iliotibial band acting as
an extensor of the knee. The medial tibia will
Posterior drawer The posterior drawer can be remain in position.
assessed in the same manoeuvre as the anterior (d) Flexing the knee from full extension into 30°
drawer but by pushing the tibia posteriorly. It is flexion. Will convert the iliotibial band (ITB)
important to assess for posterior cruciate defi- into a flexor of the knee and the lateral tibial
ciency as well as anterior cruciate as a posteriorly condyle will reduce back into the joint from
sagged tibia will lead to a “pseudo anterior its anteriorly subluxed position.
Fig. 1.6 Position of the hands whilst performing anterior drawer test. Note the examiners thumbs are just below the
joint line
8 Q.O. Tang and C.M. Gupte
Quadriceps active test (for PCL injury) The examiner on one side with an assistant on the
patient is asked to rest the knee on the couch with other side. This has since been adapted so that the
the knee in 80° flexion. The tibia will sag posteri- examiner can assess both sides together by plac-
orly in the PCL deficient knee. The examiner then ing the patient prone. The patient is asked to
holds the foot on the couch and the patient is inform the examiner of pain as they are prone as
asked to kick the foot away (eliciting quadriceps the face cannot be inspected.
contraction) against the examiner’s resistance.
The resulting quads contraction will lead the pos- The test is performed ensuring:
teriorly subluxed tibia back into joint.
(a) The knees are together and in neutral
rotation.
Test for anterolateral and anteromedial instabil- (b) The ankles are fully dorsiflexed.
ity These tests, which are modifications of the (c) The examiner is directly looking over both feet.
anterior drawer test, are for the advanced exam-
iner. For anteromedial instability (ACL and/or The dial test is performed initially with the
MCL) the tibia is rotated internally and then an knee at 30°. A 10° to 15° difference in external
anterior drawer is applied. The medial tibial pla- rotation indicates damage to the posterolateral
teau will sublux more anteriorly than the lateral corner. Excess rotation is caused by posterior
in a positive test. For anterolateral instability, the translation of the lateral tibial due to lack of pos-
opposite applies (Fig. 1.7 and Video 1.5). terolateral restraint.
If the test is positive when also performed at
Dial test The dial test was originally described 90°, this indicates a combined PCL and postero-
with the patient in a supine position and the lateral corner injury.
a b
Fig. 1.7 (a) Internal rotation of tibia allows assessment of anteromedial instability. (b) External rotation of tibia allows
assessment of anterolateral instability
1 Examination of the Knee 9
NB. False positive dial test The difference between full extension and 20°
The dial test can be positive if the posterome- is that in full extension the posterior capsular
dial corner is injured. In this case it is the medial structures act as secondary restraints to the col-
tibia translating anteriorly and the lateral tibia lateral ligaments, whereas in 20° only the collat-
staying in position. This also causes the excess eral ligaments resist the stress. Thus, a knee that
external rotation. is lax in full extension and 20° flexion may indi-
cate more damage to the posterior capsular struc-
tures than a knee that is only lax at 20° flexion.
1.5.2 Collateral Ligaments
a b
Fig. 1.8 (a) Swivelling to the left during Thessaly test. (b) Swivelling to the right during Thessaly test
10 Q.O. Tang and C.M. Gupte
performed with the thumb on the joint line and supposed to represent the resultant lateral
the tibia externally rotated (posterior horn medial pull of the patella tendon and the quadriceps
meniscus) and then internally rotated (posterior tendon on the patella. A normal value is
horn lateral meniscus). 12–15°, with the angle slightly greater in
women than men.
Increase in Q angle is associated with:
1.5.4 Patellofemoral Tests • Femoral anteversion
• External tibial torsion
Patellofemoral joint (PFJ) tracking and assess- • Laterally displaced tibial tubercle
ment of lateral tilt and tightness is mentioned • Genu valgum: increases the obliquity of
above. the femur and concomitantly, the obliquity
Other tests include: of the pull of the quadriceps
2. Patellar apprehension. In this test, the exam-
1. The clinical Q angle (Fig. 1.9). This is the iner applies gentle pressure on the medial side
angle subtended between: (a) a straight line of the patella displacing it laterally as the knee
from the anterior superior iliac spine and cen- flexes from full extension. The patient will
tre of the patella and (b) a line from the centre contract their quadriceps as a reflex in order to
of the patella to the tibial tubercle. This is avoid flexion and lateral displacement if the
test is positive.
3. Clarke’s test (Video 1.7) [7]. This, as classi-
cally described, is a painful test and should
not be performed. However, a modified
Clarke’s test for irritability of the PFJ can be
performed with the knee relaxed and flexed to
20° over the examiner’s contralateral thigh
much like the position for Lachman’s test. The
patella is then gently glided medially and lat-
erally: significant pain or crepitus indicates
PFJ irritability and chondral wear of the patel-
lofemoral surface.
Conclusion
Clinical examination of the knee is an art that
requires a combination of biomechanical
thinking, static and dynamic assessment and
delicate handling of the patient.
References
1. Schraeder TL, Terek RM, Smith CC (2010) Clinical
evaluation of the knee. N Engl J Med 363:e5
2. Haim A, Yaniv M, Dekel S, Amir H (2006)
Patellofemoral pain syndrome: validity of clinical and
Fig. 1.9 The clinical Q angle. A line from the anterior radiological features. Clin Orthop Relat Res
superior iliac spine to the superior pole of the patella inter- 451:223–228
secting a line from the inferior pole of the patella to the 3. Staheli LT, Engel GM (1972) Tibial torsion: a method
tibial tubercle. The patella, joint line and the tibial tuber- of assessment and a survey of normal children. Clin
cle are all marked in red Orthop Relat Res 86:183–186
1 Examination of the Knee 11
4. Duggan NP, Ross JC (1991) Intertester reliabil- 6. Hegedus EJ, Cook C, Hasselblad V, Goode A,
ity of the modified anterior drawer (Lachman) test for McCrory DC (2007) Physical examination tests for
anterior cruciate ligament laxity. Aust J Physiother assessing a torn meniscus in the knee: a systematic
37:163–168 review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
5. Karachalios T, Hantes M, Zibis AH, Zachos V, 37:541–550
Karantanas AH, Malizos KN (2005) Diagnostic accu- 7. Doberstein ST, Romeyn RL, Reineke DM (2008)
racy of a new clinical test (the Thessaly test) for early The diagnostic value of the Clarke sign in assessing
detection of meniscal tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am chondromalacia patella. J Athletic Train
87:955–962 43:190–196
Imaging Assessment of the Knee
2
Antony J.R. Palmer, Sion Glyn-Jones,
and Dimitri Amiras
Abstract
Many imaging modalities and techniques are helpful for the diagnosis
and prognostication of disorders within the knee. Plain radiographs
remain the first line of investigation, however, MRI now plays an increas-
ing role for imaging the knee in the setting of joint-preservation strate-
gies. Whilst the imaging findings for specific conditions are discussed in
each chapter of this book, this chapter aims to give an overview of the
imaging modalities available and to discuss in detail the use of imaging
techniques for the visualisation and assessment of early osteoarthritis
within the knee joint.
Keywords
Knee • Imaging • Assessment
2.1 Introduction
ability to diagnose early joint degeneration prior ogy in most instances. It is readily available and
to the onset of irreversible structural damage. It is relatively inexpensive and facilitates early identi-
at this early stage of disease when patients are fication of cases that are not amenable to joint
most likely to benefit from intervention. preservation procedures.
The aim of this chapter is to describe the
imaging tools available and their optimal use in
the knee. Individual imaging modalities and their 2.2.1 Joint Space Width
findings relevant to specific pathologies will be
covered in detail in the chapters relating to each Joint space width measurements are dependent
pathology. In this chapter, we will concentrate on on the radiographic protocol [7] and radiographs
imaging protocols for specific knee tissues, as may be performed weight-bearing or non-weight-
well as describing the current state of the art bearing, with the knee flexed or extended, and
imaging of early osteoarthritis. positioned under fluoroscopic or non-fluoroscopic
guidance. Radiographs that are non-weight-
bearing or acquired with the knee extended are
2.2 Radiography inferior to weight-bearing flexed-knee protocols
for the assessment of joint space width [8]. Knee
Radiography is the first line of imaging in all flexion aims to ensure joint space width on the
pathologies of the knee. Whole-limb radiographic radiograph corresponds to the site of load trans-
studies allow the assessment of malalignment and mission across the joint when the medial femoral
weight-bearing studies can demonstrate osteo- condyle is located in a central position on the
chondral lesions, as well as demonstrating sec- articular surface of the tibia. Radio-anatomic
ondary changes resulting from ligamentous alignment of the anterior and posterior margins
insufficiency (see Chaps. 8 and 9). Plain radio- of the medial tibial plateau is critical for joint
graphs allow visualisation of ossified structures space width measurements [5], and is aided by
and features of degenerative change. In OA, fluoroscopic guidance [9].
osteophyte formation is often the earliest sign on Several semi-flexed radiographic protocols
plain radiographs with narrowing of the joint are available, and two frequently adopted are the
space width, sclerosis of subchondral bone, and posteroanterior fixed-flexion (FF) protocol and
development of subchondral cysts Osteophyte its fluoroscopically guided equivalent, the Lyon
formation is often the earliest sign of osteoarthri- Schuss (LS) protocol. FF images are acquired
tis, followed by narrowing of the joint space with patients standing with their patellae and
width, sclerosis of subchondral bone, and devel- thighs against a radiograph cassette in line with
opment of subchondral cysts. Kellgren-Lawrence the tip of their great toes. This results in a fixed-
[2] and Osteoarthritis Research Society flexion of approximately 20–30°. The X-ray
International (OARSI) [3] grades can be used to beam is then directed caudally 10° to bring it par-
score the severity of these features, but measure- allel with the medial tibial plateau. LS images are
ment of joint space width provides a more sensi- acquired with the same positioning is as for FF
tive and reliable assessment of degenerative views, but rather than directing the beam 10° cau-
change [4]. Joint space width reflects cartilage dally, the beam is aligned fluoroscopically to
thickness and meniscal integrity [5], but is not ensure the anterior and posterior aspects of the
sensitive to localised cartilage lesions. MRI can medial tibial plateau are superimposed. Although
detect chondropathy that is not evident on radio- LS radiographs are more sensitive to change in
graphs [6], as well as offering three-dimensional joint space width, both techniques offer similar
assessment of subchondral bone, meniscus, liga- reproducibility [9], and the non-fluoroscopic FF
ments and synovium. However, radiography technique is better suited to routine clinical prac-
remains the first line investigation for knee pathol- tice. Posteroanterior views are combined with a
2 Imaging Assessment of the Knee 15
lateral view to permit assessment of tibial transla- ing the special considerations for different tissue
tion and patella height, in addition to features of types and pathologies.
osteoarthritis. Assessment of the patellofemoral
joint is best assessed with a skyline axial view.
2.3.1 Imaging Protocols
2.3.2 Bone
2.3.4 Meniscus
Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) [23–26]. In scan times. These include T2 mapping, T1rho,
all these systems, scores are attributed to a num- T2* mapping and diffusions protocols [30].
ber of cartilage, synovial, subchondral, ligamen- These sequences are responsive to a range of car-
tous and meniscal findings, subdivided by the tilage properties including glycosaminoglycan
area of the joint affected. All have excellent inter- content, collagen fibre orientation and cartilage
and intra-rater reliability. Such scores have been hydration. T2 mapping and T1rho are increas-
used in randomised controlled trials and epide- ingly used in clinical studies, and like dGEM-
miological studies of OA. They also appear to be RIC, values correlate with histological
clinically relevant, with the degree of bone mar- degeneration [31] and baseline values are able to
row change and synovitis being related to the predict progressive osteoarthritis in the knee [32].
degree of pain in OA. They also appear to be of T2 mapping is more sensitive than morphological
use in predicting progression of disease. MRI for the identification of early cartilage
degeneration [33], and T2 mapping has been fre-
quently employed to monitor the outcomes of
2.4 Compositional MRI cartilage repair procedures [34]. Compositional
MRI may therefore offer diagnostic and prognos-
2.4.1 Imaging Protocols tic capabilities, as well as providing a measure of
intervention efficacy.
Compositional MRI aims to assay the biochemi-
cal composition of tissues in order to detect early
osteoarthritis prior to when it is evident on mor- 2.4.3 Non-cartilaginous Structures
phological MRI, at which point cartilage damage
is likely irreversible. Potential applications Compositional MRI has also been adopted for
include the identification of individuals who may the evaluation of meniscus. There appears to be
benefit from early intervention, as well as an out- concomitant degeneration of the articular carti-
come measure to evaluate the efficacy of novel lage and meniscus in early osteoarthritis, sup-
interventions within a short timeframe. ported by delayed Gadolinium Enhanced MRI of
Meniscus (dGEMRIM) [35]. Meniscal T1rho
and T2 mapping values also correlate with the
2.4.2 Cartilage severity of knee osteoarthritis [36]. Given the
critical role played by the meniscus, addressing
A plethora of MRI sequences are available that any associated meniscal pathology may be a criti-
appear responsive to different cartilage properties cal step in delaying or preventing the develop-
[27]. The best validated compositional sequence ment of osteoarthritis. Compositional MRI of
is delayed Gadolinium Enhanced MRI of non-cartilaginous structures is likely to represent
Cartilage (dGEMRIC), which provides a mea- an area for future development.
sure of cartilage glycosaminoglycan content.
Several studies show that dGEMRIC correlates
well with the histological severity of osteoarthri- 2.5 Computerised
tis [28] and may predict future knee osteoarthritis Tomography (CT)
[29], however, clinical applicability is limited by
a long scanning protocol and requirement for CT has a limited but potentially valuable appli-
potentially nephrotoxic contrast agent. There are cation for imaging early osteoarthritis. It offers
a number of sequences with potentially greater excellent three-dimensional assessment of
clinical value that do not require contrast agent or bone morphology, and bone shape is increas-
specialist hardware, and that have acceptable ingly thought to have predictive value for the
2 Imaging Assessment of the Knee 19
three-dimensional imaging of all joint struc- 9. Le Graverand MP, Vignon EP, Brandt KD et al (2008)
tures. Compositional MRI offers great Head-to-head comparison of the Lyon Schuss and
fixed flexion radiographic techniques. Long-term
promise for the biochemical assessment of reproducibility in normal knees and sensitivity to
tissues, but does require further validation. change in osteoarthritic knees. Ann Rheum Dis
There remains a lack of standardisation 67:1562–1566
10. Sharma L, Chmiel JS, Almagor O et al (2013) The
between compositional MRI protocols and
role of varus and valgus alignment in the initial devel-
this limits any comparison between studies. It opment of knee cartilage damage by MRI: the MOST
may be this that explains the different conclu- study. Ann Rheum Dis 72:235–240
sions reached as to which tissue property a 11. Luo CF (2004) Reference axes for reconstruction of
the knee. Knee 11:251–257
compositional sequence is responsive. The
12. Felson DT, Cooke TD, Niu J et al (2009) Can ana-
influence of activity levels on compositional tomic alignment measured from a knee radiograph
MRI readings is also poorly characterised and substitute for mechanical alignment from full limb
it is important to be able to differentiate adap- films? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 17:1448–1452
13. Kijowski R, Roemer F, Englund M et al (2014)
tive from pathological signal [39]. Finally,
Imaging following acute knee trauma. Osteoarthritis
post-processing remains very time intensive Cartilage 22:1429–1443
and automated tools will be required in order 14. Brown MA, Semelka RC (1999) MR imaging abbre-
for these sequences to be used in routine clini- viations, definitions, and descriptions: a review.
Radiology 213:647–662
cal practice.
15. Hartley KG, Damon BM, Paterson GT, Long JH, Holt
GE (2012) MRI techniques: a review and update for
the orthopaedic surgeon. J Am Acad Orthop Surg
20:775–787
16. Link TM (2009) MR imaging in osteoarthritis: hard-
References ware, coils and sequences. Radiol Clin N Am
47:617–632
1. Glyn-Jones S, Palmer AJ, Agricola R et al (2015) 17. Regatte RR, Schweitzer ME (2007) Ultra-high-field
Osteoarthritis. Lancet 386(9991):376–387 MRI of the musculoskeletal system at 7.0T. J Mag
2. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assess- Res Imaging 25:262–269
ment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502 18. Erly WK, Oh ES, Outwater EK (2006) The utility of
3. Altman RD, Gold GE (2007) Atlas of individual in-phase/opposed-phase imaging in differentiating
radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. malignancy from acute benign compression fractures
Osteoarthritis Cartilage 15:A1–A56 of the spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1183–1188
4. Gossec L, Jordan JM, Mazzuca SA et al (2008) 19. Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Raynauld J-P, Waterton JC,
Comparative evaluation of three semi-quantitative Peterfy C (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
radiographic grading techniques for knee osteoarthri- of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): mor-
tis in terms of validity and reproducibility in 1759 phological assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage
X-rays: report of the OARSI-OMERACT task force. 14:A46–A75
Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:742–748 20. Bining J, Andrews G, Forster BB (2009) The ABCs of
5. Hunter DJ, Zhang YQ, Tu X et al (2006) Change in the anterior cruciate ligament: a primer for magnetic
joint space width: hyaline articular cartilage loss or resonance imaging assessment of the normal, injured
alteration in meniscus? Arthritis Rheum and surgically repaired anterior cruciate ligament. Br
54:2488–2495 J Sports Med 43:856–862
6. Guermazi A, Niu J, Hayashi D et al (2012) Prevalence 21. Roemer FW, Felson DT, Wang K et al (2013)
of abnormalities in knees detected by MRI in adults Co-localisation of non-cartilaginous articular pathol-
without knee osteoarthritis: population based obser- ogy increases risk of cartilage loss in the tibiofemoral
vational study (Framingham Osteoarthritis Study). joint--the MOST study. Ann Rheum Dis 72:942–948
BMJ 345, e5339 22. Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Haugen IK, Crema MD,
7. Piperno M, Hellio Le Graverand MP et al (1998) Hayashi D (2013) MRI-based semiquantitative scor-
Quantitative evaluation of joint space width in femo- ing of joint pathology in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev
rotibial osteoarthritis: comparison of three radio- Rheumatol 9:236–251
graphic views. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 6:252–259 23. Hunter DJ, Lo GH, Gale D et al (2008) The reliability
8. Roux CH, Mazieres B, Verrouil E et al (2016) of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI
Femoro-tibial knee osteoarthritis: one or two X-rays? and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment:
Results from a population-based study. Joint Bone BLOKS (Boston–Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score).
Spine 83:37–42 Ann Rheum Dis 67:206–211
2 Imaging Assessment of the Knee 21
24. Kornatt PR, Ceulemans RYT, Kroon HM et al (2005) cartilage of the knee joint: value of adding a T2 map-
MRI assessment of knee osteoarthritis: Knee ping sequence to a routine MR imaging protocol.
Osteoarthritis Scoring System (KOSS)—inter-observer Radiology 267:503–513
and intra-observer reproducibility of a compartment- 34. Baum T, Joseph GB, Karampinos DC, Jungmann PM,
based scoring system. Skeletal Radiol 34:95–102 Link TM, Bauer JS (2013) Cartilage and meniscal T2
25. Hunter DJ, Guermazi A, Lo GH et al (2011) Evolution relaxation time as non-invasive biomarker for knee
of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee osteoarthritis and cartilage repair procedures.
OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 21:1474–1484
Osteoarthritis Cartilage 19:990–1002 35. van Tiel J, Kotek G, Reijman M et al (2014) Delayed
26. Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S et al (2004) Whole- gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the meniscus (dGEM-
Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) RIM) in patients with knee osteoarthritis: relation
of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage with meniscal degeneration on conventional MRI,
12:177–190 reproducibility, and correlation with dGEMRIC. Eur
27. Palmer AJ, Brown CP, McNally EG et al (2013) Non- Radiol 24:2261–2270
invasive imaging of cartilage in early osteoarthritis. 36. Rauscher I, Stahl R, Cheng J et al (2008) Meniscal
Bone Joint J 95-B:738–746 measurements of T1rho and T2 at MR imaging in
28. Zilkens C, Miese F, Herten M et al (2013) Validity of healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis.
gradient-echo three-dimensional delayed gadolinium- Radiology 249:591–600
enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of hip joint 37. van Tiel J, Siebelt M, Reijman M et al (2016)
cartilage: a histologically controlled study. Eur Quantitative in vivo CT arthrography of the human
J Radiol 82:e81–e86 osteoarthritic knee to estimate cartilage sulphated gly-
29. Owman H, Tiderius CJ, Neuman P, Nyquist F, cosaminoglycan content: correlation with ex-vivo ref-
Dahlberg LE (2008) Association between findings on erence standards. Osteoarthritis Cartilage
delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance 24:1012–1020
imaging of cartilage and future knee osteoarthritis. 38. Hirschmann MT, Schon S, Afifi FK et al (2013)
Arthritis Rheum 58:1727–1730 Assessment of loading history of compartments in the
30. Guermazi A, Alizai H, Crema MD, Trattnig S, Regatte knee using bone SPECT/CT: a study combining align-
RR, Roemer FW (2015) Compositional MRI tech- ment and 99mTc-HDP tracer uptake/distribution pat-
niques for evaluation of cartilage degeneration in terns. J Orthop Res 31:268–274
osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 23:1639–1653 39. Welsch GH, Juras V, Szomolanyi P et al (2012)
31. Nishioka H, Hirose J, Nakamura E et al (2012) T1rho Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee at 3 and 7
and T2 mapping reveal the in vivo extracellular matrix tesla: a comparison using dedicated multi-channel
of articular cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging coils and optimised 2D and 3D protocols. Eur Radiol
35:147–155 22:1852–1859
32. Prasad AP, Nardo L, Schooler J, Joseph GB, Link TM 40. Hovis KK, Stehling C, Souza RB et al (2011)
(2013) T(1)rho and T(2) relaxation times predict pro- Physical activity is associated with magnetic reso-
gression of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis nance imaging-based knee cartilage T2 measure-
Cartilage 21:69–76 ments in asymptomatic subjects with and those
33. Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Munoz Del Rio A, without osteoarthritis risk factors. Arthritis Rheum
Baer GS, Graf BK (2013) Evaluation of the articular 63:2248–2256
Intra-articular Corticosteroids
and Hyaluronic Acid in the Knee
3
Joint
Carlos Kalbakdij-Sánchez
and Enrique Gómez-Barrena
Abstract
Degenerative knee osteoarthritis (OA) affects 35 % of the population older
than 65 years. Before surgical treatment (total knee arthroplasty, TKA),
there are many conservative strategies that may offer good clinical out-
comes. The aim of this chapter is to describe the mechanism of action of
corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid joint injections in knee’s osteoarthritis
physiopathology. The authors hope to improve reader’s understanding on
the role of corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid joint injections and how it
can improve the quality of life of these patients, and eventually delay total
knee arthroplasty.
Keywords
Knee • Injections • Corticosteroids • Hyaluronic acid
{11}
AMERICANISM:
Pope Leo XIII. on opinions so called.
ANARCHIST CRIMES:
Assassination of Canovas del Castillo.
ANGLO-AMERICAN POPULATION.
ANGONI-ZULUS, The.
ANTARCTIC EXPLORATION.
APPORTIONMENT ACT.
ARBITRATION, Industrial:
In New Zealand.
ARBITRATION, Industrial:
In the United States between employees and employers
engaged in inter-state commerce.
ARCHÆOLOGICAL RESEARCH:
The Oriental Field.
Recent achievements and future prospects.
F. LL. Griffith,
Authority and Archaeology Sacred and Profane,
part 2, pages. 218-219
(New York: Charles Scribner's Sons).
S. R. Driver,
Authority and Archaeology Sacred and Profane,
part 1, pages 150-151
(New York: Charles Scribner's Sons).
H. V. Hilprecht, editor,
Recent Research in Bible Lands,
page 47.
{13}
{14}
A. H. Sayce,
Recent Discoveries in Babylonia
(Contemporary Review, January, 1897).
{15}
The work at Nippur was suspended for the season about the
middle of May, 1900, and Professor Hilprecht, after his return
to Philadelphia, wrote of the general fruits of the campaign,
in the "Sunday School Times" of December 1: "As the task of
the fourth and most recent expedition, just completed, I had
mapped out, long before its organization, the following work.
It was to determine the probable extent of the earliest
pre-Sargonic settlement at ancient Nippur; to discover the
precise form and character of the famous temple of Bêl at this
earliest period; to define the exact boundaries of the city
proper; if possible, to find one or more of the great city
gates frequently mentioned in the inscriptions; to locate the
great temple library and educational quarters of Nippur; to
study the different modes of burial in use in ancient
Babylonia; and to study all types and forms of pottery, with a
view to finding laws for the classification and determination
of the ages of vases, always excavated in large numbers at
Nuffar. The work set before us has been accomplished. The task
was great,—almost too great for the limited time at our
disposal. … But the number of Arab workmen, busy with pickax,
scraper, and basket in the trenches for ten to fourteen hours
every day, gradually increased to the full force of four
hundred. … In the course of time, when the nearly twenty-five
thousand cuneiform texts which form one of the most
conspicuous prizes of the present expedition have been fully
deciphered and interpreted; when the still hidden larger mass
of tablets from that great educational institution, the temple
library of Calneh-Nippur, discovered at the very spot which I
had marked for its site twelve years ago, has been brought to
light,—a great civilization will loom up from past
millenniums before our astonished eyes. For four thousand
years the documents which contain this precious information
have disappeared from sight, forgotten in the destroyed rooms
of ancient Nippur. Abraham was about leaving his ancestral
home at Ur when the great building in which so much learning
had been stored up by previous generations collapsed under the
ruthless acts of the Elamite hordes. But the light which
begins to flash forth from the new trenches in this lonely
mound in the desert of Iraq will soon illuminate the world
again. And it will be no small satisfaction to know that it
was rekindled by the hands of American explorers."
{17}
"Among the more important finds so far made, but not yet
published, maybe mentioned over a thousand cuneiform tablets
of the earlier period, a beautifully preserved obelisk more
than five feet high, and covered with twelve hundred lines of
Old Babylonian cuneiform writing. It was inscribed and set up
by King Manishtusu, who left inscribed vases in Nippur and
other Babylonian cities. A stele of somewhat smaller size,
representing a battle in the mountains, testifies to the high
development of art at that remote period. On the one end it
bears a mutilated inscription of Narâm-Sin, son of Sargon the
Great (3800 B. C.); on the other, the name of Shimti-Shilkhak,
a well-known Elamitic king, and grandfather of the biblical
Ariokh (Genesis 14). These two monuments were either left in
Susa by the two Babylonian kings whose names they bear, after
successful operations against Elam, or they were carried off
as booty at the time of the great Elamitic invasion, which
proved so disastrous to the treasure-houses and archives of
Babylonian cities and temples [see above: BABYLONIA]. The
latter is more probable to the present writer, who in 1896
('Old Babylonian Inscriptions,' Part II, page 33) pointed out,
in connection with his discussion of the reasons of the
lamentable condition of Babylonian temple archives, that on
the whole we shall look in vain for well-preserved large
monuments in most Babylonian ruins, because about 2280 B. C.
'that which in the eyes of the national enemies of Babylonia
appeared most valuable was carried to Susa and other places:
what did not find favor with them was smashed and scattered on
Babylonian temple courts.'"
Prof. H. V. Hilprecht,
Oriental Research
(Sunday School Times, January 28, 1809).
See, in volume 1,
EGYPT.