You are on page 1of 9

Issue: RC_PL PS DGC EC

Risk Assessment First Edition : 10/2013


DISOUQ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Revision: 02
Rev.-Date: 10/14
Page:1/9

Issuer: Sitedata:
Name: Ramy Mohamed Order No: 60CO-001481.01
Company: RWE Engine, machine No.: F40138,F40311, F40358
Department: RC-PL PS DGC EC Code word: RWE-Disouq Project
Phone No.: 01001424494 Country : Egypt
Start date/duration: 13.02.2015/ 2 days Coordinator customer : RWE Dea Nile Branch

Severity (S) Likelihood (L)


Superficial injuries such as small cuts and bruises
Very Unlikely A freak or extraordinary combination of factors would be required
1 Slight Negligible loss of function/production with no damage to 1 approx1/1000 000 for the potential to be realized
equipment or the environment
Negligible injury resulting in zero absence from work
Unlikely A rare combination of factors would be required for the potential to
2 Minor Damage to equipment requiring minor remedial repair, 2 approx 1/100 000 be realized
loss of production or impact to the environment
Injury requiring hospital treatment and extended absence
from work
3 Moderate Damage to the equipment requiring extensive repair, 3 Possible Could happen if a number of additional factors are present
Value

Value
approx 1/1000
significant loss of function/production or moderate
pollution incurring some restitution costs
Considerable damage such as multiple fracture or severe
tissue damage requiring extended time in hospital
Damage to equipment resulting in production shutdown Likely Not certain but potential could be realized with one normally
4 Major
and significant production loss. 4 approx 1/100 occurring factor
Severe pollution with short-term localized implications
incurring significant restitution costs.
Fatality, life threatening injuries / intensive care,
amputation, loss of sight, poisoning Very Likely
5 Serious 5 Almost inevitable that the potential would be realized
Major pollution with long-term implication and very high approx 1/10
restitution costs
Issue: RC_PL PS DGC EC
Risk Assessment First Edition : 10/2013
DISOUQ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Revision: 02
Rev.-Date: 10/14
Page:2/9

Risk Factor(R) = Severity (S) × Likelihood (L)

Severity (S)
1 2 3 4 5 Risk Rating/Consequent Action
Likelihood (L)

1 1 2 3 4 5 1<5 Tolerable – no control measures required.


Hazard should be avoided; conditionally can be tolerable but review the Control
5 < 10
2 2 4 6 8 10 Measures ASAP is required.
3 3 6 9 12 15 10 – 25 Intolerable – immediate improvement to control measures required.
4 4 8 12 16 20 Note: After application of the Risk Control Measures, the Risk Factor should be reduced
to a level of 1 <5; otherwise the foreseen measures for controlling the Risk must be
5 5 10 15 20 25 clearly described!

Assessment Assessment
Risk
Possible sources
No Hazard Consequences Preventiveactions Tolerable
of Hazard S L R S L R (Yes/No)

Uneven and slippery floor


The use of appropriate working
surfaces. Clutter and mess
footwear. Maintaining law and order in
Tripping, slip and on the roads of
Fracture, dislocation passageways and at work
1. fall at the same communication. Spills and 2 4 8 2 2 4 Yes
of limbs, bruising (housekeeping). Caution. Observe the work
level moisture. Improper
permit requirements.Reporting threats to
footwear. Carelessness,
those responsible.
hurry.
Work at height. Improper
design of scaffolds and
Used only effective and approved
work platforms. Unsecured Fractures, sprains,
scaffolding. Caution. The use of
holes, trenches, ducts. bruises, usually of the
The fall of the lower appropriate personal protective
Failure of the protection of limbs, but also the
2. level – more than 3 4 3 12 equipment. The use of safe work 4 1 4 YES
personal protective head, long absence
m procedures - a work permit. Training and
equipment against falls of from work, extreme
medical examination. Reporting hazards
its use or misuse. Poor cases death.
to persons responsible
work organization.
Inattention
3. The fall of the lower No protection of the ladder Fractures of the 4 3 12 The use of appropriate and efficient ladders, 4 1 4 YES
level of the ladder having security before or run over to. Belaying.
from slipping, no protection extremities, spine Maintaining clean floor. Manual work on a ladder.
Issue: RC_PL PS DGC EC
Risk Assessment First Edition : 10/2013
DISOUQ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Revision: 02
Rev.-Date: 10/14
Page:3/9

against unwanted
spreading the ladder, injuries, head injuries, Training and medical examination.
ladder wrong setting, poor general beat, in
distribution center of extreme cases death
gravity, defective ladder,
No belaying
Improper working scaffold
structure - the working
platform - no toe boards Abrasions, head The use of helmets and protective footwear. Use
(15 cm). Inadequate injuries, body bruises curbs and safety nets by falling objects.
4. Struck by falling objects 3 2 6 3 1 3 YES
protection tools, spare may result in sick Separation of the work area, signage. Observe the
work permit requirements.
parts and materials on the leave
shelves, work tables.
Disorder in the workplace.

Assessment Assessment
Risk
Possible sources
No Hazard Consequences Preventiveactions Torelable
of Hazard S L R S L R (Yes/No)

Improper mounting and


positioning of cargo during
The use of personal protective
transport. Handling of
equipment including helmet, gloves and
loads over the legal limit.
safety shoes. Marking of hazardous
Inattention and haste.
cargo secure fastening. The behavior of
Working within the
attention. Conduct periodic maintenance
operation of lifting Crush injuries,
Crushing falling of transport equipment. Separation and conditionally
5. equipment (chain hoists, fractures, and in 5 2 10 5 1 5
objects (cranes) marking routes. Surveys of lifting tolerable
cranes, etc.). Poor extreme cases, death.
equipment. Compliance with the
condition of slings and
authorization procedures for hazardous
other lifting accessories.
work. Work Permit implementation.
Poor work organization, a
Training. Reporting hazards to persons
lack of permission to work
responsible
- no certificate hoisting
operations.
6. The impact of fixed Equipment on footpaths Contusions all over 2 5 10 Taking care of order and harmony in the 2 2 4 YES
elements and transport (approaches, the body (abrasions, area of work, and especially in access
Issue: RC_PL PS DGC EC
Risk Assessment First Edition : 10/2013
DISOUQ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Revision: 02
Rev.-Date: 10/14
Page:4/9

passages and passages. Caution; The


entrances, gates).
bumps, bruises), the use of safety footwear, workwear and
Machinery, equipment and
most common are protective helmets. Reporting threats to
related facilities. No
contusions hand those responsible.
marking protrusions.
Rust, splinters wire
brushes, carbon deposits -
during the cleaning of the
The use depending on the activity
surface; The use of Personal injury -
performed welding helmet or glasses /
compressed air for especially hands,
Splashes of goggles adhering to the face. Wear
7. cleaning. Molten metal face, eyes (damage 3 3 9 3 1 3 YES
materials appropriate protective clothing,
during welding, cutting, and even loss of
protective gloves. Action to reduce the
grinding in the immediate vision).
rush. Taking the necessary precautions
vicinity of the employee.
Failure protective goggles
and gloves.

Assessment Assessment
Risk
Possible sources
No Hazard Consequences Preventiveactions Torelable
of Hazard S L R S L R (Yes/No)

Structural elements
Periodic inspection of the above-
mounted machines and
mentioned condition. elements of
Sharp protruding equipment. Working with Cuts, abrasions,
construction, equipment, etc. Using
8. parts, sharp edges, steel slings. The sharp stabbing - usually 1 5 5 1 4 4 YES
gloves, protective clothing and safety
rough surfaces edges of hand tools for hand.
helmet; The behavior of the necessary
cutting, scraping, cleaning,
precautions
drilling and grinding.
There are no moving parts, Cuts, scrapes,
Struck by thrown
blade guards grinder, bruises, serious Caution. The use of goggles, face
from the machine
9. milling cutters, drills. Work personal injury that 3 3 9 shields. Compliance with the operating 3 1 3 YES
elements due to
piece - improperly may result in sick instructions
failure
installed. leave
10. Moving parts and Work with power tools and Cuts, scrapes, 5 2 10 Training of employees. Safety 5 1 5 conditionally
tools, machinery pneumatic devices. Work bruises, serious instructions for the position. Absolute tolerable
and equipment in the area of moving personal injury that compliance. Preservation of law and
equipment. Unintended may result in sick order. Caution. The use of tailored
Issue: RC_PL PS DGC EC
Risk Assessment First Edition : 10/2013
DISOUQ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Revision: 02
Rev.-Date: 10/14
Page:5/9

clothing. The use of machinery and


operation of a machine or
leave, death equipment housings. Reporting hazards
device.
to persons responsible
Compliance with health and safety
Attaching the slings for
instructions. The use of protective
carried items.
Serious injuries of gloves and protective footwear. Action to
Impact or crushing Carelessness in work
11. hands, feet, 4 2 8 reduce the rush. Taking the necessary 4 1 4 YES
the carried objects vehicles, cranes. The use
amputation of fingers. precautions. Crane work - a work permit.
of hand tools such as a
Coordinator present for the entire
hammer.
duration of the work.
Prohibition of movement of workers in
Moving motor vehicles, Limb fractures, the area of the truck, the designation of
Hitting, crushing tractors, trailers, forklifts, bruises, injuries all routes. Compliance with the Rules of
etc. By moving machinery on the road to over the body, movement of vehicles and pedestrians conditionally
12. 5 2 10 5 1 5
machinery / reach and stockyards and internal injuries, and on the site. Proper organization of work. tolerable
vehicles work place. Lack of eye in extreme cases, Caution; Appropriate signage and use
contact . even death him in the danger zone of machines, the
speed limit.

Assessment Assessment
Risk
Possible sources
No Hazard Consequences Preventiveactions Torelable
of Hazard S L R S L R (Yes/No)

 On commencement of erection and


Access to scaffold dismantle an “incomplete” scaffold sign
during erection, to be displayed adjacent to the access
prior to formal routes.
13. Serious injury/fatality 3 3 6 3 1 3 YES
inspection,  Physical barriers to be erected to
handover and prevent access.
during dismantle.

14. Collapse of scaffold


when erected and All Scaffold erectors are to receive
during manufacturers recommended training
erect/dismantle. Struck-by injuries/fatality and CISRS training to the appropriate
level for the work they are undertaking.
 Operatives must inspect material prior
Issue: RC_PL PS DGC EC
Risk Assessment First Edition : 10/2013
DISOUQ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Revision: 02
Rev.-Date: 10/14
Page:6/9

to use.
 Customer to use the scaffold in
accordance with the loading specified on
the hand-over certificate/scaffold tag.
 No modifications is to made to the
scaffold, especially removal of ties or
structural members.

Supervisor to establish a safe working


method, which may include the use of: -
Youngman boards, span decks, roof
Fragile roof working Falls from height/fatality ladders, barriers, fully boarding, fall
15.
arrest equipment. If you encounter
fragile roofs, you must stop work
immediately and seek a specific system
of work from your Supervisor

Fall protection equipment to be subject


to three monthly thorough inspections by
Failure of fall a competent person with results
Unarrested falls from
protection recorded.
16. height
equipment  Inspections above to be
supplemented by daily operative checks.
 All sub-standard equipment to be
removed from service immediately

Mobile phones must not be used in


Use of mobile Lack of awareness
operational scaffolding areas.
phones when resulting in a combination
17.  If mobile phone use is required, the
scaffolding of the hazards above.
individual must move to a safe area to
do so.

18. Overloading Scaffold collapse Fatal injuries Do not exceed the specified loading
rating of the scaffold. Add workers’
weights, plus their tools plus the weight
of materials to calculate safe tower
Issue: RC_PL PS DGC EC
Risk Assessment First Edition : 10/2013
DISOUQ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Revision: 02
Rev.-Date: 10/14
Page:7/9

loading.

Fall of men and


Incomplete Fall of men and materials materials Installation of hard barriers and relevant
19. platforms. Those at risk: scaffold Those at risk: scaffold warning signage clearly displayed, to
operatives/contractors user. operatives/contractors prevent access.
user.
Machines, devices
operating above 95 dB. Measurements of noise. The use of PPE
Ambient noise Fatigue, neurosis, hearing. Rotations employees. The use
20. Noise 4 2 8 4 1 4 YES
(background), under damage your hearing. of time limits downtime. This factor is
renovation (work welders, taken into account in medical research.
grinders and other tools).
The use of suitable footwear reducing
The vibrations emitted by vibration transmission. Reducing the
the machine, especially Fatigue load residence time in an environment
Vibration
21. noticeable during the riots osteoarticular system 4 2 8 exposed to vibration. Reporting negative 4 1 4 YES
of new installations. and blood circulation. symptoms - vibration effects. This factor
Working with power tools is taken into account in medical
research.
In high-risk situations should be used
Own activity - cutting, with masks and goggles and dust-proof.
Lung disease,
grinding, cleaning of At the time of such works as grinding
22. Industrial dust allergies, asthma, eye 4 2 8 4 1 4 YES
surfaces using power and cutting Wear a dust mask. This
irritation
tools. factor is taken into account in medical
research.
Compressors, compressed
Good work organization, the maturity of
gas cylinders. The
Zranienia, poważne a work permit. Separation and marking
hydraulic tools up to 2000
The high pressure obrażenia ciała, zones only for authorized persons. The
bar. Crack, burst system. conditionally
23. of the working złamania, a w 5 2 10 use of appropriate personal protective 5 1 5
Undesirable an agent tolerable
medium skrajnych equipment (helmet, safety glasses,
during maintenance work
przypadkach śmierć gloves, protective peeling). Take special
carried out, repair and
care. training
testing.

No Hazard Possible sources Consequences Assessment Preventiveactions Assessment


Issue: RC_PL PS DGC EC
Risk Assessment First Edition : 10/2013
DISOUQ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Revision: 02
Rev.-Date: 10/14
Page:8/9

Risk
of Hazard S L R S L R Torelable
(Yes/No)
The use of insulated tools. Categorical
Welding machines, ban on electrical repairs by unauthorized
equipment and tools Burns, injuries persons. Interrupting operation in the
powered by electricity. Bad (cardiovascular, event of violations in the field of health
conditionally
24. Electric current technical condition. nervous system), and 5 2 10 and safety. Work Permit system 5 1 5
tolerable
Electrical work at in extreme cases, implementation. Reporting hazards.
switchboards. Electrical death. Training for attendants and supervisors
measurements. Power. switching and other power equipment
together with installations.
Application of procedures for work
permits fire-risk. Ensuring the pop-fire-
fighting equipment. and periodic
Electrical shorts, work with Burns caused by
inspections of its efficiency. Follow the
open fire, flammable heat, chemicals
instructions of welding and fire. The
materials in the workplace. poisoning triggered
attention to the efficiency of wire and conditionally
25. Fire Technological processes. while smoking may 5 2 10 5 1 5
welding equipment. Inspections and tolerable
Liquid and gaseous fuels. result in release of
maintenance of welding equipment and
Smoking - non-smoking medical, disability and
electrical appliances. Provision of
ban. death
personal protective equipment. Taking
the necessary precautions.
Housekeeping. Training
Work in explosive
atmospheres, in the vicinity
of explosive gases and Adherence to procedures / manuals of
other potential factors procedures in hazardous areas the
explosives. Installation and client. Enforcement of the customer,
The works in commissioning of Burns, injury, in providing information regarding the risk conditionally
26. 5 1 10 5 1 5
explosive areas compressors together with extreme cases, death. of explosion. Application of procedures tolerable
installations (blasting for work permits. Working in certified
agents). Renovation work clothing. Antistatic. The use of tools Ex.
carried out by the ATEX training. Take special care
customer in welding and
gas cutting
Issue: RC_PL PS DGC EC
Risk Assessment First Edition : 10/2013
DISOUQ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Revision: 02
Rev.-Date: 10/14
Page:9/9

Assessment Assessment
Risk
Possible sources
No Hazard Consequences Preventiveactions Torelable
of Hazard S L R S L R (Yes/No)

27. 3 3 9 3 1 4 YES

28. 3 3 9 3 1 4 YES

Date: 11.02.2015 Issuer signature:

You might also like