Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bài giảng
Quản trị rủi ro định lượng I
www.mfe.neu.edu.vn
2021
1
Thông tin học phần
Tiếng Anh: Quantitative risk management 1
Số tín chỉ: Thời lượng: tiết
Đánh giá: (Điểm (1), (2), (3) do giảng viên quyết định)
• (1) Chuyên cần:
• (2) Bài thuyết trình:
• (3) Bài kiểm tra: (45 phút)
• (4) Thi cuối kì: (90 phút)
Nghỉ trên số giờ giảng trên lớp không được thi
Chuyên cần dưới 5 điểm không được thi
3
Tài liệu
2020 FRM Exam Part 1, Foundations of
Risk Management
2020 FRM Exam Part 1, Quantitative
Analysis
2020 FRM Exam Part 1, Valuation and
Risk Models
[4] 2020 FRM Exam Part 1,
Financial Markets and Products
4
Foundation of
risk
management
1. The Building Blocks of Risk Management
2. How do firms manage financial risk?
Learning objectives
• Explain the concept of risk and compare risk management with risk taking
• Describe the risk management process and identify problems and challenges that can
arise in the risk management process.
• Evaluate and apply tools and procedures used to measure and manage risk, including
quantitative measures, qualitative assessment, and enterprise risk management.
• Distinguish between expected loss and unexpected loss and provide examples of
each.
• Interpret the relationship between risk and reward and explain how conflicts of
interest can impact risk management.
• Describe and differentiate between the key classes of risks, explain how each type of
risk can arise and assess the potential impact of each type of risk on the organization.
• Explain how risk factors can interact with each other and describe challenges in
aggregating risk exposures.
RISK CLASSES
Operational
Market risk Credit risk Liquidity risk
risk
1 2 3
Trade off: high risk high Except for operational Portion of the
return risk variability:
• Measurable is expected loss
• Not measurable unexpected
loss (uncertainty)
FILTER RISKS INTO
DEGREES
Expected loss
Unexpected loss
Known unknown
Unknown unknown
• In the normal course of business, the
average loss scenario
EXPECTED • Predictable/ measurable
LOSS • EL = PD x EAD x LGD
• Treated as costs of doing business to
increase the price
• Could lose in excess (beyond) of average loss
UNEXPTECT scenarios
ED LOSS • More difficult to predict/measure
• E.g., Correlation risk
KNOWN • Knightian uncertainty
• Incalculable
UNKNOWN • E.g., nuclear war = known threat but
unknown probability
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN • Rumsfed: don’t know what and how much
RISK FACTOR
INTERACTION
• Risk correlation: can be dangerous
• Risk aggregation is challenging: VaR
• Disadvantage: many versions, simplified assumptions, tail
risk
• Advantage: enterprise level across business units, related to
risk capital
• RAROC: RISK-ADJUSTED RETURN ON CAPITAL
• Numerator: net return after tax and risk-adjusted (minis
expected losses)
• Denominator: capital
• RAROC should be higher than the cost of equity
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Corporate
governance, rogue Method
traders
• Risk recognition
• Strong RM system
• Periodically Audits
DISTINGUISH
• Risk management
• Defensive technique
• Reduce/eliminate losses
• Risk taking
• Opportunistic actions
• Increase risk of increasing gain
• Risk management process
• Identify risks: known and unknown
BUILDING • Expected loss, unexpected loss, and tail
BLOCKS OF loss
• Risk factor breakdown
RISK • Structural change: from tail risk to
INDENTIFY
ANALYZE
ASSESS
IMPACT
MANAGE
RISK
• Identify risks incorrectly
MANAGEME • Can’t find efficient method of transferring
NT • Risk is too concentrated among too few market
CHALLENGE participants
• Failed to prevent accounting fraud and market disruption
S • Derivatives may overstate income/equity and understate
risk
• RM is a zero-sum game not effective on an overall
economic basis
RM STRATEGY (TRAM)
2. Retain: (accept, assume) when small impact, costly if managed, desired by owners
3. Avoid: when not natural part of normal operation eg. GE sold financial business
4. Mitigate:
• Banks offering loans at higher i/r, or increase collateral to mitigate credit risk
• Upgrade planes, trucks to mitigate fuel price risk
RISK Type and level of risk a
firm is willing to retain
APPETITE
(what and how much)
Risk willingness
2 subcomponents:
Risk ability
• Map risks
• Assemble risks at cash flow level
• Risk map: magnitude, timing, location, calc method, potential for netting, consider correlation
• Conducted for all known risks or at least top 10 risks
• Input is more detailed, mapping is more robust
• Assess impact, perform risk/reward analysis, cost/benefit of tactics, choose strategy/tactics, detailed risks appetite statement
Operational risk appetite: risk policies, risk limits, right size RM team