-

.
-

.

. ) Just & Carpenter (1980

(McClure & Steffensen ) 1989
""""" " " . & McLean
) Chapman (1989 .
)) Cox et al (1991
. (1987 (Hadley .

. ) (1988) (Read et al -
) - ( : .

. (Baumann) 1986

. )Geva & Ryan
(1985 .


(Chapman) 1980
.

. (Chapman) 1979
.

.

.
.

-1

-2

-3

-4

:
) (Poersch & Schneider, 1991
.
. ) Wong (1993
. (Garber) 1979


.

: (Duin & Prenn) 1985

.

: .

 :

.

:


.

-1 :

) (1994
) Barrett (1979 ) (1989
) (1998
.
) (1990 .
) 1994 (1995 )(1995


. )(1995 ) (1989
(Barrett) 1979

) (1999

) (1988
) (1997

) (1994
. )
(1981

) (1998

 . ) Brosh (1997

.
.

-2

) Baumann (1987
1000
:

.
.

(Irwin) 1986
500

.
.

.

(Meyers) 1991
.
lexical relations
.

(Campbell) 1991
: graphic devices .

(Israelite) 1988 (McNamara) 1996 )Horiba

 (1993 (McKeown) 1990 (Vauras et al) 1992 (Beck et al) 1984

(Zabrucky) 1986 (Meyers) 1986
.

Cohesion :

(Halliday & Hassan) 1976

.

.

(Harris & Hodges ) 1983

back reference .

) (1986
.

(Halliday and Hassan) 1976 :

.

-1

reference :

(Murphy) 1979
(Harris & Hodges) 1983 :

:

: .

: .

: .

: .

-2

substitution :

) ( :

) ( .

) :(.

: .

: .

: .

-3

: ellipsis

"
"

-4

cohesion by conjunction :

" " .

" " .

" " .

" :

" .

-5

) ( lexical cohesion:

"

"" " .

" "" " .

.
.
.

) (1
.

)(1

144

141

73

71

115

102

137

155

193

151
-

6-12

5-13

3-5

0-5

4-9

4-9

5-10

5-11

6-12

4-12
-

1.75

2.39

0.79

1.20

1.57

1.32

1.65

1.70

1.91

2.40
-

9.53

9.40

3.48

3.62

6.39

6.38

6.85

7.30

8.77

6.56
-

10

10

.


.

 ::

:
.
.

.1

.2

) :( .

.3

.4

.5

( (:

-1

: :

-2

: :

-3

-4

: :

: :

-5

( ( : :

%02

.%100

.
.

)Flood (1989
.


.
.

-1

) (1999 :

. "
" .

-2

) (1994 .

-3

) (1989

-4

) (1998

. 69 19 . 161-105

-5

) (1998

. 1 4 . 203-190

-6

) (1981 : 2

. 115-100

-7

) (1990

7 7 . 301-247

-8

) (1995

1 1 . 59-43

-9

) (1991 :

2 11 . 982-965

 : (1995)

-10

. 215-204 2 1

: (1995-1994)

-11

. 252-239 1 3

(1988)

-12

(1997)

-13

. 70-59 42 1

Barrett, T. C. (1979). A Taxonomy of reading comprehension. In R. F. Smith and

-1

.T. C. Barrett, Teaching reading in the middle grade. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co

Baumann, J. (1985). Teaching third grade students to comprehend anaphoric

-2

.relationships. ED255867

Teaching third-grade students to comprehend anaphoric relationships: .(1986)

-3

.The application of a direct instruction model. Reading Research Quarterly; 21, 1, 70-90

Anaphora in basal reader selections: How frequently do they occur? .(1987)

-4

.Journal of Reading Behavior; 19, 2, 141-158

Beck, I. & Others (1984). Improving the comprehensibility of stories: The effect
.of

-5

Revisions that improve coherence. Reading Research Quarterly; 19, 3, 263-277

Campbell, K. (1991). Structural cohesion in technical texts. Journal of technical

-6

.Writing and Communication; 21, 3, 221-237

Chapman, J. (1979). Confirming children's use of cohesive ties in text:

-7

.Pronouns. Reading Teacher; 33, 3, 317-322

The development of the perception of textual cohesion. ERIC Document .(1980)

-8

.Reproduction Service No. ED192260

Cox, B. & Others (1991). Children's knowledge of organization, cohesion, and

-9

.voice in written exposition. Research in the Teaching of English; 25, 2, 179-218

Duin, A. & Prenn, M. (1985). Identifying the features that make expository texts

-10

.more comprehensible. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED272856

Flood J. (1989). Reading comprehension performance: The effect of teacher

-11

.presentation and text features. Reading Research and Instruction; 29, 1, 1-11

Garber, M. (1979). An examination of selected cohesive features found in child-

-12

produced texts and beginning reading materials. ERIC Document Reproduction Service
No. ED188132

Geva, E. & Ryan, E. (1985). Use of conjunctions in expository texts by skilled

.and

-13

less skilled readers. Journal of Reading Behavior; 17, 4, 331-46

Hadley, I. (1987). Understanding cohesion: Some practical teaching

-14

.implications. Reading; 21, 2, 106-114

.Halliday, M. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman

-15

Harris, T. & Hodges, R. (1983) (Eds.). Dictionary of reading terms. International

-16

.Reading Association

Horiba, Y. (1993). The role of causal reasoning and language competence in

-17

.narrative comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition;15, 1,49-81

Irwin, J. (1986). Cohesion factors in children's textbooks. In Judith Irwin's

-18

understanding and teaching cohesion comprehension (Ed.). International Reading

.Association

Israelite, N & Helfrich, M. (1988). Improving text coherence in basal readers:

-19

Effects of revisions on the comprehension of hearing-impaired and normal-hearing

.children. Volta Review; 90, 6, 261-276

Just, M. & Carpenter, P. (1980). A Theory of reading: From eye fixations to

-20

.comprehension. Psychological Review; 87, 329-354

McKeown, M. & others (1990). The relative contribution of prior knowledge and

-21

.coherent text to comprehension. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED330991

McLean, M. & Chapman, L. (1989). The processing of cohesion in fiction and

non-

-22

fiction by good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Research; 12, 1, 13.28

McClure, E. & Steffensen, M. (1985). A study of the use of conjunctions across

.grades and ethnic groups. Research in the Teaching of English; 19, 3, 217-

McNamara, D. & others (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of
text

-23
236

-24

coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning

.from text. Cognition and Instruction; 14, 1, 1-43

Meyers, G. (1991). Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and

-25

.popular science texts. Discourse Processes; 14, 1, 1-26

Meyer, L. and Others (1986). Children's comprehension of, reaction to, and

-26

preferences for basal reader stories of varying comprehensibility. Technical Report No.
.378. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED278978

Murphy, M. (1979). A Cross-disciplinary approach to research and theory. ERIC

-27

.Document Reproduction Service No. ED185540

Otto, B. (1992). Evidence of cohesive harmony in reconstructed beginning

-28

reader texts and complex trade book texts by emergent readers. ERIC Document
.Reproduction Service No. ED350565

Poersch, J. & Schneider, M. (1991). How the comprehension of cohesive

-29

mechanisms is associated with the production of more coherent texts. Rassagna Italia di
.Linguistica Applica; 23, 3, 51-61

Read W. & others (1988). What's so hard about understanding language. ERIC

-30

.Document Reproduction Service No. ED296587

Vauras, M. & others (1992). Comprehending coherent and incoherent texts:

-31

Evidence from eye movement patterns and recall performance. Journal of Research in
.Reading; 15, 1, 39-45

.Wong, T. (1993). Textual cohesion and reading comprehension. M.A. Thesis

-32

Zabrucky, K. (1986). The role of factual coherence in discourse comprehension.

-33

.Discourse Processes; 9, 2, 197-220

 9991.

) (1 ) (2) (3 42 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6
) (7 ) (8 ) (9 ) (10 ) (11 .
) (12 ) (13 ) (14 ) (15 )
(16 ) (17 .

) (18 ) (19 )
(20 )( 21 ) (22 ) (23
) (24 ) (25 ) (26 ) (27
)(28 ) (29 ) (30 ) (31 ) (32
) (33 ) (34 )(35

) (36 ) (37
) (38 ) (39 ) (40 .

)(1

)(2

. = 1

)(3

. = 2

)(4

. =
. = 2

)(5

. = . 2

)(6

. =

)(7

. =
=

)(8

. =

)(9

. = )(

) . (10 2
) . (11 =
) . (12 =
) . (13 =

) . (14 =
) . (15 =
) . (16 = )(
) . (17 = )(
) . (18 = ) (
) . (19 =
) . (20 =
) . (21 = =
) . (22 = 42 30
) . (23 = 22
) . (24 = )( 26
) . (25 = 24
) . (26 =
) . (27 = 26
) . (28 = )( 26
) . (29 =
) . (30 22
). (31 = 30
) . (32 = ) (
). (33 = . = )(
) (34 =
.
) . (35 = )( 18 26
) . (36 =
)(37

) . (38 =
) . (39 =
) . (40 =
) (41 :
.
"" . "
)". (42 " :