You are on page 1of 226

!

:
:
)(0300-4093026 :
:
:
224 :
260 :
2017 :
mzubair@ciitlahore.edu.pk :
hmzubair2000@hotmail.com
:

042-37244973


0301-4843312

99-J042-35839404
021-36337361
:
:

:
:

:
https://www.facebook.com/drhafizmuhammadzubair/
:
http://kitabosunnat.com/musannifeen/muhammad-
zubair-temi.html









[]116:

4 ............... ................................
: 8 .......................
9 ............ ................................
20.......... ................................
26........... ................................
26........... ................................
28.........................................
30......................................
34.........................................
35........... ................................
42...................................

43........... ................................
47...................................
49..............................
52.....................................
55............ ................................
58..........................
62......................................
: 69...................
(71............................. )Big Bang
(83.................... )Theory of Evolution
85.......................................
2

)89.............................. (atheism
89.....................................
91...................................
93....................................
95.............. ................................
97............ ................................
103 ..................
104 .........................
109 ................................

113 .........................................
110 ..........................................
116 .................................
131 ..........................................
: 134 ....................
136 ....................................
143 ..................
144 ......
145 ........................................
152 ........................................
154 ...........
159 .............
164 ........
167 ................
3

171 .......................................
189 .....................................
191 .....................................
193 ............................
197 ...........................
201 ............................

206 .......................................



)(Theology


) (mega theories







(348-
424) ( 348-424) (205-270)

()Atheists
()Biologists ( )Physicists


5











(185-256)(260-339)
(370-427) (487-533)
(520-595) (597-672)

10

(549-586) 1

( 980-1050)

(560-638) (576-632)

(606-673) (610-690)

(613-669) ( 730)

( 751) (767-832) (-817
898) (1050-1143)
971-1034( )

)(Universal
(339)
(427)




)(Emanationism

632] 1

11


( 495-570
)

(four ultimate elements)1

2


)(Numbers
)(Forms
(205-270)



)(The Absolute One
)(emanation ) (Nous

)(Psyche



()hierarchy 3

1
2 1945 650
3
12

(205-270) (-234
305) ()Enneads
( )Plotinus
( )Porphyry
(260-339)
) (The Necessary Being
)(The Contingent Being


1

)(First Intellect

1997 -457 437-436


459
1973 154- 155
60-57
1
5-4
13

)(Second Intellect







)(essense










)(Celestial Sphere Spirit

(Celestial
)Sphere Body

(Active or
2
)Productive Intellect 1
1 ] Hyle
] Substance

] Form



2 : 8-7
14


)(intelligible things
) (celestial bodies

)(celestial faculties
1

)(The One



(ten

1 410
15

)intellects



)(fixed stars

1 : 340-338
16

) (manifestation
)(self-cognition
)(self-imagination









1

2
)(word of God
)(passive intellect
(universal

1 9
2 262
17

)spirit



1


1396 ]196
18


1


2

1
820/1
2




2005 ]46
3



19




!


















1

1 127/2
20



1
) (skeptic universal

)(graded in intensity


( )Parmenides




2


) (world of ideas
3


1 129-128/2 :
2
1934 46-45
1996 29-28
3 : 120
21





1


(820-788)
()Advaita
2
3

4 5
)(reality
6

1 :122 41-40
2
1998 311
3 : 314-313
4 : 321
5


brahma satyam jaganmithyA jIvo brahmaiva nAparah anena vedyam
]sacchAstram iti vedAntaDiNDimah. [Brahma Jnanavali Mala: Verse No. 20
6 Brahman the Absolute alone is real; this world is unreal (maya), but the jiva

or the individual soul is not different from Brahman. [M. D. Chaturvedi and
Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Hinduism, the Eternal Religion: Its Fundamentals,
22


1

2





(587-549)





]Beliefs, and Traditions, (Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1992), p. 75.


1 Brahman is the only truth, the world is illusion, and there is ultimately no
difference between Brahman and individual self. [N.K. Singh and A.P.
Mishra, Global Encyclopaedia of Indian Philosophy (Delhi: Global Vision
]Publishing House, 2010), p. 16.
2 Brahman is real, the universe is mithya (it cannot be categorized as either

real or unreal). The jiva is Brahman itself and not different. This should be
understood as the correct SAstra. This is proclaimed by Vedanta. [S. N.
Sastri, Translation of Brahma Jnanavali Mala, retrieved 01 February, 2017
from http://www.celextel.org/adisankara/brahmajnanavalimala.html
23

























24






(560-638)

1















1 566/3
25


)(manifestation

(eternal ideas existing in the mind
) of God
)(opposite non-beings of Divine Names
1

1









26







( )Big Bang






()laws of nature
( )cause





()Semitic Religions
( Mega
)Narative

27





)(chance ) (accident




( ) ) (statue












( )Ontology

28













)(self evident
)(analytic
1

2

)(term
) (description ) (Genus
)(Differentia) (Property

1 ( : 1158
1996 1766/2
2 11
295/1
29

)(Universal

)(Summum Genus

( )logicians )(complete
) (deficient


) (rational animal














30









1




)(definable 2





3

1 -73
4-3 52 55-54 40-39 75
2 :
1421 2000-3/303
3
31


260-(
324) 1

2


3






4


( 384-322 )
) (Being
) (Nothingness
5

924
1 : 924
2 : 11
3
4 1766/2 :
5 : 924
32






1

2
3




4



(558-638)

1 1999
218/4 ) (
1957 3
1995 11
2
1998 27
3 :
2004 80
4
1416 1995/235/11
33



1
2






971-1034()



3
661-728()

4

1


2 - 162/1
163
1416 1996-70-68/3
3

4
34



34-33
] 9/2


35

1





2 (-370
428)(606-673)
3

1 448-441/20 :
2

3
1411 1991 -285/1
4 166-165 163/2 :
36

1 166/2 :
37



1





(614-669)
2







3



1 167-166/2 :
2
1426 274/5
140/1 : 3
3
1419 1999 / 306
38









1












2

1 1378/2 :
2 : 309-306
39



















1

!

1 : 314-306
40

1




2








3




. 1
: ]121
2 : 151-150
3 : 181 53 153 151-150
2004 155
69
41



1

















2

1 : 312-311
2 198-196/13 : 241/11 :
42




1!



2


!


3

4





1 : 19
2 : 181
3 473-470/2 :
4 591-590/7 :
43


1


( )vertical
2
(205-270)

3(205-270)
(234-305) ( )Enneads
()Plotinus
()Porphyry
(587-549)



4


1 141-140/2 : 296-294/2 :
2


3 : 459-457 437-436 : - 155
154 60-57 :
4 : 123
44


1(-606
673) /
// 2(-817
3
898)
(751)


4 (767-826)

5






6
7

1 42/3 : 129/2 :
2
1381 11-10
3 ]
2007 426-425 : 430
4
1381 17-14
5 1999 15
6

7 : 53-15
45

//






46

1 470-469/2 :
47












1











1 161 157/2 :
48










1









2


(80-131 )

1 265/16 :
2 131-127/2
49

(135-226) (231)

(256) (300)
(414) (260-324)
(328-402)
(418) (393-476)
(419-478) ( 450-505)
(756) (333)

(493) (-438

508) (537-462)
(771) (722-792)
1
(1014)






2


)(poles

1


2 576 248/2 : 48-47/3 : 470 -469/2 :
241/11
50

/
1
















( )ingenious



1 129/2 :
51
















1



2


1 592/7 :
2 370/18 :
52




1










2









1 177/2 :
2 211-210/4 :
53





1


2













1 590/7 :
1 2
20-19
54

1







2



!

3






( )presentation
1 17-18
2 : 151-150
3


55






( )Trinity
1



( )epistemology

2






1

2
1403 1983- 56-155
1419 -
199922-20/1
56





()identical
()parallel

















57


















:




[]286 :
!
!


58










1 ]9 :
59















:










60





61



1



:






















1 21-20 1
62























1



1 25-23 1
63

1





)(perspective















1 : 9
64





1
:








2
.
!
!

!

1]62 : ]32 : ]71 : ]22 : ]31 : ]5 : ]53 :


]28 : ]33 : ]8-7 : ]17 : ]97 : ]39 : :
]8 ]85-84 : ]69 :
2 70/8

65




1
502

395






2


:


:

:


:


:

:




:
1 ( 150 :
2006 185-182
2 ( 395 :
1399 1979 - 19-15/2 ( 502 :
1412 248-246
66

: :




:

:


:






1












)(undetermined

1


39/1
67

1
68








)(metaphysical







1



1418 178 162/1 :


1 1990 113-112



70



) (The Theory of The Unity of Being













)(atheists

)(atheists

1 )(atheists

1 ) (reality
) (creation ) (creature ) (cause and effect
71


) (Big Bang
(Theory
) of Evolution
) (Creationism

()Big Bang
(Totality of
)Existence
)(Glaxies
13.798
0.037

1


)(Steady State Theory



)(13.7 billion


] [event ] [person

1 Rupert W. Anderson, The Cosmic Compendium: The Big Bang and the Early

Universe, USA: Lulu Press, Inc., 2015, p. 1-2.


72



)(initial singularity 1
)(infinite density (infinite
)temperature 2
/ (initial
)singularity

)(ex nihilo 3 4
/ ) (initial singularity
)(Physical Reality
)(Mass (three
)dimentional (Infinitely
)Compressed 5
-
) (Planck Size
- ) (billion-trillionth-trillionth 6

1 ] [time [time and


] space ] [expansion
] [matter and energy
2 W. Mark Richardson and Wesley J. Wildman, Religion and Science, History,

Method and Dialogue, New York: Routledge, 1996, p. 37.


3 A State of Physical Nothingness
4 Ibid., p. 94-95.
5 Ibid.
6 Hawking, Stephen, Leonard Mlodinow, The Grand Design, New York:

Bantam Book, 2010, p. 106.


73

1



( )rate of expansion 2
/ ( )singularity
()coin ()Milky Way

()Inflation
3

()Theory of Relativity




( )Quantum Theory

1 Hoodbhoy, Pervez, Asrar-e-Jehan, Waqt Waqt ki Batain, Video: 18: 55,


Retrieved 15 December, 2015, from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIKBGqvBcYI
2 ] [Singularity 10E-43
] [gravitational force 10E-35
] [Strong Nuclear Force


] [Electromagnetic Force ] [Week Nuclear Force

] [Nucleus

] [Atom ] [Photon
] [Galaxies

3 The Grand Design, p. 104.
74

)(Quantum Theory of Gravity 1


( The Theory
)of Everything
The Theory of Everything
()String Theory
- ()M-Theory 2
( )versions
()M-Theory
( )eleven dimensions -

3


()How
()Why 4
) ( M-Theory

1 ] [quantum mechanics [theory of


] general relativity
] [Micro Level
] [electromegnatism, strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force
] [Macro Level
] [gravitational force
2 ][Master

3 The Grand Design, p. 113.
4 The laws of nature tell us how the universe behaves, but they dont answer

]the why? [The Grand Design, p. 137


75





1

(mathematical
) equation
) (equation


()atheist




( )creator
2
( )laws of nature
())William Paley (1743-1805
Natural Theology or

1 Ibid., p. 109.
2 We will describe how M-theory may offer answers to the question of creation.
According to Mtheory, ours is not the only universe. Instead, M-theory
predicts that a great many universes were created out of nothing. Their
creation does not require the intervention of some supernatural being or god.
Rather, these multiple universes arise naturally from physical law. They are
]a prediction of science. [The Grand Design: p. 13
76

Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the


Deity
1920
1972


Watchmaker Analogy




)updated(

) blind foces of physics(
1
1 Paley's argument is made with passionate sincerity and is informed by the
best biological scholarship of his day, but it is wrong, gloriously and utterly
wrong. The analogy between telescope and eye, between watch and living
organism, is false. All appearances to the contrary, the only watchmaker in
nature is the blind forces of physics, albeit deployed in a very special way. A
true watchmaker has foresight: he designs his cogs and springs, and plans
their interconnections, with a future purpose in his mind's eye. Natural
selection, the blind, unconscious, automatic process which Darwin
discovered, and which we now know is the explanation for the existence and
apparently purposeful form of all life, has no purpose in mind. It has no
mind and no mind's eye. It does not plan for the future. It has no vision, no
foresight, no sight at all. If it can be said to play the role of watchmaker in
nature, it is the blind watchmaker. [Richard Dawkinz, The Blind
77


1


The Theory of the Everything

)(origin of laws of nature


) (Galileo ( )kepler ( )Descartes
) (Copernicus ) (Newton
) (Work of God
2

) (personal God
) (Einstein ) (Arthur Compton
) (Blaise Pascal ) (Ernst Haeckel

) (James Maxwell ) (Francis Bacon (Louis
) Pasteur ) (Gregor Mendel (Gottfried
) Leibniz ) (Guglielmo Marconi (Max
) Planck ) (Thomson Kelvin (Werner

]Watchmaker, p. 5
1 ] [atheist
] [Sophists





2 The Grand Design, p. 29.
78

) Heisenberg ) (Erwin Schrodinger


) (Francis Collins )(John Eccles
1
The Theory of Everything

!
) (laws of nature
) (origin
)(Big Bang



) (theory )(observation
)(experiment
blind faith

( )Hubble
( )Red Shift
()Cosmic Background Radiation



1 Tihomir Dimitrov, 50 NOBEL LAUREATES AND OTHER GREAT


SCIENTISTS WHO BELIEVE IN GOD
79

( )Tools and Resources





)(observation or experiment
(in
) terms of concerned sciences

-




)(Heidelberg University
A Universe without Expansion, 2013
1

) (Bif Bang (Theory of
) Evolution ) (Black Holes )(Multiverse


( )event horizons

1 Christof Wetterich, A Universe without expansion, Retrieved 01 January,


2016 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6878
80

( )apparent horizons

()worm hole
1

) (mass
)(energy



) (creator and organizer ) (sustainer
)(powerful to will anything

2


3

1 Hawking, Stephen, There are no Black Holes, Retrieved 01 January, 2016


from http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-
holes-1.14583
]35 :
2
3 We will describe how M-theory may offer answers to the question of creation.

According to M-theory, ours is not the only universe. Instead, M-theory


predicts that a great many universes were created out of nothing. Their
creation does not require the intervention of some supernatural being or god.
Rather, these multiple universes arise naturally from physical law. [The
]Grand Design, p. 14
81

1
) (gravity


) (nothing
)(nothing )(something
X Y X Y
X X X
) (creation ) (nothing

) (law of gravity
2

)(nothing

quantum vacuum 3

1 Bodies such as stars or black holes cannot just appear out of nothing. But a
whole universe canBecause there is a law like gravity, the universe can and
will create itself from nothingIt is not necessary to invoke God to light the
]blue touch paper and set the universe going. [The Grand Design, p. 144
]24 : 2

]16 :


21
20 19
22 23

24


]25-19 :


]56 :
3 Lawrence M. Krauss, A Universe From Nothing, (New York: Free Press,

2012), p. 12
82


1
) (theology
) (theoretical physics


)(descriptive)(predictive )(creator


)(quantum mechanics
) (general relativity ) (disciplines
) (reality

strong nuclearelectromagnetic weak
nuclear)(gravity

quantum gravity
) (string theory


(uncertainty
) principle ) (wave-particle duality
)(reality


1

] [electromagnetic waves
83

(Design
)Argument
(rate of expansion of the
)universe (supporting for
) life
) (chance
)(probability theory

) (Multiverse


) (superstitions
)(authenticity
) (parallel universe
) (counter earth
) (fiction

)(theoretical physics


() Theory of Evolution
)(Origin of Life on Earth
) (Origin of the Universe
84


)(predict




) (atheism ) (creationism
)(schools of thought Theistic Evolution
Intelligent Design
) (geneticist ) (NIH
The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence
for Belief
) (theory ) (fact
) (biologists ) (Dawkinz
)(fact )(Kirk Fitzhugh )(theory

) (Julian Huxley )(Richard Lenski
)(theory )(fact
(change in
)organism during the history
) (fact
Irreducible Complexity
( )Michael Behe Darwinss Black Box:
The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution

()natural selection
85

The Blind watchmaker






Natural Selection
God Particle


) (fact
)(biologists)(blind faith


)(change in DNA

)(reptiles )(DNA
)(information (additional
) information (genetic
)mutation)(genetic information
intellect



)(fundamental beliefs
86


)(Book of Guidance
)(Book of Science





2014



event horizons apparent horizons

1





)(theory ) (fact
)(scientific fact

1 Hawking, Stephen, There are no Black Holes, Retrieved 6 January, 2016 from
http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-holes-
1.14583
87



)(explicit






)(species




)(evolutionary tree
) (cousin
)(missing link
) (apes
) (missing link


88


(evolution of
)evolution

)(intellectual fulfilled atheist 1


)(Atheists


1 An atheist before Darwin could have said, following Hume: 'I have no
explanation for complex biological design. All I know is that Cod isn't a good
explanation, so we must wait and hope that somebody comes up with a better
one.' I can't help feeling that such a position, though logically sound, would
have left one feeling pretty unsatisfied, and that although atheism might have
been logically tenable before Darwin, Darwin made it possible to be an
intellectually fulfilled atheist. [Dawkinz, Richard, The Blind Watchmaker,
](New York: Norton, 1986), p. 6
89



:

][2 :

)(Atheism



- :
()atheists)(dialogue
)(strategy
( )principles














90














)(reasoning and interpretation


( laws of
)nature ()Nothingness

(laws of
)nature
( )prime principle


91

:
) (motives
)(Good Atheist





( )Thank God




1

)(Social Values




1

92



1







2


) (joke
)(atheist
)(female atheist
)(intellectual


) (reaction

1
][genes

2



Mullah is not the person with long beard and a turban on head, Mullayeit is
a way of thinking, any one who condemns "rational thinking" is Mullah
93





1



confused atheist




" 1 --
--



--

-- 240
: "

http://mashalbook s.org/
2
94

1



()sensual











2

329/4
]10 : 1
2 3 4

5 ]6 :
95



)(middle ages






The Grand Design
1

1 How can we understand the world in which we find ourselves? How does
the universe behave? What is the nature of reality? Where did all this come
from? Did the universe need a creator? Most of us do not spend most of our
time worrying about these questions, but almost all of us worry about them
some of the time. Traditionally these are questions for philosophy, but
philosophy is dead. Philosophy has not kept up with modern developments
in science, particularly physics. Scientists have become the bearers of the
torch of discovery in our quest for knowledge. The purpose of this book is
to give the answers that are suggested by recent discoveries and theoretical
]advances. [The Grand Design: p.10
96




97

:




[]24 :







98


















99

1 Alif Shafak, The Forty Rules of Love, USA: Penguin Books Ltd, 2010, p. 27
100

-
1


1

2

]172 :

101

()Imaginary World


:
: 1




:
]95/2 ) } (30 :

102

1

]83 :
103

)(repeatable experiment

( )Pure Science
()Pure Scientist


)(Free Thinking
)(Rational Thinking
)(Biased
)(Agnosticism )(Atheism

)(aggressive attitude





) (scientific superstitions
104



) (worm hole
) (Black holes
) (parallel earth )(multiverse
()Harry Potters
1

-

)(aliens



1


- -

! ] [Ten Commandments


105

1()NASA
2
2025
! Tom and Jerry:
Blast Off to Mars

(religion of

)science





) (blind faith

)(gravity

1 Alok Jha, Is Stephen Hawking right about Aliens?, Retrieved 7 January, 2016
from http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/apr/30/stephen-hawking-
right-aliens
2 Mike Wall, Signs of Alien Life Will Be Found by 2025, NASA's Chief

Scientist Predicts, Retrieved 7 January, 2016 from


http://www.space.com/29041-alien-life-evidence-by-2025-nasa.html
106

) (Meta physical


1

2

1 Maddox, John, Down with the Big Bang, Nature, Volume 340, Issue 6233,
pp. 425 (08/1989).
2




1969


] [NASA



2015
] [NASA

18
2015









107






( )verification
()tools)(resourses



1








()aliens()UFO



1



108



1
1912

1953

) (Nebraska Man

2


1

The Evolution Deceit Atlas of Creation







!


http://www.harunyahya.com
2
2002 72
109












()Paradigm


()approach



1


2

1

120/1
2 In an analogous manner, when one combines the general theory of relativity
with quantum theory, the question of what happened before the beginning
of the universe is rendered meaningless. This idea that histories should be
110

()Time and Space







- )(aspect of doubt








closed surfaces without boundary is called the noboundary condition. [The


]Grand Design, p. 109
1 121/1

111

!

1



:!

::
: 2







4

1

2 329/4
3

:
4

]27
112



]8 :
1


2

:
]158
3 ]4 :

113

- )(Fossil Record





(On the Origin of Species by Means
)of Natural Selection
1950
)(DNA
) (DNA





1



) (mutations

1 : 30-22
114



)(punctuated equilibrium
1

1 : 28
2 39-38
115

1 : 53
2 : 46-43
116

1

-















)(1561-1626:
It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth mans mind to
atheism; but depth in philosophy bringeth mens minds
about to religion.2

1 : 55-54
2 Bacon, Francis, The Essays of Lord Bacon, (London: Longman and Green,
Co., 1875), p. 64
117




:(1596-1650)
And thus I very clearly see that the certitude and truth of
all science depends on the knowledge alone of the true
God, insomuch that, before I knew him, I could have no
perfect knowledge of any other thing.1



:(1642-1727)
Atheism is so senseless. When I look at the solar system, I
see the earth at the right distance from the sun to receive
the proper amounts of heat and light. This did not happen
by chance.2




:
In the absence of any other proof, the thumb alone

1 Descartes, Rene, The Philosophy of Descartes: Containing the Method,


Meditations, and Other Works, Translated by John Veitch, (New York:
Tudor Publishing Co., 1901), p. V
2 Tiner, John Hudson, Isaac Newton: Inventor, Scientist, and Teacher,

(Michigan: Mott Media, 1975), p. 123


118

would convince me of Gods existence.1





2

:(1791-1867)
The book of nature which we have to read is written by
the finger of God.3


:(1822-1895)
The more I study nature, the more I stand amazed at the
work of the Creator. Science brings men nearer to God.4


1 Chris Wright, God and Morality, (UK: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 14
2 I have a fundamental belief in the Bible as the Word of God, written by
men who were inspired. I study the Bible daily. [Ray Comfort, Nothing
Created Everything: The Scientific Impossibility of Atheistic Evolution, (Los
Angele: World Net Daily, 2009), p. 55]
3 Seeger, Raymond, Faraday, Sandemanian, The Journal of the American

Scientific Affiliation, The American Scientific Affiliation, June 1983, 35/101


4 Tiner, John Hudson, The World of Biology: From Mushrooms to Complex

Life Form, (USA: New Leaf Publishing Group, 2013), p. 12


119

:
Little science takes you away from God but more of it
takes you to Him.1


( 1824-1907)
:
Do not be afraid to be free thinkers. If you think strongly
enough, you will be forced by science to the belief in
God.2



:(1858-1947)
Anybody who has been seriously engaged in scientific
work of any kind realizes that over the entrance to the
gates of the temple of science are written the words: Ye
must have faith. It is the quality which the scientist cannot
dispense with.3


1 Guitton, Jean, Dieu et La Science: Vers Le Metarealisme, (Paris: Grasset,


1991), p. 5
2 Silvanus, Thompson, The Life of William Thomson Baron Kelvin of Largs,

(London: Macmillan and Co., 1910), 2/1099


3 Carl Gaither, Alma Cavazos-Gaither, Gaither's Dictionary of Scientific

Quotations, (UK: Springer Science and Business Media, 2012), p. 803


120


:
Both religion and science need for their activities the
belief in God, and moreover God stands for the former in
the beginning, and for the latter at the end of the whole
thinking. For the former, God represents the basis, for the
latter the crown of any reasoning concerning the world-
view.1






:
As a physicist, that is, a man who had devoted his whole
life to a wholly prosaic science, the exploration of matter,
no one would surely suspect me of being a fantast. And so,
having studied the atom, I am telling you that there is no
matter as such! All matter arises and persists only due to a
force that causes the atomic particles to vibrate, holding
them together in the tiniest of solar systems, the atom. Yet
in the whole of the universe there is no force that is either
intelligent or eternal, and we must therefore assume that
behind this force there is a conscious, intelligent Mind or

1 Max Planck, Religion und Naturwissenschaft, (Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius


Barth Verlag, 1958), p. 27
121

Spirit. This is the very origin of all matter.1









)(1879-1955:
The more I study science, the more I believe in God.2



) (Nature

3

:
Science without religion is lame, religion without science
is blind.4

1 Jeffrey Strickland, Weird Scientists: The Creators of Quantum Physics, (USA:


Lulu Inc., 2011), p. 29
2 Jim Holt, Science Resurrects God, The Wall Street Journal, 24 December,

1997, Accessed on 6 April, 2017 from


https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB882911317496560000
3 Ibid.
4 Jammer, Max, Einstein and Religion: Physics and Theology, (USA: Princeton

University Press, 2002), p. 30


122




:
I want to know how God created this world. I am not
interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of
this or that element. I want to know his thoughts; the rest
are details.1




:
Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is
of the same kind as the intolerance of the religious fanatics
and comes from the same source. They are like slaves who
are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have
thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures who
in their grudge against the traditional opium for the
people cannot bear the music of the spheres. The
Wonder of nature does not become smaller because one
cannot measure it by the standards of human moral and
human aims.2

1 Carl Gaither, Alma Cavazos-Gaither, Gaither's Dictionary of Scientific


Quotations, p. 2563
2 Max Jammer, Einstein and Religion: Physics and Theology, (USA: Princeton

University Press, 2002), p. 97


123



)(atheist 1

!



:
I cant answer with a simple yes or no. I am not an atheist
1 Einstein sometimes invoked the name of God, and he is not the only
atheistic scientist to do so, inviting misunderstanding by supernaturalists
eager to misunderstand and claim the illustrious thinker as their own.
][Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion, (London, Transworld, 2006), p.34.
124

and I dont think I can call myself a pantheist.1





:
In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my
limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet
people who say there is no God. But what really makes me
angry is that they quote me for support of such views.2


[ ]

:(1901-1976)
The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn
you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is
waiting for you.3



1 Karen Fox, Aries Keck, Einstein A to Z, (New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons,
2004), p. 269; See also, David Aikman, The Delusion of Disbelief: Why the
New Atheism is a Threat to Your Life, Liberty and Persuit of Happiness, (USA:
Tyndale House Publishers, 2008
2 Max Jammer , Einstein and Religion: Physics and Theology, (USA: Princeton

University Press, 1999), p. 97


3 David Hutchings, Tom Mcleish, Let There Be Science: Why God loves

Science and Science needs God, (England: Lion Hudson, 2017), p. 87


125

:(1933-0000)
I look at God through the works of Gods hands and from
those works imply intentions. From these intentions, I
receive an impression of the Almighty.1



(1926-1996)
:
Einstein was born into an Abrahamic faith; in his own
view, he was deeply religious. Now this sense of wonder
leads most scientists to a Superior Being der Alte, the
Old One, as Einstein affectionately called the Deity a
Superior Intelligence, the Lord of all Creation and Natural
Law.2






:(1916-1995)
I think only an idiot can be an atheist. We must admit that
there exists an incomprehensible power or force with
1 Joshua O. Haberman, The God I Believe in, (New York: Maxwell Macmillan
International, 1994), p. 184
2 Lai, C.H. and Kidwai, Azim, Ideals and Realities: Selected Essays of Abdus

Salam, (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Ltd., 1989), p. 285


126

limitless foresight and knowledge that started the whole


universe going in the first place.1








)(atheism












1 Michael Ebifegha, The Darwinian Delusion: The Scientific Myth of


Evolutionism, ( USA: Author House, 2007), p. 135
127





)(religious experience
:















[ ]35 :
()




()








128





) (blind faith
)(experience :

:

:




1
.







(Intervention of
) God
)(sterile
)(atheist

1

13/1
129


:!

1









)(artist


2


3

1


]10 :
2

21 20 ]20 :
]
53 ]
3
130

(The
)Grand Design: (The
) Grand Plan :!
:

:
:



) (observation
) (experience (Horizons of the
)Universe and own selves

)(laws of nature


) (will
)(will
!



1987 ] 52

:
131


















The Unity of the Being




)(intellectual thought
132





(The Unity of the
)Being

) (standard version
















133


) (common sense
(Natural
)Sciences)(fact

) (Sociology ) (Psychology ) (Biology
) (Anthropology ) (Archeology
) (Theoretical Physics ) (narratives
)(Alpha and Omega
)(Semitic Religions

)(Humanities and Social Sciences


) (Social Scientists
)(impossible
1

1
257 ]


15

]16 :





135






(The
)Theory of the Unity of Being
1




)(First Cause




(BACK
)DATES

(Ancient

1

136

) History ) (archeology )(anthropology


)(origion






:

/ ( )Paleolithic age
()Britannica
(2,500,000-20,000/12,000
) BCE ()Neolithic age
)(ASPRO
(12,000-
) 4,500/3,500/3,300 BCE
( )Bronze age

) (3,000-1,200 BCE
( )Iron age

) (1,200-500 BCE-CE
( )Middle ages

) (500-1,500 CE
137

)(Modern Age

1

2 3
4 5
6 )(Mesopotamia
7



(cradle of
)cvilizations
8

1 13 : 7 : 34-33 :
1411
1990595/2
2 36-31 : 48 :

3
591/2
4592/2 :
5 33-31 : =
1422 2001-514/1

6173-172 :
593/2
7
]343/13

8

138


1
2 )(Mesopotamia 3

4
) (Sumerian
)(Epic of Gilgamesh)(Babylon
) 1800(BC

5
6

7

8

1408 1988-69/14
360-358/6 :

1 213 :
596/2
2 24-23 : }
160/6
3 44 :
477-75 : 74-73 : 48 : 26 : 38-37 : 14 :

:]19-18 :9 :

5
595/2
6
1395 1975-725/5

7
288/2 855-852/7 :
869-65 : 130-123 : 21 : 8-6 :
139

1

2
3
4
5 (modern
) age

//
(Humanities and
)Social Sciences )(worldview
6
7


8
40

174-73 : 38 : 149-141 : 9 : 84-80 :


2 70 : 54-51 : 99-97 : 29-26 : 37-36 : :
79-71 177-176 : 40 :
326 : 27 :
486-84 :
5 129-127 : 6 :
6 117 : 7 : 32-24 :
7 50 :


8



]591/2
140

) (Adams Peak
) (oral tradition





1




2

)(Sumerian
)(Epic of Gilgamesh
)(Babylon ) 1800(BC
)(Atra-Hasis
) (Akkadian

1650

) (Eridu

:25-1 :2 : 1
:23-1 :4 : 2
141

) (Ur 12
) (Ziusudra

)(Eridu )(Bad-Tibira
) (Larsa ) (Sippar
) (Shuruppak

) (Mesopotamian Seven Sages
) (Adapa
)(manuscripts )1400(BC



1 1056

2




3

4 )(Sumerian
)(Epic of Gilgamesh

:32-1 :5 : 1
:32-1 : 5: 2
:10-1 : 11: 3
:19-18 :9 : 4
142

)(Babylon ) 1800(BC











1



2
3
890




:32-1 :10 : 1
:32 :5 : 2
:32-1 :11 : 3
143







1












170



1
]170/4
144




-

)(epistemology



80
131







150
241 256
276
280
311 311
145

321
324
360
371 385
297
386 387
395 418
458
481
526 600
620
728
748 751









:


146



427















1


1
1422 2002/ 75
147













1



309
2

)(Agnosticism

1 : 75
2 : 76
148



1



638
2




)(addition









1 : 77
2 211-210
149

1


) (abstraction




)(whiteness
) (white












1 ...
...
...
...
...
150

1 : 102
151

1







2




()( ) ()(
) ()





1
2 : 105
152



1
() ( ) ()
()
()







2





:

1 : 108
2 : 110-109
153






324






1
2



3

1 : 120-119
2
1400 1980- 31
3 : 122
154





1

-



:
:

:
:


2


:



1 : 133
2 2010 9
155




1

:





.





.


:

.

:

:

. : -

:

.





- - :




.

-



- :

1 252/4
156




. :
1
.



2







228

1
1416 1995/196-195/5
2












157

1
158












) (tool
) (object
) (authority
) (object








)(passive ) (active


159










1





-







179

1


2011

160


:



1
.





463:













2

.




1 ( 458 :
1401 116
2
1387 145/7
161






150:





:



1 .









482:

( )



2 .

1419 27 1 :
2 3
162

( )

(
)



483:


.





1 .

1 170
163

204
:



:



1
.






241 :



2 .







1
1416 1995- 165
2 254/1 :
164









( )





1

-




1
1403 75/1
165

























166








!












:

[]2:






167






!

















(
168

)



)(agnosticism


















169
























170

1 212/5 :
171







779




1

-



:




[]54 :

1 ( 1327 :
1406 497/1
172

1

]3 :


]2 :
]5 :
] 59 :





:

]4



]4 :
173

2



3

4



5



1

]7 :
}]124/9


2 ]86 :
]116 :
3 ]42 :


4
]75 :
5
]7 :
]17 :
174





!

1

2
3


4
5

1

]2090/4
2 :
1430 2009-]109/7
3

]56/1

4

}]126/9





]1844/4



5 :


175


1

2
3


4


5


:

]184/1
1

1421 2001-]329/14
: 2

} :




:



:
:
:


: 1998 ]81/5
3
]1981/4
} : :


:


4

:
}]126/9

5




176

1

2 :


: :

:

3

:
!
:










}]125/9
:
1
}
]124/9
: 2

}]125/9

3 : 288/5
177






:




[]1 :














178







1


2












1 340/2 :
2 437/5 :
179





)(dimentions



:

1 :

2 :
3 :
4
:


5

1 16/5 :
2 34/5 :
3 22/23 :
4 26/11 :
549-47/7 :
180

1
9/23 19/18 33-32/10 11/7 : 12/6 ::
1/4
:







102
150 150179

181179 199
204 212
231 240241
243 253 264
264 277
280 280 297
297 209
238 291 301
310311 360

1 :

( 311 :
1414 1994-]249/1
181

360369371
386 387 388
395 399 418

430 444 444
449 463
471 481 510
526 535 561
600 620
1
643
458



( )
( ) ( ) ()
2 360

3


256


1
2009
2 116/1 :
3
1420 1999-1076/3
182




1

418

2

206

280
181



3


4

1 43-42
2
1423 2003/440/3
3
1416 1995-47/1
4 30 :
183


136


1
231




:

... 2




!
3
458

4

1 441/3 :
2 442/3 :
3 445/3 :
4 118/1 :
184

1



2

228


3
4




5

387
:

1 1400
70/1
2 588/3 :
3 582/3 :
4
]572/1
5 123/4

185




: (:

: )143

:
:
: ( )69 :


: : :





:


: :




:







:






1
.



1
1418 141-139/7
186






!






















187









:



:

:
: .




:



-

-

.

.
"
"

:












188


.
1











[
]







505

1 152/5 :
189

1







2
3
68
104
4310
5 1270 1371
6

1
1424 2004- 38
217-16 :
3 ( 671 :
1384 1964-215/18
1412 25/10
4 ( 911 :
238/8
5
1420 2000-513/23
6
1415 18-17/15

1365 1946-16/29
190

:

2



3


4





5

137 :
2 109-107/7 : 42


3
323/4

4 1060/2
5

1425 2004-1128/5
191



1


2








)(three dimensions


3

1 1423/2
2


:

1395 1975-362/5
3 ]10 :

192


1

2

3



360










]158 : 1
2
]50 :
]4 :
3 .

193

-


)(relative term

1



:




[]6 :



90
90
90



360

1 2001 210
194



)(relative
















360
360


195









1








90



23.4 )(tilt

1 860/1 :
196


360 )(axes





















197

-























198













1421
1

1
1421 403-402 /1
199
















!







200





!

















201


-


) (conflict
)(basis for reconciliation


) (support






:


190



[ ]191-190 :




!
!

202



)(laws of natures

)(code of life




)(misunderstanding


203

)(ultimate truth


)(ultimate truth






(humble
)opinion


204








)(intellectuals







205

206



(ultimate
) truth



(first
) cause (Baruch
)Spinoza

)(creator








207




!
) (believer
)(agnostic )(atheist






1418

2004



1418


1403



1411 1991-





14161995/


1419 1999 /


209


1426




1396

1408 1988-


1414 1994-


1387


1998

1999






210

1416
1996-







1400 1980-




1419

1430 2009-

1420 1999-



1406

1399 1979 -

211


1421 2001-






1415







1422





1973


1401

212

1998


1395 1975-


(
)
2007


1403 1983-

1999


1411 1990

1996



2001


14161995-
213




1416 1995-
( :
502 )
1412

1998





1400




1419 1999-









214



2001


1420 2000-

1998

:
14212000-
()
()

1424
2004-



1990


1997


1384 1964-
215





1381

)(
1957

1381






14232003/


1425 -
2004
2010
1945 650



216


14222002/


1421



1996




1365 1946-




1412


2006
:

2004

217



2009

1995


1934
Alif Shafak, The Forty Rules of Love, USA: Penguin Books
Ltd, 2010
Alok Jha, Is Stephen Hawking right about Aliens?,
Retrieved 7 January, 2016 from
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/apr/30/ste
phen-hawking-right-aliens
Bacon, Francis, The Essays of Lord Bacon, London:
Longman and Green, Co., 1875
Carl Gaither, Alma Cavazos-Gaither, Gaither's Dictionary
of Scientific Quotations, UK: Springer Science and
Business Media, 2012
Chris Wright, God and Morality, UK: Oxford University
Press, 2003
Christof Wetterich, A Universe without expansion,
Retrieved 01 January, 2016 from
http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6878
David Aikman, The Delusion of Disbelief: Why the New
Atheism is a Threat to Your Life, Liberty and Persuit of
Happiness, USA: Tyndale House Publishers, 2008
David Hutchings, Tom Mcleish, Let There Be Science: Why
God loves Science and Science needs God, England: Lion
218

Hudson, 2017
Dawkinz, Richard, The Blind Watchmaker, New York:
Norton, 1986
Descartes, Rene, The Philosophy of Descartes: Containing
the Method, Meditations, and Other Works, Translated by
John Veitch, New York: Tudor Publishing Co., 1901
Guitton, Jean, Dieu et La Science: Vers Le Metarealisme,
Paris: Grasset, 1991
Hawking, Stephen, Leonard Mlodinow, The Grand
Design, New York: Bantam Book, 2010
Hawking, Stephen, There are no Black Holes, Retrieved 01
January, 2016 from
http://www.nature.com/news/stephen-hawking-there-
are-no-black-holes-1.14583
Hoodbhoy, Pervez, Asrar-e-Jehan, Waqt Waqt ki Batain,
Video: 18 : 55, Retrieved 15 December, 2015, from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIKBGqvBcYI
Jammer, Max, Einstein and Religion: Physics and
Theology, USA: Princeton University Press, 2002
Jeffrey Strickland, Weird Scientists: The Creators of
Quantum Physics, USA: Lulu Inc., 2011
Jim Holt, Science Resurrects God, The Wall Street
Journal, 24 December, 1997, Accessed on 6 April, 2017
from https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB882911317496560000
Joshua O. Haberman, The God I Believe in, New York:
Maxwell Macmillan International, 1994
219

Karen Fox, Aries Keck, Einstein A to Z, New Jersey: John


Wiley and Sons, 2004
Lai, C.H. and Kidwai, Azim, Ideals and Realities: Selected
Essays of Abdus Salam, Singapore: World Scientific
Publishing Co. Ltd., 1989
Lawrence M. Krauss, A Universe From Nothing, New
York: Free Press, 2012
M. D. Chaturvedi and Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Hinduism,
the Eternal Religion: Its Fundamentals, Beliefs, and
Traditions, Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1992
Max Jammer, Einstein and Religion: Physics and
Theology, USA: Princeton University Press, 1999
Max Planck, Religion und Naturwissenschaft, Leipzig:
Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag, 1958
Michael Ebifegha, The Darwinian Delusion: The Scientific
Myth of Evolutionism, USA: Author House, 2007
Mike Wall, Signs of Alien Life Will Be Found by 2025,
NASA's Chief Scientist Predicts, Retrieved 7 January, 2016
from http://www.space.com/29041-alien-life-evidence-
by-2025-nasa.html
N. K. Singh and A.P. Mishra, Global Encyclopaedia of
Indian Philosophy, Delhi: Global Vision Publishing
House, 2010
Ray Comfort, Nothing Created Everything: The Scientific
Impossibility of Atheistic Evolution, Los Angele: World
Net Daily, 2009
Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion, London:
Transworld, 2006
220

Rupert W. Anderson, The Cosmic Compendium: The Big


Bang and the Early Universe, USA: Lulu Press, Inc., 2015
S. N. Sastri, Translation of Brahma Jnanavali Mala,
retrieved 01 February, 2017 from
http://www.celextel.org/adisankara/brahmajnanavalim
ala.html
Seeger, Raymond, Faraday, Sandemanian, The Journal
of the American Scientific Affiliation, The American
Scientific Affiliation, June 1983
Shri Adi Shankara, Brahma Jnanavali Mala
Silvanus, Thompson, The Life of William Thomson Baron
Kelvin of Largs, London: Macmillan and Co., 1910
Tiner, John Hudson, Isaac Newton: Inventor, Scientist, and
Teacher, Michigan: Mott Media, 1975
Tiner, John Hudson, The World of Biology: From
Mushrooms to Complex Life Form, USA: New Leaf
Publishing Group, 2013
W. Mark Richardson and Wesley J. Wildman, Religion and
Science, History, Method and Dialogue, New York:
Routledge, 1996

You might also like