New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path by Perfect Domination

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.
com · Manhattan, NY, USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Perfect 3
Domination 4
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6
DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 SYNOPSIS 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperPerfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a pair 10
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is 11
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination if the following expressions, terms and 12
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination criteria holds. 13
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )]}
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 14
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic Perfect 15
Domination. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for them, but research 16
has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are 17
well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented 18
throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this research, a 19
comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic 20
SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, 21
so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand 22
the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the things that 23
are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing research and 24
future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended manner. There are 25
different types of them. Some are individual and some are well modeled by groups of 26
cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but the relationships 27
between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and 28
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on 29
“Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense super-hypermodels open avenues for 30
research on theoretical aspects and “cancer diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific 31
research have been considered. It has also been formally collected in the form of several 32
questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of Perfect 33
Domination. Since there are more ways to get type results a Perfect Domination 34
becomes more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic Perfect Domination, 35
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA
there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “Perfect Domination mastery”. 36
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 37
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Perfect Domination. If 38
the specified table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, hyperedges, and 39
hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is 40
redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of 41
SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 42
its vertices”, ”super edge values&max values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and 43
maximum values of its endpoints”. To get examples and structural examples, I would 44
like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Perfect 45
Domination. This is the original. Having the foundation of the previous definition in 46
the SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have all Perfect 47
Domination until Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Perfect Domination”, 48
but otherwise, it is not Perfect Domination. There is some explanation for the original 49
definition titled “Perfect Domination”. These two examples are further explored and 50
distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 51
methods based on a dominant Perfect Domination. Because of having Perfect 52
Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Perfect 53
Domination” and “neutrosophic Perfect Domination”. SuperHyperVertices and 54
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of 55
tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 56
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 57
desired table exists, a Perfect Domination is redefined to a “Neutrosophic Perfect 58
Domination”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. 59
Since there are more ways to obtain Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- 60
Neutrosophic Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. Consider a 61
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of 62
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 63
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 64
”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 65
SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 66
SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 67
SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 68
elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 69
of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 70
SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 71
exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 72
SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 73
SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 74
and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, 75
and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no SuperHyperEdge in 76
common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 77
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 78
separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 79
among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 80
SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 81
designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 82
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 83
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 84
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 85
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 86
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 87
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 88
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 89
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 90
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 91
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 92
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 93
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 94
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 95
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 96
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 97
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 98
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 99
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 100
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 101
the longest Perfect Domination or the strongest Perfect Domination in those 102
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for the longest 103
Perfect Domination called Perfect Domination and the strongest Perfect Domination 104
called Neutrosophic Perfect Domination. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible 105
SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at 106
least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of 107
any cycle, but literally, it is the transformation of any cycle. It literally transforms and 108
does not form. A basic introduction to the theory of Perfect Domination Neutrosophic, 109
SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 110
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperPerfect Domination, Cancer’s 111
Neutrosophic Recognition 112
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 113
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 114
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 115
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 116
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 117
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 118
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 119
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 120
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 121
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 122
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 123
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 124
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 125
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 126
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 127
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 128
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 129
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 130
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 131
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 132
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 133
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 134
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 135
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 136
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 137
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 138
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 139
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 140
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 141
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Perfect 142
Domination”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct 143
object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific 144
research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 145
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 146
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 147
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 148
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 149
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 150
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 151
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 152
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 153
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 154
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 155
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 156
Perfect Domination or Neutrosophic Perfect Domination for SuperHyperModels in it. 157
Some general results are presented. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible 158
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough 159
as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is necessary to form any style of cycle. There 160
is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form of any cycle. It literally transforms and does 161
not form. 162
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 163
“Perfect Domination Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or fixed group 164
of cells broadly, “Perfect Domination Rate” based on fixed groups or fixed cells. Groups 165
of groups of cells? 166
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 167
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 168
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 169
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Perfect 170
Domination” and “neutrosophic Perfect Domination” over “superhypergraph” and 171
“neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research has taken more 172
motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections among this 173
SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain examples 174
and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general results 175
and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key point 176
of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 177
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 178
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 179
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 180
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 181
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 182
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 183
new concepts, Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Perfect Domination, are specified 184
in the sections “Perfect Domination” and “Neutrosophic Perfect Domination”. In the 185
concept of dealing with results and in Perfect Domination to create logic about the 186
continuation of the scientific research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and 187
Neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, the 188
corresponding SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the work done in this 189
section, as “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 190
SuperHyperClasses”. Going back to the core concepts, clever steps towards common 191
concepts to extend new concepts in new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and 192
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on 193
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. There is the initial scientific research on 194
supergeneral relations and as the final and final part of the theoretical scientific research 195
is available in the section “General results”. Some general SuperHyperRelations are 196
fundamental and are known as fundamental SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” 197
were extracted and discussed. “Perfect Domination”, “Neutrosophic Perfect 198
Domination”, “Results on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic 199
SuperHyperClasses”. There are curious questions about what has been done about 200
SuperHyperNotions to make sense of the superiority of this scientific research and to 201
discover the word “best” as a description and adjective of this scientific research as 202
presented in the “Perfect Domination” section. The keyword of this scientific research 203
was presented in the section “Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and 204
sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” 205
and “Case 2: Incremental steps towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the 206
“open issues” section, there is a detailed examination and recognition of what was done 207
in this scientific research and what happened in this scientific research in the form of 208
“questions” and “issues” in order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding 209
style, the advantages and limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has 210
been done in this scientific research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” 211
section. 212
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 213
Research On the Redeemed Ways 214
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 215
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 216
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 217
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 218
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 219
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 220
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 221
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 222
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 223
to Ref. [1]. 224
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 225
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 226
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 227
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 228
+
]− 0, 1 [. 229
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 230
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 231
2.5,p.2). 232
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 233
pair S = (V, E), where 234
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 235
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 236
1, 2, . . . , n); 237
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 238
V; 239
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 240
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 241
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 242
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 243
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 244
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 245
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 246
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 247
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 248
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 249
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 250
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 251
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 252
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 253
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 254
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 255
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 256
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 257
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 258
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 259
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 260
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 261
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 262
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 263
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 264
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 265
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 266
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 268
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 269
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 270
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 271
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 272
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 273
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 274
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 275
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, 276
namely, E4 . 277
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
• On the Figure (4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 278
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 279
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 280
• On the Figure (5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 281
SuperHyperEdge. 282
• On the Figure (6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 283
SuperHyperEdge. 284
SuperHyperEdge. 286
SuperHyperEdge. 288
SuperHyperEdge. 290
SuperHyperEdge. 292
SuperHyperEdge. 294
SuperHyperEdge. 296
SuperHyperEdge. 298
SuperHyperEdge. 300
SuperHyperEdge. 302
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)


Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
SuperHyperEdge. 304
SuperHyperEdge. 306
SuperHyperEdge. 308
SuperHyperEdge. 310
SuperHyperEdge. 312
SuperHyperEdge. 314
SuperHyperEdge. 316
Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 317
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 318
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 319
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 320
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 321
characterized as follow-up items. 322
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 323
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 324





(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 325
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 326
HyperEdge; 327
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 328
SuperEdge; 329
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 330
SuperHyperEdge. 331
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 332
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 333
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 334
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 335
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 336
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 337
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 338
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 339
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 340
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 341
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 342
pair S = (V, E), where 343
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 344
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 345
1, 2, . . . , n); 346
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 347
V; 348
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 349
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 350
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 351
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 352
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 353
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 354
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 355
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 356
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 357
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 359
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 360
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 362
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 363
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 364
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 365
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 367
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 368
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 369
characterized as follow-up items. 370
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 371
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 372
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 373
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 374
HyperEdge; 375
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 376
SuperEdge; 377
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 378
SuperHyperEdge. 379
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 380
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 381
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 382
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 383
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 384
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 385
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 386
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 387
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 388
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 389
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 390
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 391
given SuperHyperEdges; 392
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 393
SuperHyperEdges; 394
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 395
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 396
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 397
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 398
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 399
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 400
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 401
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 402
common SuperVertex. 403
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 404
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 405
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 406
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 407
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 408
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 409
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 410
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 411
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 412
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 413
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 414
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 415
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 416
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 417
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 418
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 419
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 420
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 421
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 422
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 423
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 425
is up. 426
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 427
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 428
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 429
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 430
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 431
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 432
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 433
of following conditions hold: 434
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 435
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 436
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 437
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 440
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 441
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 442
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 443
0 0
Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 . 444
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 445
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 446
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 447
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 448
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 449
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 450
SuperHyperPath . 451
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 452
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 454
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 455
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 456
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 457
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 458
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 459
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 460
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 461
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 462
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 463
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 464
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 465
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 466
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 467
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 469
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 470
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 472
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 473
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 474
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 475
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 476
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 477
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 478
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 479
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 480
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 481
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 482
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 483
understandable. 484
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 485
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 486
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 487
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 488
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 489
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 490
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 491
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 492

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 493
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 494
understandable. 495
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 496
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 497
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 498
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 499
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 500
Table (3) holds. 501
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 502
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 503
in every Neutrosophic items. 504
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 506
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -
Figure 29. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the

Neutrosophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (4.2)
4 Main Resultant 513
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect 514
Domination). 515
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 516
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 517
SuperHyperPerfect Domination if the following expressions, terms and statements is called 518
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination criteria holds. 519
X X X
|( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0 Vi ∈V 0
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V , ∃!Vi ∈ V :
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )]}
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S is a pair 520
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 521
SuperHyperBipartite (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 523
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 524
SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 . Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1 }. 525
Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination since the following 526
expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect 527
Domination criteria holds. 528
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 }



Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) - -
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) - -
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)




Figure 36. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-








V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) - -
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1 }
= (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vk6=1 }, ∃!Vi ∈ V = {V1 } :
TV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = 0.26 = 0.26 = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
IV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = 0.26 = 0.26 = min[IV (Vi ), IV (Vj )],
FV0 (EVi ,Vj ) = 0.26 = 0.26 = min[FV (Vi ), FV (Vj )]}
SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 . Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1,2 }. 532
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1,2 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1,2 }
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1,2 }
= (0.5, 0.5, 0.5) =

X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vk6=1,2 }, ∃!V1 ∈ V 00 = {V1,2 } :
0
TV (EVi ,Vj ) = 0.26 = 0.26 = min[TV (Vi ), TV (Vj )],
SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 . Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 539
V 0 = {Vi=1−3 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination since 540
the following expressions, terms and statements is called Neutrosophic 541
SuperHyperPerfect Domination criteria holds. 542
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−3 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−3 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−3 }
= (0.74, 0.74, 0.74) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vk6=1−3 }, ∃!V1 ∈ V = {V1−3 } :
0
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−4 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−4 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−4 }
= (0.98, 0.98, 0.98) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vk6=1−4 }, ∃!V1 ∈ V = {V1−4 } :
0
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−5 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−5 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−5 }
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
= (2.2, 2.2, 2.2) =

X X X
= min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V 00 ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {Vk6=1−5 }, ∃!V1 ∈ V = {V1−5 } :
0
SuperHyperPart {Vi }7i=1 . Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=7 }. 560

X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=7 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
i6=7 }
= (2.45, 2.45, 2.45) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {V7 }, ∃!V1 ∈ V = {Vi6=7 } :
0
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) - -
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi=1−7 }
= (2.69, 2.69, 2.69) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {}, ∃!V1 ∈ V = {Vi=1−7 } :
0
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 571
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 572
SuperHyperPath (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (15). 574
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 575
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34 i=8 . Consider a 576
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−34 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 577
SuperHyperPerfect Domination since the following expressions, terms and statements is 578
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination criteria holds. 579
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
= (8.84, 8.84, 8.84) =
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {}, ∃!Vi ∈ V = {Vi=1−34 } :
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=8−10,31 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 584
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=8−10,31 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=8−10,31 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=8−10,31 }
= (7.96, 7.96, 7.96) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {i = 8 − 10, 31}, ∃!V3 ∈ V 00 = {Vi6=8−10,31 } :
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=3,12−14 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 591
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=3,12−14 }
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=3,12−14 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=3,12−14 }
= (7.88, 7.88, 7.88) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {i = 3, 12 − 14}, ∃!V4 ∈ V 00 = {Vi6=3,12−14 } :
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=16−18 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 598
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=16−18 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=16−18 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=16−18 }
= (8.04, 8.04, 8.04) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {i = 16 − 18}, ∃!V5 ∈ V = {Vi6=16−18 } :
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=5,20−23 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 605
X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=5,20−23 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=5,20−23 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=5,20−23 }
= (7.46, 7.46, 7.46) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {i = 5, 20 − 23}, ∃!V5 ∈ V 00 = {Vi6=5,20−23 } :
0
SuperHyperExternal {Vi }7i=1 and non-SuperHyperInternal {Vi }34

i=8 . Consider a 611
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) Eii=37 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi6=25−30 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 612

X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=25−30 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=25−30 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={Vi6=25−30 }
= (7.1, 7.1, 7.1) =

X X X
= min
00 ⊆V
|{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V N SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {i = 25 − 30}, ∃!V7 ∈ V = {Vi6=25−30 } :
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {Vi=1−34 }. Then V 0 is called Neutrosophic 619

X
|( T (Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
X
I(Vi ),
Vi ∈V 0 ={V1−34 }
X
F (Vi ))|
Vi ∈V 0 ={V
1−34 }
= (8.84, 8.84, 8.84) =

X X X
= 00 min |{ ( T (Vi ), I(Vi ), F (Vi )) |
V ⊆VN SHG
Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00 Vi ∈V 00
00 00
Vj ∈ VN SHG \ V = {}, ∃!Vi ∈ V = {Vi=1−34 } :
0
5 Main Result 622
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 623
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite has the letter z. The notion on the 624
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath coincide. 625
Proof. 626
(i). Let 627
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
628
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperBipartite ESHM : (V, E). 629
There’s a new way to redefine as 630
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 631
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect 632
Domination. The latter is straightforward. 633
(ii). Let 634
P :
ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ ,
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
635
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
is a longest SuperHyperPerfect Domination taken from a connected Extreme SuperHyperPath 636
ESHC : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 637

Domination. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 640
SuperHyperPerfect Domination. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 641
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination could be applied. 642
The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination proposes some longest 643
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 644
straightforward. 645
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set is as follows.
{V P1 }.
Proof. Let 646
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2
647
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2

Proposition 5.3. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination number is as follows.
|V P1 | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 653
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
654
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair S = (V, E). 660
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic 661
SuperHyperPerfect Domination set is as follows. 662
{
ViEXT ERN AL ,
EXT ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
}
Proof. Let 663
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
664
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperPerfect Domination number is as follows.
|V |
× 0.26.
2
Proof. Let 675
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
676
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Uniform 687
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath). 688
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every 689
pair of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 690
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 691
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called 692
Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite. 693
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 694
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 695
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 696
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 697
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath. 698
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set is as follows.
{V P1 }.
Proof. Let 699
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2
700
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V2P1 , E2

Proposition 5.8. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHM be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination number is as follows.
|V P1 | × 0.26.
Proof. Let 706
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2
707
P :
V1P1 , E1 ,
V1P1 , E2

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair 713
S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set is as follows. 714
{
ViEXT ERN AL ,
EXT ERN AL
Vi+1 ,...
}
Proof. Let 715
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
716
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (ESHC) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination number is as follows.
|V |
× 0.26.
2
Proof. Let 727
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
728
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Neutrosophic 739
SuperHyperPath). 740
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 741
two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, have the 742
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 743
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set. 744
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 745
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two have the 746
maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same 747
maximum letter, are in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set. 748
Proof. 749
(i). Let 750
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
751
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 757
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
758
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite and Embedded 769
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath). 770
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then two 771
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, from different SuperHyperParts, is in every 772
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set. 773
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then every 774
Neutrosophic EXTERNAL SuperHyperVertices with distance two is in every 775
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination set. 776
Proof. 777
(i). Let 778
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2
779
P :
V1Pi , E1 ,
P
V1 j , E2

(ii). Let 785
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1
786
P :
EXT ERN AL ∗
Vi+1 , Ei+1

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 797
Neutrosophic Recognition 798
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 799
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 800
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 801
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 802
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 803
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 804
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 805
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 806
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 807
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 808
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 809
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 810
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 811
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 812
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 813
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 814
happened and what’s done. 815
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 816
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 817
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 818
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 819
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperPerfect Domination, SuperHyperStar, 820
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to 821
find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination or the Neutrosophic 822
SuperHyperPerfect Domination in those Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 823
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 824
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 825
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 826
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 827
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 828
featured. 829
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 830
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 831
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 832
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 833
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 834
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination. 835
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination
Figure 44. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 836
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 837
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 838
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (44), the 839
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 840
Neutrosophic featured. 841
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (44) and the Table (23), the Neutrosophic 842
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 843
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 844
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 845
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 846
SuperHyperModel (44), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination. 847
9 Wondering Open Problems But As The 848
Directions To Forming The Motivations 849
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 850
The SuperHyperPerfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination are 851
defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 852
Question 9.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 853
recognitions? 854
Question 9.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperPerfect Domination 855
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination? 856
Question 9.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 857
compute them? 858
Question 9.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the SuperHyperPerfect 859
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination?

Domination 860
Problem 9.5. The SuperHyperPerfect Domination and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect 861
do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and they’re based on

Domination 862
SuperHyperPerfect Domination, are there else? 863
Problem 9.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 864
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 865
Problem 9.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 866
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 867
10 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 868
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 869
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 870
research are highlighted. 871
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 872
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Perfect 873
Domination. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition of the 874
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. Based on 875
the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new SuperHyperNotion, 876
Neutrosophic Perfect Domination, finds a suitable background to implement some 877
results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the 878
subjects of this scientific research on modeling areas that are subject to cancer attacks 879
in order to recognize this disease as mentioned under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To 880
formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Perfect Domination, SuperHyperClasses and new 881
SuperHyperClasses instances are introduced. Some general results are summarized in 882
the Perfect Domination and Neutrosophic Perfect Domination sections. Clarifications, 883
examples, and literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, the literature 884
review has met the lines containing concepts and results. SuperHyperGraph and 885
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in “cancer diagnosis” and both 886
are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer has 887
occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 888
SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, formally called “Perfect Domination”, 889
based on the connections of Cancer’s movements in the longest and strongest styles with 890
the formation of design and architecture, in terms of terms and whispering words. . The 891
“SuperHyper” prefix refers to the topic of embedded styles to explore the background of 892
SuperHyperNotions. In the table (24), the advantages and ways of this scientific 893
research are specified, pointed out and expressed. 894
11 Background 895
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 896
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 897
Table 24. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Perfect Domination
3. Neutrosophic Perfect Domination 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 898
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 899
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 900
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 901
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 902
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 903
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 904
with pages 32-55. 905
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 906
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 907
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 908
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 909
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 910
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 911
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 912
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 913
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 914
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 915
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 916
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 917
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 918
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 919
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 920
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 921
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 922
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 923
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 924
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 925
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 926
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 927
SuperHyperNumbers. 928
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 929
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 930
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 931
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 932
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 933
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 934
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 935
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 936
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 937
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 938
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 939
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 940
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 941
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 942
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 943
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 944
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 945
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 946
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 947
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 948
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 949
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 950
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 951
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 955
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 956
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 957
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 958
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 959
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 960
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 961
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 962
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 963
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 967
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 968
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 969
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 970
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 971
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 972
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 973
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 974
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 975
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 976
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 977
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 978
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 979
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 980
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 981
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 982
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 983
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 984
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 985
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 986
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 987
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 988
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 989
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 990
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 991
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 992
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 993
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 994
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 995
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 996
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 997
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 998
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 999
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1000
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1001
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1002
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1003
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1004
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1005
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1006
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1007
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1008
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1009
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1010
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1011
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1012
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1013
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1014
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1015
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1016
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1017
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1018
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1019
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1020
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1021
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1022
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1023
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1024
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1025
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1026
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1027
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1028
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1029
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1030
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1031
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1032
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1033
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1034
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1035
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1036
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [232] by Henry 1037
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1038
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1039
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [233] by Henry Garrett 1040
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1041
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1042
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [234] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1043
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1044
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1045
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [235] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1046
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1047
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [238] by 1048
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1049
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1050
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [239] by Henry 1051
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1052
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1053
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [242] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1054
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1055
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [245] by Henry 1056
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1057
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1058
in Ref. [246] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1059
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1060
Ref. [247] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1061
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1062
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [248] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1063
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1064
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [249] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1065
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1066
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [250] by Henry Garrett 1067
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1068
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [261] by Henry 1069
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1070
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1071
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [262] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–262], there 1072
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1073
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1074
at [263–400]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1075
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [401, 402]. 1076
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1077
proposed as book in Ref. [401] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1078
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1079
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1080
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1081
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1082
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1083
proposed as book in Ref. [402] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1084
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1085
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1086
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1087
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1088
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1089
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1090
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1091
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1092
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1093
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–262] 1094
alongside scientific research books at [263–400]. Two popular scientific research books 1095
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1096
science is on [401, 402]. 1097
References 1098
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1099
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1100
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1101
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1102
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1103
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1104
(2023) 35-47. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.01.05). 1105
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1106
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1107
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1108
(2023) 136-148. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.03.03). 1109
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1110
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1111
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1112
(2023) 221-307. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.06.04). 1113
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1114
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1115
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1116
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1117
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1118
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1119
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1120
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1121
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1122
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1123
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1124
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1125
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1126
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1127
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1128
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1129
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1130
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1131
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1132
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1133
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1134
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1135
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1136
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1137
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1138
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1139
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1140
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1141
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1142
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1143
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1144
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1145
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1146
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1147
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1148
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1149
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1150
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1151
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1152
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1153
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1154
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1155
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1156
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1157
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1158
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1159
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1160
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1161
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1162
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1163
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1164
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1165
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1166
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1167
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1168
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1169
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1170
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1171
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1172
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1173
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1174
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1175
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1176
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1178
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1179
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1180
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1181
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1182
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1183
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1184
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1186
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1190
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1191
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1192
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1193
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1194
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1195
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1196
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1197
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1198
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1199
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1200
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1201
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1202
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1203
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1204
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1205
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1206
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1207
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1208
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1209
29. Henry Garrett, “Star and Wheel on Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1210
SuperHyperGraph with a Specific Type of Independency of 1211
SuperHyperVertices”, Preprints 2024, , 2024020663 (doi: 1212
10.20944/preprints202402.0663.v1). 1213
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Perfect Domination”, 1215
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10888691). 1216
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel By 1218
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1219
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Bipartite and Counteroffer Path By 1222
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1223
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Multipartite and Counteroffer Cycle 1226
By Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super 1227
Gatherings”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10640905). 1228
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1230
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1231
10.13140/RG.2.2.17389.97769). 1232
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1234
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1235
10.13140/RG.2.2.28685.10727). 1236
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly Resolving Sequence 1238
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1239
10.13140/RG.2.2.24994.20169). 1240
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1242
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529). 1243
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1245
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1248
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1249
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1250
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1252
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1253
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1255
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1256
42. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1257
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1258
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1259
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1261
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1264
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1265
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1266
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1268
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1270
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1272
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1274
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1276
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1278
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1280
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1282
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1284
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1286
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1288
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1289
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1290
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1292
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1293
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1294
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1296
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1298
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1300
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1303
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1306
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1309
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1310
57. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1311
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1312
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1313
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1315
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1316
59. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1317
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1318
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1321
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1322
61. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1323
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1324
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1327
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1328
63. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1329
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1333
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1334
65. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1335
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1336
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1339
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1340
67. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1341
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1342
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1345
69. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1347
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1351
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1352
71. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1353
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1357
73. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1359
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1363
75. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1365
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1366
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1369
77. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1371
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1375
79. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1377
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1381
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1382
81. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1383
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1387
83. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1389
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1393
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1394
85. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1395
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1396
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1397
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1399
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1400
87. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1401
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1402
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1403
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1405
89. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1407
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1408
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1411
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1412
91. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1413
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1415
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1417
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1418
93. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1419
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1420
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1423
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1424
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1425
95. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1426
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1427
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1428
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1429
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1431
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1432
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1434
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1437
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1440
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1443
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1444
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1446
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1449
103. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1451
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1452
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1455
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1458
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1461
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1462
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1464
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1467
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1468
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1470
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1473
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1476
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1479
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1482
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1485
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1486
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1488
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1489
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1491
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1492
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1494
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1497
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1500
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1501
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1503
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1506
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1507
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1508
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1510
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1511
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1513
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1514
124. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1515
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1516
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1519
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1522
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1523
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1525
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1526
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1528
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1531
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1534
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1537
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1540
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1543
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1546
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1549
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1552
137. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1554
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1555
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1556
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1558
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1561
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1562
140. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1563
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1565
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1567
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1570
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1573
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1574
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1576
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1577
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1579
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1580
146. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1581
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1582
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1583
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1585
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1588
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1591
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1592
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1594
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1597
152. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1599
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1601
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1603
154. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1605
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1606
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1609
156. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1611
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1612
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1615
158. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1617
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1619
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1621
160. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1623
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1624
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1627
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1628
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1630
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1633
164. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1635
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1637
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1639
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1640
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1642
167. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1644
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1646
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1648
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1649
169. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1650
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1651
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1652
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1654
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1655
171. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1656
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1657
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1660
173. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1662
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1663
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1666
175. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1668
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1669
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1672
177. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1674
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1676
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1678
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1679
179. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1680
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1681
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1684
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1685
181. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1686
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1687
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1690
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1691
183. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1692
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1693
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1696
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1697
185. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1698
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1699
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1702
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1703
187. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1704
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1705
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1708
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1709
189. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1710
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1711
190. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1713
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1714
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1717
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1718
192. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1719
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1720
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1723
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1724
194. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1725
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1726
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1729
196. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1731
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1732
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1735
198. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1737
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1738
199. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1740
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1741
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1744
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1747
202. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1749
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1750
203. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1752
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1753
204. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1755
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1756
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1757
205. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1758
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1759
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1760
206. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1761
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1762
207. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1764
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1765
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1766
208. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1767
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1768
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1769
209. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1770
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1771
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1772
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1773
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1776
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1777
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1780
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1781
212. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1782
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1784
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1785
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1788
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1789
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1792
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1793
215. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1794
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1795
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1796
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1797
216. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1798
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1799
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1800
217. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1801
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1802
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1803
218. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1804
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1805
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1806
219. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1807
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1808
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1809
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1810
220. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1811
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1812
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1813
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1814
221. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1815
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1816
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1817
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1818
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1819
222. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1820
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1821
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1822
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1823
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1824
223. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1825
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1826
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1827
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1828
224. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1829
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1830
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1831
225. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1832
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1833
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1835
226. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1836
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1837
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1838
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1839
227. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1840
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1841
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1842
228. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1843
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1844
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1845
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1846
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1847
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1848
229. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1849
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1850
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1851
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1852
230. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1853
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1854
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1855
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1856
231. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1857
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1858
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1859
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1860
232. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 1861
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 1862
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 1863
233. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 1864
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 1865
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 1866
234. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1868
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1869
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1870
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1871
235. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 1872
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 1873
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 1874
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 1875
236. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 1876
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 1877
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1878
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 1879
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1881
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1882
238. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1883
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 1884
239. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1886
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 1887
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 1888
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1893
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1897
242. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1898
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1899
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 1900
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 1901
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1904
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1906
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1907
245. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 1908
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1909
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1912
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 1913
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 1915
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 1916
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1919
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 1920
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1922
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 1923
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 1926
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 1927
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1929
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1930
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 1932
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1937
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1938
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 1942
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 1943
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1946
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 1949
257. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1950
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1951
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1952
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1953
258. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1954
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1955
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1956
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 1957
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1960
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1961
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1964
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 1965
261. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 1966
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1967
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 1968
262. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1969
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 1970
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 1971
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 1972
263. Henry Garrett, “Stable Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1973
Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10523307). 1974
264. Henry Garrett, “Resolving Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1975
265. Henry Garrett, “Dominating Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1977
266. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1979
Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8210033). 1980
267. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1981
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 1982
268. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 1983
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 1984
269. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 1985
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8194003). 1986
270. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1987
271. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1989
272. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 1991
273. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1993
274. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1995
275. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 1997
276. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 1999
277. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2001
278. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2003
279. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2005
280. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2007
281. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2009
282. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2011
283. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2013
284. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2015
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 2016
285. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2017
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 2018
286. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2019
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 2020
287. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2021
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 2022
288. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 2024
289. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2025
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 2026
290. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2027
291. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2029
292. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2031
293. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2033
294. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2035
295. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2037
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2038
296. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2039
297. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2041
298. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2043
299. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2045
300. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2047
301. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2049
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2050
302. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2051
303. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2053
304. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2055
305. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2057
306. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2059
307. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2061
308. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2063
309. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2065
310. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2067
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2068
311. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2069
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2070
312. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2071
313. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2073
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2074
314. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2075
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2076
315. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2077
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2078
316. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2079
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2080
317. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2081
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2082
318. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2083
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2084
319. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2085
320. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2087
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2088
321. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2089
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2090
322. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2091
323. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2093
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2094
324. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2095
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2096
325. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2097
326. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2099
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2100
327. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2101
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2102
328. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2103
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2104
329. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2105
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2106
330. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2107
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2108
331. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2109
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2110
332. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2111
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2112
333. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2113
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2114
334. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2115
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2116
335. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2117
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2118
336. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2119
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2120
337. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2121
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2122
338. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2123
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2124
339. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2125
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2126
340. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2127
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2128
341. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2129
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2130
342. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2131
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2132
343. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2133
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2134
344. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2135
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2136
345. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2137
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2138
346. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2139
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2140
347. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2141
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2142
348. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2143
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2144
349. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2145
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2146
350. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2147
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2148
351. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2149
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2150
352. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2151
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2152
353. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2153
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2154
354. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2155
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2156
355. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2157
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2158
356. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2159
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2160
357. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2161
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2162
358. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2163
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2164
359. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2165
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2166
360. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2167
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2168
361. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2169
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2170
362. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2171
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2172
363. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2173
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2174
364. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2175
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2176
365. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2177
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2178
366. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2179
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2180
367. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2181
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2182
368. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2183
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2184
369. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2185
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2186
370. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2187
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2188
371. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2189
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2190
372. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2191
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2192
373. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2193
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2194
374. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2195
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2196
375. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2197
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2198
376. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2199
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2200
377. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2201
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2202
378. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2203
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2204
379. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2205
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2206
380. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2207
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2208
381. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2209
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2210
382. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2211
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2212
383. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2213
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2214
384. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2215
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2216
385. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2217
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2218
386. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2219
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2220
387. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2221
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2222
388. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2223
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2224
389. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2225
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2226
390. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2227
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2228
391. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2229
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2230
392. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2231
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2232
393. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2233
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2234
394. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2235
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2236
395. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2237
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2238
396. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2239
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2240
397. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2241
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2242
398. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2243
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2244
399. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2245
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2246
400. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2247
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2248
401. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2249
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2250
402. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2251
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2252

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path by Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path by Perfect Domination

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · DrHenryGarrett@gmail.

com · Manhattan, NY, USA

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Perfect 3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics · 6

DrHenryGarrett@gmail.com · Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperPerfect Domination). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S be a pair 10

S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then V 0 is 11

called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination if the following expressions, terms and 12

statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect Domination criteria holds. 13

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Perfect Domination and a Neutrosophic Perfect 15

has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass are 17

well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is implemented 18

comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and basic 20

SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and examples, 21

so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to understand 22

between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. “SuperHyperGraph” and 28

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and selected for research on 29

questions and problems. It is useful to define a “neutrosophic” version of Perfect 33

becomes more understandable. In order to master the Neutrosophic Perfect Domination, 35

there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “Perfect Domination mastery”. 36

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 37

hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key points, it is 40

redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values of 41

SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 42

like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Perfect 45

Domination until Perfect Domination, then it is officially called “Perfect Domination”, 48

distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 51

methods based on a dominant Perfect Domination. Because of having Perfect 52

Domination, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of “neutrosophic Perfect 53

Domination” and “neutrosophic Perfect Domination”. SuperHyperVertices and 54

SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this method, the position of 55

tags is used to assign values. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 56

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the desired table exists. And if the 57

desired table exists, a Perfect Domination is redefined to a “Neutrosophic Perfect 58

Domination”. It is useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. 59

Neutrosophic Perfect Domination becomes more understandable. Consider a 61

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the desired table exists, there are a number of 62

Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, 63

SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. 64

”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic 65

SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic 66

SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is 67

SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the number of SuperHyperEdges 68

elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are a number 69

of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a SuperHyperPath if there is only one 70

SuperVertex as an intersection between two given SuperHyperEdges with two 71

exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an intersection between two 72

SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is SuperHyperStar and only one 73

SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. It is SuperHyperBipartite, 74

common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is given as an 77

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form 78

separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one SuperHyperEdge 79

among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a SuperVertex has a 80

SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel suggests specific 81

designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 82

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 83

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 86

Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 87

of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 88

“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 89

the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 96