Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PDF Advancing Equality How Constitutional Rights Can Make A Difference Worldwide Jody Heymann Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Advancing Equality How Constitutional Rights Can Make A Difference Worldwide Jody Heymann Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/change-your-world-how-anyone-
anywhere-can-make-a-difference-1st-edition-john-c-maxwell/
https://textbookfull.com/product/change-your-world-how-anyone-
anywhere-can-make-a-difference-1st-edition-john-c-maxwell-2/
https://textbookfull.com/product/leadership-is-language-how-
small-changes-in-what-you-say-can-make-a-huge-difference-to-your-
teams-results-l-david-marquet/
https://textbookfull.com/product/influence-in-action-how-to-
build-your-conversational-capacity-do-meaningful-work-and-make-a-
powerful-difference-craig-weber/
It's how we play the game: build a business, take a
stand, make a difference First Scribner Hardcover
Edition Dick'S Sporting Goods.
https://textbookfull.com/product/its-how-we-play-the-game-build-
a-business-take-a-stand-make-a-difference-first-scribner-
hardcover-edition-dicks-sporting-goods/
https://textbookfull.com/product/deep-medicine-how-artificial-
intelligence-can-make-healthcare-human-again-first-edition-topol/
https://textbookfull.com/product/constitutional-ethos-liberal-
equality-for-the-common-good-1st-edition-tsesis/
https://textbookfull.com/product/leadership-in-higher-education-
practices-that-make-a-difference-james-m-kouzes/
https://textbookfull.com/product/how-to-make-a-completely-free-
website-1st-edition-nidacademy-ga/
ADVANCING
In a world where attacks on the basic human rights and equal PUBLIC AFFAIRS
ADVANCING EQUALITY
worth of all people are escalating, Advancing Equality reminds us
of the critical role of constitutions in protecting equal rights. An-
EQUALITY
alyzing the constitutions of all 193 United Nations countries, this
book traces fifty years of change in constitution drafting and ex-
amines how stronger protections against discrimination, along-
side core social and economic rights, can transform lives. Looking
across gender, race and ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation and
gender identity, disability, social class, and migration status, the How Constitutional
Rights Can Make
authors reveal whose rights are increasingly guaranteed in con-
stitutions, identify which nations and groups lag behind, and share
inspiring stories of activism and powerful court cases from around
the globe. Advancing Equality serves as a comprehensive call to
action for anyone who cares about their country’s future.
a Difference
“Advancing Equality shows how far we have come around the
Worldwide
world in protecting human rights, but also how far we still have to
Foreword by Dikgang Moseneke,
go. Working together and taking action, we can make sure every-
one’s rights, particularly the most discriminated against and mar-
former Deputy Chief Justice of South Africa
ginalized, are protected in every constitution and enforced by law
and societal change to realize true equality and a better world.”
ANTONIA KIRKLAND, Global Lead, Legal Equality and Access to
28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
To our children and yours
“Recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable
rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of free-
dom, justice and peace in the world.”
—universal declaration of human rights (1948), preamble
C onte nts
Acknowledgments 285
Appendix: Methods 291
Glossary 299
Notes 301
Index 375
Li st of I llustration s
MAPS
xi
xii List of Illustrations
29. Does the constitution explicitly guarantee citizens’ right to free secondary
education? 214
30. Does the constitution explicitly guarantee citizens’ right to free higher
education? 214
31. Does the constitution explicitly guarantee equal opportunities or
nondiscrimination in education? 217
32. Does the constitution explicitly provide for compulsory education? 218
33. Does the constitution explicitly guarantee an approach to the right to
health? 232
34. Does the constitution explicitly guarantee citizens’ right to public health? 233
35. Does the constitution explicitly guarantee citizens’ right to a healthy
environment? 234
36. Does the constitution explicitly guarantee citizens’ right to medical
care? 235
F IG U R E S
TA B L E S
In great part the history of humanity has been about wars for scarce resources and
kindred struggles for human freedom and equality within societies. Most domes-
tic struggles were no more than peaceful protests and demands, whilst others
were civil wars, violent revolts, or bloody revolutions. Even so, after millennia the
world remains a place of startling contrasts and unevenness of a wide variety both
within and between countries of the world. The material and social divide between
the Global North and Global South requires no further description. Much of the
economic contrast and relative underdevelopment is attributable to a prolonged
colonial and imperialist project. Within countries too, inequality and exclusion on
the grounds of race, gender, religion, disability, sexual orientation, migration, and
above all class or socioeconomic status is prevalent.
The vexed question that Advancing Equality must and does ask is: Has the
advent of constitutionalism, particularly since the 1948 Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, made the world a better place to live? Are the markers of exclusion
and discrimination like gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, and socioeco-
nomic status and disability any more mitigated than before many of the constitu-
tions of the world proclaimed fundamental rights and freedoms due to everyone?
South Africa’s 1996 constitution—which enshrined both comprehensive protec-
tions against discrimination and a wide range of social and economic rights—offers
insights. It was Arthur Chaskalson, the first President of the Constitutional Court
and later the Chief Justice of post-apartheid South Africa, who warned against the
effusive optimism that our brand-new aspirational democratic constitution would
firmly shut the door on the inhumanity and toxic inequality of our apartheid past.
Chaskalson was counseling against my more youthful revolutionary zeal, that the
xv
xvi Foreword
constitution and other related new law could and must be harnessed to erase the
past and immediately install equality and justice. It is indeed so that we may not
hang all our quests for advancing equality in the world on one peg. Some deep
causes of inequality are embedded in history or are structural or systemic. The
inequality may well be the product of inflexible power relations within a soci-
ety that would rather increase than arrest, say, racial or gender or socioeconomic
inequality. At the same time, strong constitutional protections can provide a foun-
dation for addressing many of inequality’s core contributors.
Advancing Equality does not stumble into the pitfall of arguing constitutions
are the sole solutions but rather demonstrates the powerful role they can play in
addressing inequality. This remarkable evidence-based study readily identifies the
important uses of written constitutions around the world. Expectedly some con-
stitutions are older and sparse or at best only implicit in recognizing the equal
worth of all people. Other constitutions are newer and more open in their com-
mitment to secure the equal worth of human beings. These constitutions have
drawn from global notions of human decency that have firmed up into interna-
tional humanitarian law.
This work reminds us that the achievement of equality in any society or in the
world is a work in progress and certainly not an event. To that end a domestic con-
stitution is a covenant between the people and their state. It serves as a minimum
set of protections below which no state or its people may drop. It is a preexisting
and collective agreement by all within a society that certain safeguards and entitle-
ments may not be violated, and that if they were to be limited in their scope of
protection it would be by a law of general application which must be reasonable,
the least invasive and justifiable in order to achieve one or other public purpose.
Put more simply, a protection or right may not be taken away arbitrarily, and if its
enjoyment is reduced, the curtailment of it must be clearly justified.
Constitutions and other laws have an important aspirational role. This is par-
ticularly so in post-conflict societies. The aftermath of a social upheaval or a war
presents the real possibility of revisiting myriad entrenched power relations in a
society. Constitutions of that kind are not written to record the existing societal
patterns and arrangements but rather to end or to alter them radically and lift the
nation’s eyes toward renewal. The inequalities of the past cannot in theory escape
full scrutiny and radical adaptation. This explains in great part the replete and
explicit constitutional guarantees against historical and irrational exclusions and
prejudices. Newer constitutions tend to place fundamental rights and freedoms at
the center of their democratic governance and social enterprise. Then the obses-
sion is rightly to alter society irreversibly.
Clearly not all constitutions bear the same backdrop or mission. Oth-
ers merely record preexisting arrangements and conventions. What matters is
whether on a proper reading the constitutions of that kind provide sufficient
prescripts that embrace the democratic enterprise of an open and just society
Foreword xvii
that cares for all human beings and their equal worth and opportunity to realize
their full potential.
Advancing Equality reminds us with remarkable clarity, chapter after chapter, of
the historic and persisting inequality in the world, and the critical need to address
its causes and consequences. The book opens with the history of entrenched
legal inequality predicated on race and ethnicity. Discrimination of this kind and
indeed of any kind stubbornly persists long after its formal end and leaves its vic-
tims with deep scars and social disability. Long and calculated impoverishment
of people on account of race and ethnicity is likely to leave them hurt, broken,
undervalued, and poor.
Astute constitutional change should acknowledge such a horrific past and pro-
vide for appropriate relief such as reparation, restitution, and other remedial inter-
ventions. Constitutional protections for core social and economic rights can also
accelerate progress: quality, useful, and accessible education and training comes to
mind as the single most potent catalyst toward equality and self-worth and escape
from poverty. Much the same must be said about the right of access to health care.
Study after study has shown that ill health is closely allied to inadequate education
and challenged socioeconomic conditions. Lack of adequate access to healthcare
can only deepen and reinforce poverty and inequality. Advancing Equality power-
fully addresses each of these in turn.
Advancing Equality correctly points to the foundational nature of gender equal-
ity. It is indeed so that addressing gender is a core, if not the most vital, com-
ponent of equalizing society. This work reminds us of the profound impacts of
gender inequality that stem from a simple observation: that the largest group
facing inequalities in the world are women and girls, a group that has histori-
cally been denied the right to vote, and continues in some settings to be excluded
from workplaces and schools, facing frequent violence, and in many countries is
still prevented from full participation in the economy. We are all the poorer for
it. What is more, gender inequality tends to be intersectional because it is rein-
forced by other exclusion grounds such as race, pregnancy, marital status, and cul-
tural or religious exclusions. This means in most societies women have to endure
multiple jeopardies.
This systematic exclusion of half the global population is intolerable and must
stop. Most world constitutions say so and yet so much more has to be done in
the ordinary lives of most women and girls. Most men worldwide are indeed the
biggest culprits in demeaning the equal dignity and respect women and girls are
plainly entitled to. Strong and effective legislation must be used to combat patriar-
chy and push back against toxic masculinity.
It is indeed instructive to learn from this work that in 1991 there were 100 mil-
lion migrants worldwide, and by 2017 that number had increased to nearly 258
million migrants. It is plain, despite the narrow, homegrown chauvinism and
nationalism rearing its head around the world, that we may not talk about human
xviii Foreword
dignity and equal worth of all people to the exclusion of the world’s migrants. In
smaller oases of democracy and constitutionalism such as where I come from,
there is a considerable inflow of migrants from diverse parts of the world. Ours
was a long struggle to restore inclusion and advance equal worth of all and yet
there are occasional outbursts against or hatred of migrants. Migrants are some-
times viewed as unwelcome competitors for scarce resources. Even so, world con-
stitutions and progressive world activists must remain steadfast in recognizing
the inevitability, value, and human dignity of migrants and extending them equal
protection under the law.
I welcome the affirmation of the need for explicit protection of sexual and gen-
der minorities, including those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgen-
der. I agree entirely that “achieving equality for the LGBT+ community is no less
urgent and no less fundamental.” Constitutional guarantees of fundamental rights
regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity are rightful human dignity
and equality claims that are worthy of assertion and protection. In South Africa we
did the right thing. In our supreme law we prohibited unjustified discrimination
on the ground of sexual orientation as a legitimate part of our equality protection.
Our courts rightly enforced these protections and construed them to embrace
same-sex marital unions. A variety of courts and law-making chambers around
the world are properly, albeit slowly, recognizing equal rights on the basis of sexual
orientation and gender identity as worthy of protection.
As I conclude I make a few observations about class inequality. Arguably this
is the most vexed and contested part of the equality discourse. This work opts for
the tag socioeconomic status (SES), which it defines as “an individual’s social and
economic position relative to others. Income and wealth, educational attainment,
occupation, and inherited statuses are all aspects of SES. Like disability status, SES
can be lifelong, and it can change over the life course. National economic troubles
can push increasing numbers into poverty.”
Of course, one’s class is an aggregate of the identified attributes. Clearly, some
attributes are within the grasp and control of the individual. They can be ame-
liorated by personal agency, which may enhance the opportunities of access to
quality education, training, and experience. The rest of the attributes of SES are
embedded in a history of past privilege such as inherited status and wealth, which
often is an outcome of prolonged accumulation. The national economy too is usu-
ally beyond the individual’s influence and is a function of the development and
ownership of the means of production peculiar to that economy.
All of these intricacies tend to pose the difficult question: When, for historical
and other structural reasons, socioeconomic inequality persists within a national
economy, can equality promises in a constitution and other laws help bridge the
gap? Several radical scholars think not. They argue that only fundamental eco-
nomic changes may reduce socioeconomic inequality.
Foreword xix
Over the past several years, grave threats to equal rights, both new and long-
standing, have come into sharp relief. Against the backdrop of persisting gaps in
women’s representation in government and equal participation in the economy, a
global movement has exposed the prevalence of sexual harassment in our work-
places, schools, streets, and even legislatures. Violence and natural disasters have
created unprecedented numbers of refugees, who face not only significant barriers
to accessing jobs and education upon resettling in new countries, but also discrim-
ination due to their race/ethnicity, religion, and national origin. Meanwhile, in a
range of countries, extremist movements and politicians have capitalized on the
public’s fears, insecurities, and misperceptions to call for the expulsion of immi-
grants and ethnic, racial, and religious minorities, using dehumanizing rhetoric
hearkening back to the rise of the Nazis.
At the same time, the beginning of the twenty-first century has witnessed the
culmination of decades of dramatic progress in addressing many of the great-
est barriers to equality—from discriminatory laws to the inaccessibility of basic
services and institutions. Just in the two years prior to this writing, 65 countries
reformed laws that limited women’s ability to participate and succeed in the
economy, building on hundreds of reforms adopted since the 1960s.1 Globally,
the number of people living in extreme poverty fell by half between 1990 and
2015, while that of people accessing basic education rose by over 40 million.2
1
2 Urgency of Advancing Equality
C HA N G E S I N L E G A L R IG H T S I N O U R L I F E T I M E
Over the past 60 years, countries around the world have witnessed revolutions
in equal rights. In the United States and South Africa, the overdue demise of Jim
Crow and apartheid, two legal regimes premised on racial hierarchy, inaugurated a
new era for equality and civil rights. In the Middle East and North Africa, women’s
rights movements have made steady gains over the past decade for gender equality
in the law, including with respect to violence, freedom of movement, and the right
to participate in politics;3 similar regional and national movements dating back
to the nineteenth century have brought a wave of social, economic, and political
“firsts” for women around the world. Across low- and middle-income countries,
the right to education has flourished, as governments have increasingly eliminated
tuition fees that once put public school out of reach for girls and students from
poor families. And across every region, countries have begun recognizing equal
human rights regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity.
This progress is remarkable and worth celebrating. Yet we know that exclusion
persists, and that countless daily experiences of discrimination and bias contribute
to devastating disparities in education, health, and work.
T H E D IG N I T Y O F EV E RY H UM A N B E I N G
In recent years, the troubling and vocal resurgence of overt discrimination has
called into question whether equality truly is a shared value. As hate rallies and
ethnic, racial, and religious slurs have dominated the headlines, it is reasonable
to wonder whether there was ever genuine consensus about our universal dignity
and humanity.
Numerous historical examples show how perceived physical or economic vul-
nerability—whether based in evidence or stoked by opportunistic leaders and pol-
iticians—can inspire distrust, division, and, in the worst cases, gross human rights
abuses. In some countries, these conditions have resulted in atrocities committed
by governments; other countries have endured sharp escalations in interpersonal
hostilities and violence.
Urgency of Advancing Equality 3
While we must recognize these dynamics and dangers, we must also firmly
reject the idea that hateful views are representative in any of our countries. The
data convincingly tell us otherwise. The World Values Survey asks people about
their core beliefs in the privacy of their homes in over 100 countries, representing
90% of the global population. These surveys reveal that the view that every human
being deserves dignity is both widespread and not unique to any country. For
example, when asked which qualities it was especially important for children to
learn at home, 86% of respondents in Australia, 86% in Colombia, 89% in India,
and 80% in Libya indicated “tolerance and respect for other people.”4
One critical development over the past 75 years has been the formalization of
these values in international treaties and agreements. In 1948, the newly formed
United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR),
which unequivocally affirmed that “[a]ll human beings are born free and equal
in dignity and rights,” and prohibited discrimination on the basis of “race, colour,
sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, prop-
erty, birth or other status.” The UDHR also guaranteed the rights to education,
health, and a wide range of other social, economic, civil, and political rights. In
1966, the U.N. built on these commitments with two additional treaties, the Inter-
national Covenant on Civil and Political Rights5 and the International Covenant
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.6 Together, these three instruments are
known as the “International Bill of Rights.”
Additionally, throughout the decades, the U.N. has adopted treaties specifically
and comprehensively addressing the equal rights of historically marginalized or
vulnerable groups, including refugees,7 racial/ethnic minorities,8 women,9 chil-
dren,10 migrant workers and their families,11 and people with disabilities.12
These international commitments have had important normative impacts, and
many have been widely or nearly universally ratified. Even more recently, in 2015,
all 193 U.N. countries adopted the Sustainable Development Goals, pledging to
end poverty, reduce inequality, ensure access to healthcare and education, and
achieve a range of other human rights objectives by 2030.13 The question, then, is
not whether human dignity and equality are overarching, widely shared values—
but whether these values and commitments have been translated into enforceable
national rights.
W H Y C O N S T I T U T IO N S
In many ways, constitutions provide ideal vehicles for doing so. As we explore
throughout this book, constitutions’ pathways to impact vary across countries
with different legal traditions, levels of civil society engagement, and avenues to
justice. At the same time, constitutions provide the foundation of almost every
nation’s legal system, and many of their core functions are largely consistent
across countries.
4 Urgency of Advancing Equality
A Statement of Values
To start, constitutions both express values and embody contracts between govern-
ments and their people to realize those values. Through the principles it protects,
a constitution can importantly shape national discourse, in turn influencing social
norms. New constitutions can also serve to inaugurate a new era for equal rights
that sharply diverges from the past. For example, upon signing South Africa’s post-
apartheid constitution in 1996, President Nelson Mandela remarked: “In centu-
ries of struggle against racial domination, South Africans of all colours and back-
grounds proclaimed freedom and justice as their unquenchable aspiration. They
pledged loyalty to a country which belongs to all who live in it. . . . Out of such
experience was born the understanding that there could be no lasting peace, no
lasting security, no prosperity in this land unless all enjoyed freedom and justice
as equals.”14
Through a new constitution grounded in principles including equality, diver-
sity, freedom, and reconciliation, South Africa created a new statement of values
to guide its transition into democracy.
For example, for decades, the United States has had excellent laws ensuring that
children with disabilities have equal access to quality education, and that adults with
disabilities can contribute fully at work. However, the U.S. Constitution has no foun-
dational guarantee of equal rights for people with disabilities—and strong as they
are, these laws would be far easier to dismantle or outright repeal than a constitu-
tional protection against discrimination. This vulnerability has intensified under the
Donald Trump administration, which has targeted both laws. In the absence of a
stronger constitutional foundation for equal rights on the basis of disability in work
and education, these attacks threaten to unravel the gains of the past three decades.
The same potential for retrenchment exists in the courts. When rights are
not clearly protected in the constitutional text, a court’s interpretations of who
deserves equal treatment may expand and contract over time, especially as the
court’s composition evolves. Similarly, even when courts rule in favor of equality,
the legislature may enact discriminatory laws in response, unless the constitution
prevents them from doing so.
For example, in Bermuda, the Supreme Court’s landmark 2017 decision legal-
izing same-sex marriage came under threat when Parliament passed a law the fol-
lowing year banning same-sex marriage—making Bermuda the first country to
grant and then revoke equal marriage rights. Like most countries, Bermuda has
yet to specifically prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in its
constitution. However, the Court applied another constitutional right—freedom
of religion—to overturn the discriminatory law, which the justices deemed an
imposition of specific religious views.17 Yet as this book will explore, such favor-
able outcomes are far from guaranteed when constitutions are ambiguous about
whose equal rights are recognized.
D O OU R C O N S T I T U T IO N S VA LU E EV E RY P E R S O N ?