[CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TEMPORARILY DECLASSIFIED - CIA - INTERPOL]

Date of Publication: 05/08/2024 (Refined on 05/09/2024 with the first draft removed from
Scribd.com)

Sole Author: Shawn Dexter John

Legal and Political Tenets of the Principle of Legal Preclusion, that which does not offend the
logic of nation-State or fundamental Private Rights

Note of Relation:

(1) The sons and daughters of White, Hispanic, Asian, and Black agents and officers
involved and made in association with Judgements of the United Nations (UN) and other
international and tribunal forums protecting the freedom and intellectual property rights of
Shawn Dexter John did attempt to claim the intellectual Works of Shawn Dexter John
(myself), including all Work Papers and Work Reports alongside the legal article title
[Americana] The New Societies - Concepts and [Political] Apperceptions of an Eastern
Caribbean model of Commonality, over 370 Works thus far

—------------------------------------------------------------

The Legal and Political Tenets of relation are as follows:

(1) The laws of the United States federal system, Constitution and statutes, per their legal
interpretation, ought to be superior to all lower laws, that only referencing localities within
the jurisdiction of the United States including territories; there shall be no instance of any
superseding effect imposed by any lower constitutional provision or protection (or
statute) of any instance,
(2) Supranational laws, when a federal or confederal system is imposed on its behalf and in
direct correlation, shall supersede the laws of the respective treaty contractee, all nation
and territory parties, on matters of relevance as preliminary to bonafide and political or
legislative Union and as irrevocably mandated and superior in accordance to political
and legislative Union,
(3) The right to trans-constitutionalism does not instruct any forum or other space of power
or influence the right to accord with lower laws toward any imposition onto any political
state, whether nation-state, regional, continental, or global, which would negate,
depreciate, supersede, or preclude the respective constitutional laws of relevance; only
 argumentation as complementary (or complemental) to the relevant constitutional law(s)
of the respective political State may help effect a legal imposition, whether by affirmation
or negation of the counter argument at issue,
(4) Already conventional to American law and treaty customs, there ought to be no legal
right, privilege, or freedom of any person or entity which shall serve to provide any
indemnity or immunity against the power, effect, intent, or constraint imposed or
enunciated by law, whether constitutional or statute based (as there is no inference to
any illicit activity or ambiguity in using the term statute or statutory as opposed to
constitutional code or bill),
(5) There shall be no privilege of any Union to negate the petition of any legislature to
review the credibility, authenticity, and/or competence of any officer or official responsible
in deciding the transcript, refined draft, or interpretation of law at any level and vice
versa,
(6) There shall be no private contract or contract with Government which presents any
government or private contractor as superior to the condition of protected humanity,
ethics, and human development as our innate goal and purpose as a species of social
intelligence, political understanding, and intellectual curiosity,
(7) Civil Society, via prudent and intellectual organization(s) or via popular, less popular, or
less organized multitude(s), may not create any legal forum, as is the situation of
arbitration forums and such in addressing matters niche or contractual in nature, which
supersede the corresponding judicature(s) and/or legislature(s) at issue, of the
respective level of jurisdiction and Superintendence (or that which is nominally superior),
(8) Communism and authoritarianism shall never be implied as being of this particular
protection as an inference, expression, or plausible articulation of Government, and
(9) In referencing all concepts to be adopted worldwide, there ought to be no promotion of
any contrasting constitutional framework for introducing, incorporating, and making
permanent integration models toward global integration in relating to astute activities (or
activism).

CIA-INTERPOL Partnership File Number: 172CINQWUNR1