Title: The Abolition of Capital Punishment (globally), a revised and fundamental policy of the

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and INTERPOL

[Sole] Author: Shawn Dexter John, Master of Arts

Universities of Affiliation: Howard University (Washington, DC) and Saint Thomas University
College of Law (Miami Gardens, FL)

Sole Location of the Author's [Agency] Employment: Florida, United States

Indefinite stature: author not under legal/audit inquiry or penalty (with none required by law or
employment)

Date of Updated Re-transcription: 10/28/2023

Central Intelligence Agency (Work Paper)

_______________________________________

There ought to be no condition of government restraint, custody, or address which

communicates cruelty or which communicates a lack of adjustment to the doctrine most
commendable for leading a humanist planet into the future, a future which we are conditioning
to reflect logic in association with evolution, [inherent] lineal progress, and the indoctrination of
human development as a fundamental concentration of every international authority sanctioned
as being of clout, affluence, or permanence. I suppose no delay in communicating that one of
the tenets of this doctrine is the eventual manifestation of the abolishment of the death penalty
(capital punishment) throughout the Americas and, with additional time, the globe as a
constituted State of sorts operated by the United Nations (the UN contemporarily and as the
World Government upon the UN's anticipated reform in half a century).

I will explain the argumentation template for governing this change in legal and jurisprudential
logic, applicable within domestic and supranational constructs alike in their representation of the
philosophical and scientific maturity of citizens and jurists respectively. I provide that the
following, as with every other work paper authored and published by me, whatever the word
count, isn't minimalistic in communicating legal and doctrinal policy for implementation wherever
our relations take us as an Agency versed in staunch internationalism (via partnership terms,
where demanded) and reflects the terms to be enacted when the abolition is ratified in a
respective State or adherent dependency:

(1) No local, municipal, provincial, territorial, federal/national, hybrid, or supranational

authority should interpret statute(s) abolishing the death penalty in the respective
jurisdiction as being illusory, only circumstantially applicable, up for vague or obscure
interpretation(s), or not constitutional to [coherent] human society operated under the
accord of civilization,
(2) No local, municipal, provincial, territorial, federal/national, hybrid, or supranational
authority should allow any condition allowing or supporting the immunization of any
individual or authority for not recognizing (1) fully and (2) via standard interpretation
guaranteeing government and subject's refrainment from performing the conduct of
inducing or guiding the anatomical/medical death of an identified human individual
placed under penal/identified conditions (per instance of judicial process),
(3) There shall be no government movement or allowed popular/factional movement which
threatens the life or physical/mental integrity of any individual in support of (or not in
support of) enacting or removing provision(s) addressing the abolishment of the death
penalty (capital punishment in American vernacular),
(4) There shall be no law, rule, opinion, expression, or policy, whether deemed natural,
constitutional, statutory, codified or uncodified, popular, or implied, which supports the
judicial or legal imposition of death where the abolishment of the death penalty is
enacted via due procedures prescribed to the corresponding legislature, whether
working under common or treaty-making mode; regardless, no actor shall arbitrarily or
unfairly impose death onto any individual, whether via conveyed instructions or direct
conduct,
(5) There shall be no law, rule, expression, opinion, or policy, whether deemed natural,
constitutional, statutory, codified, uncodified, popular, or implied, which supports the
imposition of condition(s) barred by law, meaning law enacted via due procedures
prescribed to the corresponding legislature, whether working under regular or
treaty-making mode,
(6) There shall be no culture or community, deemed superior, native, fundamental,
architectural, or influential in a society as perceived by any authority or subject, which
shall decide the law(s) of the respective political jurisdiction, meaning decided outside
the sanctioned and procedural work of duly enacted representatives sent to the
respective legislature for duly passing law,
(7) The duties and powers of elected (or appointed) executives and other officials,
independently or collectively applied, shall not oppose the provision(s) of law and shall
not serve to disavow the power of legislature(s) to solely enact corresponding law with
the exception of situational and constitutional referendum which may not deny the full
effect and active stature of constitutional law; this provision protects the enactment of
law abolishing the death penalty (or protecting the liberty of unimpeded life),
(8) Tribal reservations and reserves and such special political conditions, as well as local,
municipal, provincial, territorial, hybrid, and such jurisdictions, shall not serve to deny,
refrain from acknowledging, or hide the enactment and applicable active stature of
higher laws, including federal and supranational laws; this provision shall equally protect
all active laws including the abolishment of capital punishment (the death penalty) where
enacted, and
(9) There shall be no absence of jurisdiction anywhere, here on Earth or in Space, which
shall allow any party to assent to opinion(s), rule(s), policie(s), or such which would allow
any party to remove the life of any individual when not in the commission of necessary,
genuine, and reflective defense of self and/or immediate other(s) or to breach the human
 right(s) of any individual, right(s) deemed fundamental in accordance with the charter
and humanist resolutions of the General Assembly of the United Nations (UNGA).

Addendum to the above:

*(10) There shall be no actor, mechanism, party, or subject of any private or public authority (or
governance structure) or concept which shall secretly decide the constitutional or supreme
law(s) of any conventional community, neighborhood, household, hybrid community, territory,
province, State, or continental Union, and
*(11) The argument opposing the death penalty is scientifically supported by the legal principles
barring cruel and unusual punishment, cruel and [egregiously] ostentatious punishment, or
unparallel cruelty.
—-------------------------

*The language of the tenets of Agency policy authored and published by me do not suggest or
communicate that I would only reside in jurisdictions already in application of the legal policies
communicated (and directive law[s] protecting them) or that I would breach current law(s) not
yet supporting a respective policy communicated (or conditioned by it). However, I should note
that my home state and active residential state is Florida (within the United States) and that I will
remain a free resident and citizen of the United States of America indefinitely with no plan of
altering this intended condition.
*These comprehensive policies, meaning those authored and published by me, are conditioned
for perpetual applicability.
*These comprehensive policies, meaning those authored and published by me, are not of
religious origins though related principles are often preached within religious communities of an
ethical persuasion.
*I assure you that I do not serve as an authentic pariah within any community in general or in
communicating these policies and my other literary works published.
_______________________________________

Name of [Work Paper] Series Author: Shawn John

Highest Level of Degree Earned: Master of Arts
Institution Issuing Degree: Howard University
Degree being prepared: Juris Doctorate (J.D)
Preparing New Degree: Yale School of Law
Position Being Prepared: [Inaugural] President of Yale Law Journal
Agency of Contracting: Central Intelligence Agency
Institution of Agency Affiliation: Howard University
New Agency Identity Being Assumed: Khaled Hassan
Agency Position: Chief Manager of the CIA and INTERPOL
Last four digits of [U.S.] Social Security Number: 6640
Religion of Shawn Dexter John: Roman Catholicism (Christianity)
Purpose of Publication: Public Briefing
Race/ethnicity: Black/African-American of Caribbean heritage
Citizenship and Nationality: the United States of America (USA)
Sole country of Residence and Location: the United States of America (USA)
Country of Allegiance and Loyalty: the United States of America (USA)
Language of Direct Communication: American English

Sole author of Communicated Re-transcriptions: Shawn Dexter John (also identified as Shawn
John or Shawn D. John)
Sole conceptualist and author of all original, re-transcribed, and revised publications of relation:
Shawn Dexter John (also identified as Shawn John or Shawn D. John)
Sole transcriber and typist of all published literary works presented as authored by Shawn
Dexter John: Shawn Dexter John (also identified as Shawn John or Shawn D. John)

Re-incorporating and Revised Organization: ARSI International Research Policy Institute

President: Shawn Dexter John (also known as "Khaled Hassan" for lawful Agency purposes)

Nature of the Series of Publications: Non-fictional

Professional blog-site hosting the [series] publications: www.shawndexterjohn.wordpress.com