Real estate properties of Shawn Dexter John in the Dutch constituent-country of Aruba were

sold over a decade ago by Shawn Dexter John's preceding estate planner before his
assumption of the related duties for serving as the sole planner and representative of his
financial trust. The related transactions have helped with securing his trust, bank, and
assets/bonds accounts assessed as worth and reflecting $10,000,000 United States dollars
(USD), all secured by terms corresponsive, all non-criminal in protector terms and effect, and all
exclusively accessible by Shawn Dexter John in perpetuum. The purported debt of almost
$300,000 in student loans was honestly representative of an Agency budget designated solely
(for Shawn Dexter John) for professional and training purposes and for being assumed by the
Central Intelligence Agency for immediate payment without any declaration of debt or
bankruptcy and for serving as evidence to the negligence of conspirators and complicit
associates related to intelligence and bigoted sabotage.

The New Societies version published as a book with iUniverse was simply a covert and humble
sketch, published in that manner to provide a template to government affiliates working across
distance preceding its expected completion at a then later date. Tampering might have
devalued the book sketch extensively but the model and intent were communicated well
preceding the publication of the [completed] edited version, meaning the legal article of the
same namesake, and the sting operation of relation (as detailed and designed by Shawn Dexter
John) made successful. The completed version consists of 205 pages including the cover page.
(The edited version is presented as a bonafide legal article.)

—————-

Author: Shawn Dexter John

My highest level of attained university academic degree: Master of Arts in History (along with a
Graduate Certificate in International Studies) from Howard University in Washington, District of
Columbia, the United States of America.

Lower level of attained university academic degree: Bachelor of Arts in History (along with a
minor in Economics) from Howard University in Washington, District of Columbia, the United
States of America.

——————————-

Article Ten of the Universal Declaration provides that every individual defendant deserves a fair
and public hearing administered by an independent and impartial court concerning the
determination of the defendant’s interests or obligations in civil cases, concerning the
determination of the defendant’s guilt or innocence in criminal trials. Tribunals should recognize
the [pertinent] fundamental rights of addressed defendants and should be obligated to perform
the communication of those rights to all corresponding parties involved in determining civil or
criminal liability. Judges and juries are asked to treat all heard parties fairly, to provide no bias in
forming the official decisions of the courts.

(The independence of courts means that no other government organ, external official, or
[non-jury] private party should provide or help provide the decisions of the courts. Modern
domestic courts function as autonomous government entities.)

Note(s):

Fundamental rights which are typically communicated to the jury include the defendant’s right to
not testify or to remain silent without being presumed guilty, the defendant’s right to be
presumed innocent preceding the formal court’s decision providing otherwise, the defendant’s
right to be assessed only under the precise criminal code at issue, the defendant’s right to the
reasonable doubt standard, and the defendant’s right to be protected against bias arising from
the fact that he or she has been arrested, charged, or accused. (These rights, within this note,
are associated with criminal cases in the United States.)

Sentencing procedures ought to result in reasonable, fair, and humane conditions. Constructed
procedures ought to be openly standardized, extensively codified, and continuously studied by
legal officials for re-vetting those procedures to meet the ethical demands of growing modernism
and refined social contracting with the respective community, a construct which ought to abide
to the uniform moral calculations of the larger global society. Our global society depends on the
work of expert practitioners who are versed in jurisprudential studies and who are also
completely immersed in the social discourses of civil society and the common man, skilled
practitioners who must be permitted to communicate their findings to provincial societies without
reservation or any awful precondition. Sentencing procedures are as important as our statutory
laws regarding the rigors they demand in their own respective formulations. (Legal institution[s]
should not be inhibited by instance[s] of lackluster social or cultural movement on important
human issue[s] found in any significant sector of our global society. Yes, the great majority of
nations have steadfastly adopted most of the fundamental rights advocated by civil society.) (It
is safe to reference international legal studies and institutions in formulating laws, policies, and
procedures, constructs generally associated with comforting the ethical findings of civil society
[i.e. the United Nations, the African Union etc]. Today, we are becoming systematically
acquainted with the uniform findings of global institutions, studying and citing their outputs
enthusiastically, sometimes adopting their codified forms. Subnote: my usage of “global society”
refers to nation-states which have adapted to the global system as committed members of the
United Nations, nations which are generally forward-thinking.)

Notes:

(1) Fundamental rights which are typically communicated to the jury include the defendant’s
right to not testify or to remain silent without being presumed guilty, the defendant’s right
to be presumed innocent preceding the formal court’s decision providing otherwise, the
defendant’s right to be assessed only under the precise criminal code at issue, the
 defendant’s right to the reasonable doubt standard, and the defendant’s right to be
protected against bias arising from the fact that he or she has been arrested, charged, or
accused. (These rights, within this note, are associated with criminal cases in the United
States.)

(2) Sentencing procedures ought to result in reasonable, fair, and humane conditions.
Constructed procedures ought to be openly standardized, extensively codified, and
continuously studied by legal officials for re-vetting those procedures to meet the ethical
demands of growing modernism and refined social contracting with the respective
community, a construct which ought to abide to the uniform moral calculations of the
larger global society. Our global society depends on the work of expert practitioners who
are versed in jurisprudential studies and who are also completely immersed in the social
discourses of civil society and the common man, skilled practitioners who must be
permitted to communicate their findings to provincial societies without reservation or any
awful precondition. Sentencing procedures are as important as our statutory laws
regarding the rigors they demand in their own respective formulations. (Legal
institution[s] should not be inhibited by instance[s] of lackluster social or cultural
movement on important human issue[s] found in any significant sector of our global
society. Yes, the great majority of nations have steadfastly adopted most of the
fundamental rights advocated by civil society.) (It is safe to reference international legal
studies and institutions in formulating laws, policies, and procedures, constructs
generally associated with comforting the ethical findings of civil society [i.e. the United
Nations, the African Union etc]. Today, we are becoming systematically acquainted with
the uniform findings of global institutions, studying and citing their outputs
enthusiastically, sometimes adopting their codified forms. Subnote: my usage of “global
society” refers to nation-states which have adapted to the global system as committed
members of the United Nations, nations which are generally forward-thinking.)

——————————-

My contact information for potential contracting agents and operative entities (including
professional fellowships and United States federal or state government offices):
carindian1@gmail.com or shawndexterjohn@yahoo.com.