Menu

Legal and Political Writings and [Audit, Documental,

Free-masonic, and Removal of Cover
Declassification alongside the Declassification of
CIA and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints and Jesuit coverted partnership] Reports
presented by the respective author Shawn Dexter
John, the sole author of all presented publications
on this professional blog (website), now the joint
Harvard Law Review and Yale Law Journal [writing,
editorship, and executive management] competition
Winner
The following works were written, typed, published, and edited solely by Shawn Dexter John, also known by his operative
alias Khaled Hassan, the sole author of the published book sketch "The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an
Eastern Caribbean model of Commonality" (published with iUniverse); where not expressly stated as an excerpt or a
promotion, the presented [conventional] intellectual/intelligence Work Papers, political commentary Work Papers, and
related notes) are essentially completed [whole] drafts of related but independent material. All rights to the presented
material are held solely by Shawn Dexter John; the works are reserved for use by Shawn Dexter John solely. There is no
plagiarized content in The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean model of Commonality
and there is no plagiarized content in the following material; there is no lack of [necessary] citation; none of the works is of
a deceitful nature. The contents of the following material of presentation have not been and are not products of any non-
Agency assigned work from any university, employer, or any other entity, or any person; it should also be noted that The
New Societies was not the result of any such assignment(s) or task(s). No person or entity has directed or forced the
author into the presentation of the following material. Shawn Dexter John isn't contractually employed (and has never been
contractually employed) by any foreign government or system of related Caribbean governance. Also, he is not a licensed
attorney (yet), law professor (yet), instructor, college professor (yet), or a current law student. He is not and was never
compensated for the development of the following works. The author has taken and completed United States accredited
doctoral courses, which are inclusive of American Bar Association (ABA) accredited law courses. The level and the quality
of the following works are intended for a graduate-level (doctoral and post-doctoral) university audience and the related
professional community. The following are not meant to perpetuate any racial or ethnic agenda and are not of any
professional or other recruitment ideology; the following are primarily scholarly and Central Intelligence Agency related. The
primary law school of his legal education was St. Thomas University School of Law – Miami Gardens. The author is an
official, undisputed, and authentic citizen of the United States of America (USA). (Importantly, the author's partial education
at Southern University and A&M College, as a doctoral student in Public Policy [at the Nelson Mandela School of Public
Policy and Urban Affairs], served well in writing significant parts of the overall material. Both degrees awarded to the author
were received from Howard University, however.) (The author did complete a course-required research [unpaid] internship
with the Embassy of the Commonwealth of Dominica over a short period of time. The author's brief employment with USA
for UNHCR, as a paid fundraiser, never required or initiated the development of any presented material). The majority of the
following works have been written on personal computers (on private laptops of Shawn Dexter John by Shawn Dexter John
[solely] and, at times, on library desktops and/or on a personal and exclusionarily owned smartphone by Shawn Dexter
John [solely]). The author is sincere and honest in his postulation. *Shawn Dexter John isn't in representation of any other
individual as a cover – there is no other operative recognized as Khaled Hassan in the United States.*

Commentary Forty: Article Twenty-one of the Universal

Declaration and access to government
———————-

I, Shawn Dexter John, am the only individual editing the manuscript (aside being the sole author).

I will provide any update to the [edited and completed] manuscript, if any: [EDITED AND
COMPLETED] The New Societies – Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean model of
Commonality.
The version published as a book was simply a covert and humble sketch, published in that manner to
provide a template to government affiliates working across distance preceding its expected completion
at a then later date (corresponding with me editing work today) – quite a humble act. Tampering might
have devalued the book material but the model and intent were communicated well preceding the
publication of the [completed] edited version (here) – the completed version consists of slightly over
200 pages. (The edited version is presented as a bonafide law article.)

—————–

———————-

Author: Shawn Dexter John

My highest level of attained university academic degree: Master of Arts in History (along with a
Graduate Certificate in International Studies) from Howard University in Washington, District of
Columbia, the United States of America.

Lower level of attained university academic degree: Bachelor of Arts in History (along with a minor
in Economics) from Howard University in Washington, District of Columbia, the United States of
America.

——————–

Article twenty-one provides that every individual should be free to participate in government through
her elected representatives or as an elected representative herself. The article intends to protect
participation in the legislature, as an elected executive or official, or, implicitly, as an appointed or
commissioned employee.

Public service is a primary obligation of government. Government can only exercise this obligation
in absence of prejudice, meaning without requiring loyalty to any political party or official, without
forming preference for any demographic group, without showing preference to any addressed
individual. Every individual deserves equal access to public services. All qualification tests ought to
be non-discriminatory, awarding equal consideration to every person of the respective jurisdiction.

The people’s will serves as the basis of the government’s authority. The aggregate people ought to
decide who serves as their representatives, ought to communicate preferred political agendas
freely, ought to have reasonable examination power over their government. Government should be
preserved as affirmatively responsive to the rational, civil perspective of the nation’s people.
Elections should be held periodically and regularly. (Any special election feature administered ought
to be applicable within every other term when found immediately called-upon, regardless of the
figure in leadership or the majority party.) Generally, voting ought to be performed freely and
performed secretly for the privacy of each person. Voting ought to be universal, meaning equally
available to every person of age. No constituent should be deprived of the right arbitrarily. Equivalent
free voting procedures, meaning those which are parallel to conventional secret ballot procedures
where-ever alternate variation(s) are imposed, should support suffrage protection, an equal vote,
and honest supervision methods.

Notes:

1. Naturally, sanctionable court decisions inducing voting restrictions are implied as valid
(concerning trials). My acknowledgement that court decisions can require voting restrictions
concerning convicted defendants does not allude to me supporting voting restrictions as a
political statement. I do support voting enfranchisement, in general, as a basic tenet of the
philosophy I have adopted and helped further. I do support the argument which provides that
convicted individuals who have served their sentences, whatever their format, should be re-
enfranchised as dignified members of society, individuals re-made capable of participating fully
in the political arena for ensuring that politics reflect the genuine perspective of the respective
[full] community. This perspective may be deemed emotionally kind and typical amongst liberals
but it is also rational, necessary, and well thought out. A society which becomes over-restrictive
in its policies, which isn’t considerate of the modest perspectives of any segment of the
population could, very plausibly, evolve menacing & overbearing tendencies which systematically
reject fundamental interests of internal communities, consequently opening up the possibility of
great misjudgments by government and sociological mistrust by the general public (or
significant parts). (Legal rehabilitation returns convicted individuals to the status of fully-
committed members of the political society in theory. Enabling the political system to represent
the factual perspective of the society, to the greatest possible extent, is quite important.)
2. Concerning the above usage of “rational, civil perspective”, I am communicating that there are
checks and balances in democracies which go beyond the multiple branches of governments,
ones conceived and utilized for ensuring that majority-rule does not lead to the misappropriation
of power, does not deceive or injure minorities, and does not trump the effectuality of modern
and humane philosophies employed to discourage and deter the misappropriation or injury
stated. Government can only apply the civil, meaning non-violent and non-injurious, suppositions
and constitutional decisions of the corresponding constituents – reasonability is implied in the
 most functional and authentic of constitutional documents and government has to be
responsible, careful, and discreet unequivocally. Government has to acutely incorporate legal
principles (codified) and policies into its governing faculties specifically to create studied
parameters, as constitutional checks, for measuring and pacifying the unharmed will of the
corresponding population to insure against majority-induced, egregious perplexities.
Constituents are to be informed.

———————
My contact information for potential employers (including professional fellowships and United
States federal or state government offices) (pertaining only to tax contributing professional
positions): carindian1@gmail.com or sdexterjohn@gmail.com.

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Comment (required)

Submit

———————

August 17, 2013  Edit  Leave a Reply