Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(1) Shawn Dexter John and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) have documented that
fake video footage(s) of a look a like of Shawn Dexter John were purported him as being
at the dentist office (and apparently per a purportion of daily procedures, all clearly false
in reality, to audit observers, and to Shawn Dexter John). All dentist actors (in having
permitted the use of their images) and related cinematographers will succumb to the loss
of their teeth (and all their teeth where appropriate). Shawn Dexter John has all his
original teeth except a molar implant (of one tooth) implanted while in Hamburg, New
York years ago (as implanted by a Puerto Rican American dentist).
(2) Purported auditors who stated that they acted docile before Shawn Dexter John and only
wrote good commendations to satisfy his ego while writing up erroneous and malicious
(alternate) analyses on his character and behavior in defense of White pride or
patriotism or simply the plight of civilized humanity (and such) will all succumb to the loss
of all the teeth out of their mouths, not imagined in its accomplishment (and not illusory
in communicating its actuality), concerning the identified individuals of authority and
those purported as having none or slight (as effected by all UN Security Council and
other juridical Judgements).
—-------------------------------------
I, Shawn Dexter John, am the only individual editing the manuscript (aside being the sole author).
I will provide any update to the [edited and completed] manuscript, if any: [EDITED AND
COMPLETED] The New Societies – Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean model of
Commonality.
————————————
Lower level of attained university academic degree: Bachelor of Arts in History (along with a minor in
Economics) from Howard University in Washington, District of Columbia, the United States of
America.
———————–
Article twenty-seven provides that society should protect participation in the sciences, the arts, and
cultural activities. This article caters to the dynamism of modern society.
Every community should protect the right of citizens to enjoy freely inoffensive cultural activities, the
right to join with others in enjoyment, implicitly, the right to diverge from others in practicing revised
or new customs, and the right to petition government to protect participation. Second, every
individual should be free to participate in scientific activities, to employ the corresponding
information (lawfully), and to share that information with others in society. All should be protected in
enjoying benefits associated with scientific advancement. Third, every individual should be
protected in the creation of art and should have the right to exhibit it. Every person should be
protected in expressing his or her variation of artistic expression. Article twenty-seven also
empowers the protection of intellectual property rights. All persons ought to be free to gain [lawful]
interests associated with scientific, literary, or artistic production. Every inventor, artist, and author
should be free to protect his or her interests earnestly and to freely capitalize on them monetarily.
Notes:
1. All freedoms are to be exercised reasonably. In the exercise of one’s freedoms, the practicing
individual should be aware of the rights of others, the effects of his or her action on others, and
the explicit limits (relating to the particular action) spelled out in public and private laws. The
right to liberty does not provide any individual the full exercise of his or her will without
considering the direct consequences of its exercise. This fundamental principle is implied in the
most advanced jurisprudence; it is prioritized in the proper edification of tests and is commonly
re-iterated by the most enlightened jurists in their diverse analysis of legal principles.
2. Here, my usage of “inoffensive” refers to “non-breaching”. Cultural activities shouldn’t serve to
directly breach the rights of other parties and should not incite [imminent] abridgment. I do
realize that some legally-inculpable cultural practices may seem unpleasant or unfathomable to
some, with some being actually offended. I am not opposing the freedom of speech or the right
to one’s culture, in any fashion, in using the term “inoffensive”. I provide this perspective
[specifically] without promoting or aiding extremely divisive speech or excessively dangerous or
abusive cultural practices. (I do not wish to arbitrarily or prematurely help dis-empower
indigenous practices in any of the various parts of the globe. I am completely cognizant of the
possible implications, with respect to advocacy, thus my methodical, unambiguous, and detailed
explication, concerning the analyzed subject matter, and the demonstrated caution.) (Note: I
oppose all abuses.)
———————–
My contact information for potential employers (including professional fellowships and United
States federal or state government offices): sdexterjohn@gmail.com or carindian1@gmail.com.
Name (required)
Email (required)
Website
Comment (required)
Submit
———————–