[CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TEMPORARILY DECLASSIFIED]

Purport refers to "present as or communicate by inference or vivid expression."

 Menu

Legal and Political Writings and [Audit, Documental,

Non-mythical Freemasonic, Removal of Cover, and
Declassification] Reports presented by the
respective author Shawn Dexter John, the sole
author of all presented publications on this
professional blog (website), now the Yale Law
Journal competition Winner
The following works were written, typed, published, and edited solely by Shawn Dexter John, also known by his operative
alias Khaled Hassan, the sole author of the published book sketch "The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an
Eastern Caribbean model of Commonality" (published with iUniverse); where not expressly stated as an excerpt or a
promotion, the presented [conventional] intellectual/intelligence Work Papers, political commentary Work Papers, and
related notes) are essentially completed [whole] drafts of related but independent material. All rights to the presented
material are held solely by Shawn Dexter John; the works are reserved for use by Shawn Dexter John solely. There is no
plagiarized content in The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean model of Commonality
and there is no plagiarized content in the following material; there is no lack of [necessary] citation; none of the works is of
a deceitful nature. The contents of the following material of presentation have not been and are not products of any non-
Agency assigned work from any university, employer, or any other entity, or any person; it should also be noted that The
New Societies was not the result of any such assignment(s) or task(s). No person or entity has directed or forced the
author into the presentation of the following material. Shawn Dexter John isn't contractually employed (and has never been
contractually employed) by any foreign government or system of related Caribbean governance. Also, he is not a licensed
attorney (yet), law professor (yet), instructor, college professor (yet), or a current law student. He is not and was never
compensated for the development of the following works. The author has taken and completed United States accredited
doctoral courses, which are inclusive of American Bar Association (ABA) accredited law courses. The level and the quality
of the following works are intended for a graduate-level (doctoral and post-doctoral) university audience and the related
professional community. The following are not meant to perpetuate any racial or ethnic agenda and are not of any
professional or other recruitment ideology; the following are primarily scholarly and Central Intelligence Agency related. The
primary law school of his legal education was St. Thomas University School of Law – Miami Gardens. The author is an
official, undisputed, and authentic citizen of the United States of America (USA). (Importantly, the author's partial education
at Southern University and A&M College, as a doctoral student in Public Policy [at the Nelson Mandela School of Public
Policy and Urban Affairs], served well in writing significant parts of the overall material. Both degrees awarded to the author
were received from Howard University, however.) (The author did complete a course-required research [unpaid] internship
with the Embassy of the Commonwealth of Dominica over a short period of time. The author's brief employment with USA
for UNHCR, as a paid fundraiser, never required or initiated the development of any presented material). The majority of the
following works have been written on personal computers (on private laptops of Shawn Dexter John by Shawn Dexter John
[solely] and, at times, on library desktops and/or on a personal and exclusionarily owned smartphone by Shawn Dexter
John [solely]). The author is sincere and honest in his postulation. *Shawn Dexter John isn't in representation of any other
individual as a cover – there is no other operative recognized as Khaled Hassan in the United States.*

Commentary One-Hundred and Twenty (Work Paper):

Associate Member
——————–

*The following attachment, located two paragraphs down, provides the acutely edited and refined
version of the published book The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern
Caribbean model of Commonality.

I, Shawn Dexter John, am the only individual editing the manuscript.

The version published as a book was simply a covert sketch, published in that manner to provide a
template to government affiliates working across distance preceding its expected completion at a then
later date (corresponding with me editing my work today) – quite a humble act. Tampering might have
devalued the book material but the model and intent were communicated well preceding the
publication of the [completed] edited version (here) – the completed version consists of slightly over
200 pages. (The edited version is presented as a bonafide law article.)

I will provide any update to the edited and completed manuscript, if any: [EDITED AND COMPLETED]
The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean model of Commonality.

Author: Shawn Dexter John

As factions will stubbornly show dis-favor to even the most positive suppositions, I can imaging the
manifestation of a staunch segment favoring restrictive traditions over cosmopolitan intelligence.
We can consider suppositions reaching beyond our self-imposed constraints, however.
Relationships can be harnessed and empowered for supporting, simultaneously, nation-hood and
new variations of [legitimate] priorities and platforms.

The prototypical Member State supports councils enabling un-coerced congruency and complete
equality among its political-minded partners. Associate Member engages the general pursuits while
respecting the practical liturgies of politico-economic unions in their [necessary] rigidity. Both are
complimentary to nation-states’ sovereign interests.

In integrating, the United States will not refute the precepts of its parental policies, naturally. We can
only wish to extend our [philosophical] reach in engaging young and untested powers. The United
States can be expected to admonish un-refined nationalism, however, in sponsoring development
and liberalization initiatives. Concerning regional integration and our rational expectations, posited
as compromises, federated authority needs a sound structure, humble political representatives,
effectual solidarity, and our posited ethos. Consequently, the presented associate-member concept
aims to extend the reach of integration only in operating without [external] nation-state denigration,
while carefully refuting regional uber-conservatism. The presented supposition preaches amicable
relations to be enjoyed in operating, specifically without breach, beyond the Member State borders of
politico-economic unions essentially. (Here, I’m focused on both Caribbean and Pacific integration.)

In applying the presented philosophy, every substantive act of an Associate Member would become
valid only upon its parent-nation’s confirmation, meaning every initiative or agreement including its
participation would be made active only after a formal endorsement is endued by the corresponding
federal/national government. An associate Member would have the privileges of debate, attending
meetings, and considering initiatives regularly. The subtly-addressed limitation against a
membership imposing voting privileges within a corresponding general Council would not disable
any wish for conventional agreements, special arrangements constituting advanced diplomacy, and
the enjoyment of regional citizenship without supposing a separation from nation-state sovereignty.

Hawaii can serve the concept presented – we may find great comfort in the evolving Asia-Pacific
community. Puerto Rico can provide a similar comfort in the Caribbean region by embracing the
region’s contemporary positivity, by diversifying the reach of our politico-economic diplomacy,
meaning by joining Caricom. The Caribbean Community poses an adherent concerning the ideals
we support, not an obstacle.

Notes:

1. The above intellectual note envisions a completely-politicalized Caribbean Community.

2. Preserved sovereignty serves as a fundamental element of the American parental policy,
naturally. Still, we can envision a non-breaching circumstance in which U.S. territories could gain
reasonable and intense diplomatic privileges essentially. The European territories could
presumably gain such privileges additionally.
3. The stance of practical integration, meaning in adhering to practical philosophies, preaches
upward and social mobility and security absent encroachment.
4. Naturally, territories of Member States aren’t given autonomous powers within the corresponding
union ideally. Any level of autonomy may be exercised in dealing with separate unions, where
permitted. (Sovereign commonwealths could be excepted.)
5. Concerning the overall theory, Member Territories would maintain strong ties with Member
States in discourse and could provide consultation – they could exercise conference/council
associate speaker-ship. Member Territories refer to highly self-governing territories with vocal
legislative/administrative executives and the re-assessable freedom given to form treaties. In
considering things as they are currently, once again, I communicate that Puerto Rico should
serve as an Associate Member of the evolving Caribbean Community. (Theoretical Associate
Members would also enjoy these benefits minus independent treaty-making; treaty-making
powers solely separate these two statuses when absent of any Member Territory voting-privilege
exception – the exception is attainable [i.e. Montserrat]). (Associate Member and Member
Territory are also applicable to the OAS and its successor – I intended to communicate this.)
6. In The New Societies, Associate Members and Associate Member Territories refer to the same
status practically.
7. I did provide that no government official from any limited Member Territory or Associate Member
could serve as governance personnel except Associate Speaker theorem-wise. However,
independent citizens from limited Member Territories and Associate Members could be
 appointed or elected as non-General Assembly and non-Member-state officials of the union’s
governance structure within the theory at minimum. Though I did provide that the governance
executives should arise from Member States (within the charter), it is conceivable that citizens
of Associate Members and Member Territories could serve as executives under similar
[functional] variant models.
8. Member Territories could plausibly establish bona-fide [sanctionable] treat[ies] with the
respective union for gaining and exercising [autonomous] voting and other privileges. The
original limit against voting could be eventually superseded. (Changes should be reasonable,
should compliment the common intent of members and the vetted philosophy. Additionally,
union maturity is required – a cautious attitude needs to be nurtured.) (Judicial participation
could be contracted for concerning Member Territories and Associate Members.) (Only parent
nations may prescribe treaty-making powers to territories.)
9. My usage of the term “Member Territories” is different from the usage of the same term found in
the language of the superseded Agreement Establishing the East Caribbean Common Market.

Special notes:

1. My understanding of law is based heavily on American jurisprudence.

2. My usage of medians in The New Societies refers to the portal’s points at which the respective
medium’s effects connect with our senses, as can be noted of virtual-reality experiences, other
such sensory-based activities, or certain exposures to simpler audio or visual mediums.
3. My usage of de-possessed in The New Societies refers to being subject to the removal of the
lawful right to a once-possessed property and not merely the physical dispossession of the
particular property.
4. In The New Societies, my conceptual usage of the reasonable doubt standard, regarding civil
liability cases, was intended. I do understand very well the active concept of the preponderance
of the evidence standard regarding the United States and I do understand the similar variation
found in the Eastern Caribbean. I believe that the reasonable doubt standard could adequately
serve as an additional standard applied, in every related case, toward a preliminary-ruling or
toward the final-ruling communicating liability/non-liability – in finding a defendant liable, both
standards would be applied and their application would have to communicate the same
conclusion. Once again, it is respectfully conceptual. Any jurisdiction applying this concept
would ensure that the related procedures are fixed. The parallel standard to the preponderance
of the evidence standard is implied since the current laws of the Member States would be
maintained generally; it is worth being reminded that the theoretical Member State preservation
 doctrine, as stated in the charter, allows for this specific interpretation only. (Naturally, certain
parts of proposed/enacted legislative policies could appear to oppose a standing law of a
Member State; any respective Member State would have the clear procedural power to mitigate
such concerns substantially. Subcontracted legislation would serve as the exception.) (The
stated reasonable doubt standard would concern mainly the issue of the breach of duty/care.)
5. Presented on page 41 (within the book), the fourth option of the maximum standard, regarding
the option requiring 50% of the collective Member States’ legislatures, should be safely
interpreted as meaning 50% of the collective national legislatures’ members, cumulatively,
regardless of an un-met 50% vote amount in affirmation experienced in the separate national
legislature of any one Member State.
6. Material within Article 5, Part 2 require that the repayment by any Member State in reception of
funds specifically provided by another Member State, where in adherence to the language of the
constitutive charter, would begin two years from the date of the original reception of funds. Full
payment or installments of payments from that date forth were intended; I certainly did not
intend to attract any interpretation which would force a needy Member State to make a one-time,
full payment upon the beginning of the purported repayment period. (Refer to pages 377-378 in
The New Societies.)
7. The Asia-Pacific comprises of Eastern Asia and Australiasia (Australia and the [Antillean]
Pacific).

————————————————————————–

Posted by: Shawn Dexter John

My highest level of earned university academic degree: Master of Arts in History (along with a
Graduate Certificate in International Studies) from Howard University in Washington, District of
Columbia, the United States of America.

Lower level of earned university academic degree: Bachelor of Arts in History (along with a minor in
Economics) from Howard University in Washington, District of Columbia, the United States of
America.

My contact information for potential employers (including employing professional fellowships and
United States federal or state government offices): carindian1@gmail.com or
sdexterjohn@gmail.com.

Retail location of my book:

The New Societies: Concepts & Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean Model of Commonality

May 5, 2017  Edit  Leave a Reply

« Previous Next »

Leave a Reply

View Full Site

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information