Menu

Legal and Political Writings and [Audit, Documental,

Non-mythical Freemasonic, Removal of Cover, and
Declassification] Reports presented by the
respective author Shawn Dexter John, the sole
author of all presented publications on this
professional blog (website), now the joint Harvard
Law Review and Yale Law Journal [writing,
editorship, and executive management] competition
Winner
The following works were written, typed, published, and edited solely by Shawn Dexter John, also known by his operative
alias Khaled Hassan, the sole author of the published book sketch "The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an
Eastern Caribbean model of Commonality" (published with iUniverse); where not expressly stated as an excerpt or a
promotion, the presented [conventional] intellectual/intelligence Work Papers, political commentary Work Papers, and
related notes) are essentially completed [whole] drafts of related but independent material. All rights to the presented
material are held solely by Shawn Dexter John; the works are reserved for use by Shawn Dexter John solely. There is no
plagiarized content in The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean model of Commonality
and there is no plagiarized content in the following material; there is no lack of [necessary] citation; none of the works is of
a deceitful nature. The contents of the following material of presentation have not been and are not products of any non-
Agency assigned work from any university, employer, or any other entity, or any person; it should also be noted that The
New Societies was not the result of any such assignment(s) or task(s). No person or entity has directed or forced the
author into the presentation of the following material. Shawn Dexter John isn't contractually employed (and has never been
contractually employed) by any foreign government or system of related Caribbean governance. Also, he is not a licensed
attorney (yet), law professor (yet), instructor, college professor (yet), or a current law student. He is not and was never
compensated for the development of the following works. The author has taken and completed United States accredited
doctoral courses, which are inclusive of American Bar Association (ABA) accredited law courses. The level and the quality
of the following works are intended for a graduate-level (doctoral and post-doctoral) university audience and the related
professional community. The following are not meant to perpetuate any racial or ethnic agenda and are not of any
professional or other recruitment ideology; the following are primarily scholarly and Central Intelligence Agency related. The
primary law school of his legal education was St. Thomas University School of Law – Miami Gardens. The author is an
official, undisputed, and authentic citizen of the United States of America (USA). (Importantly, the author's partial education
at Southern University and A&M College, as a doctoral student in Public Policy [at the Nelson Mandela School of Public
Policy and Urban Affairs], served well in writing significant parts of the overall material. Both degrees awarded to the author
were received from Howard University, however.) (The author did complete a course-required research [unpaid] internship
with the Embassy of the Commonwealth of Dominica over a short period of time. The author's brief employment with USA
for UNHCR, as a paid fundraiser, never required or initiated the development of any presented material). The majority of the
following works have been written on personal computers (on private laptops of Shawn Dexter John by Shawn Dexter John
[solely] and, at times, on library desktops and/or on a personal and exclusionarily owned smartphone by Shawn Dexter
John [solely]). The author is sincere and honest in his postulation. *Shawn Dexter John isn't in representation of any other
individual as a cover – there is no other operative recognized as Khaled Hassan in the United States.*

Commentary One-hundred & ninety-four: Article twenty-

nine of the Universal Declaration
Author: Shawn Dexter John

Highest level of attained university academic degree: Master of Arts in History (along with a
Graduate Certificate in International Studies)

Other level of attained university academic degree: Bachelor of Arts in History (along with a minor in
Economics)

I, Shawn Dexter John, am the only individual editing the manuscript (aside being the sole author).
I will provide any update to the [edited and completed] manuscript, if any: [EDITED AND
COMPLETED] The New Societies – Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean model of
Commonality.

The version published as a book was simply a covert sketch, published in that manner to provide a
template to government affiliates working across distance preceding its expected completion at a then
later date (corresponding with me editing work today) – quite a humble act. Tampering might have
devalued the book material but the model and intent were communicated well preceding the
publication of the [completed] edited version (here) – the completed version consists of slightly over
200 pages. (The edited version is presented as a bonafide law article.)

———————–

Article twenty-nine communicates that every individual should have the right to civic involvement in
his or her community. Provided aside this, every person ought to be fostered inoffensively within this
political environment. Every individual should be allowed to develop his or her own genuine
personality and variant perspectives, to act on viewpoints outside infringing upon the rights of
others. The ideal limits provided by law are purposed with enabling the common recognition of the
rights held by all individuals, with enabling respect for public order, ethics, the general welfare
(concerning government obligations), and the participatory well-being of society specifically in a
democratic format.

Also presented, the rights and liberties detailed in the Universal Declaration shouldn’t be applied in a
manner which contrasts with the priorities and principles exposited by the United Nations, of
course. Member governments are to be superbly responsible. (The United Nations’ work is intended
to effect prudent conduct performed by its Member States’ governments and their citizens. It is a
duty of governments to communicate the sociopolitical principles earnestly and correctly.)

Notes:

1. This particular article gives citizens and their activist associations the power to petition
governments for meeting the needs and demands of their respective populaces by prioritizing
the astute allocation of resources for meeting those needs and demands, by prioritizing
economic and political expeditions purposed with identifying ways to finance those
appropriations and to sustain them, and by edifying infrastructures to regulate, harness, and
maximize the effects of those related initiatives. Our general welfare is a fundamental priority of
 government in every rational theory devised for instructing its operation. I do recognize that
there will remain a need to maintain reasonability in satisfying this imperative quality of
government but its purpose cannot be denied or refuted by any of the various factions found in
modern prototypical societies. There are innate vices in common society, often unintended by
many, which prevent great success in all parts of society or sadly induce the disturbing
disenfranchisement or marginalization of segments of the population – this has been studied
and is re-confirmed by the most capable of critical and social scientists. Consequently, theorists
have devised that it is a duty of popular government, inherent within the space of human
civilization, to mitigate concerns rigidly, to reduce and to even completely dissolve the actuality
of these imperfections for the betterment of humanity, in order to ensure the happiness of
posterity (in refuting the whims of under-nourished social constructs precisely) – it is a duty of
government to remove sociological impediments though without harsh impositions. Naturally,
society has to evolve out of embracing ultra-archaic sentiments. Government can install
refreshing mechanisms.
2. The usage of the term “morality” in this particular article references objective and universal
standards of ethics in the modern sense. The term “morality” may be misinterpreted as meaning
religious ethos most commonly observed by one’s respective nation-state or by large segment(s)
of the global community. Morality, concerning the breadth of international jurisprudence, refers
to humanistic principles uniformly adopted by the global community, those prioritized by the
United Nations in particular (in reaffirming its own relevance and noble purpose), those
energizing social, economic, and political equity amongst peoples and, now, consolidated
societies in its logical extension.

————————–

My contact information for potential employers (including professional fellowships and United
States federal or state government offices): carindian1@gmail.com or sdexterjohn@gmail.com.

————————–

Retail location of my book:

The New Societies: Concepts & Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean Model of Commonality

February 2, 2017  Edit  Leave a Reply

« Previous Next »

Leave a Reply

View Full Site

Blog at WordPress.com. Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information