[CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TEMPORARILY DE-CLASSIFIED]

Date of Publication: 01/23/2024

*Nothing [reported and] published by Shawn Dexter John has been debunked by authentic
employee(s) or office(s) of competence (or relation) of the United Nations (UN), the Department
of Justice of the United States(Justice Department), or any other authority communicated. No
publication of Shawn Dexter John is comical, jovial, or communicated as opposite as part of any
scheme, drill, moot case, mock trial, community trial, or fictitious communications (or
conditions).

(1) Shawn Dexter John is clearly not accustomed to or comfortable in hellish conditions and
that should not matter. Our sting operatives have identified all related officers and
agents who have concluded and communicated otherwise in their clear ignorance,
uncared for the law, and in belief that they are judge, jury, and attorney, an acclaim we
may not recognize.
(2) The belief that immigrants are of inferior intelligence, awareness, humanity, economic
value, cultural worth, competence, or professionalism is clearly absurd, an
exemplification of the incompetence of certain federal and international agents, officers,
and officials. Brandon Holmes isn't an undercover agent or informant (and never was)
and isn't of fake medical or criminal records. He will succumb to the amputation of his
right or left arm but will serve as a community liaison with INTERPOL after having
already served a year in prison and after having already admitted guilt to attempted
murder in having shot a loaded handgun at decoys of Shawn Dexter John and, unknown
to Karl Lawrence Chen, Karl Lawrence Chen and his son Ke****** Chen, not of any
biological relation to the Johns. Brandon Holmes is prepared to give his life to Christ
amongst other positive and progressive conduct. Karl Lawrence Chen is certain that
Shawn Dexter John is Jesus Christ and, erroneously without a doubt, that Shawn Dexter
John is willing to sacrifice his life and lose all memories and return to altered
publications. Mr. Chen's related delusions, certainly not inherently corresponsive with
his belief that Shawn Dexter John is Jesus Christ and God (a covered fact not easily
believable by declassified) (documented by INTERPOL in files undisclosed concerning
formal email correspondences of top priority covered by joviality here and there), are not
worth legal suppositions or exposition.
(3) There are no re-trials (as all related mediation, tribunal, and other forums and their
processes are exhausted by the defendants (never having included Shawn Dexter John)
and, of worth noting, Shawn Dexter John isn't sleep deprived, of hunger or thirst, or
deprived of emotional bonding with his Earthly father Clay Crispin John (Crispin Clay
John in certain INTERPOL employee files stored by Associates of Shawn Dexter John)
and his Earthly mother Anita Phillip (currently in Antigua and Barbuda).

INTERPOL-CIA PARTNERSHIP FILE NUMBER: 7LMN451Y

 Menu

Legal and Political Writings and [Audit, Documental,

Non-mythical Freemasonic, Removal of Cover, and
Declassification] Reports presented by the
respective author Shawn Dexter John, the sole
author of all presented publications on this
professional blog (website), now the Yale Law
Journal [writing, editorship, and executive
management] competition Winner
The following works were written, typed, published, and edited solely by Shawn Dexter John, also known by his operative
alias Khaled Hassan, the sole author of the published book sketch "The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an
Eastern Caribbean model of Commonality" (published with iUniverse); where not expressly stated as an excerpt or a
promotion, the presented [conventional] intellectual/intelligence Work Papers, political commentary Work Papers, and
related notes) are essentially completed [whole] drafts of related but independent material. All rights to the presented
material are held solely by Shawn Dexter John; the works are reserved for use by Shawn Dexter John solely. There is no
plagiarized content in The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean model of Commonality
and there is no plagiarized content in the following material; there is no lack of [necessary] citation; none of the works is of
a deceitful nature. The contents of the following material of presentation have not been and are not products of any non-
Agency assigned work from any university, employer, or any other entity, or any person; it should also be noted that The
New Societies was not the result of any such assignment(s) or task(s). No person or entity has directed or forced the
author into the presentation of the following material. Shawn Dexter John isn't contractually employed (and has never been
contractually employed) by any foreign government or system of related Caribbean governance. Also, he is not a licensed
attorney (yet), law professor (yet), instructor, college professor (yet), or a current law student. He is not and was never
compensated for the development of the following works. The author has taken and completed United States accredited
doctoral courses, which are inclusive of American Bar Association (ABA) accredited law courses. The level and the quality
of the following works are intended for a graduate-level (doctoral and post-doctoral) university audience and the related
professional community. The following are not meant to perpetuate any racial or ethnic agenda and are not of any
professional or other recruitment ideology; the following are primarily scholarly and Central Intelligence Agency related. The
primary law school of his legal education was St. Thomas University School of Law – Miami Gardens. The author is an
official, undisputed, and authentic citizen of the United States of America (USA). (Importantly, the author's partial education
at Southern University and A&M College, as a doctoral student in Public Policy [at the Nelson Mandela School of Public
Policy and Urban Affairs], served well in writing significant parts of the overall material. Both degrees awarded to the author
were received from Howard University, however.) (The author did complete a course-required research [unpaid] internship
with the Embassy of the Commonwealth of Dominica over a short period of time. The author's brief employment with USA
for UNHCR, as a paid fundraiser, never required or initiated the development of any presented material). The majority of the
following works have been written on personal computers (on private laptops of Shawn Dexter John by Shawn Dexter John
[solely] and, at times, on library desktops and/or on a personal and exclusionarily owned smartphone by Shawn Dexter
John [solely]). The author is sincere and honest in his postulation. *Shawn Dexter John isn't in representation of any other
individual as a cover – there is no other operative recognized as Khaled Hassan in the United States.*

Two-hundred & four: the Ninth Amendment of the

Constitution of the United States
Highest level of attained university academic degree: Master of Arts in History (along with a
Graduate Certificate in International Studies)

Other level of attained university academic degree: Bachelor of Arts in History (along with a minor in
Economics)

——————–

*The following attachment, located two paragraphs down, provides the acutely edited and refined
version of the published book The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern
Caribbean model of Commonality.

I, Shawn Dexter John, am the only individual editing the manuscript.

I will provide any update to the [edited and completed] manuscript, if any: [EDITED AND
COMPLETED] The New Societies – Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean model of
Commonality.

The version published as a book was simply a covert sketch, published in that manner to provide a
template to government affiliates working across distance preceding its expected completion at a then
later date (corresponding with me editing work today) – quite a humble act. Tampering might have
devalued the book material but the model and intent were communicated well preceding the
publication of the [completed] edited version (here) – the completed version consists of slightly over
200 pages. (The edited version is presented as a bonafide law article.)

I present short commentaries on the first ten amendments of the Constitution of the United States
which exhibit, alongside the commentaries on the Universal Declaration, the aggregate jurisprudence
which ought to be enjoyed by the international community concerning human and civil rights.

———————

Author: Shawn Dexter John

The ninth amendment of the Constitution of the United States provides that non-enumerated rights
(Constitution-wise) affirmed/granted aren’t to be diminished or ignored due [simply] to the limited
enumeration set forth in the Constitution.

No federal executive authority or formal interpretation of prescribed constitutional liberties should

arbitrarily oppose or upset admissible rights and freedoms squarely inferred or unsurrendered,
whether or not superficially unpopular within any one engaged state, district, or incorporated
territory. The Constitution serves to add and preserve inalienable or evident rights, to compliment
liberties already established externally as fundamental or sanctionable and those, of the same
humane theory, to come. The document does not serve to form classes of rights effecting any
disparaging hierarchy – the federal Constitution serves to protect the multiple sectors of rights quite
acutely. Our pragmatic framers, by intent, did not ordain explicit rights which are constitutionally
recognizable solely or negligently essentially. In theory and for [obvious] practical reasons, in being
precise, any fundamental or active compliant right which isn’t cataloged within the Constitution
survives significantly secured. (Concerning legislators, read note 1 below.)

Notes:
1. Though all rights are to be protected earnestly, it has been concluded that laws claimed as
breaching rights require separate tests for determining the validity of those laws, tests created to
ascertain whether the respective law at issue is constitutional precisely. The three tests cited are
the rational basis test, the intermediate scrutiny test, and the strict scrutiny test. Claimed
government breach of fundamental rights or anti-discrimination laws associated with protected
[minority] classes historically discriminated against generally require a peculiar and intensely
rigorous test, the strict scrutiny test. A claimed breach which harms certain protected class(es),
especially gender, or violates certain first amendment rights requires the intermediate scrutiny
test, a less rigorous test. The rational basis test, the least strenuous, is applied in cases involving
the breach of rights which aren’t considered fundamental rights or rights associated with
protected classes (historically discriminated against). The burden of proof is placed on the
respondent government except when pertaining to the rational basis test.
2. An active right is preservable only if constitutional – the right has to comply with the provisions
of the federal Constitution. (Concerning external laws, enacted codes can’t breach the rights
explicitly incorporated within the document; this is mechanized for maintaining astute and
humane principles. This is necessary to stress since state and local governments can create
wide-ranging laws. Respecting the strong terms of the federal Constitution does not limit states
unabatedly. I say this in acknowledging the Incorporation Doctrine – states are not yet obligated
to adopt all provisions of the Bill of Rights concerning the activities of their government organs.
Our documental [essential] civil rights have been imposed, however.)
3. The national constitution should always compliment humane laws and rights uniformly affirmed
throughout the larger world, ones [truly] engaging humanistic creeds – in present intellectual
times, this approach is ultimately safe. Naturally, future laws ought to cater to a carefully
augmented and a prudently analyzed philosophy peacefully nurtured – a sound precedential
foundation is essential. A democratic and malleable philosophy is attracted, one capable of
parenting future legal concepts soundly and consistently, one employing the relevant
[fundamental] legal principles in a sound evolutionary form, when called upon, for meeting all
fundamental needs and challenges raised. A scientific method is required in moving forward,
one responsive to an integrating world and a world preserving nation-state sovereignty
simultaneously. This approach is applicable throughout. (Political and economic integration and
diplomacy require a hybrid jurisprudence of pre-tested legal principles for joint judiciaries. This
note focuses on both our current international condition and our integrated future.)
4. All active rights have equal force. Penalties for their breach vary and adoption & reversal
procedures can vary, however.
 5. In government theory, incorporated territory status is attainable regarding the United States and
the application of all federal laws within territor[ies].

Reference:

1. Legal Information Institute (Cornell law school website). Wex, http://www.law.cornell.edu.

———————–

My contact information for potential employers (including professional fellowships and United
States federal or state government offices): carindian1@gmail.com or sdexterjohn@gmail.com.

Retail location of my book:

The New Societies: Concepts & Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean Model of Commonality

May 1, 2017  Edit  Leave a Reply