[CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TEMPORARILY DECLASSIFIED - CIA - INTERPOL]

Date of Publication: 05/20/2024

Sole Author: Shawn Dexter John

Legal and Political Tenets of the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, a
Directive on the Abolition of Unregulated and/or Preclusionary Militias
—-----------------—-----------------------------------------

Legal and Political Tenets of relation are as follows:

(1) There shall be no privilege or right of Government or the American people, citizen and
mere resident alike, which shall effect any breach of the permanent and the
constitutional design of the Government of the United States and the human
development of the United States as a country of international admiration, including
private or government supported militias,
(2) There shall be no militia within the United States, whether mainland, the state of Hawaii,
or territory, which isn't allowed audited, regulated, or conditioned by the United States
federal government toward constitutional purposes and toward ensuring ethical
procedure and general conduct in activism,
(3) There shall be no enumerated or instantial rule, code, regulation, or policy, in compliance
with domestic or international law, which shall establish any emergency or related
protocol (or a standard condition) depriving government of the right to dismiss militias in
a manner detrimental to the safety and comprehensive happiness of the American
people (in referencing multi-generational citizens, migrants, and immigrants alike),
(4) There shall be no priority or protocol of Government or Civil Society which shall debate
or argue the development or operation of militia which threatens the constitutional safety
and comprehensive happiness of the American people, meaning attributes protected by
the Constitution of the United States per nominal interpretation or pointed expression,
(5) There shall be no interpretation of any constitutional provision which allows for the
prevalence of gun or weapon activism, whether private or government, toward
promoting, complementing, or articulating violence as predominant, fundamental, or
prioritized by the American public, including obscure or indigenous sub-cultures within,
(6) The inferred ban on militia supremacy and the bar on its equality to the structural power
and right of Government, with respect to related activity and in general, shall not deter
the right of private citizens and mere residents, alike, to reasonably defend his or her
 person and those of others within their household or proximation; government militaries
shall not attain any power which deprives any individual, multitude, or community of
his/her/their equal freedoms and human rights and shall not gain any privilege which
provides it any purpose refuting the sensibility of the prudent and ethical protection of the
lives and un-mitigated infrastructure of any society,
(7) Any and all laws and policies on the matter of the right to bear arm shall refrain from
communicating any contrast to the right of all individuals to the private and lawful
purchase of protective mechanisms, whether technologically advanced or more
traditional; however, such a purchase or lease (or gained possession) of such
mechanisms, including guns, shall never serve any unethical purpose, utility, effect, or
comprehensive communication,
(8) There shall be no power of detainment or harm which shall be mandated by any
emergency condition which would preclude any human right or civil liberty afforded by
(a) the Constitution of the United States, Congress, or any state or local legislature
enacting protections clearly constitutional in nature and effect, (b) the American
Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, and (c) the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (UDHR, also colloquially stated as the Universal Declaration on human rights) at
minimum, and
(9) All powers, duties, and contracted communications of Government and Civil Society and
their workforce, peculiar or otherwise, shall respect the right of Government to mitigate
all fractious agreements devised toward forming or effecting militia or security activity
and the right of Government to remove all unethical contracts denoting militia or security.

Re: The second amendment of the United States Constitution provides that each state
will maintain a formal and regulated militia. In modern terms, the securement equates
to the preservation of [government-sanctioned] armed forces for defending the borders
and territories of the states. It responds to inherent and legitimate threats, domestic and
external.

The amendment communicates clearly that the American people may keep and bear
arms for the purpose of formally supporting the government in its protection of
sovereignty and order. The Supreme Court has, however, concluded that the right to
keep arms privately is also protected by the corresponding provision. Implied within the
specific text, the inherent right to protect one’s person (and others) serves as a
preeminent reason for this official conclusion. These rights are to be preserved in times
of war and peace for responding to imminent threats and for taking precautionary
measures.

Note:

1. Though respecting the Constitution, I am not a gun-advocate by any

measure.
Reference:

1. District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)

CIA-INTERPOL Partnership File Number: 13YWNBO173829